Sudden Fear: the 1952 noir that cemented Joan Crawford’s star – again

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Joan Crawford's Career Resurgence in 1952's Sudden Fear"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In 1952, Joan Crawford starred in the film Sudden Fear, a noir that would reaffirm her status in Hollywood. During a radio appearance, she described the film as a thrilling drama that left her feeling scared while reading the script. The public perception of Crawford often revolves around themes of fear—fear of being forgotten, fear of negative reviews, and fear of how she was portrayed on screen. After moving from MGM to Warner Bros. in 1943, Crawford faced challenges in finding suitable roles as she approached her late 40s. Sudden Fear marked a significant turning point for her career, as she took on the dual role of actress and executive producer, allowing her to have creative control over the project. She was instrumental in hiring director David Miller, selecting the screenwriter, and choosing her co-stars, including Jack Palance and Gloria Grahame, which was a groundbreaking move for women in Hollywood at the time.

In Sudden Fear, Crawford plays Myra Hudson, a successful playwright who becomes romantically involved with a younger man, Lester Blaine, portrayed by Palance. The plot thickens as Lester, alongside his lover Irene Neves, devises a plan to murder Myra to inherit her wealth. The film captivates the audience with its suspenseful moments, particularly when Myra inadvertently overhears a recording of Lester’s betrayal. This pivotal scene allows Crawford to deliver a powerful performance, reminiscent of her silent film roots, as she reacts to the disembodied voice of her lover expressing his true feelings. Myra's character embodies resilience and determination, as she refuses to succumb to the threats against her life, instead taking control of her narrative by outsmarting her adversaries. Sudden Fear not only revitalized Crawford's career but also showcased her ability to navigate the male-dominated film industry. A decade later, she would further solidify her legacy with the cult classic What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?, illustrating her enduring influence and adaptability in Hollywood.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the cinematic legacy of Joan Crawford, particularly focusing on her film "Sudden Fear," which played a significant role in revitalizing her career in the 1950s. It portrays Crawford not only as an actress but also as a pioneering figure in Hollywood who took on the roles of producer and director, shaping her own career trajectory and defying industry norms for women of her age.

Crawford's Career Context

The narrative outlines Crawford's transition from MGM to Warner and highlights her dissatisfaction with the limited roles available to older actresses. This context serves to illustrate her resilience and adaptability in a male-dominated industry. The mention of her Oscar win for "Mildred Pierce" establishes her as a figure of significant talent, yet it also hints at the underlying fears that plagued her throughout her career, such as the fear of obsolescence.

Hollywood Archetype

Crawford's involvement in "Sudden Fear" is notable for establishing a new archetype in Hollywood: the actress who also serves as an executive producer. This shift reflects broader changes in the industry, where women began to assert more control over their narratives and careers. By choosing her collaborators and influencing the film's direction, Crawford set a precedent that would inspire future generations of actresses.

Cultural Reflections

The article touches on the cultural memory of Crawford, framing her as both a figure of fear and empowerment. This duality resonates with audiences familiar with the complexities of female representation in film. The description of her character, Myra Hudson, as both a successful playwright and a woman in love with a younger man adds layers to her portrayal, emphasizing the complexities of femininity and desire.

Perceptions and Manipulation

The underlying tone of the article seems to strive for a re-evaluation of Crawford's image, moving beyond the stereotypes of fear and intimidation. While the article presents a positive view of Crawford's contributions to film, it may also reflect an attempt to reshape public perception of a figure often pigeonholed in a negative light. This intention could lead to a more favorable understanding of her legacy, potentially manipulating the audience's view of her.

Trustworthiness of the Content

The reliability of the information presented hinges on the sources and the narrative style. While it offers a compelling perspective on Crawford's career, it may also gloss over less flattering aspects of her life and career choices. The article appears well-researched but should be approached with an understanding of the biases inherent in biographical narratives, especially those related to iconic figures like Crawford.

Impact on Society

The article might influence public interest in classic cinema and encourage a re-examination of female roles in the film industry. However, its direct impact on economic or political spheres appears minimal. The focus on historical Hollywood dynamics does resonate with ongoing conversations about gender equality in contemporary industries.

Target Audience

This piece likely appeals to film enthusiasts, historians, and those interested in feminist narratives within Hollywood. It seeks to engage readers who appreciate the complexities of legendary figures and wish to explore the evolution of female representation in the arts.

Market Implications

While the article itself may not directly affect stock markets, it could contribute to renewed interest in classic films and related media, potentially benefiting companies involved in film restoration and streaming.

Contemporary Relevance

Although the article discusses historical events, it connects to today's discussions around gender dynamics in the workforce and the film industry. The legacy of figures like Crawford continues to shape the landscape for women in entertainment.

In summary, the article presents a nuanced view of Joan Crawford's career through the lens of "Sudden Fear," shedding light on her contributions while also addressing the fears and challenges she faced as a woman in Hollywood.

Unanalyzed Article Content

“It’s the kind of a drama we used to call a thriller,” Joan Crawford said in aradio appearancein 1952, teasing an upcoming film. “In fact, it’s so exciting that the first time I read the script some friends rang my doorbell about 9 o’clock at night and I was afraid to open the door.” Imagine, for a second, a frightened Joan Crawford home alone, stirred up by the story that would soon become her next movie: Sudden Fear.

In the collective memory, Crawford is imagined with fear always in mind. Fear of being disliked or forgotten, fear of the box office, of bad lighting, even fear of wire hangers. The prevailing view of Crawford was that of the scary lady: frightening and frightened.

In 1943, after remaining under contract with MGM for 18 years, Crawford moved to Warner, the studio that would help her win her best actress Oscar for Mildred Pierce. But soon she became displeased with the roles available for a woman in her late 40s (her exact year of birth, even now, is still up for debate). Then came Sudden Fear, a film noir she took to competing studio RKO that once again won her Academy favour.

Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning

With Sudden Fear, Crawford forged an unprecedented Hollywood archetype: the now prevalent actress-turned-executive producer. She presided over the entire project, hired director David Miller, chose the screenwriter and cinematographer and personally selected co-stars Jack Palance and Gloria Grahame.

In Sudden Fear, Crawford plays Myra Hudson, a successful playwright and wealthy heiress lovestruck by a younger man. Sitting in on a rehearsal of her latest play, Myra decides that leading man Lester Blaine (Palance) must be recast. He “just doesn’t look romantic”, she says, and we’re inclined to agree. Like Crawford, Palance is a singular beauty: a skull rather than a face, craterous in black and white.

Sign up toSaved for Later

Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips

after newsletter promotion

By chance, the two meet again on a cross-country train to San Francisco. In close quarters, Myra is disarmed by Lester’s charms. She absolves him of her early judgments, and casts Lester as her romantic lead off-stage.

There’s a snag, however: Lester’s brassy lover Irene Neves, with whom he concocts a plot to murder Myra for her fortune. Mid-dinner party at Myra’s, Lester and Irene steal away to the host’s office voicing their plans – let slip only by the then-futuristic dictation machine accidentally recording them.

Of course, Myra ends up hearing the recording – and under the web of intrigue, there’s a tragic confession. “Love you?” Lester declares on the dictation machine. “I never loved you. Never for one moment.” In perfect melodrama, the camera never leaves Crawford’s face as she stumbles around the room reacting – or over-reacting. The filmmaker François Truffaut called her performance “a question of taste” – one that, I feel, should be acquired rather than challenged.

The disembodied voice, played back by the recording device, lends Crawford the chance to reprise her silent-film-star status once more: by 1929 she was one of very few to survive the transition from silents to talkies. The conversation she hears takes on a paranoid quality.Is this how people speak about me when I’m not around?As a filmmaking tool, the voice-over typically serves as an internal monologue, but here it’s terrorising: both absent and presently threatening. The voices come from elsewhere, estranged by time, and now they are lodged in Myra’s head!

Wide awake with conspiratorial voices keeping her up at night, Myra plans her counterattack, writing the rest of the script before it is written for her. She forges letters, breaks into Irene’s apartment, feigns sickness and dramatically falls down a flight of stairs to intercept her violent demise. It’s in these moments that Crawford’s own bias seeps into the text, and her attraction to Sudden Fear is exposed. Myra is a woman at the top of her game who chooses not to fold when she is undermined, instead taking back control and coming out the other side. Sounds like Joan Crawford to me.

Ten years after Sudden Fear and, at her nadir, Crawford would campaign for the novel What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? to be adapted as a motion picture, starring herself alongside – nay, underneath – twin flame Bette Davis. The film cemented their conjoined cult status and spawned a whole new subgenre: hagsploitation. If What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? was the story of industry roadkill, then Sudden Fear was Crawford in the driver’s seat of her own star vehicle.

No Way Out is streaming on Tubi in Australia and available to rent in the UK and the US. For more recommendations of what to stream in Australia,click here

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian