The Liberal party’s appointment of Sussan Ley is a historic moment – but not the one that matters | Julia Banks

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Sussan Ley Becomes First Female Leader of the Liberal Party Amid Ongoing Challenges"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Liberal Party of Australia has recently appointed Sussan Ley as its first female leader in its 80-year history, a move that has been hailed by the party as a significant historical moment. However, this appointment comes in the wake of a series of electoral defeats and a growing disconnection between the party and female voters. Following the 2022 elections, the Liberal Party saw a substantial loss of support from women, a trend that continued into the 2025 elections as voters increasingly turned to the Labor Party and teal independents. Ley's appointment is seen by some as an attempt to address this disconnect, yet many critics argue that simply placing a woman in a leadership position will not resolve the underlying issues that have plagued the party, such as its outdated policies and failure to engage with contemporary social values that resonate with many voters, particularly women concerned about climate change and social equality.

Despite Ley’s promises to lead from the 'sensible centre' and engage more effectively with women, the Liberal Party's continued alignment with right-wing factions and its reluctance to adopt progressive policies raise doubts about the sincerity of this new direction. The party has not only maintained connections with groups opposed to women's rights and climate action but has also shown resistance to implementing measures such as quotas to enhance female representation. Critics argue that Ley's leadership, while historic, may simply be a symbolic gesture that fails to address the deeper, systemic issues within the party. The real historic moment, they assert, is the record number of women in the current Australian parliament, which reflects a broader political shift away from the Liberal Party's traditional base. As Ley takes on her new role, many are left questioning whether this appointment will genuinely lead to meaningful change or if it is merely an attempt to placate a disillusioned electorate.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reflects on the significant yet controversial appointment of Sussan Ley as the first female leader of the Liberal Party in Australia. It contextualizes this moment within a broader narrative of the party's struggles, particularly regarding gender representation and electoral losses. The writer, Julia Banks, critiques the party's past actions and highlights the implications of Ley's appointment.

Historical Context and Critique

The piece starts with a reflection on Scott Morrison's leadership style and the internal dynamics of the Liberal Party. Morrison's earlier emphasis on the future inclusion of women in leadership positions appears to be a hollow promise, especially in light of the party's history of sidelining women. This critique serves to underscore the notion that Ley's appointment may be more of a symbolic gesture than a genuine commitment to change.

Implications of Ley's Appointment

While the announcement of Ley's leadership is framed as a historic moment, the article argues that it fails to address the systemic issues within the party that have contributed to its decline in female support. The author suggests that simply appointing a woman is insufficient to rectify the party's deep-rooted problems and electoral failures. This viewpoint raises questions about the sincerity of the Liberal Party's commitment to gender equality.

Public Sentiment and Electoral Impact

The article notes that female voters have increasingly distanced themselves from the Liberal Party, opting instead for the Labor Party and independent candidates. This migration reflects broader societal changes and the demand for genuine representation and progressive policies. By highlighting this trend, the article aims to foster dialogue about the party's future and the necessity for authentic engagement with women's issues.

Manipulative Elements and Trustworthiness

There are manipulative undertones present in the framing of Ley's appointment as a solution to the party's woes. By presenting this event as a historic breakthrough, the article suggests that the Liberal Party is attempting to distract from its failures and the discontent among its base. The language used suggests a critique of the attempt to mask deeper issues with superficial changes, resulting in a level of distrust towards the party's intentions.

In summary, the article provides a critical perspective on the Liberal Party's recent leadership change, questioning both its significance and the sincerity of the party's commitment to addressing gender inequality. It serves as a call to action for voters to remain vigilant and demand genuine change rather than accept tokenism.

Unanalyzed Article Content

In 2018, Scott Morrison addressed theLiberal partyroom with an evangelical Trumpian fervour. Having just blown up Malcolm Turnbull’s government to become Liberal leader and prime minister ahead of Peter Dutton and Julie Bishop, he seemed oblivious to the bloodshed he had just caused.

He pointed to the framed photographs of previous Liberal leaders and prime ministers and said, in what I’m sure he thought was a Churchillian tone: “One day there will be a woman there.” The room was glum with silence, pierced only by Bishop’s quiet quip. In which century?

That day marked the beginning of the Morrison and Dutton show. Women centrists such as Bishop, Kelly O’Dwyer and me jumped ship. Kerryn Phelps won Turnbull’s seat of Wentworth and Zali Steggall won Tony Abbott’s seat of Warringah in 2019, the same year as Morrison’s ‘miracle’ win. In the 2022 election, six women – business leaders, lawyers and doctors among them – pushed men out of “blue ribbon” seats that had been held by Liberal party since last century.

A slow but steady trail of destruction continued. The reactionary right, emboldened by Trump 1.0, and later Trump’s second coming, has continued to flavour their talking points accordingly and develop copycat policies. They consoled climate deniers with a Gina Rinehart-friendly pro-nuclear stance, and reinforced their antiquated attitude to women by preselecting more men, and temporarily telling men and women that they would have to ditch working from home and return to the office.

Women voters deserted the Liberal party in 2022 and fled it again in 2025 – to the Labor party and teal independents.

The Liberals have finally appointed a women, Sussan Ley, as leader. Their excited declaration that this was an important moment in history – Ley is the first woman the party has appointed in its 80 years – contains the subtle implication that the appointment will fix their deep-seated dysfunctional woes and make up for a shocking electoral defeat.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

The more significant historic moment, which the Liberal Party would prefer we not see, is that the 48th Australian parliament will include a record-breaking number of women and that about 50 of them are likely to be Labor MPs, compared with only about seven Liberals. Added to that number are the five women teal independents who held their seats in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth. The Liberals say they are ‘the sort of women’ who should be in the Liberal party while remaining oblivious to the fact that literally millions of women have demonstrated they wouldn’t go anywhere near the Liberal Party – because they are women who care about the climate, about health and education and about the economy for future generations and who share the values of integrity, respect and equality.

After the 2022 election, Ley, as deputy leader of the party and shadow minister for women, often said she was “talking with women”, going on a “listening tour”, and that the party wanted to win back the urban seats lost to the six female teals. During this time, a 60-page post-election review of the Liberal party unsurprisingly found that a decline in support from female voters was an important factor in the loss. After this year’s emphatic loss, it appears the review went unheeded; basic things such as the Liberal party’s intransigent resistance to quotas remained and the community independents movement grew.

As Ley takes up the leadership, she has vowed to lead from the “sensible centre”. But how exactly? The Liberals came out of this election beholden to the National party and remain underpinned by a Trumpian support base. They went into this election preferencing One Nation and Family First in electorates across the country – parties with longstanding positions against equality, abortion, LGBTQI+ rights, multiculturalism and renewable energy. There does not appear to be anything remotely “sensible” or “centrist” left in that party room, especially when it comes to the issue of women.

It’s going to take more than the appointment of a female leader declaring a “new narrative”, and a “fresh approach” to rebuild the party.

Words alone don’t cut it with the Australian people.

Ley declared that her appointment sends a signal to Australian women. But does the party really believe Ley’s appointment is going to fix the deeply dysfunctional and embedded problems the Liberals face?

Ley’s picture will be hung on the wall with former Liberal leaders, but more needs to be done to ensure it’s not perched on one of the biggest glass cliffs in Australian history.

The most profound and meaningful signal has already been sent, and it is not the one the Liberal party sent by appointing its first female leader. It’s the one the Australian people sent on 3 May.

Julia Banks is an author, leadership consultant, keynote speaker, lawyer, and former Liberal and Independent MP

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian