Sycamore Gap accused says he was asked to take blame for felling of tree

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Accused in Sycamore Gap tree felling trial claims he was asked to take blame"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Daniel Graham, one of the two men accused of felling the iconic Sycamore Gap tree, took the stand during his trial at Newcastle Crown Court, vehemently denying any involvement in the act. Graham asserted that his co-defendant, Adam Carruthers, was the sole individual responsible for the tree's destruction, which occurred during the early hours of September 28, 2023, amidst the strong winds of Storm Agnes. He described Carruthers as having a sentimental attachment to the tree, which he referred to as 'the most famous tree in the world.' Graham acknowledged that his vehicle was used to approach the site and that his phone recorded the incident, yet he maintained that he was asleep in his caravan at the time, having taken sleeping pills. The prosecution contended that both men were on a reckless mission to cut down the tree and later reveled in the media attention that followed the act.

In his testimony, Graham claimed that Carruthers asked him to take the blame for the felling due to his mental health issues, suggesting that he would receive a lighter sentence. Graham rejected this proposition, stating that Carruthers and another individual, Lindsay Dalgleish, attempted to persuade him by implying that he would not face serious consequences. Graham also named Dalgleish as a potential suspect, although police investigations concluded that he was not involved. Under cross-examination, Graham faced scrutiny regarding his credibility, particularly about his knowledge of the tree prior to its felling. He argued that simply knowing about the nearby car park did not equate to awareness of the tree. The trial revealed that the police have yet to recover the chainsaw used in the crime, and Graham expressed dissatisfaction with the investigation's thoroughness. Both Graham and Carruthers deny the charges, which include causing over £622,000 in damage to the tree and additional harm to the adjacent UNESCO World Heritage site, Hadrian's Wall. The trial is ongoing, with further developments expected as the case unfolds.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The case surrounding the felling of the Sycamore Gap tree has attracted significant attention, particularly due to the nature of the accusations and the individuals involved. As the trial unfolds, the statements made by Daniel Graham shed light on potential motives and the dynamics between the accused.

Accusations and Denials

Daniel Graham, one of the accused, claims he is not responsible for the tree's destruction and suggests that he was pressured to take the blame due to his mental health issues. This angle introduces a complex narrative about accountability and mental health, potentially drawing sympathy from the public. By positioning himself as a victim of manipulation, Graham attempts to distance himself from the actions that led to this trial.

The Role of Relationships

The relationship between Graham and his co-defendant, Adam Carruthers, is pivotal in this case. Once friends, the dynamics have shifted dramatically, and Graham's testimony indicates a rift that could influence jury perceptions. The mention of Carruthers’s sentimental attachment to the tree highlights a personal motive, which could be perceived as either a whimsical act or a serious offense, depending on how the jury interprets the context.

Public Sentiment and Environmental Concerns

This incident has broader implications beyond the courtroom. The felling of a tree described as "the most famous tree in the world" resonates deeply with environmental issues and the preservation of natural heritage. Public reaction could be swayed by the emotional weight of losing such a symbol, potentially amplifying the charges against the defendants. It raises questions about societal values related to nature and conservation.

Potential Distractions or Cover-ups

The legal proceedings surrounding this case could serve as a distraction from more significant issues, either locally or nationally. Given the dramatic nature of the felling incident—occurring during a storm—there's a possibility that the media focus on this trial is diverting attention from other pressing matters, such as environmental policy or community welfare.

Manipulation and Narrative Control

The language used in the report could indeed be seen as manipulative, as it emphasizes emotional elements and personal struggles. By portraying Graham as someone who might be coerced due to mental health issues, the narrative may aim to elicit compassion from readers. The framing of the tree as a cultural icon underlines its significance, adding layers to public perception.

Reliability of the Report

Considering the details provided, the reliability of the report hinges on the balance of perspectives presented. While Graham's account adds a layer of complexity, it is essential to weigh it against the prosecution's claims and evidence. The trial's outcome will ultimately reveal the truth behind this incident, but current reports can be seen as biased towards generating public interest rather than solely delivering factual updates.

In summary, this case reflects broader societal values regarding environmental conservation, mental health, and the implications of personal relationships on legal matters. The narrative constructed around the incident may serve particular agendas, and the true motivations behind the actions of those involved remain to be fully understood.

Unanalyzed Article Content

One of the two men accused of felling the Sycamore Gap tree has denied being responsible and said he was asked to take the blame because he had mental health issues.

Daniel Graham said his co-defendant, Adam Carruthers, was responsible for felling the tree next to Hadrian’s Wall.

He said Carruthers called it “the most famous tree in the world” and had a sentimental attachment to a length of string which he once used to measure its circumference.

Graham, 39, and Carruthers, 32, were once good friends and are jointly charged with criminally felling the tree and damaging the Roman wall on which it stood.

On day four of their trial at Newcastle crown court, Graham, who ran a groundwork business, gave evidence and accepted that his Range Rover car was used to drive to and from the tree and that his Apple iPhone was used to film its felling.

But appearing in the witness box for the first time, wearing a white shirt and black trousers, Graham said he played no part and would have been in bed asleep in his caravan having taken sleeping pills.

The tree was deliberately cut down in the early hours of 28 September 2023 during the strong winds of Storm Agnes. Prosecutors claim Graham and Carruthers were together on a “moronic mission” to topple it and later revelled in the resulting headlines.

Graham said that on the morning it happened Carruthers rang him and said he had cut down the tree. Graham told the jury: “I told him that he was talking shite, I didn’t believe it.”

On a later date, he said Carruthers and another man, Lindsay Dalgleish, arrived at Graham’s property with pizza. They asked Graham to take the blame for felling the tree “because I have mental health issues. Apparently they would be more lenient with me.” Graham said “no”, he told the jury.

Asked what their reaction was, Graham said they goaded him and told him: “Nowt will happen to you, you will get away with it.”

Graham has named Dalgleish as a suspect in the case. DI Calum Meikle of Northumbria police told the court they had looked into claims about Dalgleish but were “satisfied that he wasn’t involved”.

Graham’s barrister, Christopher Knox, asked his client if Carruthers had ever talked about felling the Sycamore Gap tree. “He’d mentioned it but he mentioned a lot of things,” said Graham.

Graham said he recalled Carruthers talking about the tree in 2021 when Graham went to use some string and Carruthers said not to because it had sentimental value.

Carruthers laid the string in a circle and said it was the circumference of the Sycamore Gap tree. “He told me it was the most famous tree in the world,” said Graham. That was the first time Graham knew about the tree, he said.

Knox said it was clear two people had been involved on the night – one person cutting down the tree and one filming.

“Adam felled the tree, I don’t know 100% who the other person was,” Graham said.

Under cross-examination by the prosecuting barrister, Richard Wright KC, Graham was asked if he was lying and changing his story.

The court heard Graham owned two dogs, one big and vocal. Wright asked Graham why his dog did not go “berserk” when two people came into his yard and took his Range Rover. Graham said it was windy, the dog may not have heard and it would not have barked if it heard Carruthers’ voice.

Wright asked if it was a lie that Graham first knew about the tree in 2021 since he had reported a car being stolen from the Steel Rigg car park – used by visitors to Sycamore Gap – in 2020.

Graham said: “Just because I know about the car park doesn’t mean I know about the tree.”

At one point Graham said to Wright: “You might be a little bit more educated than me and you’re trying to make a fool of me.”

The trial has heard that police have never recovered the chainsaw used to cut down the tree, or a wedge of trunk that was removed in order to cut it down and was photographed in the boot of Graham’s Range Rover.

On Friday the jury was played a phone call Graham made to police a year after the crime in which he offered intelligence anonymously.

Graham can be heard telling police that if they were to visit Carruthers’ home, a caravan on Kirkbride airfield, they would find the chainsaws and wedge. He also said Carruthers had access to firearms – a handgun and an old shotgun.

Graham told the court he believed the “police did not do a very good job” investigating the crime.

Graham, of Carlisle, and Carruthers, of Wigton, are jointly charged with causing criminal damage worth £622,191 to the tree. They are also charged with causing £1,144 of damage to Hadrian’s Wall, a Unesco world heritage site. The wall and the tree belong to the National Trust.

The pair deny all the charges against them. The trial continues.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian