The Settlers review – this vital film forces Louis Theroux to do something he’s never done before

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Louis Theroux's 'The Settlers' Examines Israeli Settlements and Shifts Documentary Approach"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In his latest documentary, 'The Settlers,' Louis Theroux revisits the Israeli settlements in the West Bank, a topic he initially explored in his 2011 film, 'The Ultra Zionists.' The new film highlights the alarming increase in settler population and the normalization of their ideology within Israeli politics. Theroux's signature style, known for its faux-naïveté, faces a significant challenge in this context, as he encounters both physical intimidation and confrontational attitudes from settlers. Notably, Theroux's approach shifts from his usual charm to a more direct engagement, reflecting the gravity of the situation he is documenting. He finds himself in precarious situations, including when settlers threaten him with weapons, emphasizing the tension that permeates life in the West Bank. This documentary marks a departure from his previous work, as he grapples with the stark realities faced by Palestinians and the aggressive stance of the settlers he interviews.

One of the film's pivotal moments occurs during an intense exchange with Daniella Weiss, a prominent figure in the settler movement. Theroux's attempts to challenge her views culminate in a rare moment of forthrightness, as he labels her a sociopath in response to her denial of settler violence against Palestinians. This direct confrontation represents a significant evolution in Theroux’s documentary style, showcasing a willingness to editorialize in a way he has not done before. While the film could benefit from a broader exploration of Israeli activists who oppose the settlements, it is clear that 'The Settlers' signals the return of Theroux as a probing filmmaker, willing to tackle difficult subjects with a renewed sense of urgency and authenticity. The documentary aired on BBC Two and is currently available on iPlayer, reminding audiences of Theroux's capabilities as a serious documentarian amidst a changing political landscape.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article examines Louis Theroux's latest documentary, "The Settlers," which revisits Israeli settlements in the West Bank, analyzing the shift in the political landscape and Theroux's evolving journalistic approach. It suggests that the film is a critical commentary on the situation in the region and highlights the need for a more confrontational style in Theroux’s reporting given the dire circumstances faced by Palestinians.

Intent Behind the Article

There is a clear intention to highlight the relevance and urgency of Theroux's documentary. By framing the discussion around his shift from a more light-hearted approach to a serious examination of a pressing global issue, the article emphasizes the importance of addressing the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The narrative suggests that this change is necessary due to the increasing normalization of settler ideology, which could resonate with audiences concerned about human rights and geopolitical issues.

Public Perception and Messaging

The piece seeks to evoke a sense of urgency and concern regarding the situation in the West Bank. By emphasizing the confrontational nature of Theroux's experiences during filming, it aims to generate empathy and awareness among readers. The portrayal of settlers as aggressive and the implications of their actions may lead the audience to adopt a more critical stance towards Israeli policies and settlements.

Potential Omissions or Deceptions

While the article focuses on Theroux's experiences and the broader implications of the documentary, it may overlook the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, including the perspectives of Israeli citizens who support settlements. Such omissions could skew public understanding by presenting a one-dimensional view of the situation.

Manipulative Elements

There are elements of manipulation present, particularly in the emotional framing of Theroux's confrontations with settlers. The language used evokes strong feelings and could lead readers to a predetermined conclusion about the nature of the conflict. This approach may polarize opinions and influence how audiences perceive both Theroux's work and the situation in the West Bank.

Authenticity and Reliability

The reliability of the article hinges on its portrayal of Theroux’s experiences and the accuracy of the information regarding Israeli settlements. While it provides a compelling narrative, the subjective nature of documentary filmmaking and the complexities of the geopolitical context may limit its objectivity. The article appears to be well-researched but should be viewed with a critical eye.

Connections to Other Media

In the broader context of media coverage on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this article fits into a pattern of highlighting human rights issues while potentially neglecting the multifaceted nature of the conflict. It aligns with narratives that emphasize Palestinian suffering but may not fully explore the motivations or experiences of settlers.

Impact on Society and Politics

The documentary and its coverage may influence public opinion regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, possibly leading to increased advocacy for Palestinian rights. This could have political ramifications, especially in Western countries where public sentiment can impact foreign policy decisions.

Community Support and Target Audience

The article likely resonates with progressive audiences, including activists and individuals concerned about human rights, who might support Theroux's critical examination of the Israeli settlements. It appeals to those who are already sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.

Economic and Market Implications

While the article may not have direct implications for stock markets or businesses, the broader discourse on human rights and international relations can influence investments, particularly in companies operating in or associated with the region. The film's release may also stimulate interest in related media and educational content.

Geopolitical Relevance

The documentary and the accompanying discussion are deeply relevant to current geopolitical dynamics, especially as tensions in the region continue to evolve. The narrative aligns with ongoing debates about sovereignty, occupation, and international law, making it pertinent to today's global discussions.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

It is unclear whether AI was employed in crafting this article, but if it were, models might have been used to analyze language patterns and construct narratives that evoke emotional responses. Such interventions could shape how the subject matter is framed, steering it towards more impactful storytelling.

Ultimately, the analysis conveys a critical perspective on Theroux's work and its implications, inviting readers to engage thoughtfully with the issues presented.

Unanalyzed Article Content

If you’ve even casually been tracking Louis Theroux’s career, you will have detected a noticeable deceleration of late. For a while, after he shed the culty sheen of his Weird Weekends persona, Theroux emerged as a sober, probing documentarian who made films about drug addiction, sexual assault and postpartum depression. These films were, without exception, vital.

Then lockdown happened, and the wheels fell off. After going viral for a self-consciously ironic rap he did 20 years earlier, Theroux settled into the low-stakes quicksand of a generic celebrity interview podcast. You were left with the feeling of an extraordinary talent being wasted.

The Settlers lays all those worries to rest in an instant. By travelling to Israeli settlements in theWest Bank, Theroux is revisiting the subject matter of a documentary he made in 2011. That film, The Ultra Zionists, concerned a clutch of Jewish people who – propelled by religious nationalism – were infringing on international law by building their homes in Palestinian territory. But, 14 years on, he has returned to find that the settlements have accelerated. The settler ideology has found itself gaining political traction. What was fringe has now become mainstream.

As such, The Settlers requires Theroux to alter his approach. Ever since Weird Weekends, his stock in trade has been the faux-naïf, lulling his subjects into a false sense of security with his bumbling charm. With everyone from Jimmy Savile to the members of the Westboro Baptist Church, he was able to lay traps they simply didn’t see coming.

But the situation in the West Bank is so dire that the kid gloves have to come off. This is partly because he and his crew repeatedly find themselves subject to many of the confrontations and intimidations that blight the lives of Palestinians on a daily basis. During a visit to a Palestinian home, settlers drive up and point guns with laser sights through the windows at him. More than once, he has to politely ask people to lower their guns while talking to him. In one especially tense encounter, he has to bark “Don’t touch me” at a pair of balaclava-wearing Israeli soldiers.

In the early years, Theroux would gently attempt to convince his subjects that their worldview might not be the only one around. In the later, more serious films, he would leave long silences on which the viewer could project scorn on his behalf, saving his true feelings for the voiceover afterwards. In truth, there is some of this in The Settlers. When he meets Ari Abramowitz, a Texas settler in the West Bank who refuses to even use the word “Palestinian”, he holds his tongue. When he meets a rabbi who calls Palestinians “savages” and “camel riders”, he manages to do the same.

Then comes Daniella Weiss. A key member of the Israeli settler movement for 50 years, Weiss is Theroux’s prime target. She is able to hide her extreme views behind a friendly smile, no matter how aggressively he plays cat and mouse with her. But, at the end of the episode, they both get to each other like never before. Theroux corners Weiss and presses her on settler violence against Palestinians. She says none exists. He says he has witnessed it, notably in a video of a Palestinian being shot. She claims the Israeli shooter was acting in retaliation, then physically shoves Theroux in the hope that he’ll push her back. Instead, he does something he’s never done before. He calls her a sociopath.

I’ve been watching Theroux’s films for more than three decades, since his days on Michael Moore’s TV Nation, and watching him be this forthright feels like a true watershed moment in his career. This level of stridently editorialising just hasn’t been in his toolbox until now. Whether it works or not is debatable – by the end of the encounter Weiss has recovered herself enough to taunt “I wish you’d pushed me back” at him – but this new version of Louis Theroux feels like a deliberate adaptation to the ages. It suits him.

As with everything, you wish certain aspects of the situation could be explored more. Most notably, the peripheral glimpses of Israeli activists who protest against the settlements probably need more airtime, if only to demonstrate that this is a problem of individuals rather than an entire nation. But that’s by the by. It looks very much like we’ve got Louis Theroux back, and not a moment too soon.

The Settlers aired on BBC Two and is on iPlayer now

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian