Starling’s profits drop 25% as bank takes blame for Covid loan losses

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Starling Bank Reports 25% Profit Drop, Admits Weak Controls in Covid Loan Scheme"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Starling Bank has reported a significant 25% decline in its annual profits, attributing this drop to its own inadequate controls over the government-backed bounce back loan (BBL) scheme. The digital bank has decided to forgo government guarantees on £28 million of Covid loan losses, admitting that some loans were granted without proper checks, which disqualified them from taxpayer coverage. CEO Raman Bhatia acknowledged that certain procedures and requirements of the BBL scheme were not fully met, raising concerns about the bank's loan approval processes. This revelation adds to the scrutiny Starling faced regarding its handling of the BBLs, which were designed to quickly provide financial assistance to small businesses during the pandemic. The BBL scheme allowed loans of up to £50,000 at a low interest rate, with the government covering potential losses, making it crucial that lenders adhere to strict vetting procedures to ensure that only eligible businesses received the funds.

The bank's troubles have been compounded by a recent £29 million fine imposed by the Financial Conduct Authority for inadequate financial crime controls, which the regulator claimed left the bank vulnerable to criminal activities. The combination of the fine and the losses from the BBLs has reduced Starling's profit for the year ending in March to £223 million, down from £301 million the previous year. In light of these challenges, Bhatia indicated that the bank would consider adjusting executive pay based on the impact of these issues, though it remains uncertain whether this will affect former CEO Anne Boden, who resigned earlier in 2023. Starling's rapid growth during the pandemic saw its customer base expand dramatically, but the recent controversies surrounding its loan processes have raised significant questions about its operational integrity and risk management practices. CFO Declan Ferguson emphasized the bank's commitment to improving its financial crime resource and compliance capabilities to prevent future issues, expressing confidence in the bank's future growth prospects as it builds stronger foundations moving forward.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The report on Starling Bank's 25% profit drop brings to light significant challenges faced by the digital bank in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation not only highlights the bank's internal shortcomings but also reflects broader implications for the financial sector.

Implications of Profit Decline

Starling's admission of weak controls regarding the government's Bounce Back Loan (BBL) scheme raises questions about its operational integrity. By openly acknowledging its failures, Starling seems to aim for transparency, which could potentially rebuild trust. However, the fallout from this situation may deter investors and customers who prioritize financial stability and security.

Public Perception and Accountability

The narrative suggests that a considerable portion of the losses stems from the bank's failure to conduct adequate checks on loan applicants. This could shape public perception negatively, painting Starling as a less reliable institution compared to its peers. The CEO's mention of executive pay cuts indicates a commitment to accountability, although it remains uncertain how this will be perceived in the context of broader corporate governance practices.

Hidden Agendas or Distractions?

While the focus is on Starling's financial struggles, the timing of this report might serve as a distraction from other systemic issues within the banking sector, such as regulatory concerns and the economic impact of COVID-19. The emphasis on internal weaknesses could divert attention from external factors that also contributed to the financial landscape during the pandemic.

Comparison with Other Reports

When compared to other financial news, this report highlights a critical point of concern in the banking sector regarding the handling of government-backed loans. It aligns with a growing scrutiny of financial institutions following the economic disruptions caused by the pandemic, suggesting a trend in reporting that emphasizes accountability and risk management.

Potential Economic and Political Consequences

This situation could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny of digital banks and their operations, potentially impacting their ability to attract future investments. The discourse around accountability may lead to legislative discussions surrounding financial oversight in the wake of the pandemic. If public trust erodes, it could further complicate the recovery of the banking sector.

Target Audience and Community Support

The report may resonate more with stakeholders in the financial sector, including investors and regulatory bodies, rather than the general public. It appeals to communities that prioritize corporate governance and accountability, potentially influencing investors who are keen on supporting well-regulated financial institutions.

Market Impact and Stock Reactions

The implications of this report on the stock market could be significant, particularly for companies in the financial technology space. Investors may reassess their positions in Starling and similar entities, leading to fluctuations in stock prices based on perceived risk. This could also spark interest in competitors that have managed to maintain stronger operational controls.

Geopolitical Context

While the report primarily addresses a national banking issue, it reflects broader trends in global financial governance and accountability. The insights gained from Starling's situation could influence international best practices, particularly in how digital banks manage government support during crises.

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Reporting

It is possible that AI tools were employed in crafting this report, especially in data analysis and summarization. Such technologies might have influenced the framing of Starling's challenges, focusing on accountability and transparency. The narrative style seems aimed at fostering a serious tone, possibly to align with regulatory concerns and community expectations.

In conclusion, the reliability of this report is high as it is based on factual outcomes and statements from the bank's leadership. Nonetheless, the framing could influence how the public perceives Starling's operations and the banking sector as a whole. The emphasis on accountability and transparency serves a purpose in the current context of financial scrutiny.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The digital bank Starling has suffered a 25% drop in annual profits and said it would turn down government guarantees on £28m of Covid loans losses after conceding its own weak controls were to blame.

The admission stirs upa long-running controversyover Starling’s handling of the government-backed bounce back loan (BBL) scheme, which was built to get money quickly to small businesses during lockdown.

The scheme offered loans of up to £50,000 at 2.5% interest but carried little risk, with taxpayers picking up 100% of losses if the companies defaulted.

On Wednesday, Starling’s chief executive, Raman Bhatia, said the bank had proactively reviewed some of the BBLs on its books, and conceded that a tranche of loans had been granted to applicants without proper checks. That meant they were unlikely to qualify for government guarantees, which might have otherwise seen taxpayers foot the £28m bill.

“In some cases, we think we may not have met all the procedures, all the requirements, of the scheme,” Bhatia told journalists during the conference call. He did not confirm whether Starling had discovered fraud or financial crime within that tranche of loans.

The news comes just months after Starling was hit with a £29m fine for“shockingly lax” financial crime controls, which the City regulator said had left the financial system “wide open to criminals and those subject to sanctions”.

Together, the fine and BBL loss reduced Starling’s profit for the year to March to £223m, down 25% from £301m a year earlier.

Bhatia said the bank may consider cutting or clawing back pay from executives if appropriate. “We have discharged our duties to consider any impact on [remuneration] where appropriate. I can’t share any further details.”

It is not clear whether that might impact Starling’s founder and former chief executive, Anne Boden, who stepped down in 2023 citing a“conflict of interest”between being a boss and a large shareholder in the lender.

Starling’s distribution of Covid loans gained heightened attention in 2022when a former minister, Theodore Agnew, accusedStarling of using the BBL scheme as a “cost-free marketing exercise to build their loan book and so their company valuation” and failing to properly review borrowers before handing out taxpayer-backed loans.

Boden at the time vehemently denied Agnew’s claims.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Unlike large lenders, Starling opened BBL applications to new clients and saw its client base swell as a result. Its business customer base grew from 87,000 to 330,000, equivalent to adding 15,000 a month. And while the bank had only issued £23m of its own loans before the pandemic in November 2019, it had distributed £1.6bn in BBLs by the time the scheme closed in March 2021.

Commenting on the Financial Conduct Authority fine and the BBL loss on Wednesday, Starling’s chief financial officer, Declan Ferguson, said: “We continue to make significant investment into our financial crime resource to ensure our risk management and compliance capabilities are commensurate with the high-growth business and experience.

“Working closely with both the FCA and the British business bank, we have also sought to limit the impact of these issues and ensure they remain one-offs, but now we are now more confident we are moving forward into the next stage of our growth on much stronger foundations.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian