Saul review – probing, dark and engrossing staging of Handel’s oratorio

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Glyndebourne Revives Handel's Saul with Engaging Direction and Strong Performances"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Glyndebourne festival continues its season with a revival of Handel's oratorio, Saul, directed by Donna Stirrup and based on Barrie Kosky’s acclaimed 2015 staging. This production is notable for its engaging and thought-provoking interpretation, showcasing Kosky’s reputation for originality in theater. The oratorio, which premiered in 1739, draws parallels to Shakespeare’s King Lear, exploring the psychological decline of King Saul as he grapples with his political and personal dilemmas in the wake of David’s rise after Goliath’s defeat. Kosky’s staging updates the narrative to an 18th-century setting that reflects a stylized, hedonistic world, blending elements reminiscent of Hogarth and the cinematic flair of Fellini. The visual transformation from garish colors to darker tones in the second half effectively underscores Saul’s descent into chaos and war, mirroring the moral complexities surrounding the dethroning of a monarch, a theme particularly resonant in the context of the historical Revolution of 1688.

Musically, the performance is anchored by the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment under the baton of Jonathan Cohen, who delivers a nuanced interpretation that enhances the oratorio's dramatic weight. Christopher Purves returns as Saul, delivering a powerful and at times harrowing portrayal of the king's mental unraveling, while Iestyn Davies as David provides a contrasting presence of calm and faith, captivating the audience with his ethereal vocal quality. The ensemble cast, including standout performances from Sarah Brady as Merab and Linard Vrielink as Jonathan, complements the lead roles effectively. Additionally, tenor Liam Bonthrone, playing a jester-like character, adds a layer of complexity to the narrative. The chorus shines throughout the production, executing intricate counterpoint with clarity and engaging in choreographed segments that enhance the overall theatrical experience. This revival of Saul at Glyndebourne is set to run until 24 July, promising an engrossing encounter with Handel's timeless work.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of Handel’s oratorio "Saul" highlights the artistic direction and production quality of the Glyndebourne festival. It not only serves as an evaluation of a particular performance but also reflects broader themes in art, interpretation, and the relevance of historical narratives in modern contexts.

Artistic Intent and Cultural Reflection

The production aims to engage audiences with a thought-provoking interpretation of "Saul," connecting it to Shakespearean themes of madness and moral dilemmas surrounding monarchy. By updating the setting to a stylized 18th century, the director Barrie Kosky provides a contemporary lens through which to view historical narratives, suggesting that the past has ongoing relevance in today's political and social discussions. The choice to include a jester figure mirrors the dynamics seen in "King Lear," encouraging audiences to reflect on the complexities of power and authority.

Public Perception and Community Impact

This review is likely intended to evoke curiosity and prompt attendance at the performance, creating a sense of excitement around the Glyndebourne festival. The vivid descriptions and positive commentary on the production aim to enhance the reputation of the festival while fostering a community around classical music and opera. By showcasing the talented performers and their emotional depth, the review may also cultivate an appreciation for the arts among audiences who may not be traditionally engaged.

Omissions and Unspoken Contexts

While the review focuses on the artistic merits of the production, it may inadvertently divert attention from broader socio-political issues related to the themes of "Saul." The historical context surrounding the original composition, including the political upheavals of the time, is acknowledged but not deeply explored, which could leave out significant discussions relevant to contemporary audiences.

Manipulative Elements and Authenticity

The review appears to maintain a high level of authenticity, as it provides a detailed account of the performance while emphasizing its artistic value. However, the language used is highly favorable, which could lead to perceptions of bias or manipulation, particularly if readers feel that the review does not adequately represent any criticisms of the production. Describing the performance as "probing" and "insightful" can create an idealized image that may not align with every audience member's experience.

Connections to Other News

In the realm of cultural journalism, this review aligns with a trend of highlighting the intersection of classical arts with modern societal issues. As such, it sits among other reviews that seek to elevate the profile of the arts within discussions of contemporary relevance. This connection may amplify interest in similar performances and encourage a cultural renaissance within the community.

Societal and Economic Implications

The review of "Saul" has the potential to strengthen community ties to the arts, which can be economically beneficial for local businesses surrounding the festival. Increased attendance at cultural events can stimulate economic activity and support the local economy. Furthermore, as audiences engage with the themes of the oratorio, discussions stemming from the performance may extend into broader societal debates about leadership and morality, especially in light of current political climates.

Audience Demographics and Support Bases

This article likely appeals to individuals interested in classical music, opera enthusiasts, and those engaged with the arts and culture sector. It may resonate particularly with audiences who appreciate nuanced interpretations of classical works, as well as those drawn to the exploration of historical themes in contemporary contexts.

Market and Global Dynamics

While this review specifically addresses a cultural event, its implications may extend to the market for arts and entertainment. Positive reviews and heightened interest in performances can lead to increased ticket sales and support for artistic endeavors. Such dynamics can influence stock prices for companies involved in the arts, tourism, and hospitality sectors.

In conclusion, the review serves as a powerful tool for promoting the arts, emphasizing the emotional and intellectual engagement that comes from attending performances like "Saul." Its focus on artistic merit and cultural relevance enhances its credibility, though one must remain aware of the potential biases inherent in such evaluations.

Unanalyzed Article Content

TheGlyndebourne seasoncontinues with a revival by Donna Stirrup of Barrie Kosky’s 2015 staging ofHandel’s Saul, widely regarded as one of the festival’s finest achievements and the production that cemented Kosky’s reputation in the UK as a director of remarkable originality. This is the first time I’ve seen it, having missed bothits opening runand the 2018 revival, and it strikes me as an example of Kosky’s work at its finest: probing, insightful, sometimes witty, sometimes dark, always utterly engrossing.

Premiered in 1739, Saul has often been compared to King Lear. There is much of Shakespeare in this portrait by Handel and his librettist, Charles Jennens, of the Old Testament king whose mind slowly disintegrates under the challenges presented to him politically and privately by David after the death of Goliath.

Mindful that the work also examines the moral arguments around dethroning an anointed king – still a huge issue in the wake of theRevolution of 1688– Kosky updates the oratorio to the time of composition, though his 18th century is a stylised, hedonistic place, reminiscent of Hogarth orFellini’s Casanovain its gaudy seediness. Garish colours give way to black in the second half when Saul’s behaviour drags his country into war. Kosky underpins the Shakespearean resonances by weaving four small roles together for a single performer (tenor Liam Bonthrone), effectively a jester, who stands in relation to Saul much as the Fool does to Lear.

Jonathan Cohen conducts the Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment with great subtlety and dramatic weight, admirably capturing the work’s sometimes unsettling urgency. Christopher Purves (Saul) and Iestyn Davies (David) are both returning to the roles they played in 2015. Purves’s snarling delivery has an almost expressionist ferocity, but he is of course a superb actor and his depiction of Saul’s mental breakdown is at times almost distressingly vivid. Davies is his perfect foil, always calm and psychologically centred, suggesting unswerving certainties of faith. His voice remains unearthly in its beauty, and time stands still when he singsOh Lord, Whose Mercies Numberless.

The rest of the cast are equally strong. Sarah Brady’s Merab is all hauteur and adamantine coloratura, in contrast to Soraya Mafi’s softer voiced Michal. Linard Vrielink makes an outstanding Jonathan, handsomely lyrical, his love for David beautifully realised, while Bonthrone is wonderfully caustic as Kosky’s newly created fool. The chorus, whether sashaying through one of Otto Pichler’s classy dance routines, or negotiating Handel’s complex counterpoint with perfect clarity, are simply sensational.

AtGlyndebourneuntil 24 July

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian