The Guide #189: Your new celebrity best friend? It’s just a deepfake trying to con you

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"BBC's Scam Interceptors Discuss Rising Threat of Deepfake Scams"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the latest issue of The Guide, Nick Stapleton and Mark Lewis, presenters of BBC's Scam Interceptors, delve into the alarming rise of deepfake technology and its implications for online scams. The recent series features a particularly unsettling case involving a deepfake of actress Reese Witherspoon, which was used by scammers to establish false relationships with unsuspecting victims. The duo highlights a notable incident where a woman in France was conned out of nearly a million euros by someone impersonating Brad Pitt. This case exemplifies how easily scammers can leverage AI-generated content, blending real-life details with fabricated interactions to manipulate individuals who are eager to connect with their favorite celebrities. The widespread availability of generative AI tools creates a significant vulnerability for social media users who may not be aware of the risks associated with engaging with such technology. The article underscores the importance of recognizing these scams as they become increasingly sophisticated and prevalent.

Stapleton and Lewis recount their own experiences infiltrating online groups where scammers operate, portraying a digital underworld filled with impersonators of various A-list celebrities. They describe how they engaged with a scammer posing as Witherspoon, who employed various tactics to maintain the illusion of authenticity, including sending doctored images and personalized messages. This interaction highlights the emotional manipulation involved in such scams, as the scammers seek to elicit a sense of familiarity and trust. The presenters offer practical tips for identifying deepfakes, such as scrutinizing skin texture, observing mouth movements, and listening for inconsistencies in voice tone. They caution that as AI technology advances, distinguishing between real and fake will become increasingly challenging, making it imperative for users to develop skills to navigate this evolving landscape. The article serves as a wake-up call, urging readers to remain vigilant against the potential dangers posed by deepfake technology and the scammers who exploit it.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the emerging dangers associated with deepfake technology and its exploitation by scammers. It draws attention to a specific instance of a woman in France being deceived by a deepfake of Brad Pitt, showcasing how advanced AI can create convincing impersonations that lead to significant financial loss. The discussion revolves around the broader implications of such scams and the need for awareness among social media users.

Purpose of the Article

This piece aims to raise awareness about the risks posed by deepfakes in the context of online scams. By highlighting specific examples and discussing the role of generative AI, the authors seek to educate the public on how to recognize and avoid falling victim to such scams.

Perception Among the Public

The article intends to instill a sense of caution regarding digital interactions, particularly those involving perceived celebrity endorsements or relationships. It encourages readers to be skeptical and vigilant, fostering a protective mindset among social media users.

Potential Concealment of Information

While the article focuses on the dangers of deepfakes, it may not delve deeply into the broader implications of AI technology on privacy, misinformation, and the erosion of trust in digital content. This omission could lead to a limited understanding of the full scope of AI's impact on society.

Manipulative Elements

The article could be seen as somewhat manipulative by framing the narrative around the emotional draw of celebrity relationships. This tactic may elicit stronger emotional responses from readers, making them more likely to engage with the content. The language used evokes concern and urgency, which could influence public perception regarding the safety of interacting online.

Credibility of the Information

The article appears credible as it references a real-life case and presents insights from professionals in the field. However, the sensational nature of the topic could lead to some degree of skepticism among readers regarding the accuracy of the claims made.

Intended Message

The primary message being conveyed is one of caution regarding the potential dangers of engaging with AI-generated content. It serves as a reminder that technology, while beneficial, can also be misused in harmful ways.

Connections to Other News

This article aligns with a growing trend in media that addresses the ethical implications of AI and technology, alongside an increase in reports about scams and misinformation. There is a broader conversation in society about digital literacy and the need for education on these topics.

Impact on Society and Economy

The article could exacerbate existing fears about digital scams, potentially leading to increased regulatory scrutiny on AI technologies. As public awareness grows, it may spur demand for better tools and legislation to combat such scams, influencing the tech economy.

Support from Specific Communities

The content may resonate more with communities that are already engaged in discussions about technology, ethics, and online safety, such as tech enthusiasts, educators, and consumer rights advocates.

Market Implications

While this article primarily focuses on social implications, it may indirectly affect tech companies involved in AI and social media by prompting discussions around ethical practices, which could influence stock prices if regulatory changes are enacted.

Geopolitical Relevance

The discussions surrounding AI and deepfakes are increasingly relevant in a world where misinformation can have significant geopolitical consequences. This article fits within a larger context of societal concerns over trust, security, and the integrity of information.

Use of AI in Writing

It’s possible that AI tools were utilized in crafting this article, particularly in generating insights or analyzing trends in technology and scams. However, the narrative style suggests a human touch, with personal anecdotes and professional perspectives.

In summary, the article serves as a critical reminder of the potential dangers posed by deepfake technology and encourages readers to remain vigilant. Its emphasis on the emotional allure of celebrity interactions underscores the manipulation potential within digital spaces, while also fostering a necessary discourse on the implications of AI in society.

Unanalyzed Article Content

This week’s newsletter is written byNick StapletonandMark Lewis, presenter and producer respectively on BBC’sScam Interceptors. If you haven’t seen Scam Interceptors, it’s a very entertaining factual series in which Nick and his team of ethical hackers attempt to disrupt scamming attacks on the public as they happen. In the show’s fourth series,now airing daytimeon BBC One, one of the scams disrupted involves a worryingly convincing Reese Witherspoon deepfake. So we thought we’d ask Nick and Mark to tell us all about their brush with (fake) celebrity, and share some pointers on how to spot a deepfake before it convinces you to empty your bank account. –Gwilym

Ever wanted to have a deep and meaningful with your favourite Hollywood celebrity? Go on. Who is it? Pedro Pascal? Aubrey Plaza? Jeff Bridges (Nick). Beyoncé (Mark). Well, we’ve gotgreatnews for you. Thanks to the seemingly unbothered-by-scams social media giants and the absurdly rapid growth of free-to-use generative AI, you can. The only downside is that they will probably be a version of that celebrity being controlled by a scammer who wants to extort money from you.

Many of you will have seen the story of the woman in France who was scammed out of almost a million euros bysomeone posing as Brad Pitt. The scammer used AI-generated deepfakes and details from real-life news reports about Pitt’s divorce to trick the woman into thinking she was in a relationship with him. Unfortunately, the widespread availability of AI is an open goal for scammers who want to exploit social media users, many of whom are not au fait with the technology, and are simply trying to interact with their favourite celebs.

You probably tittered at the Brad Pitt story. It’s very easy to sit in judgment of those who have money stolen like this, but far more difficult to admit that the way AI is changing the online world might make us all vulnerable.

In the latest series of our show,we decided to tackle this issue head-on. Donning our digital Donnie Brasco caps, we infiltrated the online groups these scammers were lurking in. What we found was, to continue the Donnie metaphor, a digital mafia. Scammers operating en masse and without hindrance, each one claiming to be an A-list celebrity. Mariah Carey, Jenna Ortega, Keanu Reeves: any A-lister you can think of is probably being criminally impersonated, in plain sight.

Fuelled by a recent viewing of the smash 2001 romcom Legally Blonde, we signed up for the Reese Witherspoon fan club on Facebook. (We must admit, to our shame, we weren’t already members.) Within minutes, we were inundated with messages from multiple accounts, all claiming to be the Real Reese Witherspoon, or Reese Witherspoon Private Account or similar.“Hello Sweetheart”, one greeted us, with a kissy-face emoji.

From there, our friendship developed, and the scammer, claiming to be Reese, pulled out multiple tricks to keep up the ruse. They sent us images of Witherspoon, Photoshopped to include her supposed driving licence, and shared details of their busy filming schedule. Over several weeks, they messaged us at all hours of the day, to the point where we grew to expect her name to pop up on the phone, just as you would your friend or colleague. We even got a little dopamine rush when it did – which is of course exactly what they want.

It’s all a part of their world-building, where they invest significant time and effort into making you believe that maybe, just maybe, this could be the real celebrity. And if you’re willing enough to believe it, it can, and does work. To top off their charade, and to assuage any doubts, we received two videos.

The person in these videos looked like Witherspoon, and sounded like her too.“Hello, I’m real. So if you don’t believe me, I don’t know what to tell you – this is me, have a good day,”she says by way of proof. Of course, she doesn’t though. It’s a deepfake. The friendship led to an intro to Witherspoon’s “manager”, and, well, you’ll have to watch the show to see how they tried to steal our money.

All of this is unsettling. Not only because it leaves you with a sense of dread about our slow march towards aM3gan-style humanoid dystopia, but also because the videos sit in a weird, uncanny valley. They’re notquiteright. There are enough discrepancies to make them look a bit odd to the trained eye. And it’s in these discrepancies that you can short-circuit the scammer’s spell.

Here are a few quick tips on how you can distinguish reality from AI-generated video fakery. This is probably about to become a necessary life-skill for all of us navigating the online world as is maintaining 47 unique passwords.

Active engagement| Broadly speaking, try to engage actively with any vaguely suspicious content. Don’t allow it to wash over you as you probably do with most of what you see online. The phrase “soft eyes” is how you can describe much of our engagement with the online world. Well, harden those peepers. If you want to be sure, observe keenly.

Skin texture| For a video of a person, start by looking at the skin’s texture. If it appears excessively smooth that’s always a good indicator of deepfakery (AI still struggles to generate texture). Granted, that may not be helpful when working out whether you’re looking at AI or just your average Hollywood surgical Ken or Barbie.

Sign up toThe Guide

Get our weekly pop culture email, free in your inbox every Friday

after newsletter promotion

Badly dubbed| Watch the mouth closely. Are the mouth shapes what you would expect from someone saying the words coming out? Blinking too – are they blinking too little and staring straight into your soul with shark-like dead eyes?

Listen closely| The human voice can be a great read on whether video or audio has been faked. AI has a hard time with the ups and downs of our emotional range, so AI-generated voices tend to lack movement in tone. They will probably be flat, a recreation of the voice of the individual concerned, but only at one level.

It is very important to add that all of the above is correct as of today, but as the technology evolves, it will get better at this. A lot better. Soon enough, being able to tell real from fake online is going to become one of our most vital skills, enabling us to avoid all kinds of emotional and mental manipulation. The creators of AI have no intention of stopping until they hit AGI (artificial general intelligence), essentially a human brain in computer form. It won’t need prompts. Google’s owner, Alphabet,has recently dropped its promiseto not use AI for developing weapons and surveillance tools. Cool.

While talking to ChatGPT about the ethics of AI the other day, in its usual chilled-out California surfer dude style, it described itself to us as a “hoodie-wearing superweapon”.Deepfake Reese might be the thin end of the wedge.

Scam Interceptors season 4 is on BBCOne every weekday at 2pm. The full series is available on iPlayer now

If you want to read the complete version of this newsletterplease subscribeto receive The Guide in your inbox every Friday

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian