Senators receive delayed Iran briefing as Democrats rage over lack of transparency

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Senators Briefed on Iran Strikes Amid Concerns Over White House Transparency"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

US senators are set to receive a classified briefing regarding President Donald Trump's recent military actions targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, following a postponement of the meeting by the White House. This delay has sparked significant backlash from Democratic lawmakers who argue that the Trump administration is obstructing Congress's right to oversight over military operations, which are typically subject to legislative approval. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer expressed outrage at the postponement, emphasizing the necessity for transparency and the administration's legal responsibility to keep Congress informed about such critical developments. The briefing is expected to include key national security officials, such as CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, although notable figures like Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, will not participate despite initial plans for her attendance. This exclusion raises further questions about the transparency of the intelligence shared with Congress and the rationale behind the administration's military actions.

The effectiveness of the strikes against Iran's nuclear program has become a point of contention, with conflicting reports emerging from intelligence agencies. A leaked Pentagon draft suggests that the strikes only temporarily hindered Iran's nuclear ambitions, contradicting claims made by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the total destruction of Iran's capabilities. Democratic leaders have criticized these assertions as misleading, focusing instead on the underlying question of Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons. Additionally, some Republican senators, particularly those advocating for non-interventionist policies, have expressed concern over the implications of unilateral military action taken by the president, calling for a reevaluation of the constitutional limits on presidential war powers. As the Senate prepares to vote on a resolution requiring future military actions against Iran to receive congressional approval, the likelihood of its passage remains uncertain due to Republican control of the chamber. The White House has also acknowledged its decision to limit intelligence sharing following leaks about the Pentagon's assessments, indicating a desire to protect sensitive information from unauthorized disclosure.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

US senators are receiving a classified briefing onDonald Trump’sbombing of Iranian nuclear sites, after the White House abruptly postponed the session and restricted intelligence sharing with Congress.

The delayed session with senior national security officials comes after the White House moved back its originally scheduled briefing for Tuesday, fueling Democratic complaints that Trump is stonewalling Congress overmilitary actionthe president authorized without congressional approval.

“Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,” Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said this week, calling the earlier postponement “outrageous”.

CIA director John Ratcliffe, secretary of state Marco Rubio and defense secretary Pete Hegseth are believed to be leading the briefing to senators behind closed doors. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, looks to be left out of the session despite being scheduled to appear at the original meeting weeks aftershe delivered testimonythat Iran was not building a nuclear weapon.

Intelligence agencies appear to be in open dispute over the strikes’ effectiveness. Aleaked draft Pentagon reportfound Iran’s nuclear program was set back only months, contradicting Trump and Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims of total destruction.

Gabbard and Ratcliffe scrambled on Wednesday to back Trump, with Gabbardposting on Xthat “new intelligence confirms what POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran’s nuclear facilities have been destroyed.”

House intelligence committee ranking Democrat Jim Himes dismissed the destruction claims as meaningless. “The only question that matters is whether the Iranian regime has the stuff necessary to build a bomb, and if so, how fast,” he posted.

The destruction response has also rankled Republican senators in the anti-interventionist wing of the party such as Rand Paul, who rejected claims of absolute presidential war powers.

“I think the speaker needs to review the constitution,” said Paul. “And I think there’s a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.”

The Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution requiring congressional approval for future military action against Iran, though the measure appears unlikely to pass given Republican control of the chamber.

Sign up toFirst Thing

Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

The White House also admitted on Thursday to restricting intelligence sharing after news of the draft assessment leaking. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters today the administration wants to ensure “classified intelligence is not ending up in irresponsible hands”. Leavitt later said the US assessed that there “was no indication” enriched uranium was moved from the nuclear sites in Iran ahead of the strikes.

Trump formally notified Congress of the strikes in a brief letter sent on Monday, two days after the bombing, saying the action was taken “to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran’s nuclear program.”

The administration says it remains “on a diplomatic path with Iran” through special envoy Steve Witkoff’s communications with Iranian officials.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian