Is it really the end this time? For Russell Westbook, Sunday’s Game 7 decider between the Thunder and the Nuggets was a homecoming in more senses than one: not only was he returning to the city to which he’d given his best years, a court on which he’d embodied more than any other player in the franchise’s brief history the thunder of Oklahoma City’s name, he was also a man in search of a place to call his own – a role, an identity – after years of peripatetic wandering across the NBA in which teams have often seemed unsure how best to exploitthe 2017 MVP’s prodigious, if fading, gifts.
After near-misses with Oklahoma City in the 2012, 2014 and 2016 playoffs, the litany of injuries that followed, and the long search for a basketball home in the years since – which have seen him play both an ill-fitting support position in the LeBron James-Anthony Davis Los Angeles Lakers and a starring hand for the cross-town Clippers that did little to hide metastasizing deficiencies in his game – the move to Denver last summer seemed to offer hope for a reset: occupying a clear sixth man role, Westbrook was brought in to supply experience and energy off the bench for those crucial minutes when Nikola Jokić and Jamal Murray needed a rest.
The experience and the energy were all there on Sunday, as they have been throughout the postseason: even at 36, with a right knee that’s seen more cuts than a federal government agency under Elon Musk, Westbrook remains improbably quick, and he still jets through the lane with that curiously upright sense of majesty that makes him seem far taller than his 6ft 4in. But all the other parts of the Westbrook package were on display too: the missed shots, the poor passes and turnovers, the hastiness of thought and action. These playoffs have been brutal for the nine-time All-Star, andDenver’s Game 7 annihilationat the hands of the team that shaped him offered a neat summary of his recent struggles: over a 13-minute first half-stretch in which Westbrook took over as chief on-court orchestrator, the Nuggets endured a 23-point swing against them. From there, the Thunder’s ultimate victory never really seemed in doubt; with Jokić chained to the lash of Alex Caruso and Aaron Gordon visibly hindered, the game was dead as a contest by half-time.
Westbrook’s lust for on-court glory remains undiminished, but increasingly it’s confronted by the evidence that he’s no longer the player he once was – and no longer able to mask his flaws as he once could through simple accumulation of minutes. Denver’s decision to sign Westbrook was a calculated gamble on the kind of talent the team needs to support Jokić and push on for a second ring. Reportssuggestthat Westbrook has disturbed the balance of the locker room and “changed the entire vibe and spirit of the team”, as one player put it, and the on-court performances have been underwhelming. The gamble, plainly, has not worked, and it’s fair to ask whether it ever could have: Westbrook, after all, is the polar opposite of Denver’s generational star, a player as demonstrative and ripped as Jokić is unassuming andgloriously doughy.
At this point Westbrook’s drift into a kind of late-career entropy seems unarguable. Those piston arms are still pumping, and the square-jawed stare is undefeated, but the magic is gone. A career that once promised so much – coming close to the pinnacle first with the 2012 Thunder, whose trio of Westwood, Kevin Durant, and James Harden were a kind of younger mirror of the Miami Big Three that eventually orchestrated their finals downfall, and then with the 2016 vintage,famously collapsing from 3-1 upto gift the Western Conference finals to Golden State – and has since had to negotiate a sequence of career-threatening injuries seems to have little room left to run. And if there’s one thing Westbrook needs to sustain himself as a basketballing force, it’s room to run. This may not be quite The End, not yet at least: but the signs are there that the curtain is descending. Even the intensity on which Westbrook built his name is no longer quite so volcanic, though there’s still the occasional putdown to savor. Asked by reporter Vinny Benedetto in the locker room after Sunday’s loss whether he will exercise his option to stay with the Nuggets for another season, Westbrook looked at his watch and asked Benedetto what he would be wearing the next day. Benedetto replied that he did not know. “Exactly”, Westbrookreplied, and walked off.
The high-flown arrogance on display in that response is part of what has made Westbrook a curious figure of hate among a great number ofNBAfans – but it’s also part of his aura, what makes him so unique. In a league increasingly built on ensemble talents, role players, mild-mannered Europeans, and honest grafters, Westbrook is a mouth, a showman, a god. At his peak he expressed a steaming individuality of the type that’s increasingly hard to find in today’s NBA, where system and structure and saying the right thing reign supreme. Westbook is the rare player whose flaws and strengths are essentially synonymous. All the things that pundits and fans regularly criticize him for are part of what makes Russ Russ: the preening, the sense of entitlement, the invincible self-belief. The faults are forgivable because for many years – and especially when he was in his prime – Westbrook’s zany on-court experiments came off just as frequently as they flamed out. The volatility that makes Westbrook so challenging to build a team around is also what makes him so magnetically watchable. Even now, amid all the missed shots and flubbed passes and sad indecision of his basketballing dotage, it’s hard not to look at him go through the gears and wonder: could it still work? Stranger things have happened on a basketball court, and Westbrook has frequently been their author.
This sense of evidence-proof wonder is key to the Westbrook mythos, the reason he will still be remembered fondly once the technocrats and percentage-players of this generation are forgotten. In a culture awash with nostalgia, Westbrook is maybe the ultimate basketballing fetish object: a richly gifted player whose appeal is rooted not only in his own unrealized promise but in the abiding sense that he belongs to a different era. Westbrook was drafted as the fourth overall pick by the Seattle SuperSonics in 2008 and the team immediately moved to a different city and changed its name – marking him, perhaps, as a man perpetually out of sync with the times. Even the number 0 he took while playing for his first team, the rebrandedOklahoma City Thunder, seemed to appeal to something nonexistent, making him the basketball equivalent of an empty set.
The modern NBA – the game reshaped and dominated by Steph Curry, Jokić, and the Boston Celtics’ nerveless micro-managers – is built on accuracy from the perimeter, transition defense, and lightning ball movement. Westbrook represents none of these things: he’s not a great shooter, is a decent half-court defender but is not set up to commit defensively in the split-second following a possession change, and though extreme speed is a key part of his identity he rarely employs it in the service of distribution. He’s happiest with a big runway and ball in hand, calling the shots, going for glory.
In some senses he’s more like a player from the 1980s or 1990s – a 21st-century Dominique Wilkins, all strength and fizz and spin. His play has always been characterized by an invincible belief in the possibilities of the improbable: the crazy drives, the never-on threes, the “surely he won’t, actually he will” fadeaway jumpers. And for much of his career, if you ignore the glaring lack of a championship ring, you’d have to say it has worked. This is a man who emerged in an era of “bigs” and despite a comparatively slight frame now owns therecord for the most triple doublesin NBA history. Though Jokić will probably pass his record soon and the usefulness of triple doubles as a marker of on-court excellence may have faded in recent decades, this still says something about Westbrook’s commitment and all-action style, his inability to ball at anything other than maximum volume.
But the signature Westbrook style only works as long as he’s the main man, and he’s clearly had trouble adapting to a lesser role. For periods throughout these playoffs Westbrook has appeared to want to reinvent himself as a master assister, moving the ball to his teammates and fanatically refusing to shoot himself. It hasn’t worked. What else could? Nabbing an MVP crown while never winning a title is probably not the distinction Westbrook would have wanted for his career when he was drafted. But with the prospect of a ring slipping away, that is the group of which Westbrook now looks set to become a permanent member, joining Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, Steve Nash, and – for now – his contemporary Harden in the ranks of the brilliant and trophyless. That seems like fitting company, the mavericks all raging unfulfilled together. Whether Westbrook can stick around for another season or two and find a franchise willing to offer him the kind of support role in which he so clearly failed for the Nuggets remains to be seen; the question now may not be whether he can be a useful sixth man but a productive eight or ninth or 10th. All that will be left now, whatever happens, are glimmers of the old glamor.
In the modern game it seems increasingly clear that this is the type of player around which you can build a highlights reel, but not a championship roster. And maybe that’s enough, when the highlights arethis good. Unpredictable, sometimes messy, frequently celestial, and always entertaining, Westbrook will be remembered as perhaps the last of the NBA’s great virtuosos, his talent as large as it was strangely unharnessable.