Tackle industrial fishing, but local inshore fleets deserve support | Letters

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Support for Small-Scale Fisheries Amid Critique of Industrial Fishing Practices"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In response to George Monbiot's critique of the fishing industry, which he labeled as 'the most destructive of all private industries,' the letter writers argue that small-scale fishers play a crucial role in ocean conservation and should not be unfairly demonized. While acknowledging the significant issues surrounding industrial fishing, particularly the environmental devastation caused by practices like bottom trawling, they emphasize that local inshore fleets employing low-impact fishing methods contribute positively to coastal ecosystems. These small-scale fishers are often the first to experience the negative effects of overfishing and are in a unique position to propose sustainable solutions. The letter writers advocate for a reevaluation of current funding and support structures, suggesting that the UK government should redirect subsidies to favor small-scale fisheries, which can enhance food security, climate resilience, and healthier marine environments.

Moreover, concerns are raised regarding the media's portrayal of the fishing industry and the potential complacency following impactful documentaries like David Attenborough's recent film. Critics argue that while such films raise awareness, they often fail to hold large industrial players accountable, instead focusing on the broader industry. They call for more transparency and accountability in the fishing sector, urging that the names of companies involved in destructive practices be publicly revealed. Additionally, the letters highlight the lack of progress in establishing marine protected areas and the need for immediate action against overfishing, warning against the dangers of political procrastination. The writers emphasize that the health of ocean ecosystems is vital for the planet's well-being and that a collaborative approach with small-scale fishers is essential for sustainable management of coastal waters.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

According to George Monbiot, fishing is “the most destructive of all private industries” (Attenborough’s Ocean is the film I’ve been waiting my whole career for – now the world must act on its message, 13 June). Have fossil fuel lobbyists finally got to him?

Monbiot is right to highlight our complacency with overfishing, but in our attempts to tackle industrial fishing’s worst abuses, especially unchecked bottom trawling, we should not demonise small‑scale fishers – our ocean’s most powerful custodians.

Across the globe, small‑scale fishers using low‑impact gear in coastal waters are on the frontlines against industrial overfishing. They’re the first to feel the impacts of ocean decline and the best-placed to propose solutions.

Is it true that “the fishing industry trashes everything”? No. Some gears, like bottom trawls, are indeed destructive and should be restricted. But small-scale fisheries using low-impact gears are the opposite. They use environmentally friendly methods to provide healthy, low-carbon food to coastal communities.

Is fishing really “the most destructive of all private industries”? No. Fossil fuel, mining and chemical lobbyists will be smiling as readers direct their ire towards the local inshore fishing fleet.

Should the UK government redirect funding away from fishing and let the industry fade? No. Current subsidies unfairly favour industrial vessels with outsized impacts. Redistributing funds and rapidly scaling investment in small‑scale fisheries would deliver dividends through resilient food systems, enhanced food security, sustainable livelihoods and greater climate resilience, alongside healthier ecosystems.

Should the oceans be closed to fishing, bar a few gazetted areas? No. Coastal waters should be fully co‑managed with small-scale fishers to ensure they are stewarded for future generations.

The world is awakening to the impacts of bottom trawling. Now it must wake up to the vital importance of small‑scale fisheries – and fast.Tom CollinsonAdvocacy manager, Blue Ventures

I read George Monbiot’s article with interest. I am one of the producers of Rupert Murray’s 2009 filmThe End of the Line, which was about marine destruction, was funded in part by Channel 4, and broadcast by it. This film did not “carefully avoid” blaming the fishing industry, and an independent study showed that it had an impact on public attitudes, corporate behaviour and political policy.

That film drew heavily on the previous work ofCharles Clover, who appeared in the film and whose 2004 book of the same title was a milestone in the campaign to save the world’s oceans.

It is not just a question of making good and powerful programmes. Today, those have to have a celebrity at the front of them, and a lasting impact is achieved by a sustained and continuous campaign from civil society groups and journalism – in George’s words “those whose job it is to inform us”. My concern is that afterOcean, the BBC will think “job done” and everyone else in the media will agree.Christopher HirdDartmouth Films

Many of us echo George Monbiot’s “At last!” in response to David Attenborough’s film. But I was disappointed that the names of the trawlers plundering the oceans were blurred. It is about time the international companies plundering our oceans’ ecosystems were publicly shamed.

Environmental NGOs, especially local ones using citizen scientists to gather data in their own time and often unpaid, have amassed millions of pieces of relevant data, especially from inshore waters. Yet we still have long “consultations” on marine protected areas, usually resulting in nothing changing. I have completed four in recent years about Scottish inshore waters. There is collusion between UK governments and their national scientific and nature conservation organisations in this, and environmental NGOs, in fear of losing finance, grants etc stay silent.

The government has procrastinated in ratifying the 2023UN high seas treatyagreeing to put 30% of these waters into marine protected areas. Ecosystems are the lifeblood of our oceans and ultimately us. Overfishing, short-term greed and financial returns are the name of this game. Stop the politics of delay – do it now!Dr Sally CampbellLamlash, Isle of Arran

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Pleaseemailus your letter and it will be considered for publication in ourletterssection.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian