Taxpayers set for £10bn loss on NatWest as disgraced ex-boss takes £600k-a-year pension

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UK Government Faces £10 Billion Loss as NatWest Returns to Private Ownership"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Fred Goodwin, the former chief executive of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), is reportedly set to receive an annual pension of nearly £600,000, while the UK government prepares to announce a £10 billion loss following the sale of its final stake in NatWest, the bank that emerged from the RBS bailout during the 2008 financial crisis. The government's extensive efforts to divest its remaining 84% stake in the banking group, which has now returned to full private ownership, mark the culmination of a 17-year process aimed at recovering funds from a £45 billion state bailout that was critical in averting the bank's collapse. Despite recent increases in share prices, which have only recently surpassed pre-crisis levels, the government is expected to recover approximately £35 billion of the original £45 billion investment, resulting in a significant financial shortfall for taxpayers.

Goodwin, who earned the moniker 'Fred the Shred' due to his aggressive cost-cutting measures during his tenure, was responsible for the bank's expansion and subsequent near-collapse. His decisions, including a controversial £21 billion acquisition of NatWest, left the bank vulnerable during the credit crunch. Although he initially received a £16 million pension pot, public backlash led to a reduction in his annual payouts. However, inflation adjustments have nearly restored his pension to its original value. The government's intervention during the crisis was deemed necessary to prevent broader economic repercussions, including the potential loss of savings for millions of customers. NatWest's current leadership has acknowledged the public's role in the bank's survival, emphasizing that the government was never expected to make a profit from the bailout, which was essential for stabilizing the financial sector during a turbulent period.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The news article highlights the significant financial loss faced by taxpayers due to the government's handling of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), now known as NatWest. It focuses on the retirement pension of Fred Goodwin, the former CEO, who is set to receive nearly £600,000 annually despite the substantial losses incurred by the government after the bank's bailout during the 2008 financial crisis. This situation raises questions about accountability, governance, and the ethics of executive compensation following a public rescue.

Public Sentiment and Accountability

The article aims to evoke outrage from the public regarding the perceived injustice of Goodwin's pension amidst a £10 billion loss to taxpayers. By emphasizing the stark contrast between the financial struggles of the government and Goodwin's lucrative pension, the report seeks to foster a narrative of unfairness and lack of accountability in corporate governance, particularly in the banking sector.

Potential Omissions

While the focus is on Goodwin's pension and the financial implications for taxpayers, the article might downplay broader systemic issues within banking regulations and governance that allowed such situations to occur. It may also obscure other relevant financial or political contexts that could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.

Manipulative Elements

There is an element of manipulation in how the story is framed, particularly in its emotional appeal to public sentiment against corporate executives who benefit from state bailouts. The language used can be seen as inflammatory, suggesting a deliberate intention to provoke outrage rather than simply report the facts. Highlighting Goodwin's past failures alongside his current financial gains creates a narrative that can easily resonate with individuals who feel disenfranchised by financial institutions.

Comparative Context

When compared to other financial news, this article fits into a broader narrative around executive compensation and corporate accountability in the wake of financial crises. Similar stories often serve to reinforce public skepticism about the banking sector, particularly in the context of bailouts and the perceived disconnect between executive rewards and the financial well-being of the general public.

Implications for Society and Economy

This news piece could have significant implications for public trust in financial institutions and government actions. The revelations about Goodwin's pension might fuel calls for reform in banking practices and regulations surrounding executive pay, particularly in institutions that have received taxpayer money. It may also affect political discourse regarding accountability in the financial sector.

Target Audience

The article primarily appeals to taxpayers, the general public, and those interested in corporate governance and accountability. It resonates particularly with those who are critical of the banking sector and its leaders, often advocating for greater fairness and responsibility in how financial institutions are managed.

Market Impact

In terms of market implications, the news could influence investor sentiment regarding NatWest and similar institutions. While the bank is returning to private ownership, the lingering public sentiment around executive compensation may impact stock performance, especially if it leads to increased scrutiny from regulators or activists.

Global Context

While the article primarily addresses a UK-based issue, it reflects broader global discussions about corporate governance, executive compensation, and the consequences of financial crises. This theme is relevant in many countries, particularly as governments navigate the complexities of regulating financial institutions and ensuring accountability.

The writing style of the article appears to be straightforward and analytical, with no clear indication of AI involvement. It presents information in a way that aligns with traditional journalistic standards, focusing on facts and public interest.

In conclusion, the article raises pertinent questions about fairness and accountability within the banking sector, particularly in light of taxpayer losses. It effectively taps into public sentiment while potentially overlooking broader systemic issues. The manipulation rate of the article is moderate, given its framing of Goodwin's pension as a focal point of public outrage.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Fred “the Shred” Goodwin, the disgraced ex-boss ofRoyal Bank of Scotland, is estimated to be receiving an annual pension worth nearly £600,000, as the government prepares to declare a £10bn loss after selling its final stake in the bank as early as this week.

The banking group, now known as NatWest, is expected to return to full private ownership within days, drawing a line under a £45bn state bailout that saved the bank from the brink of collapse at the height of the 2008 financial crisis.

The 17-year effort to off-load the government’s 84% stake in the lender has come at a substantial cost to the public purse, with the government expected to fall short of recouping its financial support.

Shares have only recently pushed past their pre-financial crisis levels – closing at 524p on Friday – but the bulk of the government’s shares have been below the 502p at which they were bought. It means the government could end up recovering roughly £35bn of the original £45bn spent on the rescue package in 2008, marking a near-£10bn loss.

Meanwhile, yearly payouts have soared for Goodwin, the boss blamed for helping push the bank to its near-collapse.

The former RBS chief executive, who was sacked as part of a non-negotiable condition of the state rescue, originally walked away with a£16m pension pot that paid out about £700,000 a year. But public outrage forced Goodwin and the bank tohalve those payouts to £342,500 a year.

However, after nearly two decades, an agreement that linked his payouts to the rate of inflation has pushed that figure ever-closer to the original sum. The bank is now spending about £598,000 a year on Goodwin’s pension nearly 17 years after the bailout, according to estimates by wealth manager Quilter shared with the Guardian.

NatWest Group declined to comment. The Guardian was not able to reach Goodwin for comment.

Goodwin’s excessive spending on a string of acquisitions, private jets, and a sprawling £350m campus in Edinburgh, were criticised for leaving RBS without sufficient financial buffers that could have helped the bank to ride out the credit crunch hit in 2008.

Goodwin was widely known to be a ruthless boss, earning his nickname “Fred the Shred” for making harsh cuts to his workforce amid his expansion efforts. That included a decision to slash 18,000 jobs after RBS’ flashy £21bn takeover of NatWest in 2000, one of the largest cost-cutting exercises in banking at the time.

By the time of the bailout, Goodwin had expanded RBS into 50 countries and grown its assets to £2.2tn – more than double the size of the UK economy that year. Had the government failed to step in, shock waves from the bank’s implosion in 2008 could have led to a systemic collapse in the wider economy.

The government was concerned that its failure could wipe out the savings of everyday customers, and prompt panic about the health of other lenders across the UK, creating a domino effect of failures across the industry.

The bank’s eventual emergency rescue made Goodwin – now 66 years old – a lightning rod for public anger over the cost of bank bailouts, which led to years of government austerity that many blame for hollowing out public services across the country.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Goodwin was also slow to say sorry for the record-breaking losses that he left behind at the centuries-old bank. He was laterstripped of his knighthood in 2012, amid concerns that he had“had brought the honours system in to disrepute”.

The government has spent nearly two decades trying to take the bank off the public books, through a combination of sales to institutional investors and a drip-feeding of shares into the open market. NatWestfast-tracked the processthrough multibillion-pound share buy-backs, helping the stake drop from 38% in December 2023 to 0.9% earlier this month.

NatWest’s current chair, Rick Haythornthwaite, said last month the bank wasindebted to the public for keeping the lender afloat.

“We remain incredibly grateful to the government, and to UK taxpayers, for their intervention and support, which protected millions of savers, homeowners and businesses at a time of global crisis,” he said at the bank’s AGM in Edinburgh.

He added the government was always expected to lose money on the bailout. “I don’t think they ever went into this is an investment … This was a rescue of a sector, and they did well as a result.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian