Sam was an engineer in Baghdad but couldn’t land a callback for similar roles in Australia. Many face the same issue

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Refugees in Australia Struggle with Job Recognition and Occupational Downgrades"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Sam Matti, an engineer who fled religious persecution in Iraq, arrived in Australia in 2015 with a bachelor’s degree in automation engineering and five years of relevant experience. Despite his qualifications and multilingual abilities, Matti struggled to find work in his field, receiving little to no response to his job applications. Instead, he had to take on various low-skilled jobs, including cleaning and catering, to make ends meet. His experience reflects the broader issue faced by many refugees in Australia, who often find their skills and qualifications unrecognized, leading to a significant occupational downgrade. A report by the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) revealed that a decade after resettlement, many former professionals are forced into lower-skilled positions, with about 30% of employed women and 19% of employed men experiencing such downgrades. Specifically, among women who were once managers or professionals, more than two-thirds were not in paid employment after ten years in Australia.

The AIFS report highlights that barriers to employment for refugees include challenges in skill and qualification recognition, language proficiency, and the lingering effects of forced migration. Dr. John van Kooy, the lead author of the report, noted that a significant portion of refugees expressed a desire to work but remain outside the labor force due to these obstacles. Further emphasizing the potential economic benefits of employing refugees, a 2024 report by Settlement Services International (SSI) suggested that addressing the underutilization of skills among migrants could yield a billion-dollar benefit for the Australian economy. SSI's head of strategic relations, Dane Moores, pointed out the complexities and inconsistencies in the qualification recognition process, which often hinders refugees from utilizing their professional skills. After two years, Matti eventually secured an internship, leading to his current position as an operations manager at Australia Post, demonstrating how providing opportunities can transform lives and contribute positively to society.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the challenges faced by refugees, particularly those with professional backgrounds, when trying to integrate into the Australian workforce. It uses the story of Sam Matti, an engineer who has faced significant hurdles despite his qualifications and experience, to illustrate a broader trend affecting many refugees.

Purpose of the Article

The publication aims to shed light on the difficulties that skilled migrants encounter in Australia, especially regarding the recognition of their qualifications and experiences. This narrative serves to provoke empathy and awareness among the Australian public about the systemic barriers refugees face.

Community Perception

The article seeks to create a perception that there is a significant issue regarding the employment of refugees, particularly women. By emphasizing the stark contrast between their previous roles and their current situations, it aims to engage the audience in discussions about inclusivity and the need for policy changes to better support skilled migrants.

Omissions and Hidden Aspects

While the article provides a compelling narrative, it may downplay the individual agency of refugees like Sam Matti. It does not explore other potential factors influencing their employment difficulties, such as language barriers, cultural differences, or personal circumstances that might affect their job search.

Manipulative Elements

There is a moderate level of manipulative intent in the article. It uses emotive language and specific statistics to evoke sympathy and raise awareness about refugees’ struggles. The focus on occupational downgrade highlights systemic issues but could be seen as framing refugees as victims without adequately addressing their resilience or contributions to society.

Trustworthiness of the Information

The article appears to be based on a report from the Australian Institute of Family Studies, which lends it credibility. However, the selective focus on negative outcomes without presenting counter-narratives or successes could affect the overall reliability. It’s important to consider the broader context of refugee integration, which includes successes alongside challenges.

Perceived Impact on Society and Economy

This article may lead to increased public support for policies aimed at improving the integration of refugees into the workforce, potentially influencing economic discussions about labor shortages and skills shortages in Australia. Increased awareness could also drive community initiatives focused on supporting refugees.

Target Audience

The article seems to target socially conscious individuals, policymakers, and organizations involved in refugee support and integration. It appeals particularly to those who advocate for social justice and equality, aiming to mobilize them toward supporting systemic changes.

Market Implications

While it may not directly impact stock markets, the article could influence sectors that rely on skilled labor, such as engineering and technology. Companies that engage in diversity and inclusion initiatives may find this narrative aligns with their values, potentially affecting their brand image and investment attractiveness.

Global Power Dynamics

The article touches on a broader global issue of migration and integration, which is relevant in contemporary discussions about national identity and multiculturalism. The plight of refugees is a pressing topic globally, and this article contributes to ongoing dialogues regarding human rights and humanitarianism.

Potential Use of AI in Writing

There is no clear indication that AI was used in writing this article. However, if AI were involved, it could have influenced the phrasing and structure to create a more engaging narrative. AI models might have been used for data analysis, but the emotive storytelling suggests a human touch in articulating personal experiences.

Overall Analysis of Manipulation

The article does contain elements of manipulation, primarily through its emotive language and selective statistics. By framing the refugee experience in a way that emphasizes struggle and occupational downgrade, it seeks to mobilize public sentiment toward advocacy for change.

In conclusion, the article effectively highlights the challenges faced by refugees in Australia, particularly in terms of employment recognition, while also inviting readers to consider the broader implications of these struggles on society.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When Sam Matti came to Australia, he had a bachelor degree in automation engineering and five years of experience working as an engineer at an electric power plant in Baghdad. After fleeing religious persecution in Iraq, where Islamic State was targeting minority Christians, Matti arrived in Australia in 2015. Here, Matti, who speaks five languages, applied for every suitable engineering job – but couldn’t even land a callback.

“I applied for every possible and available position on Seek,” says Matti, now 37.

“The usual response was, ‘Sorry, we found a more experienced person with the right skills’ or no response at all.”

So Matti worked a variety of jobs – cleaning, catering and working in aged care – whatever he could get to help pay the bills.

His experience is not unique. Many refugees who have worked as managers and professionals before arriving in Australia struggle to have their skills and qualifications recognised, and are still experiencing an “occupational downgrade” 10 years after arrival, according to a new report by the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS).

About 2,400 humanitarian migrants were surveyed over a 10-year period. The report found 30% of employed women and 19% of employed men had been working in managerial or professional roles before arriving in Australia. That dropped to 17% and 10% respectively after 10 years of residency.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

Half of men who had worked in fields such as business, human resources, marketing and ICT in their home country were working as technicians, tradespersons or machinery operators after a decade living in Australia.

For female refugees, the occupational downgrade was even more pronounced. Among those who had been managers or professionals in their home countries, more than two-thirds (67%) were not in paid work after 10 years in Australia. The remainder were mostly working as carers, cleaners, education aides or sales assistants.

The likelihood of women who were in families with children under five being employed was 84% lower than men in the same situation.

Dr John van Kooy, the report’s lead author, said 60% of women and about 37% of men in the study were not employed in the 10th year of the research and were not actively looking for work.

“So not in the labor force at all, which is large,” he says. “But what’s interesting about that group is that many of them indicated that they do, in fact, want a job.

“We know from our analysis that they’re likely facing these sort of multiple challenges related to having their skills and qualifications recognised, building up their English language capability, or dealing with some of the effects of forced migration.”

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

A 2024 report by national not-for-profit service provider Settlement Services International (SSI) found there was a potential for a “billion-dollar benefit” in the employment of refugees and other migrants thought to have “chronically under utilised skills”.

SSI’s head of strategic relations, Dane Moores, says almost half of permanent migrants in Australia work below their skill level, with humanitarian entrants even more likely to have their skills under utilised.

“Many refugees arrive in Australia with years of professional experience and valuable skills, but they face a system that devalues their expertise and puts up unnecessary roadblocks to formally recognising their qualifications,” Moores says.

“The process to have overseas qualifications recognised is complex, costly and inconsistent, and many refugees find it difficult to meet the rigid documentation requirements.”

After two years Matti landed an internship at a leading construction company – and now works as an operations manager at Australia Post.

“Giving an opportunity to a person can be a life-changing event,” he says.

“I was given an opportunity, and I was able to squeeze every single thing out of it to be able to achieve, you know, better results for myself and my family and society in general.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian