Resurrection review – fascinating phantasmagoria is wild riddle about new China and an old universe

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Bi Gan's 'Resurrection' Explores Themes of Immortality and Historical Reflection"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Bi Gan’s latest film, "Resurrection," premiered at the Cannes Film Festival and is characterized by its bold ambition and striking visual style. This film continues the director's exploration of time and memory, a theme he famously tackled in his previous work, "Long Day’s Journey Into Night." While "Resurrection" presents a less powerful narrative than its predecessor, it comprises various episodic segments that contribute to an overall enchanting effect. The film culminates in visually stunning images and intricate tracking shots, offering a rich, sensory experience that invites viewers to reflect on its deeper meanings. The narrative is structured as a journey through Chinese history, culminating on New Year’s Eve 1999, a pivotal moment as China transitioned into a new era of capitalism while grappling with its historical political conformity.

The story unfolds in an alternate reality where humans can achieve immortality by abstaining from dreams, a condition that raises questions about overpopulation and the human experience. The central character, known as the Fantasmer, portrayed by Jackson Yee, is a dreamer who defies this norm, embodying a sacred monster who reincarnates through various lowlife existences across different historical periods. The Fantasmer's encounters range from a silent-movie-like figure in the early 20th century to a crooked gambler at the century's close, all while a mysterious woman, played by Shu Qi, intertwines with his life. The film's title, "Resurrection," poses questions about transformation and continuity, leaving its enigmatic nature open to interpretation. While some viewers may find the film's riddles perplexing, its artistic merit and visual allure establish it as a noteworthy cinematic endeavor, inviting contemplation on the nature of existence and the passage of time.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of Bi Gan's film "Resurrection" provides an intriguing look into the intersection of reality, dreams, and historical context within contemporary Chinese cinema. The film invites viewers to reflect on profound themes, such as the implications of overpopulation and the dichotomy of dreams versus reality. As such, the article may serve multiple purposes, primarily to evaluate the film's artistic merit while also engaging with broader sociopolitical themes relevant to modern China.

Artistic Evaluation

The article highlights the film's visual artistry and ambitious narrative structure, noting its episodic nature and the varying quality of its segments. By comparing "Resurrection" to Gan's previous work, the review emphasizes the director's evolving approach to storytelling and visual representation. The choice to present a surreal and dreamlike narrative reflects a growing trend in international cinema to explore psychological and societal themes through innovative filmmaking techniques.

Cultural Context

The film's setting during a pivotal moment in Chinese history—New Year’s Eve 1999—underscores its cultural relevance. It reflects on the tension between embracing modern capitalism and adhering to traditional political values. This duality raises questions about identity and progress, suggesting that the film is not merely a personal journey but a collective exploration of national consciousness.

Audience Engagement

The review suggests that the film targets an audience that appreciates thought-provoking cinema and is willing to engage with complex themes. By depicting a reality where humans can live indefinitely at the cost of their dreams, it invites viewers to reflect on the nature of existence and the societal implications of such a scenario. The inclusion of dream elements may resonate with those interested in psychological narratives and philosophical inquiries.

Implications for Society

Given the film's themes, it could provoke discussions that extend beyond the cinematic experience into broader societal and political realms. The portrayal of a dissident character may resonate with contemporary audiences in China, where political dissent is a sensitive topic. Therefore, the film could inspire conversations about freedom, individuality, and the role of art in challenging societal norms.

Potential Manipulative Elements

While the review does not explicitly indicate manipulation, the way it frames the film’s themes could lead to various interpretations. By emphasizing the historical context and the struggle between dreams and reality, it may subtly encourage viewers to reflect on their perceptions of China’s socio-political landscape. Such framing could be seen as an attempt to guide audience sentiment towards a specific understanding of contemporary issues.

Reality Check

The reliability of the review stems from its analytical depth and the critical engagement with the film's themes. However, the subjective nature of film criticism means interpretations will vary. The review's focus on the film's artistic and thematic elements provides a solid foundation for understanding its place within both cinema and cultural discourse.

Global Relevance

In a broader context, the themes presented in the film and discussed in the review resonate with global audiences facing similar existential questions. The exploration of reality versus dreams is a universal theme, making the film relevant to viewers outside of China. This reflects a growing trend in cinema where filmmakers tackle global issues through localized narratives.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Bi Gan’s new movie in Cannes is bold and ambitious, visually amazing, trippy and woozy in its embrace of hallucination and the heightened meaning of the unreal and the dreamlike. His last filmLong Day’s Journey Into Nightfrom 2018 was an extraordinary and almost extraterrestrial experience in the cinema which challenged the audience to examine what they thought about time and memory; this doesn’t have quite that power, being effectively a portmanteau movie, some of whose sections are better than others – though it climaxes with some gasp-inducing images and tracking shots and all the constituent parts contribute to the film’s aggregate effect.

Resurrection is, perhaps, a long night’s journey to the enlightenment of daybreak; it finishes at a club called the Sunrise. It is also an episodic journey through Chinese history, finishing at that historic moment which continues to fascinate Chinese film-makers whose movies are a way of collectively processing their feelings about it: New Year’s Eve 1999, the new century in whichChinawas to bullishly embrace the new capitalism while cleaving to the political conformism of the old ways.

We are in a kind of alt-reality universe where humans have discovered they can live indefinitely if they do not dream, an activity which burns up humans like a lit candle. Bi Gan leaves it up to us to ponder what that implies for overpopulation.

But there is one outlier, one dissident, a man who does dream – he is a sacred monster called the Fantasmer (Jackson Yee) and the paradox is that the Fantasmer’s ecstatic perception of illusions and dreams allows him to reincarnate and resurrect in an exotic variety of lowlife existences at different historic times in the last century – and a woman enters his life. Is it the woman perceiving these events, or is the Fantasmer doing it?

At the beginning of the century, and occupying a kind of antique silent-movie world, he is a white-faced figure like the vampire Nosferatu being tended to by a mysterious woman (played by longtime Hou Hsiao-shen performer Shu Qi). During the second world war he is involved in a violent imbroglio in a mirror shop – shades of Welles’s The Lady From Shanghai perhaps – involving a theremin. We flashforward 20 years and our time-travelling itinerant Fantasmer is in a remote and wintry temple where he breaks a Buddha statue and encounters a Spirit of Bitterness.

Some decades later, he is a crooked card-sharp who inveigles a little girl into a scam he’s got going against a local gangster and finally we are at the brink of the new century in which the Fantasmer meets another mobster Mr Luo – his vampiric destiny, and the movie’s own visuals, ascend to a new plane.

It is a deeply mysterious film whose enigma extends to the title – is what is happening “resurrection” in any clear transformative sense? Or is it just a continuous flickering shape-shifting: the Fantasmer just a pulsating star on the far-reaches of the universe, that might in a few hundred thousand years explode or collapse in on itself?

Asking or answering these questions may not be the film’s point and its riddling quality, combined with its spectacular visual effects, may leave some audiences agnostic – and I myself wasn’t sure about the silent-movie type effects. Yet it’s a work of real artistry.

Resurrection premiered at theCannes film festival

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian