Seth Meyers on looming recession: ‘We all knew Trump was bad with money’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Late-Night Hosts Critique Trump's Economic Policies Amid U.S. Recession"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 4.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent contraction of the U.S. economy in the first quarter of 2025, marked by a decline of 0.3%, has prompted late-night hosts to reflect on the implications of Donald Trump's economic policies. Seth Meyers, addressing the surprising reaction of news anchors to the economic downturn, pointedly remarked that the public was well aware of Trump's financial mismanagement, citing past failures such as bankrupting casinos and significant personal losses. Meyers emphasized that the current economic situation is unprecedented due to a combination of rising prices and negative growth, contrasting it with the previously robust economy just months prior. He humorously criticized Trump's focus on trivial matters, like renaming the Gulf of Mexico, while the nation faces serious economic challenges, suggesting that Trump's administration is unprepared for the consequences of its policies, which have led to potential shortages and increased consumer prices due to tariffs on imports from China.

Other late-night hosts, including Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert, echoed Meyers' sentiments, highlighting Trump's attempts to shift blame onto President Biden for the economic troubles. Kimmel noted the stark contrast between Trump's claims during his presidency when he took credit for stock market gains and his current narrative of distancing himself from economic failures. Colbert added that Trump's previous assertions about the market being tied to his leadership now appear hypocritical, as he tries to pin the downturn on Biden. Overall, the late-night commentary reflects widespread skepticism about Trump's economic stewardship and the effectiveness of his administration's responses to the looming recession, underscoring the deepening concerns among economists and the public alike as consumer confidence reaches alarming lows.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a satirical take on the current economic situation in the United States, particularly focusing on the implications of Donald Trump's past financial decisions. By highlighting the contraction of the economy and Trump's historical mismanagement of finances, the piece aims to criticize both Trump's economic policies and the responses of current media figures.

Media Reaction and Public Perception

Seth Meyers' commentary reflects a broader media sentiment that questions the credibility of Trump's economic claims. The surprise expressed by newscasters about the economic downturn serves as a rhetorical device to emphasize the disconnect between political narratives and economic realities. By stating, "we all knew Trump was bad with money," Meyers seeks to frame public opinion against Trump, suggesting that his past actions are directly linked to current economic challenges.

Historical Context and Accountability

Meyers draws a comparison between Trump and historical figures like Harry Truman to underline the importance of accountability in leadership. This reference aims to instill a sense of responsibility among political leaders, contrasting Truman's "the buck stops here" with Trump's perceived evasion of blame. This points to an underlying message that effective leadership requires acknowledging one's role in both successes and failures, especially in economic matters.

Critique of Current Policies

The article criticizes Trump's approach to policy-making, particularly in terms of tariffs and their impact on consumers. By mentioning rising prices and the implication of "barren shelves," Meyers suggests that Trump's policies are not just ineffective but potentially harmful to everyday Americans. This creates a sense of urgency about the economic implications of Trump's leadership and policies.

Manipulative Elements

There are elements of manipulation in the article, primarily through its use of satire and humor. The language is designed to provoke a strong reaction from the audience, making them question Trump's competence and the media's portrayal of economic situations. The mocking tone, especially in phrases like “dresses like a guy selling watches in a dark alley,” is intended to evoke disdain for Trump’s persona and leadership style.

Impact on Financial Markets

The narrative presented could influence public sentiment towards the stock market and economic policies, especially if it gains traction among audiences that are already skeptical of Trump's financial acumen. Investors often react to media portrayals of economic stability or instability, which could lead to fluctuations in market performance based on public perception.

Target Audience

This article likely resonates more with progressive and liberal audiences who are critical of Trump and his policies. By employing humor and satire, it seeks to engage readers who are already inclined to view Trump unfavorably, reinforcing their beliefs about his financial mismanagement.

Connection to Broader Issues

The economic narrative discussed in the article is not isolated; it connects to larger themes of governance, accountability, and public trust in leadership. The commentary reflects ongoing debates about economic policy and leadership effectiveness, particularly relevant in the context of upcoming elections and political discourse.

The overall reliability of the article is contingent on its satirical nature. While it includes factual elements regarding the economy, its primary goal is to entertain and provoke thought rather than to provide an objective analysis. The manipulation through humor and sharp critiques suggests a significant bias against Trump, which should be considered when interpreting the information presented.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Late-night hosts pondered a possible recession underDonald Trump, as the US economycontractedduring the first quarter of 2025.

The US economy officially contracted during the first quarter of 2025, with -0.3% growth that seemed to surprise even newscasters. “It’s very sweet that the news anchors are acting so surprised,” saidSeth Meyerson Wednesday evening, “but come on – we all knew Trump was bad with money. He bankrupted casinos, lost a billion dollars and he dresses like a guy selling watches in a dark alley. Also everyone said what Trump was doing was bad for the economy, and it was bad for the economy.

“We’ve seen recessions before,” the Late Night host continued, “but we haven’t seen this specific confluence of factors – rising prices, negative growth – in a long time. And what makes it so much worse is that just a few months ago, we had an economy that was considered the strongest in the world.

“But who cares about the economy?” he added. “Trump is doing the important stuff anyway, like renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America, not that anyone could afford new maps with these tariffs.”

During the now-halcyon days of the Biden presidency, Trump took credit for the booming economy, attributing stock market gains to expectations that he would win the election. But now, Trump is blaming Biden for a possible oncoming recession. “I get it now – when the economy is good under Biden, it’s because of you. But when the economy is bad under you, it’s because of Biden,” said Meyers. “You know, Harry Truman had a sign on his desk at the Oval Office that said, ‘the buck stops here,’ which let people know the value of taking responsibility. I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump had one that says, ‘get that fucking buck away from me! I’ve never seen that buck before in my life!!!’

“Thanks to Trump’s policies, we’re now staring down the prospect of rising prices and possibly even barren shelves, and his team is basically just shrugging and hoping for the best,” Meyers summarized. When asked about 145% tariffs on China, which will raise prices for most products for American consumers, Trump simply answered without merit: “China will have to eat those tariffs.

“China will not eat those tariffs. We will eat them,” said Meyers. “Literally, we will have to eat tariffs because we won’t be able to afford the mangos.”

“Sixty per cent of economists who were polled believe there is a high or very high chance of a recession, so the president now is distancing himself from himself,” saidJimmy Kimmel.

On Truth Social, Trump posted: “This is Biden’s stock market, not Trump’s … our country will boom, but we have to get rid of the Biden ‘Overhang.’” He also added: “BE PATIENT!!!”

“What happened to the guy who promised it would all happen on day one?” Kimmel laughed. “What happened to the guy who less than 100 days into his first presidency crowed” about $3.2tn in gains just because he won the election.

“The buck stops wherever he wants it to stop,” he added. “And consumer confidence is at its lowest level since May of 2020. You remember what happened in May of 2020? We were fighting old ladies for toilet paper in May of 2020.”

Kimmel also talked about Trump’s frightening interview with ABC, which Kimmel called “the most disturbing moment yet” of his presidency. “Trump says crazy stuff every day. But most of the time, you know he’s full of it – he’s bragging, lying or whatever, just throwing crap on to his vision board.” But the ABC interview on Tuesday “went off that rails” when Trump showed the interviewer a mock-up image trying to justify theunlawful and erroneous deportationof Kilmar Ábrego García to a prison in El Salvador.

“This couldn’t look worse even if Trump had written it in a Sharpie himself,” said Kimmel. “Our president is falling for Facebook memes.”

And on the Late Show,Stephen Colbertreacted to the report that the US economy contracted in the first quarter of 2025, shrinking 0.3% – much worse than economists projected. “And that’s saying a lot, because economists did not have high expectations,” said Colbert. “This is like your girlfriend’s review of the Phish concert: I didn’t know any of the songs going in and I don’t like that kind of music, and once I got there I actually hated it.”

On Truth Social, Trump tried to deflect blame, posting: “This is Biden’s stock market, not Trump’s.”

“OK, but when Biden was president and the market was good, back then Trump posted ‘this is the Trump stock market, because my polls against Biden are so good that investors are projecting that I will win,’” said Colbert.

“It’s Freaky Friday rule,” he mocked. “When Biden is president, it’s actually me and when I’m president, it’s actually Jamie Lee Curtis.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian