Real or flake? Experts weigh in on whether TikTok’s viral ‘caveman method’ skin care routine actually works | Natasha May

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Experts Critique TikTok's Viral 'Caveman Method' Skincare Routine"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The 'caveman method' has recently gained traction on social media, particularly on TikTok, where creator Tia Zakher has become a focal point of discussion. This unconventional skincare routine advocates for abandoning all skincare products and even water, allowing the skin to heal naturally. Zakher, who has shared her journey with visibly flaky skin, claims that this is simply the shedding of dead skin cells, which will reveal healthier skin underneath over time. While her videos have garnered millions of views and sparked a trend, they have also raised eyebrows among skincare experts who question the efficacy and safety of such an approach.

Dermatologists and skincare professionals have expressed serious concerns regarding the caveman method. Associate Professor Deshan Sebaratnam from the Skin Hospital in Sydney warns that neglecting proper skincare can lead to skin conditions like terra firma-forme, where dead skin cells accumulate. He emphasizes that while the body naturally sheds skin, not washing can lead to complications, particularly in today's polluted environment. Professor Yousuf Mohammed from the University of Queensland reinforces this by noting that natural oils, if left unwashed, can create a breeding ground for bacteria. Experts recommend a balanced approach to skincare, advocating for the use of gentle cleansers and sunscreen rather than extreme measures like the caveman method. They suggest that a simple routine can effectively maintain skin health without resorting to an all-or-nothing philosophy. Ultimately, they advise individuals to be mindful of their skincare choices, as what works for one person might not benefit another, reinforcing the importance of personal skincare goals and needs.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article explores the controversial "caveman method" of skincare that has gained traction on TikTok, highlighting its origins, the experiences of a prominent influencer, and expert opinions surrounding the practice. This trend has sparked significant debate, particularly regarding its efficacy and potential consequences for skin health.

Purpose of the Article

The intention behind this piece seems to be to inform readers about a trending skincare practice while also cautioning against it. By presenting both the viral phenomenon and the skepticism from experts, the article aims to provide a balanced perspective that encourages critical thinking among readers. It serves to highlight the potential dangers of following unverified beauty trends that circulate on social media.

Public Perception and Concerns

The article may influence public perception by framing the caveman method as a questionable fad. The mention of expert opinions that strongly advise against the practice could lead readers to develop skepticism about such trends and foster a more cautious approach to skincare. This could also encourage a dialogue about the importance of relying on scientific evidence rather than social media influencers for health and beauty advice.

Potential Hidden Agendas

The article does not appear to have an overt hidden agenda. However, it subtly promotes the idea of consulting skincare professionals rather than relying solely on viral trends, which may serve the interests of dermatologists and skincare experts. By emphasizing the risks associated with the caveman method, it encourages consumers to prioritize professional advice, potentially benefiting the skincare industry as a whole.

Manipulative Elements

The article does not exhibit overt manipulation, but it does employ a persuasive tone through the use of expert testimonies. The inclusion of dermatologists' opinions adds credibility to the argument against the caveman method, potentially steering readers toward a more informed perspective. The framing of Tia Zakher’s experiences as a cautionary tale could evoke concern and prompt reflection on the risks of such trends.

Credibility Assessment

The article appears to be credible, as it references qualified dermatologists and experts in skin health. Their insights provide a scientific basis for the criticism of the caveman method, and the balanced presentation of both sides of the argument allows readers to form their own conclusions. However, the sensational nature of the topic may attract attention more for its entertainment value than for its educational content.

Connection to Broader Issues

This discussion ties into larger societal issues surrounding beauty standards, the influence of social media, and the impact of viral trends on health practices. It reflects a growing awareness of the risks associated with following unverified advice from online sources, which is particularly relevant in a time when misinformation can spread rapidly.

Community Support and Target Audience

The article likely resonates more with individuals who are health-conscious and skeptical of unverified beauty trends. It appeals to a demographic that values expert opinions, such as those interested in dermatology, skincare, and overall wellness. The cautionary tone may also attract readers who have experienced negative consequences from following similar viral trends.

Market Impact

While this article may not have a direct impact on stock markets, it highlights trends in the beauty industry that could influence consumer behavior. Brands that prioritize scientifically-backed skincare products may benefit from increased trust among consumers who are cautious about following fads like the caveman method.

Global Context

The relevance of this article extends beyond skincare to reflect broader themes of health misinformation and the role of social media in shaping public opinion. In today’s context, where digital platforms significantly influence consumer choices, the cautionary tale of the caveman method serves as a reminder of the importance of evidence-based practices.

AI Involvement

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this article. However, if AI were to be involved, it might have contributed to the analysis of trends or synthesized expert opinions. Human editorial oversight is likely present to ensure the narrative aligns with journalistic standards, particularly in a health-related context.

Conclusion on Reliability

Overall, the article is reliable due to its references to qualified experts and the balanced presentation of the topic. It encourages readers to think critically about viral trends and their potential health implications, fostering a more informed public discourse on skincare practices.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The latest viral skincare routine involves no skincare at all. Dubbed the “caveman method”, it involves shunning any kind of skincare products, as well as water, and letting the skin barrier “heal”.

TikTok creator Tia Zakher has become a viral sensation for her adherence to the trend. The 22-year-old sparked debate about the method afterposting videos of herself with visibly flaky skin, apparently a result of the trend. “What you’re seeing is dead skin, that’s going to flake off eventually while new healthy skin forms underneath,” she told millions of viewers.

Zakherhas her scepticsbut, whether or not you believe the videos, what do experts think about the regime, which has been attributed to other celebrities includingAlexa Chung and Salma Hayek?

Like many healthcare professionals who have commented on the viral videos, Associate Prof Deshan Sebaratnam, a dermatologist at the Skin hospital in Sydney, says “it’s not a good idea”.

“The reason being is your body is constantly regenerating itself, your skin is constantly turning over, and old skin cells are being shed. Normally they can fall off, but sometimes they can get stuck together, particularly if your skin’s a little bit oilier.”

Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning

Sebaratnam said a condition known as terra firma-forme – where those dead skin cells can accumulate like scale – can develop when people don’t shower.

“I wouldn’t recommend what she’s doing,” he said.

Associate professor Yousuf Mohammed, an expert in pharmaceutics and skin toxicology at the University of Queensland, said sebum – the natural, oily substance produced by sebaceous glands in the skin – provides a partial barrier to protect the skin, but if left unwashed for too long can create the perfect atmosphere for certain types of bacteria to grow.

“The caveman technique [might have] worked when we lived in the caves because we didn’t have these new kinds of [modern] pollutants around,” he said. “In today’s day and age, we really do need to wash.”

“There’s all this misinformation out there that you need a12-step skincare routine– that’s completely not true. But you don’t want to take it from one extreme to the other, like this person,” Sebaratnam said.

He recommends in the morning putting sunscreen on, and then at the end of the day a gentle soap-free cleanser, ideally without fragrances or perfumes. “You don’t need to be spending lots of money – the cheap stuff works great.”

Sebaratnam says cleansers are helpful because “with makeup, with sunscreen, even with your own sweat and oil, you need something a little bit more than just water, because those things are oil-based, and oil and water don’t mix, so you need something that can help remove oil-based products.”

“That’s really all you need in terms of a very simple skincare routine – you don’t need to be doing anything extra on top of that. All sunscreen have moisturiser in-built within them, so you don’t need to be putting sunscreen and moisturiser on at the same time,” Sebaratnam said.

From a medical perspective, only people with conditions such as eczema need moisturiser, Sebaratnam said. But there are lots of different factors that motivate people when it comes to their skincare – “for some people, that’s their form of meditation or their form of self-care”.

Sebaratnam says aggressive skin care products can certainly disrupt the barrier function of the skin. “Even products like soap can strip away natural oils. Anything you put on your skin can disrupt the pH transiently but our skin is resilient and has mechanisms in place to self-regulate this.”

Commercial skincare brands often promoteproducts with active ingredientsto target specific concerns such asvitamin A for anti-ageing, hyaluronic acid for hydration or vitamin C for brightening. “There’s lots of different products that you can put on your skin but, in particular, a lot of the actives, they’ll all cause a small degree of irritation, and then if all of a sudden you’re putting 12 of these things on, you know, 12 times a small degree of irritation becomes a big degree of irritation,” Sebaratnam says.

“Be intentional with your skincare. Just because you see someone online using something and it suits them, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s going to help you reach your skincare goals.

“Having a sense of what you want to achieve with your skincare is important, and then you can pick products that suit that.”

For some people whose intention is to use their skincare to pamper themselves, they might want to buy expensive products, often paying for a fancy bottle and fragrance, but the improvement in skin quality the next day is likely to be the same whether you use $150 or $15 cream at night, he says.

Natasha May is Guardian Australia’s health reporter

Antiviralis a fortnightly column that interrogates the evidence behind the health headlines and factchecks popular wellness claims

Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.

Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian