Scared advertisers, flag bans and Trump: the US is in for a troubled Pride 2025

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Rising Anti-LGBTQ+ Legislation and Corporate Withdrawals Pose Challenges for Pride 2025"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In recent months, several U.S. states, including Utah, Idaho, and Montana, have enacted bans on flying LGBTQ+ flags at government buildings and schools, reflecting a broader trend of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation across the country. Utah's ban, which imposes fines on violators, has been met with disappointment by local organizers like Chad Call from UtahPride, who highlighted the state's conservative stance on LGBTQ+ issues. This wave of legislation is not isolated; around 31 flag-related bills have been introduced across 17 states, with significant implications for Pride celebrations and LGBTQ+ advocacy. As these bans take effect, communities in places like Salt Lake City and Boise are responding with their own flag designs that integrate traditional symbols with pride motifs, demonstrating resilience against the political climate. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is currently tracking nearly 600 anti-LGBTQ+ bills, while other organizations estimate the number could reach 700, with many proposed measures ultimately failing in recent years.

As Pride Month approaches, the atmosphere surrounding Pride events is increasingly fraught, with many corporate sponsors withdrawing their support due to economic uncertainty and fears of backlash from anti-diversity initiatives linked to the Trump administration. High-profile withdrawals, such as those from San Francisco Pride and New York City Pride, have left organizers scrambling to cover funding shortfalls. For instance, San Francisco Pride faces a $200,000 deficit, while New York City Pride anticipates a $750,000 shortfall. Despite these challenges, many organizers remain committed to holding events, emphasizing the importance of community solidarity in the face of adversity. Activists argue that the essence of Pride—rooted in protest and community celebration—will endure, as attendees seek connection and affirmation of their identities, particularly in more conservative regions. Furthermore, the ongoing safety concerns surrounding Pride events have prompted calls for increased vigilance and collective action to protect LGBTQ+ spaces, underscoring the critical need for unity and visibility during these challenging times.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community in the United States, particularly in light of recent legislative actions aimed at restricting the display of pride flags in various states. By focusing on the ban implemented in Utah and similar measures in Idaho and Montana, the report highlights a broader trend of increasing anti-LGBTQ+ legislation across the country.

Legislative Context and Community Response

The article contextualizes the pride flag bans within a landscape of rising anti-LGBTQ+ bills, noting that around 31 flag-related bills have been introduced across 17 states. The responses from local LGBTQ+ leaders illustrate a sense of resilience and community solidarity despite the challenges posed by these restrictions. Chad Call and Donald Williamson express disappointment in the political climate but also emphasize the strength of their communities in the face of adversity.

Public Sentiment and Resistance

The initiatives in Salt Lake City and Boise to create new flags that incorporate traditional designs with pride colors demonstrate a form of resistance against the bans. These actions suggest that local officials and community members are actively seeking ways to affirm their support for LGBTQ+ rights, even when state laws attempt to suppress such expressions. This resistance may foster a greater sense of unity and determination among LGBTQ+ individuals and their allies.

Wider Implications of Legislative Actions

The article raises concerns about the impact of these legislative actions on the LGBTQ+ community and society at large. With the ACLU tracking hundreds of anti-LGBTQ+ bills, there is a looming fear regarding the potential normalization of discrimination against marginalized groups. The emphasis on these legislative measures may serve as a call to action for supporters of LGBTQ+ rights, urging them to mobilize and advocate for change.

Media Influence and Public Perception

In terms of the article's reliability, it appears to present factual information supported by quotes from key figures in the LGBTQ+ community and data from organizations like the Movement Advancement Project. The tone is assertive in highlighting the seriousness of the situation, which may influence public sentiment towards viewing these legislative actions as part of a wider pattern of discrimination.

While the article does not overtly manipulate facts, the selection of quotes and emphasis on community resilience could be seen as a strategy to galvanize support for LGBTQ+ rights. The language used suggests an urgency in addressing these issues, which may resonate with readers who are sympathetic to the cause.

Potential Economic and Political Consequences

The consequences of these legislative actions extend beyond the LGBTQ+ community, affecting political dynamics and potentially influencing economic conditions. Companies that support LGBTQ+ rights may feel pressured to take a stand, which could impact their public image and consumer trust. Moreover, the broader political climate could lead to increased polarization, affecting not only local elections but also national narratives surrounding civil rights.

Target Audiences and Support Base

The article seems to cater to individuals who are already supportive of LGBTQ+ rights, aiming to inform them about the current challenges and mobilize further action. By highlighting community responses and resilience, it fosters a sense of solidarity among those who support LGBTQ+ rights while also encouraging broader public discourse on these critical issues.

Global Context and Future Outlook

This report resonates with ongoing global discussions about LGBTQ+ rights and the political landscape in various countries. The restrictions imposed in certain US states reflect a larger trend of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation seen in various parts of the world, reminding readers of the need for vigilance and advocacy.

Overall, the article is grounded in factual reporting, yet it strategically emphasizes the urgency of the situation to encourage public engagement and support for LGBTQ+ rights.

Unanalyzed Article Content

WhenUtahbrought in its pride flag ban, organizer Chad Call was hardly surprised. On 7 May the US state became the first to explicitly prohibit the flying of LGBTQ+ flags at government buildings and schools; anyone who does so could face fines of $500 a day.

“We live in an incredibly conservative state,” says Call, executive director of UtahPride. “It’s disappointing that this is such an important issue to our lawmakers. Unfortunately, we lead the nation in anti-LGBTQ legislation.”

Similar Pride month flag bans have been signed into law in Idaho and Montana.“Bigotry is nothing new,” says Donald Williamson, executive director of Idaho’sBoise Pride. “This community has been dealing with targeted legislation for several years now — flags are just the latest. All it does is bond us more closely together and emphasize how important festivals like Pride are.”

In Salt Lake City and Boise, which are both Democrat-run, people are already resisting the bans. Salt Lake City has introduced three newly designed flags featuring the city’s traditional sego lily design imposed over a pride flag, the transgender flag and the Juneteenth flag. Meanwhile, Boise’s mayor issued a proclamation retroactively making the pride flag an official city flag.

Around 31 flag-related bills have been introduced across 17 states, says Logan Casey, policy director of independent LGBTQ+ thinktank theMovement Advancement Project(MAP). “Some bills apply to all government property, while some apply to school settings only,” says Casey. “Some specifically name and prohibit LGBTQ-related flags, while others only allow certain flags like the national, state, or other governmental flags – and so LGBTQ-related ones are prohibited implicitly.

Ushering in a Pride month that is sure to be tumultuous, these flag bans are among a raft of fresh anti-LGBTQ+ legislation. At the time of writing,the ACLUwas tracking the progress of 588 anti-LGBTQ+ bills across the country. MAP puts the figure at around 700 bills, while pointing out that in recent years most anti-LGBTQ+ bills have ultimately been defeated.

Pride 2025 already has an acutely political focus due to the sheer scale of these legislative attacks on LGBTQ+ people, alongside theTrump administration’s targeting of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and trans rights. In this precarious landscape, a swath of big-name corporate sponsors have withdrawn from Pride events, leaving organizers to urgently re-evaluate both their size and security costs.

The exodus of sponsors from America’s Pride events, large and small, have made headlines: the loss of the likes of Anheuser-Busch, Comcast and Diageo fromSan Francisco Pridehas accounted for – at the time of writing – a $200,000 shortfall for a $3.2m event last year attended by an estimated 1.5 million people. (La Crema and Benefit Cosmetics have recently returned as sponsors, a spokesperson said.)

Some organizers say that companies retreating from Pride have been spooked by Trump’s anti-DEI crusade. (The White House did not respond to requests for comment about its plans for any Pride month messaging.)

Utah Pride, for instance, is currently short $400,000 – or close to half – of its typical sponsorship total. “It’s primarily due to the anti-DEI rhetoric happening on a federal and state level,” says Call, declining to name the companies that have withdrawn. “We definitely have a target on our backs. But there is nothing they can do to prevent us from having Pride, unless more legislation is coming down, and that would be probably unconstitutional.”

Yet some companies have said they are pulling their financial support because of the jittery economic climate.

“Businesses are struggling for a lot of different reasons, like uncertainty around future tariffs,” says Elizabeth Michael, executive director of SoMA 501, which is organizing aPride eventin Little Rock, Arkansas. “Putting on this event costs a lot of money, around $20,000-40,000, and we’re doing our best to scrape it together the best we can.”

SF Pride had also been struggling to regain its stability after the pandemic, even before this year’s turmoil. “We are by no means financially safe,” Elizabeth Ford, its executive director, says. “I don’t think any Pride in the United States is financially safe at this moment.”

New York City Pride, the US’s largest Pride festival attended last year by an estimated 2.5 million people, has seen the withdrawal of Mastercard, PepsiCo, Nissan, Citi and PricewaterhouseCoopers as corporate sponsors.The New York Times reportedthat 25% of New York’s corporate Pride donors had “canceled or scaled back their support, citing economic uncertainty and fear of retribution from the Trump administration”. Organizers Heritage of Pride now face an estimated $750,000 shortfall.

Technology company Booz Allen Hamilton withdrew their backing fromWorldPride, the biannual, global-themed event this year happening in Washington DC. Two corporate sponsors have withdrawn fromPridefest, Virginia’s largest LGBTQ+ festival,Axios reported(organizers declined to name them). Anheuser-Busch, Lowe’s, Nissan and Walmart have withdrawn from Columbus Pride in Ohio, costing the organization around $125,000 in lost donations,according to the Columbus Dispatch.

Many Pride organizers say that the impact of sponsors’ withdrawal will not just be felt at Pride events, but in the losses to funding, and potential scaling back, of LGBTQ+ advocacy programs throughout the rest of the year.

Not all companies have turned their back on Pride. Citi still plans to have an employee presence in theNew Yorkmarch, and contribute to other events. Ford says that whilesome large businesses were still funding SF Pride events, they had requested they receive no public recognition for doing so; she declined to name them. Other event organizers said the same, claiming that companies still wanted to support Pride but privately, with their names unspoken and invisible.

In Boise, Williamson says: “so far, knock on wood,” no sponsors had withdrawn their support for the September festival, now in its 36th year. Last year, 60,000 people attended the largest Pride event inIdaho, backed by 77 corporate sponsors and 35 small business sponsors. Williamson says that so far, there are only 40 corporate and small business sponsors signed up for the festival’s 2025 edition. He declined to name names. “I don’t want to jinx anything at this stage in the process.”

Despite the monetary perils and anti-DEI headwinds, Pride organizers who spoke to the Guardian insisted the show will go on, especially in light of the political hostility LGBTQ+ people are facing in the US and globally.

There was a certain irony to the brouhaha around the sponsor withdrawal headlines, many US organizers note. Some LGBTQ+ activists have long criticized Pride events for being too corporatist and beholden to big businesses seeking to cash in on the queer community and “pinkwash” their reputations.

“Big sponsors supported Pride because they knew LGBTQ people had money in our wallets,” says Eve Keller, co-president ofUSA Prides, a national network of around 200 LGBTQ+ Pride festival organizations across the country. “They weren’t making lasting change, they were just rainbow-washing their logos for the month of June. We had Pride before corporate sponsors paid us any attention. We’re getting back to our community roots, with people wanting to connect and collaborate with each another. Pride started as a protest. We’re here to show up and be heard as who we are. Pride creates joy, and queer joy is an act of resistance.”

In red states Pride marches and festivals take on an added depth and importance, says Densil R Porteous, executive director ofStonewall Columbus, which organizes the Ohio city’s event, “so people do not feel alone, especially if they’re living in smaller rural communities”.

Columbus’s event goes under the moniker United in Pride and was attended by around 700,000 people last year. Porteous says the gathering helps combat “feelings of defeat many people are feeling, and to remind us of the joy in our community and the history we’re upholding. We are determined to come together and not be hidden and diminished any more.”

Williamson in Boise agrees: “It’s incredibly rewarding to see tens of thousands of attenders. It’s very easy to feel isolated and alone in deep red states like Idaho with people living in relatively isolated areas and incredibly regressive legislatures targeting the LGBTQ community.”

SF Pride’s Ford, who is originally from the “very red” Owensboro, Kentucky, says the scale of larger Pride festivals can also encourage LGBTQ+ people from small towns. “The size and importance of an event like SF Pride is to say to LGBTQ people everywhere: ‘You’re not alone, and here inSan Franciscoyou can be who you are. We don’t tolerate you. We celebrate you.’”

Ford cites Harvey Milk, the San Francisco gay rights crusader who advocated coming out as the most potent expression of LGBTQ+ strength, as a guiding light. “I knew I was trans when I was five years old. I didn’t come out till I was 46. Trans people have to be visible. We are confident, capable, loving people, and we deserve the same rights as everybody else. We don’t need special favors, just a chance to exist.”

Keeping attenders safe is another prime expense and focus for Pride organizers. There have been Pride security scares before, most notably at Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, in 2022 whenpolice foiled plansof a white nationalist group to riot at a Pride event.

Ahead of World Pride in DC, two LGBTQ+ organizations, Egale Canada and the African Human Rights Coalition, issued warnings against traveling to the US – principally down to concern that trans and non-binary people would not be allowed to enter the country. “People are scared to leave America in case they’re not allowed back in, and scared to come here in case they’re not allowed in,” said Keller. “People do not feel safe coming to America.”

It is unknown if these worsening perceptions of America will tangibly dent its share of the LGBTQ+ tourism market,currently estimated at around $300bn, including those traveling to the US for Pride events.

Due to concerns that the FBI and Department of Homeland Security had not yet issued safety advisories ahead of this year’s Pride month, Porteous in Ohiorecently publisheda call “for heightened collective safety and public solidarity”. In the statement he wrote: “In a time marked by increasing visibility and vulnerability, our shared responsibility is clear: we must protect the spaces we’ve fought to create, together.” (The FBI did not respond to repeated requests for comment about any threats to Pride events it was monitoring this year.)

The difficulties facing Pride this year has led to organizers rethinking how future gatherings will be financed, perhaps involving more community donations and crowdfunding.

“Ultimately, SoMa Pride is about community,” says Michael in Little Rock. “It’s about ensuring everyone has a place to feel safe and welcome. We’re optimistic about closing the funding gap. We know money is tight right now, but if a progressive, welcoming south is important to you,consider giving $5.”

The LGBTQ+ community and its allies need to show up and pay up, adds Ford in San Francisco. “If every person who came through the gates of SF Pride gave us $20 we’d be in fine shape for 2026.”

If the sponsors who have withdrawn from SF Pride wish to return in the future, “we would have to discuss with them what happened,” Ford says. “It can’t be swept under the rug. We always have to entertain the idea of rehabilitation, but we can’t forget.”

InOhio, Pride organizer Porteous says they had paused relationships with some organizations, “but if they come back to common sense we’ll have a conversation. It can be about healing and reconciliation, but also just because someone says sorry, it doesn’t mean you have to accept their sorry.”

However vexed the current moment, “it is vital that Pride events across the country are well-attended this year,” Ford says, in order to send a strong message of collective presence and power to all those attacking LGBTQ+ rights. “We can’t afford people to stay home, it’s a revolutionary act to go to your Pride.”

In Idaho, Williamson remains determined to put on a celebratory Boise Pride. “The queer community has been here forever, and Pride is the best time to show the world that the community will still be here when all this shit is done.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian