‘Some of these diseases are in the Bible’: despair as cuts halt progress on age-old tropical illnesses

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Funding Cuts Threaten Progress Against Neglected Tropical Diseases in Sierra Leone"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Sulaiman Tarawallie, a community drug distributor in Sierra Leone, has dedicated years to combating neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) such as river blindness and lymphatic filariasis in his village. However, this year marks a significant setback as he, along with 30,000 other community distributors, finds himself out of work due to the cancellation of USAID’s NTD program. This initiative, while a small part of USAID's overall budget, had a profound impact on public health, delivering treatments to 1.7 billion people across 31 countries and successfully eliminating several NTDs as public health problems in many regions. The program relied heavily on mass drug distribution, where entire communities received necessary medications, regardless of whether they exhibited symptoms, to control and potentially eradicate these debilitating diseases.

The cessation of funding has raised concerns about the resurgence of diseases that had previously been brought under control. Dr. Angela Weaver from Helen Keller Intl, which implemented the USAID program in West Africa, expressed deep concern for the millions of people who will now be at risk due to this funding cut. The program had not only provided critical medications but also facilitated significant healthcare advancements in countries like Mali and Niger, where trachoma and onchocerciasis were successfully eliminated. The interruption of drug shipments and the potential waste of medications threaten to undo years of progress, leading to fears that without sustained investment, diseases that have plagued communities for generations could return. Tarawallie and others in the community are now pleading for the reinstatement of this vital program, as they worry about the health and well-being of their families and neighbors who could once again suffer from these diseases if preventive measures are not continued.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The cancellation of USAID's work on neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) has significant implications, especially for communities that rely on the efforts of community drug distributors like Sulaiman Tarawallie. The article highlights the dire consequences of funding cuts on public health initiatives, which have shown success in combating debilitating diseases in impoverished areas.

Impact of Funding Cuts

The article articulates the immediate effects of USAID's withdrawal from NTD programs, emphasizing how 30,000 community drug distributors, who play a crucial role in delivering medications, are affected. This loss not only halts the distribution of critical medicines but also threatens to reverse years of progress in controlling diseases such as lymphatic filariasis and river blindness. The narrative surrounding the funding cuts aims to evoke a sense of urgency and despair in readers, highlighting the risks associated with losing effective public health programs.

Public Perception and Emotional Response

By focusing on the personal story of Tarawallie, the article aims to create an emotional connection with readers. This strategy seeks to foster empathy and provoke outrage against the decision to cut funding for NTDs. The mention of diseases referenced in the Bible further emphasizes the historical context and the long-standing nature of these health challenges, potentially leading to a perception that neglecting these issues is a moral failure.

Potential Information Gaps

While the article discusses the cancellation and its implications, it may not provide a comprehensive view of the broader context, such as the reasons behind the funding cuts or alternatives that might be considered. This omission could lead to speculation and distrust regarding the motivations of policymakers and aid organizations.

Manipulation and Reliability

The article’s emotional appeal and selective focus suggest a degree of manipulation in its messaging. While it effectively raises awareness about the issue, it could be critiqued for not presenting a balanced view of the situation. Despite its strong emotional narrative, the reliability of the article hinges on the accuracy of the facts presented regarding the impact of USAID's withdrawal and the success of the NTD programs.

Broader Implications

The funding cuts could have wider repercussions, affecting not only public health outcomes in affected countries but also international relations and cooperation in global health initiatives. The narrative aligns with ongoing discussions about healthcare funding and the responsibilities of wealthier nations towards poorer communities.

Target Audience

This article appears to target health advocates, policy-makers, and the general public who are concerned about global health issues. By highlighting the human aspect of the story, it is likely designed to mobilize support and provoke action from these groups.

Market Impact

In terms of market implications, the health sector may see fluctuations in funding and investment, particularly in pharmaceuticals and NGOs focused on tropical diseases. Companies involved in drug production or public health initiatives may experience changes in stock performance based on public sentiment and policy shifts.

Geopolitical Context

The article subtly underscores the ongoing tension between funding priorities and humanitarian needs, reflecting broader geopolitical dynamics. The discussion of NTDs resonates with current global health agendas, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath, where resource allocation has come under scrutiny.

Use of AI in Reporting

There is no direct indication that AI was employed in writing this article. However, aspects such as data analysis or trend forecasting in public health might have benefited from AI tools, potentially influencing the framing of the discussion. If AI had been used, it might have enriched the narrative by providing more data-driven insights or highlighting trends in disease prevalence.

In conclusion, while the article effectively raises important issues surrounding NTDs and the implications of funding cuts, it does so through a lens that may be more emotionally charged than strictly factual. The reliability of the piece is moderate, influenced by its choice of focus and emotional framing.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Since 2013, for around two weeks each year, Sulaiman Tarawallie has pulled on his community drug distributor (CDD) uniform and gone from household to household in his remote farming community to hand out medication to fightriver blindnessandlymphatic filariasis. Once he has completed the rounds of his village, he heads further out to take the drugs to even more remote homes – keeping the diseases that had plagued generations at bay with a handful of pills.

But this year, Tarawallie, who works as a community health worker and primary school teacher in Sierra Leone’s northern Bombali district, will not be making his annual trip.

He is one of 30,000 CDDs in the country out of a job after the cancellation of USAID’s work on neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). It represented a tiny fraction of USAID’s budget, but had a huge impact, aid workers say.

The World Health Organization recognises about 20 NTDs, debilitating conditions typically found among poor communities in tropical areas. USAID work focused on five of the most common:lymphatic filariasis,trachoma, onchocerciasis (also known as river blindness),schistosomiasisand intestinal worms. They can be brought under control – and in time eliminated – via mass drug distribution in communities. Everyone takes the pills, whether they show symptoms or not.

The programme worked with the private sector, with every $1 of US government funding leveraging $26 in donated medicines for mass treatment campaigns.

A fact sheet prepared by USAID’s NTD team shortly before it was dismantled sets out the programme’s achievements: treatments have been delivered to 1.7 billion people across 31 countries. In almost half of those countries, at least one NTD has been eliminated as a public health problem, meaning millions of people no longer require treatment for diseases including lymphatic filariasis, trachoma and river blindness.

The programme was on track to repeat its success – 15 countries were expected to eliminate at least one NTD within five years, and 14 countries were in the middle of developing sustainability plans that would integrate NTDs into the wider health system.

Tarawallie credits the US government for providing the drugs to defeat onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, commonly called elephantiasis. Now people in his community in Makeh, on the outskirts of Makeni city, are free of them.

“Before, [these diseases] were wreaking havoc on people,” Tarawallie says. In onchocerciasis, a parasitic worm causes severe itching, bumps under the skin and blindness. In lymphatic filariasis, parasites damage the lymphatic system leading to the abnormal enlargement of body parts, causing pain and disability.

Four of his relatives were affected. “They felt shame and stigma, and didn’t want to mingle with [other] members of the community,” he says.

Tarawallie also took part in a US-funded programme that hands out bed nets and sprays mosquito breeding grounds with insecticide to cut malaria cases. That too has been halted, he says.

Dr Angela Weaver, vice-president of the NTD portfolio at Helen Keller Intl, was the USAID team’s first employee in 2006 when it launched. She remains proud of “the greatest thing you’ve never heard of”. The spending of about $112m (£87m) a year was almost “a rounding error” compared with USAID’s bigger programmes tackling diseases like HIV and malaria, she says.

“For such a little amount, we’ve been able to reach so many people and we could finally get rid of some of these diseases that have been around since for ever. I mean, some of them were referenced in the Bible,” she says. “To have that all put at risk is really devastating. Just in our programme alone, there’s over 100 million people that are now going to be at risk.”

Helen Keller Intl implements the USAID programme in six countries in westAfrica, including Sierra Leone. Its work is currently suspended.

“These six countries are ones that have been in the programme the longest, so that we’re starting to see the real impact of what happens when you actually invest continuously over time in these diseases,” she says.

In Mali, “the entire population was at risk for developing irreversible blindness because of trachoma, and two years ago, we were able to celebrate its elimination”. In January, Niger became thefirst country in Africa to eliminateonchocerciasis.

For 2025, according to calculations by NGOs, the pharmaceutical companies that donate drugs had committed $975m worth of medication. “Some of them had already begun to ship those drugs, and some were planned for shipment, and now everything’s on hold,” says Weaver.

Some drugs and diagnostic tests “will end up expiring if not used”, she adds. Some pharmaceutical companies were hesitating to ship supplies because they feared they would go to waste, others had suggested they might need to close down drug production lines “if we stay in this state”.

There are pockets of Africa that have yet to receive any mass drug administration, Weaver says. And even in the countries that have successfully suppressed the diseases “they can still come back – we haven’t changed the basic factors that make them possible”. That would amount, she says, to a waste of previously spent US taxpayer money.

With organisations across global health reeling from widespread cuts, Weaver says she fears that NTDs will “suffer from what we’ve always suffered from: that it’s diseases that people don’t know about, they don’t understand, they’re hard to pronounce, and they’ve just not been the priority when pitted against other diseases that kill people”.

Tarawallie pleaded for a reversal of the decision. “Thanks to this programme, you can never find someone who has these diseases in my community. But my worry now, if this programme is stopped, is the worst might happen.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian