The Guide #192: How reality TV and streaming has shaped 21st-century TV

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Impact of Streaming and Reality TV on 21st Century Television"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

As we reflect on the evolution of television in the 21st century, it is evident that the advent of streaming has transformed the viewing landscape dramatically. The traditional model of communal television watching has shifted towards a more fragmented experience, where audiences now have access to a plethora of shows at their convenience. Despite this fragmentation, certain events still capture the collective attention of viewers, as evidenced by the most-watched broadcasts in the UK. These events, ranging from royal weddings to major sporting competitions, reveal that while the television landscape has diversified, there remains a significant appetite for large-scale cultural moments. However, the ratings reflect a British-centric view, with notable omissions like Netflix’s impact until its recent inclusion in ratings measurements. This shift highlights the ongoing struggle to grasp the full scope of television consumption in an era dominated by streaming services.

Moreover, the influence of reality television has been a defining characteristic of this period, reshaping audience preferences and program formats. Phil Harrison, a prominent TV journalist, notes that shows such as 'Big Brother' have left an indelible mark on the industry, paving the way for various reality formats that emphasize ordinary individuals as stars. However, traditional soap operas have seen a decline in viewership as the audience gravitates towards reality shows and streaming content that offer more engaging narratives. Notably, 'Gavin & Stacey' stands out as a successful scripted show, resonating with viewers through its relatable themes and well-crafted characters. In contrast, many scripted dramas have struggled to maintain relevance in a landscape increasingly dominated by reality programming. Overall, the television industry in the 21st century has witnessed a significant evolution, marked by the rise of streaming, the decline of soaps, and the enduring popularity of reality formats, culminating in a complex and ever-changing media environment.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the transformative impact of reality TV and streaming platforms on television in the 21st century. It highlights the cultural shift from a collective viewing experience to a more fragmented one, driven by the advent of streaming services. This change reflects broader trends in media consumption and societal preferences, as audiences increasingly seek personalized content.

Cultural Shifts in Television

The article emphasizes the shift in how audiences engage with television. The once uniform experience of watching shows collectively has evolved into a diverse landscape where viewers choose from a myriad of options. This fragmentation signifies a departure from traditional broadcasting models, indicating a broader change in cultural consumption patterns.

Nostalgia for Monoculture

Despite the changes, the article notes that there remains an appetite for mass entertainment, as illustrated by the continued popularity of certain broadcasts in the UK. This duality suggests that while streaming has diversified viewing habits, traditional forms of entertainment still hold value for many, hinting at a nostalgic yearning for the shared experiences of the past.

Incomplete Representation of Streaming

The analysis acknowledges the limitations of current metrics, particularly the focus on British viewership and the delayed inclusion of streaming services like Netflix in viewership statistics. This raises questions about the completeness of the data presented and suggests that the full impact of streaming on television consumption may not be accurately captured.

Insights from Industry Experts

The inclusion of perspectives from TV journalist Phil Harrison adds depth to the analysis. His insights into the evolution of British television from 2000 onward provide context for understanding the broader implications of these changes in the industry. This expert opinion lends credibility to the discussion and helps frame the ongoing transformation within a historical context.

The overarching goal of this article appears to be to foster a dialogue about the state of television today and its evolution over the last quarter-century. It seeks to engage readers in reflecting on their viewing habits and the cultural significance of television in contemporary society. The narrative encourages a recognition of both the changes brought about by streaming and the enduring appeal of traditional television formats.

In comparison to other articles, there is no explicit mention of hidden connections, although the themes of cultural evolution and media consumption are common across various discourse in the entertainment industry. This article positions itself within a broader conversation about the future of television and pop culture.

The potential societal impacts of this analysis are significant. As television continues to evolve, so do its implications for advertising, viewer engagement, and the economic dynamics of the entertainment industry. The conversation around streaming versus traditional broadcasting may influence future content creation and distribution strategies.

Demographically, the article may resonate more with younger audiences who are accustomed to streaming services, while also appealing to older generations who remember the communal aspect of television viewing. This dual appeal underlines the article's aim to bridge generational gaps in media consumption preferences.

In terms of market impact, the discussion around streaming services and their role in shaping television could influence investment in entertainment stocks, particularly those tied to major streaming platforms. Companies like Netflix, Disney+, and others could see fluctuations in stock performance based on public sentiment and viewing trends highlighted in such analyses.

From a geopolitical perspective, the article does not directly address power dynamics but reflects an ongoing shift in media influence. The rise of streaming platforms aligns with broader trends of digital globalization and cultural exchange, which are relevant in today's discussions of media sovereignty and influence.

The article appears to be composed in a manner that is consistent with journalistic standards, thus minimizing the likelihood of manipulation. The language is informative and analytical rather than sensationalist. However, it subtly encourages readers to consider the implications of their viewing habits, which could be interpreted as a form of behavioral nudging.

In conclusion, the reliability of the article is bolstered by its use of expert commentary and a thoughtful examination of industry trends, although it does exhibit some limitations in data representation. Overall, it serves as a reflective piece on the ongoing evolution of television in the 21st century.

Unanalyzed Article Content

To try to get our heads round the fact that we’re somehow a quarter of the way into the 21st century, the Guide is running a miniseries of newsletters looking at how pop culture has changed over the past 25 years.We tackled music last monthand we’ll be looking at the state of film next month, before sharing our favourite culture of the century so far, and asking for yours too, in July.

Today, we’re taking the temperature of TV. Like the music industry, television has seen its entire business model upended by the streaming revolution this century. That has meant what was once a universal activity – an entire nation sat around the glow of the old cathode ray tube – has been replaced by people watching a galaxy of different shows, or watching the same show but at completely different times.

Still, the monoculture isn’t entirely dead. A look atthe listof each year’s most-watched broadcasts in the UK from TV ratings agency Barb shows that, for all the changes that have come with streaming, tens of millions of us still have an appetite for mass entertainment. That list, based on consolidated ratings (ie viewed within seven days of a show’s broadcast) isn’t a perfect encapsulation of the state of telly: its focus is British, not global; TV’s golden age doesn’t get a look in (shows like The Wire were hardly ratings hits, and for many, were discovered long after they were broadcast); and perhaps most significantly, streaming isn’t fully represented – Netflix, for example, only signed up to Barb in 2022 (though maybe that doesn’t matter: surprisingly, Netflix shows rarely crack Barb’s weekly top 20). But it is the best measure available for getting a sense of what people have watched over the past two and a half decades.

To make sense of it, I spoke to TV journalistPhil Harrison. He’s the author ofThe Age of Static: How TV Explains Modern Britain, which covers British television from 2000 onwards, so if anyone can explain how TV has changed in that time, it’s him. Here’s the list and what we can learn from it …

The full list

2000| Coronation Street2001| Only Fools and Horses2002| Only Fools and Horses2003| Coronation Street2004| Euro 2004: England v Portugal2005| Coronation Street2006| World Cup: England v Sweden2007| EastEnders2008| Wallace & Gromit: A Matter of Loaf and Death2009| Britain’s Got Talent final2010| The X Factor final2011| The Royal Wedding of Prince William and Catherine Middleton2012| Olympics Closing Ceremony2013| New Year’s Eve Fireworks2014| World Cup Final: Germany v Argentina2015| The Great British Bake Off final2016| The Great British Bake Off2017| Blue Planet 22018| World Cup: Croatia v England2019| Gavin & Stacey, Christmas special2020| Prime Ministerial Statement on Covid-192021| Euro 2020: England v Denmark2022| The Funeral Service of Queen Elizabeth II2023| The Coronation of King Charles III2024| Gavin & Stacey: The Finale

Events, dear boy! Events!

Our list shows that the biggest TV ratings this century have been for major cultural or news events. This might sound completely unsurprising – but it wasn’t always the case.

“In previous decades, you see TV premieres of films and more scripted drama and comedy at the top of these lists, but viewers have become more atomised and niche-occupying,” says Phil. “Various quite popular things have stopped being national events as the amount of choice, channels and platforms has expanded. Apart from a few outliers, communal national TV watching is now basically about live events with assumed national importance.”

This means Covid briefings or royal funerals – or, more cheerily, sporting events or the New Year’s Eve fireworks. “Though why so many people watched that live in 2013, I have no idea,” Phil rightly wonders.

Big Brother’s influence looms large

The emergence of reality TV is another theme on the list, with singing contests and then Bake Off taking the top slots. But the show that perhaps defined the reality boom – Big Brother – is surprisingly absent. Still, says Phil, its fingerprints are all over this list.

“The innovations it spawned have driven TV discourse,” he says. “I think a few shows on here – the eliminative format, ‘ordinary people’ as the stars – can be at least tangentially linked to it. You could tie X Factor to it, Bake Off too. It opened up a space and introduced a broad, adaptable idea that literally dozens of shows have since occupied.”

A case in point: the most watched show of 2025 so far is The Traitors – “another show with plenty of Big Brother’s DNA”, says Phil.

The fat lady is singing for soap operas

As the appetite for reality TV has grown across the 21st century, the popularity of soaps has plummeted. Once dominant in these end-of-year lists, EastEnders and Coronation Street now consider it a strong night if they crack the 5m mark – as EastEnders just about managed for its much-trailed 40th anniversary live episode.

Sign up toThe Guide

Get our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Friday

after newsletter promotion

With their endless ongoing storylines soaps are particularly ill-suited to the age of the binge, says Phil: “It’s quite a job keeping on top of them, what with all the other options. And streaming shows have, to an extent, taken their place: so open-ended in narrative terms, so expansive in terms of run time and so impossible to kill – Stranger Things has been running for a decade. They’ve essentially become high-production value soaps.”

But it’s not just the delivery method, says Phil – but the actual drama itself: “I just don’t know if they reflect people’s lives any more. You can’t really see 2025 London in EastEnders. You can’t see 2025 Manchester in Corrie. They’re like living period pieces and for that reason, I just can’t imagine they gain many new, young fans.”

That’s borne out by starklydeclining numbersfor EastEnders and Coronation Street among 16- to 34-year-olds – though Hollyoaks has bucked the trend with that age group,according to Channel 4, by releasing fewer episodes a week and shaving its runtime down to an attention-span-friendly 20 minutes.

Gavin& Stacey aims for the middle

Of course it’s not just soaps: scripted TV is largely absent from our list from the 2010s onwards. There’s one major exception: Gavin & Stacey, which appears twice on this list, with last December’s finale attracting 19.1 million viewers.

How has a cheerful, low-stakes romantic comedy set in south Wales proved so ratings-conqueringly successful? By aiming squarely for the middle, says Phil. “It’s intelligently written without being hard to swallow. It’s knowing and self-conscious but also has incredibly universal themes: romance, the minor irritations and routines of family life, getting older etc. And it’s really fond and respectful of its own characters – there’s no real snark in it, or victims, or perpetual butts of the joke: it started in the late 00s at the time of loads of cringe comedy, stuff that occasionally veered towards cruelty and there’s absolutely none of that.

“Also,” Phil adds, “it’s got a really good cast. Rob Brydon, Alison Steadman and Ruth Jones are all great at what they do – and even James Corden hits his beats among certain people!”

What sums up 21st-century TV?

Which show on the list best explains UK TV in the last 25 years? With Big Brother ineligible, Phil opts for The Great British Bake Off, a show seeminglyin sync with the nation’s psyche, from its name onwards: “That title prefix The Great British … is emblematic of the desperate search for a workable national identity that we’ve been embarking on throughout the 21st century.”

It’s also, says Phil, the show that best demonstrates how reality TV – the dominant genre of 2000-2025 – has evolved: “It feels like we tried slightly cruel variations on reality TV early on in the century and then decided we preferred nice, twee ones instead. With bunting.”

If you want to read the complete version of this newsletterplease subscribeto receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian