Starmer pushes back at Streeting doubts over budget for assisted dying

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Starmer Defends Commitment to Assisted Dying Legislation Amid Budget Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Keir Starmer has reaffirmed the government's commitment to enacting assisted dying legislation in all its facets, countering concerns raised by Health Secretary Wes Streeting regarding budget constraints. Streeting, who has shifted his stance on the issue, emphasized the necessity of enhancing end-of-life care to prevent terminally ill individuals from feeling they have no alternative but to choose assisted dying. He expressed worries that the ethical implications of introducing such a service without significant improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) could lead to misguided priorities in resource allocation. Streeting highlighted that while there might be potential savings from assisted dying, establishing the required infrastructure would demand both time and financial resources that are currently lacking. He expressed concern that the political choices being made may have been misguided in this context.

The assisted dying bill, which has successfully passed the Commons with a majority, is now undergoing further scrutiny in the House of Lords. This legislation would grant terminally ill adults in England and Wales the legal right to end their lives with medical assistance, contingent on approvals from two doctors and a panel comprising various professionals. Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP who introduced the bill, aims for it to receive royal assent by October, which would initiate a four-year implementation process. Although Streeting's previously known opposition to assisted dying has raised eyebrows, he has assured allies that he will not obstruct the legislation's implementation, which will be managed by the Department of Health and Social Care. Starmer, mindful of the free vote granted to MPs, refrained from influencing their decisions, having previously criticized Streeting for his remarks on the matter. The prime minister’s backing and the legislative momentum suggest a significant shift in the government's approach to assisted dying, despite the ongoing debate surrounding its ethical and financial implications.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Keir Starmer has insisted the government is prepared to deliver assisted dying legislation “in all its aspects”, pushing back against comments made by his health secretary, Wes Streeting,who claimedthere was no budget to implement the new law.

Streeting, who was previously a supporter of assisted dying but switched sides last year, saidbetter end of life carewas needed to stop terminally ill people feeling as though they had no alternative but to end their own life.

Writing on his Facebook page, Streeting cited Gordon Brown’s opposition to the move and expressed concerns about the ethics of offering an assisted dying service before significant improvements are made to the NHS.

“The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money,” he wrote. “Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context, to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply.

“There isn’t a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we’ve made the wrong one.”

The prime minister backed the historic measure, whichpassed the Commonswith a majority of 23. MPs were given a free vote.

When asked on Wednesday if the bill must be implemented and the budget must be found for the legislation, Starmer told reporters ahead of the Nato summit: “It is my responsibility to make sure the bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects. I’m confident we’ve done that preparation.”

The assisted dying bill, which was formally introduced in the House of Lords for further scrutiny on Monday, gives terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months to live the legal right to end their lives with medical support.

This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel including a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.

Kim Leadbeaterintroduced the legislation as a private member’s bill, and the Labour peer Charlie Falconer is expected to lead on the legislation in the Lords.

Falconer, who supported Leadbeater’s efforts, said peers should not use procedural devices to block the bill.

Sign up toFirst Edition

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Leadbeater, theLabourMP for Spen Valley, hopes the bill will get its royal assent by October, allowing the start of a four-year process to formally implement it.

Streeting will oversee the implementation of the law, as it will be carried out by the Department of Health and Social Care, although the day-to-day work will be handed over to the care minister, Stephen Kinnock, who backed the bill.

Although Streeting’s views on assisted dying are well known, he has told allies he will not seek to impede the bill’s implementation.

Given MPs were allowed to vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines, Starmer had been conscious of not wanting to appear to influence MPs’ decisions. He had criticised Streeting for doing so earlier this year.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian