‘The pain was worse than giving birth’: why are so many women separated from their babies in prison?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Exploring the Impact of Maternal Separation on Incarcerated Women in the UK"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a poignant exploration of the emotional turmoil faced by incarcerated mothers, Dr. Laura Abbott has documented the harrowing experiences of 29 women across five UK prisons who have been separated from their newborns shortly after giving birth. Many of these women described their separation as an excruciating pain, often likening it to losing a part of themselves. As they recounted their stories, the women expressed deep grief and longing for their children, with one stating, "It was worse than giving birth," highlighting the profound emotional distress caused by the enforced separation. Abbott's research, part of the Lost Mothers Project, aims to shed light on an often invisible group of women whose experiences are rarely voiced, as they grapple with the physical and emotional consequences of their separations. The project underscores the inadequacies of the mother and baby units (MBUs) in prisons, where not all mothers can secure a place, and decisions regarding their custody can be inconsistent and lacking in legal representation.

Dr. Abbott's findings indicate that the bureaucratic processes surrounding MBU placements often exacerbate the trauma for mothers, who face severe anxiety and stress during decision-making meetings. The report highlights the lack of adequate support systems for these women, many of whom have not committed violent crimes, yet face harsh punitive measures that separate them from their infants. The emotional scars of separation can have lasting impacts, as illustrated by the experiences of mothers like Anna, who describes the psychological toll of being apart from her son. With calls for reform growing louder, including the establishment of a Women’s Justice Board aimed at reducing female incarceration, advocates argue that systemic changes are necessary to ensure that mothers are not unjustly separated from their children and that their needs are prioritized within the justice system. As the conversation around maternal separation in custody continues, the voices of these women must be amplified to foster understanding and drive meaningful change.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the profound emotional and psychological distress experienced by women in UK prisons who are separated from their newborns shortly after giving birth. It presents a disturbing narrative of loss and grief that transcends conventional bereavement, highlighting the unique challenges faced by incarcerated mothers. Through personal testimonies, the piece illustrates the intense emotional pain these women endure, comparing it to physical suffering far beyond what one might expect.

Emotional Impact on Incarcerated Mothers

The vivid accounts shared by the women demonstrate that the separation from their babies creates an unbearable emotional burden. Their expressions of pain—comparing it to losing a limb or sight—serve to underline the depth of their anguish. This emotional turmoil is compounded by the practical realities of prison life, such as the inability to express their feelings freely or care for their infants. The article emphasizes how these women are often left voiceless in their suffering.

Objective of the Report

The Lost Mothers Project, which is the basis for the article, aims to bring awareness to the needs and experiences of these women, an often-overlooked demographic. By giving them a platform to share their stories, the project seeks to advocate for better support systems within the prison system for mothers. The goal appears to be not only to inform the public but also to push for systemic changes in how incarcerated mothers are treated.

Public Perception and Societal Implications

Through its emotional storytelling, this piece aims to foster empathy and raise awareness about the broader issues of maternal rights and treatment of women in prison. It seeks to challenge the societal perception of incarcerated individuals by highlighting their humanity and the unique circumstances surrounding motherhood in prison. This could lead to increased public pressure for reforms in the justice system.

Potential Hidden Agendas

While the article serves to illuminate an important issue, it could also be seen as a call to action for specific advocacy groups focused on criminal justice reform and maternal health. There is a potential for the narrative to be used to further broader political agendas concerning prison reform and women's rights. However, the authenticity of the women's experiences and the emotional weight of their stories lend credibility to the report.

Reliability of the Article

The article seems credible, as it cites a project grounded in research and personal testimonies. The emotional depth and the involvement of professionals in the field of midwifery and maternal health add to its reliability. Nevertheless, it is essential to consider that such narratives, while powerful, may not capture the full spectrum of experiences within the prison system.

Connection to Broader News Trends

This report resonates with ongoing discussions about women's rights, criminal justice reform, and mental health. It aligns with a growing awareness of the need for humane treatment of incarcerated individuals, particularly vulnerable populations such as pregnant women and new mothers. Such stories often intersect with broader societal issues, including systemic racism and economic inequality.

Support from Specific Communities

The article is likely to resonate particularly with feminist groups, advocates for prisoners' rights, and maternal health organizations. By amplifying the voices of incarcerated mothers, it seeks to engage communities that are passionate about reforming the justice system and improving maternal care.

Economic and Political Ramifications

While the article itself may not directly impact stock markets or economic indices, the advocacy it promotes could influence public policy discussions, leading to potential changes in funding for prison programs or maternal health initiatives. This could, in the long term, affect sectors related to healthcare, social services, and criminal justice reform.

Global Context and Relevance

The issues raised in the article are not confined to the UK; they reflect a global challenge regarding the treatment of women in prison systems worldwide. The narrative aligns with current debates about human rights and justice reform, making it relevant to contemporary discussions about equity and fairness in society.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

There is no clear indication that AI was used in the writing of this article; however, if AI were employed, it might have shaped the narrative style or aided in data analysis. The focus on personal stories suggests an emphasis on human experience rather than algorithmic processing, which tends to prioritize factual reporting over emotional depth.

In conclusion, the article presents a compelling case for the need to address the unique challenges faced by incarcerated mothers. Its emotional weight serves to highlight the urgent need for reform within the prison system, particularly concerning maternal care and support for women. The reliability of the piece is reinforced by its basis in real experiences and research, making it a significant contribution to ongoing discussions about justice and health.

Unanalyzed Article Content

One by one, 29 women sat before Dr Laura Abbott in similarly small, nondescript rooms across five UK prisons, and described losing their babies. They were not bereaved in the conventional sense – although they were clearly holding in grief, as once the guards had left, they let rare public tears fall. Prisoners who had given birth in custody, they had been separated from their newborn children. In some cases this had happened within four or five days of becoming mothers.

“It was worse than giving birth,” said one woman. “That was the hardest pain of my life. I’ve never felt pain like it … It was in my chest, in my heart. Even in my belly.”

“It was as if my whole body craved him,” said another woman. “It’s like losing a limb, losing your sight,” a third explained. “It’s like losing any hope.”

Some of the mothers were still producing milk when Abbott and her assistants spoke to them. One said she was so reluctant to raise this in the prison that she was expressing manually into her cell sink.

“I get cramps when I’m expressing milk, which I know is normal,” another said, adding: “I miss having a bump; I miss having the baby. I keep waking up at night and he’s not there.”

Abbott, 54, a former midwife and senior lecturer in midwifery at the University of Hertfordshire, spoke to the women last year for the Lost Mothers Project, which will be launching at the British Museum in London on 8 May.

A collaboration between the university, the charity Birth Companions and an advisory team of women with lived experience, the report, which is the result of three years of research, examines the experiences and needs of an invisible cohort.

Abbott says that many of the women had not voiced their experiences before. “They hadn’t often had the chance to talk about it,” she says, describing how slumped shoulders would begin to shudder and “it just all came tumbling out” against the foil of shouts and banging outside.

“The women would use really quite violent language to describe their baby being ripped from them,” she says. “That really struck me, that physical rawness of the pain.”

New mothers in custody can remain with their babies while they are under the age of 18 months. There are mother and baby units (MBUs) in six of the 12 women’s prisons in England and Wales. But not all pregnant women in custody, or mothers entering the system with infants, are granted a place. Between 2023 and 2024, 50 women entered MBUs from 92 applications. Lost Mothers claims the MBUs are “underutilised”. Who does get a place is decided by multidisciplinary MBU boards. Abbott observed five such meetings, and while few would argue that every mother should remain with their baby, the decisions made can be “inconsistent”, Abbott claims. They can also happen late in pregnancy, causing severe stress, or even after birth.

While mothers may speak at the decision meeting, they have no legal representation. Social workers, Abbott reports, sometimes do not attend, or might not know the mother. And yet the outcome of meetings can be seismic, with babies placed in foster care or adopted. Abbott estimates that about half of the decisions she witnessed went against the mother. She believes that too many enforced separations are happening. More than 70% of female prisoners have not committed a violent crime.

“There are situations where women do need to be separated,” she says. But, she adds, “There are situations with some of the women I’ve met when you think: ‘Why weren’t they given a chance?’”

Usually measured, her composure frays – she carries those 29 women with her. “I think it’s unfathomable,” she says. “The cruelty of that punishment of having your baby removed. You can hear from the women’s voices, it’s torturous.”

Anna (not her real name), 38, has endured this. Her trauma and anger are now channelled into campaign work and she assisted the project. She was six months pregnant when she was sent to prison nine years ago for her first offence. She was at full term when she finally stood before an MBU board. She is vocal about the horrors of giving birth in custody. She had to press her call bell “four or five times for an hour” when she felt labour pains. She says she was taken to hospital in handcuffs: “[The guard] told me to be grateful that she put me in long cuffs.” They were taken off before she was taken to the delivery suite – since 2022, it is mandated that restraints must not be used on pregnant women taken to appointments unless they are deemed essential.

But it is when she talks about her subsequent separation from her son that Anna momentarily loses her words. She was initially granted an MBU place, but when bailed before sentencing she had to go back to the beginning, and needed to reapply when she returned to prison. This bureaucratic delay resulted in a five-week separation.

Anna began to feel suicidal, and even stopped her mum bringing her son to visit. “It was just getting harder. Sometimes my legs felt heavy, as if they didn’t want to walk away,” she says. “Sorry, I’m getting upset …” She continues: “It was as if somebody was tearing my heart out.”

She was still producing milk.Womenare entitled to express, but she says guidance wasn’t offered. “I went to a shower and hand expressed,” she says. “I had suicidal thoughts but I didn’t want to say anything because I thought it would be held against me.”

Attending the MBU boards was terrifying. The first, when she was heavily pregnant, was one of “the most scariest, anxious times of my life”. Of the second, she claims she was told to “pull herself together” when she cried. “I don’t even know who the social worker was. I’d never met her before,” she says.

An intense fear of separation is palpable in Abbott’s report. One woman interviewed describes a fellow prisoner in labour: “She didn’t press her cell bell. She knew they were going to take the baby. So, it was as if she was trying to keep hold of her baby for as long as possible … In the end, they had to prise her legs open to make her give birth.”

Abbott’s Lost Mothers Project was prompted by her doctorate in 2012, which examined the experience of pregnant women in prison. She had no personal connection; indeed, had never even entered a prison before. She is sunny and softly-spoken, but her gentle manner belies a fierce desire for justice.

“I saw a woman handing her baby back [after a visit] with bags of milk she’d expressed,” she recalls. “It haunted me.”

Then, in 2015, came the suicide in custody of first-time offender Michelle Barnes, 33, who had been separated from her newborn daughter and told she wasn’t able to see her. The Ombudsman’s report revealed she had been returned to prison and allowed to visit her newborn child in hospital to feed – only to subsequently be informed “without explanation or discussion” that she wouldn’t see her baby again.

Abbott describes ad hoc support for separated mothers, and often inappropriate understanding, stemming in part from a lack of formal training, she believes. In response, the Ministry of Justice highlights a catalogue of new measures. It underlines that in 2022 a new women’s prison officer course, including a newly developed module on pregnancy, MBUs and maternal separation, was introduced. This was followed by new training on pregnancy and perinatal care. And there is now mandatory multidisciplinary care planning for pregnant women, plus new liaison officer roles.

But Abbott claims she did not see evidence of training on compulsory separation. She believes formal training on this for staff, including midwives, social workers, and prison guards, is minimal. Some staff who spoke to Abbott also confided their own struggles and concerns.

“Regardless of whether a woman should or shouldn’t be separated from her baby, that woman still needs a special type of support,” Abbott says.

One woman’s experience exemplified acutely the void in understanding. She had given birth about eight months previously, and her son had been removed within days. She still cuddled his blanket at night. “She looked like a little girl,” Abbott recalls. “She was saying that in the hospital they had been really kind, because they’d given her this baby box.” She describes a box of well-intentioned items chosen to help remember a baby. “But it was meant for a baby that died.”

She recorded the young woman’s words. “There are things in there that weren’t quite right … like a little seed packet to plant a tree,” the mum says. Abbott clenches her teeth. “Well, you know, it was kind of them to do it, but actually that is so inappropriate,” she says.

Campaign groups including Birth Companions have long argued that pregnant women should not be imprisoned. In 2019, newborn Aisha Clearydied in her 18-year-old mother’s cellafter her calls for help during labour went unanswered. In 2020 another baby was stillborn in its mother’s cell.

Yet the number of pregnant women imprisoned was not counted until 2021. There are now known to have been215 pregnant women in English prisonsbetween April 2023 and March 2024, more than a third of them on remand. During the same period, 53 women gave birth in custody. Data is not kept on mothers and babies separated soon after birth.

The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has agreed that prisons are not working for women. “The simple truth is we are sending too many women to prison,” Mahmood said on the launch of a new Women’s Justice Board in January. “Many are victims, and over half are mothers, leaving a child behind when they go inside.”

The board was formed “to reduce the number of women in prison, and better support those who must still be imprisoned”, says a Ministry of Justice spokesperson.

There have been other developments, too.Judges can now consider pregnancy as a mitigating factor in sentencing, and a further guideline issued by the Sentencing Council was due this spring, stipulating that pre-sentence reports should be required for certain groups, including pregnant women. This has been delayed.

Other measures have been recommended or introduced – although campaigners say progress is too slow. The 2022 chief social worker’s MBU review made recommendations including changing the governance of boards; making the independent chair role a formalised public appointment with a fixed term; and ensuring greater scrutiny.

Measures called assessment, care in custody, and teamwork, used to check regularly on prisoners at risk of self-harm or suicide, are now applied to women separated from their children, but Abbott says she did not consistently see support offered in tandem.

Naomi Delap, director of Birth Companions, which works to improve the lives of mothers and babies facing inequality and disadvantage, says the case of Barnes “starkly” illustrates the risks, and stresses the trauma to babies. “It’s such a critical time for attachment relationships … Disrupted attachment affects people’s mental health throughout their whole life,” she says.

For her, the answer can only be community alternatives: “Ending the use of custody for those women in all but the most exceptional circumstances,” she says. “There needs to be a mandated approach as there is in so many other countries.”

Anna’s son is now nine, and has been diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). She cannot know if the trauma of their separation contributed. Potential links have been found between insecure attachment disorder and ADHD symptoms. This is because attachment plays a key role in the development of our ability to regulate emotions.

Progress is too slow, Anna says. “It seems like medieval times, with the mindset of you do the crime; whatever repercussions come your way, you deserve.”

There is no one size fits all, but perhaps one mother’s voice from Abbott’s report should ring clearly in every decision-maker’s ears: “Not all people that come to prison make bad mothers,” she says.

In the UK and Ireland,Samaritanscan be contacted on freephone 116 123, or emailjo@samaritans.orgorjo@samaritans.ie. In the US, you can call or text theNational Suicide Prevention Lifelineon 988, chat on988lifeline.org, ortext HOMEto 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In Australia, the crisis support serviceLifelineis 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found atbefrienders.org

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian