Shifty review – Adam Curtis’s new show is an utter rarity: stylish, intelligent TV with something to say

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Adam Curtis Explores Societal Fragmentation in New Documentary Series 'Shifty'"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Adam Curtis's new five-part documentary series, titled 'Shifty', adds to his extensive body of work that critiques modern society through a lens of history and media analysis. In this latest entry, Curtis focuses on the UK, examining the fragmentation of social cohesion and the erosion of a shared reality essential for a functioning democracy. The series opens with a striking visual of Margaret Thatcher, accompanied by Jimmy Savile, symbolizing the beginning of a decline that Curtis attributes to the rise of individualism and the dissolution of collective trust in institutions. Through a rich tapestry of archival footage, including news clips, pop culture references, and political events from the 1980s, Curtis illustrates how pivotal moments like the Falklands War, the miners' strike, and the emergence of new media have contributed to a societal shift away from community values towards personal gain and self-interest.

As the series progresses, Curtis critiques the evolution of political ideologies, culminating in the arrival of New Labour, which he suggests failed to escape the pessimism of its historical context. The documentary reflects on the lasting impacts of political scandals and the erosion of public trust in politicians, as exemplified by the decline of figures like Gordon Brown. Although 'Shifty' stops short of addressing more recent events such as Brexit and the Trump presidency, Curtis implies that the groundwork for contemporary discontent was laid during these transformative years. The series stands out for its stylish presentation and intellectual rigor, posing challenging questions about the state of society while engaging viewers with its dynamic and thought-provoking approach. It invites audiences to reflect on the complexities of historical narratives and their relevance to current social and political realities.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of Adam Curtis's new series "Shifty" highlights the unique approach Curtis takes in unfolding the complexities of modern society and its historical roots. The series aims to dissect the fragmentation of shared realities and the implications for democracy, engaging viewers with a blend of stylish visuals and thought-provoking commentary.

Purpose of the Article

This review serves to introduce "Shifty" to a wider audience, reflecting on Curtis's previous works while emphasizing the thematic continuity regarding societal disintegration and the challenges faced by contemporary democracies. By positioning the series as a necessary exploration of troubling societal trends, the article seeks to draw attention to the relevance of Curtis's narrative in today's context.

Community Perception

The article appears to encourage a sense of urgency and concern among viewers, suggesting that the issues Curtis presents are critical to understanding the current state of society. It implies that audiences should engage with these themes, fostering a collective introspection about the future of democracy and shared experiences.

Omissions or Hidden Agendas

While the review does not overtly conceal information, it may gloss over the complexities of alternative narratives or solutions to the problems discussed. By focusing primarily on the disintegration of shared realities, it risks painting a somewhat pessimistic view of society without acknowledging ongoing efforts to rebuild community and democratic engagement.

Manipulative Elements

The review utilizes emotionally charged language and vivid descriptions of Curtis's style, which may influence readers' perceptions of the documentary as not just informative but also as a call to action. The framing of Curtis's work as both stylish and intelligent could evoke a sense of elitism, positioning it as essential viewing for those concerned about societal issues.

Truthfulness of the Content

The review accurately reflects Curtis's trademark style and thematic focus, which is well-established in his previous works. However, the interpretation of his content may vary among viewers, as some might view his approach as overly dramatic or nihilistic.

Desired Public Sentiment

The overarching sentiment intended to be conveyed is one of concern and reflection on the fragility of social cohesion and democracy. The review encourages viewers to critically engage with the material, fostering a community dialogue about societal challenges.

Comparative Context

In relation to other news articles, this review stands out for its deep dive into cultural commentary rather than just reporting on current events. It connects to broader discussions about media influence, individualism, and power dynamics, which may resonate with readers familiar with similar topics in contemporary journalism.

Sector Image

The publication of this review positions itself as a platform for thoughtful critique and analysis, appealing to an audience interested in documentary storytelling and the socio-political landscape. This enhances its image as a serious contender in cultural discourse.

Potential Societal Impact

As the series provokes thought about critical societal issues, it could lead to increased public discourse regarding democracy and collective identity, potentially influencing political engagement and activism. The themes presented may resonate with audiences who feel disillusioned with current governance structures.

Supportive Communities

The content is likely to attract viewers from intellectual and progressive communities who are concerned about social justice, democracy, and the effects of media on public perception. It may particularly appeal to those who appreciate in-depth analysis of historical and contemporary issues.

Market Influence

While the review does not directly address market dynamics, the themes discussed in "Shifty" could influence public sentiment on political or social issues, thereby impacting sectors like media, technology, and even political campaigns that aim to address similar themes of division and community.

Geopolitical Relevance

Curtis's exploration of societal fragmentation aligns with global discussions on democracy, populism, and the rise of authoritarianism, reflecting ongoing tensions in the geopolitical landscape. The themes resonate with current events, making the series timely and relevant.

AI Involvement

It is unlikely that AI played a significant role in the creation of this review, though it is conceivable that tools were used for research or organization. The human touch in the critique suggests a personal interpretation rather than algorithmic generation.

Manipulative Language

The review employs persuasive language and vivid imagery to evoke an emotional response, which could be considered manipulative. This technique aims to engage the reader's concern for societal issues, encouraging them to seek out the documentary and reflect on its implications.

In conclusion, the review of "Shifty" presents a compelling narrative that invites audiences to engage critically with Adam Curtis's work. While it effectively highlights the importance of the themes explored, it also raises questions about the portrayal of societal challenges and the potential for manipulation through emotive language.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Hello and welcome to the latest addition to Adam Curtis’s growing compendium of documentaries I have unofficially entitled How Did Things Get So Shit? Let Me Explain in a Weirdly Uplifting Manner. Previous volumes include The Century of the Self, The Power of Nightmares, The Trap: What Happened to Our Dream of Freedom, All Watched Over By Machines of Loving Grace, HyperNormalisation, Can’t Get You Out of My Head and Russia 1985-1999: TraumaZone.

Even if you have not had the challenging pleasure of watching, the titles alone should be enough to evoke most of the concerns found therein – the rise of individualism, the fragmentation of old systems, the political vacuums new people and powers have rushed to fill, the death rattle of formerly dependable entities on which western civilisation has traditionally rested and once allowed us to sleep peacefully at night, the creeping destabilisation of all things, and so very much on.

The new entrant is a five-part series called Shifty. It is a rare purely UK-focused dissection of recent history, built around the idea that the growing atomisation of society has ushered in an age in which the concept of a shared reality on which we can all depend has dissolved – and with it any hope of a functioning democracy. Come on in, guys, the water’s lovely! Though we can’t even agree that it’s wet any more.

In Curtis’s trademark telling – a vast, kaleidoscopic assemblage of archive clips from news reports, TV shows, vox pops, pop videos, home videos, celebrity and political profiles and whatever else he has found that serves his purpose, cleverly curated, wittily juxtapositioned and bouncily soundtracked – the decline began, as so many seem to have done, with Margaret Thatcher. The series begins with her opening her study door to a group of children escorted in by her favourite man-of-the-people Jimmy Savile because – well, how could it not? Once that clip had been found, it was going in.

From there, we follow Britain through the 1980s – the Falklands, the Troubles, the miners’ strike, Kelvin MacKenzie, Wham!’s first tour, the advent of CCTV, the transformation of houses from homes into assets, art and fashion into diffusion lines, all of them uncoupling the old ways from the new powers, truth from reality or Britain from its moorings in some way. On we go through the next decade as old imperial ways, people and myths struggle to survive under the onslaught of new media, new tech, new economic experiments and a new privileging of individual independence, self-interest and the profit motive that was absolutely never going to end badly for anyone.

New Labour arrives in the fifth and final episode, however, and the idea of society arranged around working for the common good is restored. I’m kidding! “They couldn’t escape the world they had inherited and its pessimism about human motives.” Not simply regarding the electorate – the venality and sleaze that had enshrouded the Tory party over the preceding years (and may I say that there really should be a public health warning any time clips of David Mellor are to be shown, whether or not you lived throughthe Antonia de Sancha scandal) had also eroded all remaining trust in politicians and Blairites “just accepted the belief that politicians were always self-interested”. If you watch party conference clips closely, you can see the light in Gordon Brown’s eyes gradually going out. The last noble mien.

We stop before Brexit and Donald Trump, but it is clear how Curtis believes the seeds have been sown for all our current sorrows. Is the viewer persuaded? It depends where you start from, of course – I can’t speak for anyone who wasn’t already halfway there before kick-off as I was – and it will depend perhaps even more on how you feel about this most Marmite of film-makers. Now that I have learned to let his films wash over me, to pay attention but not drill down as they go, then wait and see how they work on my consciousness afterwards, I manage much better and admire much more. But perhaps that is partly a function of context too. It is an increasing rarity to stand in the presence of anyone with an idea, a thesis, that they have thoroughly worked out to their own satisfaction and then present stylishly, exuberantly and still intelligently. The hell and the handcart feel that bit more bearable now.

Shifty is on BBC iPlayer now

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian