Sentimental Value review – Stellan Skarsgård is an egomaniac director in act of ancestor worship

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Joachim Trier's 'Sentimental Value' Explores Family Dynamics and Artistic Legacy"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In 'Sentimental Value,' Norwegian filmmaker Joachim Trier presents a vibrant exploration of familial relationships through the lens of an aging film director, Gustav Borg, played by Stellan Skarsgård. The narrative revolves around Gustav's attempts to reconnect with his two grown daughters, Nora and Agnes, after the death of their mother. Nora, a successful stage actor grappling with anxiety, and Agnes, a more grounded character with her own family, find themselves sorting through their childhood home. This house, steeped in memories, is revealed to be a point of contention as Gustav, who abandoned his family years ago, seeks to use it as a filming location for a biopic about his mother, who tragically took her own life there. The film delves into themes of abandonment, the complexities of father-daughter relationships, and the emotional turmoil of navigating personal histories while intertwined with the harsh realities of the film industry.

As the plot unfolds, tensions rise when Gustav, despite his neglectful past, pressures Nora to star in his new project, hoping to revitalize his dwindling career. The dynamics shift further when Hollywood star Rachel Kemp expresses interest in the same role, inciting jealousy and frustration in Nora. Trier's film oscillates between comedic moments and poignant reflections on the changing landscape of cinema, capturing the bittersweet essence of family ties and artistic ambition. The film also features clever nods to cinematic history and the evolution of the industry, such as a humorous scene where Gustav gifts his grandson inappropriate DVDs that lack the necessary technology to play them. Ultimately, 'Sentimental Value' offers a layered narrative that acknowledges Gustav's artistic talents while also critiquing the emotional toll of familial neglect, resulting in a bittersweet yet heartfelt reflection on legacy and the complexities of love within a family.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Sentimental Value" delves into the complex relationship between an egocentric film director and his daughters, highlighting themes of family dynamics, mental health, and the weight of familial legacies. The film's narrative appears to reflect on the psychological burdens that come with personal and artistic aspirations, and the review suggests a mix of humor and sentimentality that resonates with contemporary societal issues.

Analysis of Intent and Perception

The article seems aimed at critiquing the self-indulgence often found in artistic circles, where personal narratives can overshadow familial responsibilities. By portraying the protagonist as an egomaniac, the review fosters a critical view of such personalities in the film industry, perhaps encouraging audiences to reflect on real-life figures in similar positions. This critical lens may shape public perception, creating a dialogue around the balance between artistic expression and personal accountability.

Hidden Agendas

There doesn't appear to be overtly concealed motives within the review, but the framing of the director's flaws could suggest a broader critique of celebrity culture, potentially distracting from systemic issues within the film industry. The focus on personal issues and family drama may be intended to evoke empathy, while simultaneously critiquing the protagonist's narcissism.

Manipulative Elements

The review employs a tone that combines humor with serious undertones, possibly to manipulate audience emotions. By using comparisons to established filmmakers like Fellini and Bergman, it elevates the film's artistic merit while also establishing a certain expectation of depth. This juxtaposition may serve to appeal to a more discerning audience that values both entertainment and critical analysis.

Comparison with Other Reviews

In contrast to other reviews that may focus solely on plot or technical aspects, this piece emphasizes character development and thematic exploration. This approach aligns with a growing trend in film criticism that values emotional storytelling over traditional narrative structures, suggesting an intentional shift in how films are discussed in public forums.

Potential Societal Impact

The themes of the film, as highlighted in the review, may resonate with audiences dealing with familial issues or mental health struggles, potentially fostering deeper conversations about these topics. The interplay between personal and professional lives depicted could lead to increased awareness and advocacy for mental health, especially in creative fields.

Audience Support Base

The review is likely to attract readers who appreciate character-driven narratives and nuanced storytelling. It may resonate particularly well with audiences familiar with the film festival circuit or those who are critical of celebrity culture, thus fostering a community interested in reflective and meaningful cinema.

Economic and Market Implications

While the review itself may not directly influence stock markets, the film's reception could impact the sales of related media or merchandise. Films that engage with complex themes often attract niche audiences, which can lead to profitable box office returns or streaming revenue.

Global Context and Relevance

The themes of egotism and family dynamics are universally relevant, particularly in today's society where discussions about mental health and personal responsibility are increasingly prominent. The film's exploration of these issues may reflect broader societal concerns, making its narrative timely and significant.

AI Influence in Writing

There is no clear indication that AI was used in crafting this review, as the tone and style reflect a human touch. However, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the organization of thoughts or the selection of comparisons to renowned filmmakers. This could make the review more accessible or appealing to a broader audience.

Trustworthiness of the Review

The review appears credible, drawing on familiar tropes in cinema and providing a thoughtful analysis of character dynamics. It aligns with contemporary critiques of the film industry, suggesting a level of authenticity in its insights. Overall, the combination of humor, critique, and emotional resonance lends the review a trustworthy quality.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Here is an exuberant, garrulous, self-aware picture about an ageing and egomaniac film director and his two grownup daughters; it comes from Norwegian film-maker Joachim Trier, who gave Cannes themarvellous romantic drama The Worst Person in the World in 2021, starring the award-winning Renate Reinsve, who stars in this one as well. The film cycles through a range of moods and ideas, and finally delivers a fair bit of that sentimentality from the title; it’s a movie of daddy issues and cinematic adventures in the manner of Fellini and Bergman, with a gag about overhearing a therapist’s session through the heating pipes, pinched from Woody Allen’s Another Woman.

Stellan Skarsgård plays preening auteur Gustav Borg, whose career is on the slide; many years ago he left his wife, Sissel, a psychotherapist, and two grownup daughters, abandoning the family home – the house where Gustav himself was brought up. Now their mother has died and Gustav’s daughter Nora (Reinsve), a famous stage actor starring in a production of A Doll’s House, is suffering anxiety attacks – and to snap out of it, she asks to be slapped backstage by the (married) actor with whom she is having an affair, played by longtime Trier player Anders Danielsen Lie.

Nora’s sister Agnes (Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas) is a little calmer and more grounded, being happily settled with husband and young son, though a little messed up by the memory of having once had a small child-actor role in one of Gustav’s films – and feeling abandoned once the filming was over. Just as the two women are sorting through the house’s contents for things of sentimental value they might want to keep before selling the house, they are stunned to realise that the insufferable Gustav actually still has legal rights to the property and now wants to use it as a location for a biopic about his mother, who took her own life there due to the trauma of being tortured by the Nazis during the war.

To add insult to injury, Gustav begs Nora to take the lead role of her own grandmother, expecting that Nora, whom he neglected for most of her life, will use her stage fame to revive his flagging career. He even asks Agnes to let him use her young son as a child-actor, just as she once was used. But after Nora angrily refuses, the part is taken by Hollywood superstar Rachel Kemp (Elle Fanning) who has fallen for Gustav’s rascally charm at a film festival and brings with her huge amounts of investment funding. So Nora gets to be jealous and upset all over again.

The stage appears to be set for an uproarious but bittersweet black comedy of the movie world and show business and the emotional vampirism and ruthlessness it involves, with a touch of All About Eve perhaps – made worse when you are working with members of your own family. And to some extent, that is what we get. But this long and slightly indulgent film also ranges across moods of rather serious wintriness and cinephile sadness about the changing industry. Gustav had insisted on using a veteran cinematographer with whom he’d worked many times, but realises he’s going to have to rescind the offer when he sees how decrepit the poor guy now is.

There are also cinephile in-jokes (which are also Cannesphile in-jokes). When Agnes’s son has his tenth birthday, Gustav brings the poor boy an outrageously unsuitable present: some brand new DVDs of horribly shocking films like Michael Haneke’s The Piano Teacher and Gaspar Noé’s Irreversible – but Trier shows the ultimate irony is that they don’t have a DVD player. Technological changes have robbed these films of the power to shock.

We are of course heading for an emollient ending in which Gustav’s very real talent is to be acknowledged along with his muddled, flawed, old-guy affection for his daughters – and maybe Trier himself is now not above a bit of fictional ancestor-worship appropriate to his own high status. It’s a baggy comedy, sentimental in ways that are not entirely intentional effect, but there is value too.

Sentimental Value screened at the Cannes film festival

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian