RAF base vandalism not enough to justify Palestine Action ban, says ex-minister

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Former Justice Secretary Questions Legality of Banning Palestine Action After RAF Vandalism"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent vandalism of aircraft at RAF Brize Norton by the pro-Palestinian group Palestine Action has sparked a significant debate regarding the potential proscription of the organization. Former justice secretary Charlie Falconer stated that the act of spray-painting military planes alone does not provide adequate legal grounds for labeling the group as a terrorist organization. This incident, which marks the fourth attack on UK defense assets by Palestine Action, has drawn a swift response from government officials, including Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, who emphasized the need for a robust response to such actions. Reynolds also noted that while the Palestinian cause is noble, the group's methods do not serve it well. Meanwhile, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is preparing to address Parliament regarding the proscription of Palestine Action, following a police investigation that has escalated to the counter-terrorism unit due to the seriousness of the breach of security at the airbase, which is vital for national defense operations.

Palestine Action has defended its actions, claiming that their protests aim to disrupt Britain's involvement in what they describe as genocide and war crimes in the Middle East. The group released footage showing individuals infiltrating the airbase and vandalizing military aircraft, prompting criticism from various quarters, including MPs and human rights organizations like Amnesty International. Critics argue that equating the group's actions with terrorism undermines the original intent of counter-terrorism laws and could lead to a chilling effect on legitimate protests. Former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell and former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf voiced strong opposition to the government's approach, suggesting it mischaracterizes the group's intentions and actions. With increasing pressure from advocacy groups and public figures, the situation raises important questions about the balance between national security and the right to protest, particularly in the context of sensitive geopolitical issues such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The spray-painting of aircraft at an RAF base by a pro-Palestinian group would not provide the sole legal justification for banning it, according to a former justice secretary.

The home secretary,Yvette Cooper, is expected to move to proscribe Palestine Action in the coming days after an incident on Friday at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire.

Jonathan Reynolds, the trade secretary, said on Sunday it was the fourth attack by the group on key UK defence assets and that those interfering over a period of time with defence infrastructure should expect “a very robust response”.

“I would also say those people do no service to the Palestinian cause, which is a noble one,” Reynolds said in an interview on the BBC.

But reports of amove to proscribe the group, which would in effect label it as a terrorist organisation, have been met with criticism from some, including MPs, Amnesty International and the former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf.

A Thames Valley police investigation into the incident has been taken over by counter-terrorism police, while the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said it was in the process of reviewing security at its bases. Cooper is preparing a written ministerial statement that will be placed before parliament on Monday.

Palestine Actionreleased a short video on Friday morningshowing two people driving electric scooters unimpeded inside the airbase at night and spraying two military planes.

The group said it had targeted RAF Voyager aircraft used for transport and refuelling, and that “activists have interrupted Britain’s direct participation in the commission of genocide and war crimes across the Middle East”.

The incident is the latest action in recent years by the group, but it is also a particularly embarrassing breach of MoD security at a site that holds transport planes used by the king and prime minister.

The former justice secretary Charlie Falconer said on Sunday that the “sort of demonstration” that took place at the RAF would not justify proscription, “so there must be something else that I don’t know about”.

Asked whether the group’s actions were “commensurate with the need to proscribe an organisation”, Lord Falconer told Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme: “I am not aware of what Palestine Action has done beyond the painting of things on the planes in Brize Norton. They may have done other things I didn’t know.

“I think the question will probably not be what we know about them publicly, but there would need to be something that was known by those who look at these sorts of things that we don’t know about, because they got into the airbase, which might suggest they’ve got some degree of ability to make them dangerous.”

Criticism came from quarters including the MP and former Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who said on X: “Prosecuting Palestine Action protestors for criminal damage for paint spraying at the airbase would be expected but putting them on a par with mass killers like Jihadis & Boko Haram & proscribing doesn’t seem appropriate & not what the counter-terrorism laws were introduced for.”

During a protest march in London on Saturday, Yousaf accused the UK government of “abusing” anti-terror laws against Palestine Action. He later said on X: “If the UK Government believes those protesting against the atrocities in Gaza are terrorists, but those killing children should be supported and provided with weapons, then this Government has not only lost its way, it has lost its conscience.”

Amnesty International UK said it was “deeply concerned at the use of counter-terrorism powers to target protest groups”.

Palestine Action was founded in 2020 by Huda Ammori, whose father is Palestinian, and Richard Barnard, a leftwing activist. The organisation, which focuses its campaigns on multinational arms dealers and corporate banks, recently targeted a factory in Shenstone, Staffordshire, claiming it made drones for the Israeli army.

The home secretary has been the focus of lobbying by groups pushing for Palestine Action to be banned. The Campaign Against Antisemitism said it recently wrote to her calling for the proscription of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000 and providing her with a dossier on the group.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian