The most pointless role in UK politics? The secretary of state for Wales | Will Hayward

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Calls to Abolish the Obsolete Role of Secretary of State for Wales"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The role of the secretary of state for Wales has been increasingly viewed as obsolete, particularly in light of recent failures by the Labour government in Westminster to adequately support Wales on critical projects, such as rail funding and national insurance contributions. Despite being established as a voice for Wales within the UK cabinet, the position has often been more representative of Westminster's interests than those of the Welsh people. With a historical backdrop that dates back to 1964, when Wales finally acquired its own secretary of state, the role was initially celebrated. However, over the decades, many individuals appointed to this position have not only lacked a genuine connection to Wales but have also demonstrated a lack of commitment to Welsh interests. This has resulted in a perception that the role serves as a mere façade, providing the illusion of representation while lacking real power or influence in decision-making processes affecting Wales.

The discussion surrounding the secretary of state for Wales is further complicated by the growing call for reform in how Wales is represented in the UK government. The current officeholder, Jo Stevens, has made efforts to advocate for Welsh needs, yet her ability to effect change remains limited by the constraints of her role, which is appointed by the prime minister and bound by collective cabinet responsibility. The article argues for a fundamental shift in governance, suggesting that Wales should have its own directly elected representative in the cabinet, rather than relying on an appointee who may not even reside in Wales. This would ensure that Welsh interests are genuinely prioritized in UK politics. The author, Will Hayward, emphasizes the need for Wales to have a true voice in government, one that reflects its distinct identity and needs, ultimately advocating for broader reforms that recognize the unique status of Wales within the UK.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the seemingly redundant role of the Secretary of State for Wales, emphasizing the historical context and the current disillusionment with the position. It critiques how this role has transformed from being a potential advocate for Wales to a mere conduit for Westminster, reflecting a broader disconnect between Welsh interests and UK governance.

Historical Context and Evolution of the Role

The article provides a historical perspective on the establishment of the Secretary of State for Wales, noting that Wales did not receive this position until 1964, while Scotland had been represented much earlier. This timeline highlights a perceived neglect of Welsh political representation. The initial success of the role in advocating for Welsh language rights is contrasted with later ineffective and controversial figures, suggesting a decline in its significance.

Critique of Current Political Dynamics

The author argues that the current Secretary of State for Wales has failed to adequately represent Welsh interests, especially in light of recent financial decisions made by the Labour-led Westminster government that negatively impact Wales. This criticism underscores a growing sentiment that the position is outmoded and needs to be re-evaluated or abolished.

Public Sentiment and Awareness

The call for a "hero" to advocate for Wales suggests a desire among the public for stronger representation and accountability. The article captures the frustration of Welsh citizens who feel marginalized and disillusioned with their current political leadership. This sentiment may resonate particularly with communities in Wales that have historically felt overlooked by central government policies.

Potential Manipulation and Underlying Agendas

While the article aims to raise awareness about the inadequacies of the Secretary of State for Wales, it may also reflect a broader political agenda to push for increased autonomy or changes in governance for Wales. By framing the role as unnecessary, it could be seen as an effort to catalyze discussions about Welsh self-governance or the need for structural changes in political representation.

Impact on Society and Future Scenarios

This critique has the potential to influence public discourse regarding Welsh governance, possibly leading to increased advocacy for devolved powers or a reassessment of the role of the Secretary of State. If the sentiments expressed resonate, it could result in political movements aimed at enhancing Welsh representation and addressing core issues affecting the region.

Communities and Support Base

The article likely appeals to those in Wales who feel disenfranchised by the current political structures, including activists and advocates for Welsh language and culture. It seeks to engage audiences who prioritize regional representation and accountability in governance.

Economic and Market Implications

While the article primarily focuses on political representation, the implications of discontent in Wales could affect economic policies and investments in the region. Businesses and investors may view political instability or dissatisfaction as a risk factor, potentially influencing market dynamics in Wales.

Global Context and Relevance

The discussion around regional representation is relevant in a broader global context, where similar movements for autonomy and representation are emerging in various regions. This article taps into contemporary discussions about governance, representation, and the balance of power in a globalized world.

Use of AI in Writing

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was used in crafting this article. The nuanced arguments and historical references suggest a human touch, possibly indicating a journalist's deep understanding of the political landscape rather than AI-generated content.

The article effectively communicates its message and is grounded in historical facts, making it a reliable source of information. However, its potential bias towards advocating for change in Welsh governance should be considered when evaluating its overall trustworthiness.

Unanalyzed Article Content

In the space of one week, Labour-run Wales has been short-changed by Labour-run Westminster on projects fromrail fundingtonational insurance contributions. The poorest nation in the UK is being let down. Repeatedly. But what is to be done?

What we need is a hero. Someone whose job is to speak up forWalesin cabinet, to be Cymru’s voice in Westminster’s corridors of power. Luckily for Wales, there is such a person – the secretary of state for Wales. Unluckily for Wales, this role has long been utterly obsolete. Rather than being the voice of Wales in cabinet, it far more often represents the voice of the cabinet in Wales. It needs to go.

Wales didn’t have its own secretary of state until 1964. The Scots, meanwhile, were given that voice more than 250 years before in 1707, though it was subsequently abolished three decades later and then recreated in 1926. When Wales did finally get one, it was a real cause for celebration and the culmination of much campaigning.

The first two people in the post were Jim Griffiths and Cledwyn Hughes, who were highly respected and had great credentials within the Labour movement. The new role paid dividends and within the space of three years the Welsh Language Act was passed, giving Welsh legal status in Wales (amazing what happens when you give people a voice).

But in the following decades there were some absolute stinkers in the job. The next one was George Thomas, who wasanti Welsh languageand described the setting up of the Welsh Office as the “greatest mistake”. The low point of his tenure came after the Aberfan disaster, in which a coal tip collapsed on to a school killing 116 children and 28 adults. Subsequent inquiries found that the National Coal Board was squarely responsible for these deaths after refusing to pay for the removal of the tips. After the disaster, 88,000 individual contributions were received for the victim fund but the Labour UK government decided to take money from that fund and use it to clear the remaining tips.Thomas put pressure on the fundto give in.

Over the subsequent decades, many of the people holding the role were not even Welsh or in a Welsh constituency. (Imagine if they had tried to do that to the Scots.) The worst of these was the Conservative John Redwood, who was born in Kent and was MP for Wokingham in Berkshire. (If you want a treat, dig out the video of himfailing to mimethe Welsh national anthem.) Redwoodrefused to sign documentsthat were written in Welsh, and didn’t like to stay overnight in Wales, instead driving back to his constituency in England. But perhaps most damning was that, in a country with significant levels of poverty, he took great pride inreturning £100m of the Welsh Office’s budgetto the Treasury unspent. What an effective voice for Wales in cabinet.

More recently, Wales has been blessed with some equally diligent secretaries of state. One was Alun Cairns, who resigned from the post after it emerged that one of his staff wasaccused by a judgeof deliberately sabotaging a rape trial. His best-known contribution was a supreme act of brown nosing when he got the Severn Bridge renamed the “Prince of Wales Bridge” – a decision thatonly 17% of people in Walessupported. Another was Simon Hart, whoadmits in his just-published diariesthat, at the official opening of the new Welsh parliament in 2020: “I skip the Senedd bit – partly in protest, and partly to have lunch with Adam.” He doesn’t say what he was protesting about. Another recent office holder was Robert Buckland who was, err, the MP for South Swindon …

While Wales has had some shocking secretaries of state, this isn’t why the role should be ditched. It needs to be gone because, however principled, competent and driven the holder of the office, there is no way they can realistically do the job of being Wales’s voice. They have no power, barely any staff, are appointed by the prime minister and bound by collective responsibility. The current situation represents the worst of both worlds: it gives the illusion of Wales having a voice when it comes with a pre-installed mute button.

The current holder of the office is Jo Stevens. Speaking to people in other departments as well as the Wales Office, I get the impression that she is at least proactive in making Wales’s needs part of the conversation. I am told she has been focused in trying to get the historic injustices on rail funding remedied ahead of next week’s spending review. Whether it works remains to be seen – and she sadly failed this week to prevent the new rail project between Oxford and Cambridge being classed as an “England and Wales” scheme, meaning that Wales will not receive Barnett consequentials from it. But at least she isn’t openly contemptuous of Welsh democracy like many of her predecessors.

The fact remains, however, that whether or not Welsh issues are raised in Whitehall is totally dependent on the whims of a cabinet member who is appointed and often living outside Wales. That’s a terrible status quo. Wales should appoint its advocates, not the prime minister, who has only once in the history of the UK been Welsh. The role of secretary of state for Wales needs to be replaced by a representative of theWelsh government, which is directly elected by the people of Wales. Better still, we need to properly reform the UK so the UK government doesn’t double as the English government.

Devolution gave Wales and Scotland a voice, and that voice should reverberate around the cabinet table. It is long past the time that Whitehall needs to acknowledge that the UK is made up of distinct countries. Giving these nations a real voice doesn’t weaken the union, it strengthens it.

Will Hayward is a Guardian columnist. He publishes a regular newsletter on Welsh politics and is the author ofIndependent Nation: Should Wales Leave the UK?

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian