‘Putting profit over people’: big gas is waging war on a California clean air rule

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"California's Clean Air Regulations Face Opposition from Gas Industry Amid Climate Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In early January, Barbara Ishida, a second-grade teacher from Altadena, California, was forced to evacuate her home as a wildfire, exacerbated by climate change, destroyed it. With a determination to rebuild in a way that mitigates future climate risks, Ishida plans to construct an environmentally friendly home without gas appliances. This vision aligns with a recent University of California Berkeley study that advocates for all-electric construction as a sustainable rebuilding strategy. However, the gas industry, represented by SoCalGas, is actively opposing proposed regulations aimed at promoting the use of zero-emission space and water heaters. These regulations, if enacted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), would significantly reduce harmful nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions, potentially preventing thousands of premature deaths and asthma cases. The proposed rules have faced delays and modifications due to lobbying efforts from SoCalGas and business coalitions claiming the regulations could impose substantial costs on consumers.

The SCAQMD's proposed amendments to Rules 1111 and 1121 aimed to set zero-emission standards for new heating appliances, which would apply to manufacturers and installers. Originally, the regulations would have required complete compliance by 2026 for new buildings, but the revised rules now demand only a gradual increase in zero-emission sales targets. Critics argue that these weakened regulations will prolong the reliance on gas appliances, undermining efforts to combat climate change and air pollution. The opposition has included a lawsuit challenging the SCAQMD's authority to impose such regulations, further complicating the situation. As wildfires continue to threaten communities in California, advocates like Ishida express frustration over the prioritization of corporate profits over public health and safety, emphasizing the urgent need for sustainable building practices to combat the worsening climate crisis.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the ongoing conflict between the gas industry and advocates for clean air regulations in California, highlighting the personal story of a teacher whose home was destroyed by wildfires. This narrative serves to frame the broader issue of climate change and the resistance to transitioning to cleaner energy sources.

Motivation Behind the Publication

The primary aim of this article appears to be raising awareness about the detrimental effects of the gas industry on public health and the environment. By sharing the personal story of Barbara Ishida, the piece seeks to evoke empathy and encourage discussions on the importance of implementing clean air regulations. The article emphasizes the urgency of addressing climate change and the need for sustainable rebuilding practices.

Public Perception Influence

The article is designed to cultivate a negative perception of the gas industry, particularly in how it prioritizes profits over public health and environmental concerns. By detailing the opposition to clean air regulations, the piece aims to rally support for stronger environmental policies among readers.

Potential Omissions

There may be aspects of the gas industry's arguments or the economic implications of transitioning to all-electric homes that are not fully explored in the article. For instance, the potential job losses in the gas sector or the economic impact on lower-income families might be downplayed to strengthen the narrative favoring clean energy.

Manipulative Aspects

The article exhibits a degree of manipulation by focusing heavily on personal stories and emotional appeals while potentially neglecting counterarguments from the gas industry. By framing the gas industry as solely profit-driven and neglecting to address any legitimate concerns they may have, the narrative risks oversimplifying a complex issue.

Truthfulness of the Content

The article appears to be grounded in factual reporting, citing studies and regulatory bodies. However, the framing and language used could lead to a biased interpretation of the situation, particularly against the gas industry.

Societal Impact

Should the proposed regulations be passed, they could have significant implications for public health, climate goals, and economic dynamics in California. The push for cleaner energy sources may lead to a shift in consumer behavior and industry standards, influencing future energy policies nationwide.

Target Audience

This article is likely to resonate more with environmentally conscious individuals, activists, and communities affected by pollution and climate change. It seeks to mobilize support from those advocating for sustainable practices and clean air initiatives.

Market Effects

The article could impact the stock prices of companies involved in the gas industry, particularly SoCalGas, by increasing scrutiny on their practices and lobbying efforts. Investors might reassess the long-term viability of gas companies in light of growing support for clean energy policies.

Geopolitical Context

While the article primarily focuses on a local issue, it reflects broader trends in the global energy transition and climate change discussions that are highly relevant today. The conflict between fossil fuel interests and clean energy advocates is a significant aspect of international environmental politics.

AI Involvement in Writing

There is a possibility that AI tools were utilized in the writing process, especially in analyzing data or generating specific content. If AI was involved, it could have influenced the narrative by emphasizing certain aspects of the story while downplaying others, shaping the overall presentation of the information.

Manipulative Techniques

The language used in the article may lead readers to view the gas industry in a negative light, potentially inciting anger or frustration against corporate interests. The emphasis on personal tragedy and environmental urgency serves to heighten the emotional stakes of the narrative.

In conclusion, while the article presents a compelling case for clean air regulations and highlights significant environmental concerns, it could benefit from a more balanced exploration of the complexities involved in the energy transition. The potential bias and emotional appeals suggest a moderate level of manipulation, aimed at mobilizing public support for specific regulatory changes.

Unanalyzed Article Content

This story isco-published with Floodlight.

On a windy night in early January, Barbara Ishida, a second grade teacher, spotted the Eaton fire glowing in the hills behind her home in Altadena,California. Her mind turned to the deadly wildfires in Lahaina and Paradise and she thought, “Let’s get out – now.”

Ishida and her husband evacuated safely, but the flames destroyed their home. An attributionstudyfound that climate change, which is primarily caused by burning fossil fuels, made the January fires 35% more likely.

She thought the least they could do is rebuild in a way that wouldn’t compound the climate crisis that raised the fire risk.

“Building back is our only option at this point,” Ishida said, “so we’re going to build back super environmentally friendly.”

Her vision is to build a fire-resistant home with no gas appliances. That approach is backed by a University of California Berkeleystudyin April that concluded all-electric construction is the best and most climate-friendly strategy to rebuild after the fires.

But the gas industry is pushing back against this idea. Proposed rules that would have encouraged Ishida and other homeowners to buy furnaces and heaters that emit no nitrogen oxides (NOx) – a key pollutant from gas appliances – have been weakened and delayed by a coalition of groups that includes SoCalGas, the country’s largest gas utility.

SoCalGas has ahistory of lobbying hardagainst regulations that hurt its bottom line. After a fierce opposition campaign, the rules are going to a vote on Friday, 6 June.

The rules are proposed by the south coast air quality management district (SCAQMD), the agency responsible for improving air quality in Los Angeles and nearby communities, one of the most polluted air basins in the United States.

If passed, the rules are designed to create cleaner air and reduce planet-heating emissions by setting future targets for sales of new zero-emission space and water heaters. The rules would apply to manufacturers, distributors, sellers and installers. They are expected to prevent 2,490 premature deaths and avoid 10,200 asthma cases.

“Consumers will continue to have a choice of purchasing either a gas or electric space/water heaters when replacing their existing units,” explained Nahal Mogharabi, a spokesperson for the air-quality district. “Importantly, consumers can continue to operate their existing units until the consumer chooses to replace it or the unit breaks.”

SoCalGas defended its role in the opposition campaign. “SoCalGas’ stakeholder engagement and outreach efforts on this topic are a regular part of any rulemaking process where we share information that could affect Southern California customers,” Erica Berardi, a SoCalGas spokesperson, wrote in an email.

BizFed, a business group that was also part of the opposition campaign, advocated for a delay in the rule-making process “to allow for more transparency and sufficient public outreach to make Southern Californians aware of the significant costs associated with these changes”, Elizabeth Daubel, communications director for BizFed, wrote in an email.

At the same time that the opposition campaign ramped up, groups allied with the gas industryfiled a lawsuitagainst the SCAQMD, aiming to undermine its authority to impose such regulations.

The opposition is far from unique; a Februaryreportby a London-based thinktank InfluenceMap found that fossil fuel companies in the United States, European Union and Australia are waging parallel campaigns against laws that restrict use of gas in buildings – pushback that has largely succeeded in preventing and weakening these laws.

Ishida signed a letter supporting the proposed SCAQMD rules because she believes they would encourage Altadena to build back in a sustainable way. When she heard about the organized opposition to the rules, Ishida felt angry.

“They’re just putting profits over people,” she said. “It’s sad and it’s selfish and it’s not right.”

Although progressive states like California are leading the transition away from fossil fuels, gas appliances remain ubiquitous in California homes and across the western United States.

Buildings account for one-quarter of greenhouse gas emissions in California but are subject to local control, meaning that local regulators like the SCAQMD have a big role to play in lowering emissions.

In 2023, recognizing the air pollution caused by gas appliances, the agency proposed amendments to two rules to encourage alternatives. Changes to Rules 1111 and 1121 would establish a zero-emission NOx standard for furnaces and water heaters.

As originally written, the new rules would have impacted more than 10m gas-fired residential and commercial furnaces and residential water heaters. The rules would not affect gas stoves, a flashpoint in similar regulatory efforts.

As they were written in October 2024, the proposed rules would have required all furnaces and water heaters installed to become zero emission by 2026 for new residential and commercial buildings. Existing buildings and mobile homes had a few more years to comply.

But in recent months, SCAQMD staff have softened the proposed rules. The current version now requires manufacturers to meet zero-emission sales targets for residential buildings, starting at 30% in 2027-28 and rising to 90% by 2036. The rule no longer requires that all new furnaces and water heaters be zero emission by a certain date.

The original rules would have reduced NOx emissions by 10 tons a day, which would have been the largest emissions reducing rule package adopted in over three decades by the SCAQMD. The revised rules would achieve a reduction of 6 tons a day of NOx emissions.

Kim Orbe, senior conservation program manager at Sierra Club, said pushing back the compliance date would allow manufacturers to continue building gas-powered equipment for years to come. She described the rules as “tremendously weakened”.

In late 2024, an opposition campaign sprung up, prompting SCAQMD’s board to push back a scheduled hearing and final vote by six months, to Tuesday 6 June.

SoCalGas and groups aligned with the company helped delay the rule-making process by encouraging public officials to oppose the rules, according to records obtained by theEnergyand Policy Institute and shared with Floodlight.

Ahead of a major SCAQMD meeting on 20 December, SoCalGas employees sent “urgent” requests to public officials, including mayors of cities in the south coast area, asking them to send letters, testify and pass resolutions opposing the rules.

Their emails claimed – misleadingly – that the rules would prohibit the sale and installation of all gas furnaces and water heaters.

Some of the letters that SCAQMD received from public officials were drafted by a consultant working for BizFed. Several city governments copied the consultant’s draft letter onto their letterhead. Almost word-for-word letters were sent to the SCAQMD by the Orange county council of governments, the city of Lake Forest and the city of Loma Linda.

The response to the rules was overwhelming, generating over 12,500 comments. But staff reported that many letters opposing the rules contained faulty information, including that the rules would mandate homeowners switch to all-electric appliances.

The governing board delayed the vote and modified the rules to give more time to address concerns about “cost, technology availability and consumer choice”, Mogharabi wrote in an email.

“Even though the rule has been modified, as is typical during the rule-making process,” she added, “the current NOx reductions are significant.”

Mogharabi noted that this summer, the agency is launching a Go Zerorebate programthat will provide more than $21m to help residents and small businesses install zero-emission heating appliances.

On 10 January 2025, as unprecedented megafires burned out of control in Los Angeles – destroying thousands of homes and killing 30 people – SCAQMD officials held a public meeting to consider the proposed rules 1111 and 1121.

The tone of the meeting was somber. Officials began by acknowledging the wildfires and smoke cloaking the city, offering condolences to a board member who lost his home to the flames. Minutes later, lobbyists including a representative of SoCalGas asked for the rules to be delayed or retracted, citing the lawsuit challenging SCAQMD’s authority to make such rules.

Jessi Davis, a SoCalGas lobbyist said, “We think it would be prudent for the board to postpone this rulemaking until these issues are resolved by the courts.”

In December, a coalition of groups, including homebuilders, restaurant owners and unions,filed the lawsuitagainst the SCAQMD, seeking to overturn a related rule that phases out large gas-fired furnaces and water heaters in commercial and industrial facilities. That rule is different from the proposed rules, which are specific to smaller residential and commercial furnaces and water heaters.

“The legal theories they’re trying to push would undermine the ability of the (agency) to protect its residents,” said Adrian Martinez, an attorney at Earthjustice, an environmental nonprofit that is intervening in the case. “They’re attempting to strip local entities like SCAQMD of the ability to clean up pollution.”

With another wildfire season on the horizon, Ishida is thinking about the future of Los Angeles if climate change continues to worsen. “We’re not going to be the only community that burns,” Ishida said. “We’re not going to be the last if we continue down this stretch.”

Floodlightis a non-profit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian