The holy screen: a brief history of popes on film and TV, from Peter O’Toole to Robbie Coltrane

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Exploring the Representation of Popes in Film and Television: From Historical Figures to Fictional Narratives"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The cinematic portrayal of popes has a rich history, reflecting the complexities and the theatricality inherent in the papacy. Films like "Conclave" showcase the dramatic process of selecting a new pope, capturing the tension, ritual, and the weight of history that accompanies such a pivotal moment. Notable actors, including Ralph Fiennes and Jeremy Irons, have embodied historical popes, often highlighting their flawed human nature. The depiction of popes in cinema often leans towards the dramatic, where they may serve as antagonists or minor characters, as seen in the portrayal of Julius II by Rex Harrison in "The Agony and the Ecstasy." The unique spectacle of a new pope emerging onto St. Peter's Square is a moment that resonates with audiences, drawing parallels between reality and the cinematic experience. The film industry has tapped into this narrative, with many actors demonstrating the iconic moment of a newly elected pope facing the public, a scene that is both powerful and filled with symbolic weight.

In more recent productions, such as "The Two Popes," the duality of the papacy is explored through the relationship between Pope Francis and Benedict XVI, played by Jonathan Pryce and Anthony Hopkins, respectively. Their dynamic reveals the human side of the papal office, showcasing the internal struggles and moral dilemmas faced by those in power. The film cleverly juxtaposes the desire to retreat from the responsibilities of the papacy with the inevitability of being thrust into the role, echoing themes from other cinematic narratives like "The Godfather." The tradition of the reluctant pope continues, with comedic interpretations like Robbie Coltrane's character in "The Pope Must Die" and Jude Law's Pius XIII in "The Young Pope," both of which challenge and satirize the established norms of papal authority. These portrayals invite audiences to reflect on the nature of leadership within the Catholic Church, while also addressing broader issues of patriarchy and power dynamics. As the legacy of past popes is revisited through film and television, the role of the pope remains a topic of both reverence and critique, highlighting the ongoing relevance of these narratives in contemporary society.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article explores the portrayal of popes in film and television, emphasizing the cinematic elements inherent in the papacy and the cultural significance of these representations. It illustrates how these depictions resonate with audiences, tapping into themes of authority, morality, and the human condition, while also noting the blend of fact and fiction in these portrayals.

Cinematic Appeal of the Papacy

The portrayal of popes in various adaptations captures the drama and gravitas associated with the papal office. Films like "Conclave" highlight the tension and spectacle surrounding the election of a new pope, a process steeped in ritual and historical weight. The article's discussion indicates that these cinematic representations are not merely entertainment but also serve to shape public perception of the papacy and its role in contemporary society.

Cultural Resonance

There is an implicit recognition of how audiences connect with the figure of the pope through visual storytelling. By referencing well-known actors portraying historical popes, the article suggests that such portrayals influence how individuals perceive the authority and character of real-life popes. The mention of specific actors and their performances serves to ground these portrayals in a cultural context that audiences can relate to, potentially reinforcing or challenging existing views about the papacy.

Potential Overlooked Narratives

While the article focuses on the cinematic representations of popes, it raises questions about what narratives may be obscured in these portrayals. The emphasis on dramatization might downplay the complexities and realities of the papacy, such as the political and social issues faced by pontiffs today. This selective representation may lead audiences to form opinions based on a curated image rather than a comprehensive understanding of the papacy's challenges and responsibilities.

Manipulative Aspects

There is a potential for manipulation in how these portrayals frame the papacy and influence public perception. By emphasizing the spectacle and drama, the narrative may lead audiences to view the pope as a character in a story rather than as a real individual with significant responsibilities. The language used in the article, while informative, also reflects a tendency to romanticize or dramatize the role of the pope, which could skew public perception.

Trustworthiness of the Article

The article presents a blend of cultural commentary and analysis, which can be valuable for understanding the intersection of media and religion. However, its reliance on cinematic examples may lead to a somewhat biased view of the papacy, as it focuses primarily on entertainment rather than the multifaceted realities of the role. Therefore, while the article is engaging and thought-provoking, readers should approach it with a critical mindset, aware of its limitations.

Impact on Society and Culture

The portrayal of popes in film and TV may influence societal views on authority, morality, and religion. As new popes are elected, the public's expectations and interpretations of their roles can be swayed by cinematic representations. This could lead to increased scrutiny or reverence based on how the media depicts the papacy, ultimately affecting public discourse around religion and authority.

Community Engagement

This article is likely to resonate with audiences interested in cultural studies, film critique, and religious discussions. It aims to engage those who appreciate the intersection of pop culture and serious subjects like faith and leadership, thus potentially fostering a dialogue among diverse community groups.

Economic and Political Implications

While this article may not directly influence stock markets or economic conditions, it contributes to the ongoing conversation about the role of the church in contemporary society. The way the papacy is represented in the media might indirectly affect public sentiment and policy discussions related to religious institutions, which can have broader implications for social and political dynamics.

Global Power Dynamics

Although the article primarily focuses on cultural representation, the portrayal of religious figures like the pope in a global context can reflect and influence power dynamics. The way these figures are depicted can affect their influence on international issues, including moral leadership on global challenges.

Use of AI in Article Composition

It is plausible that AI tools were utilized in drafting the article, particularly in organizing thoughts or analyzing trends in media representation. However, the narrative style and subjective interpretations suggest human oversight in crafting a nuanced discussion. The AI may have assisted in structuring the analysis but did not dominate the thematic direction.

In conclusion, while the article is engaging and offers valuable insights into the representation of popes in media, it is important for readers to maintain a critical perspective regarding its implications and potential biases.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Everything about the papacy is cinematic – especially picking a new one, as shown in the wildly popular movie Conclave, withRalph Fiennesas an unwilling contender for the top job. There is the mystery, the ritual, the vestments; the spectacle of a lone, fragile human being poised over an abyss of history and good and evil; the elevation of one flawed man to a position of supreme authority, an exaltation whose parallel to the crucifixion is sensed but not acknowledged.

Discussing the onscreen representation of the pope in Conclave would risk the blasphemy of spoilerism but there have been many popes on screen, some cheekily fictional, many factual. Many a heavyweight British thesp has turned in a gamey cameo as some hooded-eyed Renaissance pontiff. Peter O’Toole was the lizardly and capricious Paul III in TV’s The Tudors (2007), presiding over a simperingly submissive 16th-century court of cardinals. Jeremy Irons was a small-screen Alexander VI inThe Borgias(2011), a family member whose face radiated sensual refinement and hauteur.

If the pope has to be a minor or supporting character, it is easier to play him as a baddie. Rex Harrison was a very stately and boring Julius II, the so-called Warrior Pope in Carol Reed’s The Agony and the Ecstasy (1965), always being shouted at by Charlton Heston’s Michelangelo while he is trying to get on with painting the Sistine Chapel ceiling.

In the real world, the successor to the late Pope Francis will undoubtedly have seen a pope on film or TV, and seen the actor do the signature screen-pope moment: the camera follows behind, maybe in slow-mo as the cheering gets louder and, clad in his unfamiliar robes, he emerges for the first time on the balcony overlooking St Peter’s Square as the senior cardinal intones “Habemus Papam” – “We have a pope” – and introduces him by his chosen name. From the new pope’s POV, behind his head, we see the thousands of extras – or more likely CGI images. Pope Francis’s successor must do it for real.

Jonathan Pryce’s wonderfully sympathetic, humorous performance in Fernando Meirelles’sThe Two Popes(2019) as Francis – or as he is for the most of the film Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio – must surely have set the tone for memories of the late pope, at least for the secular unbelieving world. Pryce’s future pontiff is discreet, frank, humble, yet troubled, with a demotic man-of-the-people touch which irritates and yet fascinates the incumbent pope, the intensely conservative Benedict XVI, played by Anthony Hopkins. Pryce’s screen Francis is a nice guy, without the flashes of temper that he is said to have shown in the real world, the Francis that thought it was all right to punch someone who insults your mother. When Benedict resigns, it is these two men who have to share the Holy See as the two popes. This unique double act allows the movie camera to explore a profound mystery – what is it like to be pope, to see the pope as the pope sees the pope? The movie shows one pope hearing confession from another.

Importantly,The Two Popesstarts with Cardinal Bergoglio’s Michael Corleone moment. The movie imagines Bergoglio wanting to retire as Cardinal, to retreat from the politics and show of church power – which Benedict will not countenance. Similarly, Fiennes’s Cardinal Lawrence begins Conclave by wanting to resign as dean of the college of cardinals. This initial “resignation” impulse naturally signals the very real possibility or even certainty of becomingcapo di tutti capi. Michael Corleone, played by Al Pacino, confesses his terrible sins in Coppola’s The Godfather Part III to Cardinal Lamberto – a fictional character who, harrowed by Corleone’s crimes, later becomes an imagined version of Pope John Paul I, and fatefully looks into the Vatican’s corruption scandals like his real namesake. Anthony Quinn’s fictional pope in The Shoes of the Fisherman (1965) follows the same “Corleone” narrative path to the top.

The unwilling or unworthy pope is a screen tradition. Poor John Paul I, who died so soon after his elevation, is an inspiration for Nanni Moretti’s We Have a Pope, in which Michel Piccoli plays the fictional Cardinal Melville, who finds the top job thrust upon him and succumbs to stage-fright. The film is very good at showing how, during the conclave, most Cardinals are obviously yearning not to have this terrible burden placed upon them.

Movie history’s most outrageous reluctant pope is Robbie Coltrane’s David I, in Peter Richardson’s farcical comedy The Pope Must Die (1991) – widely re-titled as The Pope Must Diet to avoid giving offence. The film interestingly takes its cue from the technicality that a new pope does not theoretically need to be a cardinal. Coltrane’s antihero is a rackety but basically honest priest, Dave Albinizi, who is accidentally elevated to the Holy See through a bizarre mistake and, like Lamberto in The Godfather Part III, is under pressure from the mob for looking too hard into Vatican bribery and corruption.

For sheer hilarity and outrage, however, there is the fantastical Pius XIII, formerly Cardinal Lenny Belardo, played byJude Lawin Paolo Sorrentino’s streaming TV drama The Young Pope. We see this new pope smoking cigarettes – a shocking image, perhaps, although John XXIII and Benedict XVI were both smokers – and even treats us to the extraordinary vision of the pontiff striding along the beach, super buff, clad in nothing but tiny white Speedos.

And how about the patriarchy and misogyny of Catholic rule? Many female stars have played the legendary and mythic Pope Joan, who supposedly ruled with her gender a secret for two years in the ninth century – Liv Ullmann was Pope Joan in 1972: pale and determined, an unworldly version of Joan of Arc.

To be pope is to take an above-the-title lead role in a problematic franchise which many think should be revamped. It is a thankless and demanding role where the reviews come in at the very beginning and the very end.

Perhaps someone like Peter Morgan could create a new movie, entitled Great Again, in which Jonathan Pryce can reprise his great performance as Francis, takinghis final meeting: with the oleaginous and uncomprehending JD Vance, played by, perhaps, Sam Rockwell. The ageing man of gentle wisdom tries to get through to the heartbreakingly childlike and vain vice-president, advising him on ways of buying his soul back.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian