The Donald laps it up as Nato leaders compete to shower him with sycophancy | John Crace

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Trump Embraces Flattery at NATO Summit as Starmer Struggles with Leadership Challenges"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the wake of a recent NATO summit, Donald Trump showcased his trademark narcissism, reveling in the flattery of world leaders who seem eager to indulge his ego. The article highlights how leaders from various nations competed to shower him with compliments, creating an atmosphere where insincerity appeared to morph into genuine admiration. Trump's ability to manipulate reality is emphasized, as he confidently proclaimed the success of his controversial military actions, such as the bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, while dismissing any contradicting narratives as 'fake news.' His casual disregard for traditional political decorum, including swearing and brash remarks, has paradoxically earned him praise for authenticity, reinforcing his position as a leader who thrives on the adoration of others, regardless of the consequences of his actions.

In contrast, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer struggles under the weight of leadership, grappling with the relentless pressures of governance and the expectations of his party. The article contrasts Starmer's more reserved demeanor with Trump's flamboyant confidence, suggesting that Starmer's lack of narcissism may hinder his effectiveness as a leader. As he navigates the complexities of domestic and international politics, Starmer faces criticism for his perceived inability to connect with the electorate on an emotional level. His recent speeches, including a forgettable address to the British Chambers of Commerce, illustrate his struggle to inspire confidence in his leadership. Despite these challenges, Starmer's confrontations with opposition figures, particularly Kemi Badenoch, reveal a glimmer of resilience, showcasing his capability to unite his party against a common adversary. Nevertheless, the article leaves readers pondering the contrasting political landscapes shaped by leaders who either thrive on adulation or bear the burdens of responsibility with an earnest but often faltering approach.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Sometimes it pays to be a narcissist. To bend reality to your own worldview. To live almost entirely in the present. Where contradicting yourself is not a problem because two opposing statements can both be true. On the way toNatoyou can question article 5. On the way back you can give all the other Nato leaders a patronising pat on the head. And everyone is grateful for it.

There again it also helps if you are the most powerful man in the world.Donald Trumpis not just tolerated, he is actively indulged. Prime ministers from other countries go out of their way to compete with one another in outright sycophancy. Flattery that started off as contrived now sounds dangerously sincere. Almost as if they genuinely believe it. Thank you Agent Orange for all you have done. We don’t know where we would be without you.

And The Donald just laps it up. Feeds on it. At the recent Nato summit he looked like a pig in shit. Living his best life. Whatever sunbed regime he’s on, it’s working for him. If he lost any sleep over his decision to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities, it doesn’t show. Just repeat after Donald.The mission was a complete and utter successand Iran’s programme has been put back decades. If the Pentagon says otherwise, it’s just fake news. Yet again, reality can be what you want it to be.

Even when Trump temporarily loses it, he wins. Swearing is generally a no no for any leader. A sign that you’ve lost control. But when Donaldsaid Israel and Iran didn’t know what the fuck they were doing, he came out of it smelling of roses. Praised for his authenticity. Applauded for saying what the rest of the world is thinking. The Donald can do no wrong. He looks relaxed. God stand up for narcissists.

Keir Starmer is no narcissist. And breathe a sigh of relief for that. The UK tried the narcissist route with Boris Johnson and that didn’t end well. Maybe we just aren’t a powerful enough country to get away with a sociopath in charge. Or, heaven forbid, maybe it was a matter of timing. Boris was the right man at the wrong time. That’s a horrible thought. Most of us would quite happily settle for a period of fairly boring politics. Where the government is serving the country rather than the ego of the person in charge. Where even when they are getting things wrong, they are at least trying to do the right thing.

But that level of decency comes with a cost. Your psyche does not reward itself with a free pass. You worry about the consequences of your actions. Your toadying to The Donald. You worry about the people dying in Ukraine, Gaza, Israel and Iran. You worry when your domestic policieslook like they are falling apart. Wish you had spent more time reassuring backbenchers. Had explained better the trade-offs you were making. Had not been so quick to take a quick cash-saving win by removing benefits from people who can’t wash themselves before going to work.

Keir has tried to keep a lid on all this as leaders always do. Pretend that he’s fully in charge of the situation. That everything is going according to plan. But always the tell-tale signs leak out. Starmer’s eyes betray him. They have a deadness to them, the life squeezed out. His face pasty and pallid. A man desperate for a breather, a moment to relax away from the treadmill.

Yet always there is one thing more. Another summit, another speech, another bilat, another crisis at home. This wasn’t how he imagined his first year in Downing Street. The pressure and the pace is relentless. The treadmill going ever faster and there’s no getting off. He aches in the places that he used to play.

Just hours after returning from The Hague, Keir was giving a keynote speech to the British Chambers of Commerce. It was one that he and they will quickly forget. A routine, box-ticking affair. An annual date, along with the CBI, in any prime minister’s diary. It wasn’t meant to be this way, mind. Starmer knows better than anyone that Labour has to work twice as hard to show that it is the party of business. But this time he couldn’t fake it to make it. He’s no visionary. He can’t access people’s hearts. Only their reason. And that only intermittently.

Keir began by thanking the BCC for all it had done for the country. He knew it had been a tough year and he had asked a lot of business, but the good times were round the corner. Possibly. There was the new infrastructure strategy. Now there was also a new trade strategy which sounded very much like the old one. Which was to keep on doing the trade deals we can, as with the partial deals with the EU, US and India, and try to do some new smaller deals with other nations. The applause from the audience was barely audible. They didn’t sound desperately impressed. They can tell when a speaker is out on his feet and is phoning it in.

Just over an hour later and Starmer was in the Commons for a statement on the G7 and Nato summits. Here he was much more like his chipper self. Not so much in his opening remarks about how the west was making a dangerous world safer, but in his reply toKemi Badenoch.

The Tory leader just gets worse and worse. Half-witted, sulky and tone deaf. Kemikaze seemed to think the UK should no longer bother to send its prime minister to these international meetings. That Keir had only gone for the craic and to avoid her at prime minister’s questions. As if. Facing Kemi over the dispatch box was his half an hour of R&R in the week.

Starmer dismissed her with barely concealed contempt as neither serious nor credible. An am-dram politician. Even the Tories were aghast. Mark Pritchard openly criticised his leader. He spoke for many on his own benches.

Kemi had achieved the seemingly impossible. She had revivified a tired prime minister and united both Labour and opposition MPs against her. There is only one politician who looks a genuine leader in the Commons and it is still Starmer. He may have his hands full with a rebellion over the welfare bill, but as long as Kemi remains the leader of the opposition, he has nothing to fear from the Tories.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian