Rules that protect UK homeowners from repossessions may be scrapped

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"FCA Considers Repealing Mortgage Charter Protecting Homeowners from Repossession"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is considering the potential repeal of the mortgage charter, a set of regulations designed to protect homeowners from repossession during financial difficulties. This review comes as part of a broader push by Chancellor Rachel Reeves to reduce regulatory burdens on businesses and stimulate economic growth. The charter, introduced two years ago, provided a 12-month grace period for homeowners facing financial distress, allowing them to avoid immediate repossession after missing mortgage payments. FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi highlighted that the charter was established during a time of rapidly rising interest rates, which have since stabilized. He questioned whether the current economic landscape still necessitates such protective measures, especially given that repossessions have decreased and the regulatory environment is under scrutiny for being overly cautious. The FCA aims to ensure its rules do not stifle economic growth while still providing adequate consumer protections.

In light of the changing economic conditions and the government's emphasis on encouraging risk-taking, the FCA is reassessing several regulatory frameworks, including those affecting home loans. The mortgage charter was initially implemented to address concerns that rising interest rates could put millions of homeowners at risk of losing their properties. The charter had the support of 49 major lenders, including HSBC and Lloyds Banking Group, who agreed to measures such as preventing repossession within a year of a missed payment and allowing customers to seek advice without impacting their credit scores. As the FCA engages in this review process, Rathi emphasized the need for transparency regarding the government's risk appetite and the importance of maintaining consumer confidence. He called for a dialogue about acceptable levels of risk and the balance between regulatory oversight and fostering a competitive business environment, asserting that these discussions are crucial for long-term economic stability and growth in the UK housing market.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The City watchdog is considering scrapping rules meant to protect struggling homeowners from having their homes repossessed, in the latest sign of regulators reacting topressure from the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to remove red tape for businesses.

The chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Nikhil Rathi, said themuch-lauded mortgage charterwas up for review as the body tries to show it is addressing accusations that its rules have hindered economic growth.

Repealing the newer charter, introduced only two years ago under the Conservatives, would mean homeowners would no longer have a safety net that granted a 12-month grace period before potentially losing their home.

“The chancellor sees the regulatory system as having regulated for risk, not growth. So we’re engaging seriously with this feedback, and we continue to make changes at pace,” Rathi told TheCityUK annual conference in London on Thursday.

“Take mortgages: I have raised with the prime minister and the chancellor the mortgage charter. It was designed for a period of sharply rising interest rates. But could it now be retired, with the [consumer] duty in place, repossessions lower, the maturing risk mindset?” Rathi asked.

“Do we need this duplicative approach, with the added reporting burdens it brings? So as we at the FCA review the mortgage market fundamentally, what signal does it send about political risk tolerance if the charter is retained?”

Although relatively new, the mortgage charter is now one of a number of regulatory measures being reconsidered, as ministers order watchdogs to make the UK more attractive to businesses and investors.

Reeves threw down the gauntlet in November, saying that consumer-friendly regulations put in place after the global financial crisishad “gone too far”. She ordered financial watchdogs to encourage more risk-taking and roll back rules that may have been curbing the growth and competitiveness of City firms.

The FCA is looking at how it could ease home loan rules, including those that were tightened after the banking crisis, in order to boost property ownership.

The mortgage charter was introduced amid fears that millions of people could be at risk of losing their homes amid soaring UK interest rates,which hit 5.25% in August 2023. The surge resulted in much higher monthly payments for households due to sign on to new fixed-term contracts, as well as those on trackers, where contract rates move in lockstep with the base rate.

Ultimately, 49 lenders, including HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, NatWest, Santander and Nationwide, signed the charter, agreeing that:

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

No home would be repossessed within 12 months of the first missed payment.

Customers could seek advice from their lender without it affecting their credit score.

Customers could switch to an interest-only deal for six months; or extend their mortgage term and revert back within six months if they want. Neither option requires an affordability check or will affect their credit score.

Rathi said it was important for the government to be transparent about the amount of risk it was willing to take as part of its growth drive. “One of the reasons I’ve consistently called for an open debate on risk appetite and metrics for tolerable failures alongside metrics for competitiveness growth and operational performance, is to ensure that as we shift to this stance, it will endure over time.

“We want to … give firms and consumers long term confidence to invest, while building greater coherence between government, industry, parliament, and regulators.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian