The Windrush generations were proudly British. Yet immigrants are still fighting to be seen that way | Diane Abbott

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Commemorating the Windrush Generation: A Reflection on Migration and Resilience"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Diane Abbott reflects on her experience attending a Windrush Day reception at 10 Downing Street, where the contributions of Caribbean migrants, known as the Windrush generation, were celebrated. The event was marked by a vibrant atmosphere, with a steelband providing musical accompaniment and Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressing the attendees. Abbott emphasizes that the Windrush generation did not perceive themselves as immigrants but as proud British citizens who came to support the rebuilding of the UK after World War II. Many had served in the British armed forces or responded to government calls for workers, and they embraced their new lives with a strong sense of loyalty to Britain. However, while the acknowledgment of their contributions is welcomed, Abbott cautions against romanticizing the Windrush era without recognizing the systemic racism and challenges these migrants faced upon arrival.

The Windrush generation encountered significant obstacles, particularly in employment and housing. During the early years of their arrival, racial discrimination was rampant, with the first Race Relations Act not being enacted until 1965. Consequently, many Windrush migrants found work in sectors experiencing labor shortages, such as transport and healthcare, often facing harsh working conditions. Abbott reflects on her family's struggles, including her father's efforts to secure housing in a discriminatory market, where black tenants were often exploited by landlords. The community's resilience is highlighted, as Abbott shares a personal story of her family's interactions with neighbors, illustrating the solidarity among diverse communities during a time of racial tension. The Windrush generation's journey was marked by both bravery and hardship, making their eventual recognition and celebration at events like the one at Downing Street a powerful testament to their enduring legacy in British society.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

This week I went to a Windrush Day reception in the gardens of 10 Downing Street. Standing in the brilliant sunshine, with a steelband tinkling away in the background, it was great to see this generation ofCaribbeanmigrants finally being honoured as their bravery and enterprise deserves.

The excited guests – Windrush-era Caribbean migrants, their friends and family – were thrilled to be at No 10, and the absolute highlight was being addressed by the prime minister, Keir Starmer. Fortunately on this occasion, he refrained from telling his guests that they were turning Britain into an “island of strangers”. In any case, it would have been nonsense.

Nobody identified more strongly with Britain than that generation, many of whom had a picture of Queen Elizabeth II on their living-room wall. When the Empire Windrusharrived at Tilbury docks in Essex,its occupants did not see themselves as “immigrants”, but citizens of the United Kingdom and Commonwealth come to help rebuild the “mother country” after the war. Most of the passengers gave their last country of residence as the Caribbean, including Jamaica, Trinidad, St Lucia, Grenada and Barbados. Some had served in the British armed forces, but others had responded to the British government advertisements for workers.

While it is good to see the contribution of migrants to Britain in the postwar period commemorated, it is possible to get too sentimental about the Windrush era and forget the brutality of the racism they faced when they disembarked from those ships. They had been so very proud to come, but Britain’s reception was cooler than they might have expected.

One issue was employment. The Windrush era spanned from 1948 to the early 1970s, but the first Race Relations Act was not until 1965. So, in the early years of the Windrush era, employers could brazenly refuse to employ someone because they were black and not even pretend there was another reason. Accordingly, most Windrush migrants went into sectors hit by postwar labour shortages like transport or factory work.

Windrush-era women often went into the NHS. It was not an easy way to make a living. Nurses, in particular, were often on permanent nights or put into grades where there was plenty of backbreaking work but no promotion. Instead, they had to train younger white nurses and watch them climb the ladder. Despite all that, they were hugely proud of their jobs. Some people nowadays like to talk about the pressure immigrants put on the public services. But my mother’s generation helped to build the NHS.

Another problem was housing. Windrush-era migrants owned their own homes to an extent that might seem remarkable now. But it was not because they earned a lot of money. They had little choice. Before the 1965 Race Relations Act, many councils simply would not let to black people. The private sector was even worse. A notorious slum landlord of the time was Peter Rachman, who would charge double or treble the normal rent. He specialised in Caribbean tenants because they could get so few mainstream landlords to rent to them.

My father, like very many Caribbean migrants of the time, bought a house in what was then a shabby part of west London. He accumulated the deposit using an intra-communitysaving scheme called “pardner”. But he paid the mortgage by having a tenant or a family in every room. We ourselves were in one room in that house with a cooker on the landing. When my father bought his house, there was an Irish family, headed by “Uncle Jimmy”, as sitting tenants in the basement. I don’t think Uncle Jimmy had encountered a black baby before. When I was born, he promptly fell in love. Every morning, my mother would give me breakfast. Then she would take me down to Uncle Jimmy and he would give me another breakfast.

In the Windrush era, black people were often the victims of violence by bad actors such as teddy boys or fascist organisations such as the BNP. There was a backdrop of fear. The Notting Hill race riots were the culmination of years of teddy boys attacking black people. My mother used to tell a story about teddy boys storming down our west London road. They knocked on every door and if they found a black family inside, they beat them up. My parents waited petrified as the noise of the teddy boys grew nearer. Then out from our basement emerged Uncle Jimmy. He said very firmly “they are not getting our Diane” and when the teddy boys knocked on our door, he opened it. Seeing a white man, they assumed a white family lived inside and moved on to the next house.

No one should ever underestimate the courage of the Windrush generation. Travelling from the Caribbean countryside to one of the biggest cities in the world in order to build a new life was an act of extraordinary daring. Nor could my parents, and that whole wave of Caribbean migrants who came here in the 1950s on the Empire Windrush and all the other ships, have ever guessed that their achievements would one day be celebrated with so many splendid events. Including a reception in the garden of 10 Downing Street.

Diane Abbott has been the Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington since 1987

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in ourletterssection, pleaseclick here.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian