Reeves expected to freeze income tax thresholds to raise fresh funds

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Chancellor Reeves Likely to Extend Income Tax Threshold Freeze Amid Budget Deficit"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, is poised to extend a freeze on income tax thresholds as a strategy to generate additional funds amidst a growing budget deficit resulting from the government's reversal on welfare cuts. As pressure mounts on Reeves to reconsider her stance on tax increases, the recent U-turn by Keir Starmer has amplified the likelihood that she will need to either raise taxes or cut public spending in her upcoming autumn budget. Independent analysts widely anticipate that a tax increase is imminent, with the extension of the threshold freeze being viewed as the most feasible option. This freeze, initially implemented by former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, has gradually increased the number of individuals subject to the higher tax rate, which is projected to affect 7 million taxpayers this year alone, an increase of 500,000 compared to the previous year. Experts suggest that extending the freeze for an additional two years could yield an estimated £8 billion annually, which would help address the financial shortfall exacerbated by the government's welfare policy changes.

The financial implications of these policy adjustments are significant, with the Resolution Foundation estimating that the U-turn on disability benefits could cost the chancellor £3 billion annually by 2029-30. Additionally, Reeves' recent decision to revert cuts to pensioners' winter fuel allowances adds a further £1.25 billion to the budgetary pressures. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is expected to revise its growth forecasts, which could further complicate the fiscal landscape. Analysts express concern that the downgrade in productivity estimates by the OBR could overshadow the impacts of the welfare changes. Moreover, with limited options available to raise substantial funds due to Labour's pre-election tax pledges, experts like Paul Johnson from the Institute for Fiscal Studies emphasize that the freeze on income tax thresholds represents the simplest way to secure necessary revenue. Despite the Chancellor's assurances of a potentially more favorable economic outlook, skepticism remains regarding the government's ability to navigate these financial challenges without resorting to tax increases or further spending cuts.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Rachel Reeves is expected to extend a freeze on income tax thresholds to raise fresh funds afterthe government’s U-turn on welfare cutsleft her with a growing budget hole.

The chancellor was already facing pressure to backtrack on pledges not to increase taxes further as she attempted to fix public services and grow the economy while meeting her fiscal rules.

However, Keir Starmer’s U-turn late on Thursday has increased the likelihood that she will raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget.

Independent commentators are all but unanimous in expecting taxes to go up – and many point to the threshold freeze, which is estimated to raise £8bn a year, as the most likely option.

The freeze, introduced by the former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt, drags ever more people into paying the higher rate of tax and isdue to end in 2028. The number of people in the UK paying income tax at the higher rate is already expected toincrease by 500,000 this tax year, to 7 million.

“The most obvious thing would be to extend the income tax thresholds, for another two years,” said Ruth Curtice, director of the Resolution Foundation thinktank – which estimates that the U-turn on disability benefits will cost the chancellor £3bn a year by 2029-30.

That bill comes in addition to the £1.25bn price of Reeves’ recent decision toreverse most of the cut to pensioners’ winter fuel allowance– and thewidely held expectationthat the Office for Budget Responsibility will downgrade its growth forecasts in the autumn.

The Treasury’s independent watchdog is revisiting its estimate of productivity – a key determinant of economic growth – which looks optimistic relative to most independent forecasts.

Paul Johnson, the outgoing director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the U-turns on benefits could be dwarfed by the probable downgrade from the OBR.

“In one way this [the welfare U-turn] doesn’t change anything very much – it’s a £3bn-£4bn change at the end of the period, and the OBR forecast could change things by a lot more than that – but obviously if the OBR moves in the wrong direction then this adds to the pressure,” he said.

Johnson pointed out that the most straightforward ways of raising large enough sums had been ruled out by Labour’s pre-election tax pledges. “There are always ways of finding small numbers of billions, but if you are looking for £10bn or £20bn it gets really quite difficult, if you’re not going to increase income tax or VAT,” he said, adding, “the threshold freeze is obviously the politically easiest thing to do.”

Simon Wells, chief European economist at HSBC, agreed. “They’re boxed in and something has to give,” he said. “The income tax thresholds is by far and away the line of least resistance.”

Mujtaba Rahman, managing director at the consultancy Eurasia Group, said: “Reeves may have to find up to £20bn to balance the books and give her enough headroom for future emergencies from a series of small-scale changes. They are likely to include extending the freeze on income tax thresholds and allowances for another two years.”

The chancellor’s team continue to insist that there is no inevitability about tax increases, pinning their hopes on a rosier economic outlook by the time of the autumn budget.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

They claim that firms have become more upbeat about the UK as an investment prospect, and many consumers are benefiting from above-inflation pay rises. “Sentiment is really changing,” argued a Treasury source.

Asked earlier this week about recentworse-than-expected public finances figures, Reeves said: “I wouldn’t read too much into one month’s data. It’s just one of a number of factors that will affect the next forecast that the Office for Budget Responsibility will produce.”

However, there is also frustration in government at the way the OBR’s forecasting process, combined with the slim £10bn of headroom Reeves has againsther fiscal rules, has led to constant market speculation about the chancellor’s next move.

One proposal made recently by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was for just one OBR forecast a year. The Treasury is understood to be sceptical about this idea, as it would make the UK an international outlier – but officials are understood to be looking at the nature of the spring forecast.

Downgrading its role could prevent the scramble for savings seen in the run up to this year’s spring statement which led to the welfare cuts.

The Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, this weekwarnedagainst “over-interpreting” the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecasts.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian