Preferences may help decide the Australian election. Here is what could happen in five crucial seats

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Key Electorates to Watch for Preference Dynamics in the 2025 Australian Election"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Preferences are a critical factor in determining the outcomes of Australian elections, as evidenced by the 2022 federal election where only 15 out of 151 seats were won by candidates who received the majority of first preference votes. In 16 seats, the eventual winners did not have the highest first-preference votes, highlighting the importance of how voters direct their preferences. Political parties and candidates distribute how-to-vote cards to guide voters on preference allocation, which can significantly influence close races. While voters are not obligated to follow these recommendations, the order in which candidates are listed can sway the final outcome, particularly in tightly contested electorates. As the 2025 election approaches, five key electorates are under scrutiny for their preference dynamics, with the potential for significant shifts in party representation based on voter preferences.

Among these electorates, Peter Dutton's seat of Dickson, which has a narrow 1.7% margin, is particularly noteworthy. Despite initial expectations that Dutton would retain his seat, recent polling suggests a decline in Coalition support, allowing Labor's Ali France a chance to challenge. The independent candidate Ellie Smith's strategy of recommending an open ticket complicates the flow of preferences, as her supporters may lean towards Labor in the final count. In contrast, the Labor-held seat of Perth sees Kate Hulett posing a serious threat due to altered preference directions from the Liberals and Greens. Additionally, the intricacies of preference flows in Melbourne's seat, where the incumbent Labor MP Josh Burns has opted for an open ticket, could lead to unpredictable outcomes depending on how preferences are distributed if he falls into third place. The dynamics in Leichhardt and the inner-city seat of Sturt further illustrate the complexities of preference flows, particularly with the rise of minor parties and their influence on major party candidates. These electorates will be closely monitored as the election nears, with preferences likely playing a decisive role in determining the final results.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article examines the significance of preference votes in determining the outcomes of Australian elections, particularly in the context of the upcoming 2025 election. The analysis highlights specific electoral seats where preference flows could play a decisive role, underscoring the evolving dynamics of party politics in Australia.

Role of Preferences in Elections

Preferences are crucial in Australian elections, as evidenced by the 2022 election where only a small fraction of winners secured the majority of first preference votes. This indicates that the outcome is often influenced by how voters allocate their preferences, which can be manipulated through strategic campaigning, such as how-to-vote cards. The article emphasizes that while these cards guide voters, they do not guarantee compliance, particularly in tightly contested areas.

Focus on Key Electoral Seats

The analysis identifies five electorates where preference flows will be closely monitored. One key seat mentioned is Dickson, held by Peter Dutton, where the margin is slim. The shifting coalition vote and the rise of independent candidates like Ellie Smith complicate the traditional voting patterns, suggesting that preferences from teal voters could significantly impact the final outcome. The article suggests that while Smith's preferences may lean towards Labor, the actual flow will depend on her strategic recommendations.

Underlying Messages and Implications

There is a subtle implication that the dynamics of voter preferences could lead to unexpected outcomes in traditionally safe seats. This narrative poses a challenge to established party politics, indicating a shift in voter sentiment, especially among younger and more progressive voters who may resonate with teal independents. The article aims to create a sense of urgency and awareness about the changing political landscape, encouraging voters to consider how their preferences may influence the election results.

Potential Manipulation and Public Perception

The article does not seem to hide or obscure information, but it may downplay the complexity of voter behavior regarding preferences. The focus on certain electorates could suggest a strategic framing designed to elicit concern or engagement from voters. While the writing style is straightforward, the emphasis on particular candidates and the dynamics of preferences may lead some readers to perceive it as a partial analysis.

Trustworthiness and Reliability

The article appears to be grounded in factual information and recent electoral trends, making it relatively reliable. However, the framing of the narrative around specific candidates and the potential outcomes could introduce a degree of bias. The analysis seems credible, as it is based on observable electoral patterns and polling data, but the emphasis on specific individuals and scenarios might skew public perception.

In conclusion, the article serves to inform readers about the importance of preferences in Australian elections while subtly suggesting potential shifts in political power dynamics. The narrative could encourage greater voter engagement and consideration of how individual preferences can shape electoral outcomes.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Preferences play a crucial role in decidingAustralian elections. In 2022, the winning candidate polled a majority of first preference votes in just 15 out of 151 seats. In 16 seats, the eventual winner did not poll the most first-preference votes.

Parties and candidates issue how-to-vote cards to ensure voters cast a formal vote, and to influence how they direct their preferences. That doesn’t mean voters always follow those recommendations, but in some close seats the order in which candidates are listed on how-to-votes can play a key role.

Here are five electorates where preference flows will be closely watched at the 2025 election.

The seat held by Peter Dutton on a 1.7% margin covers suburbs on the northern outskirts of Brisbane. There was no expectation at the start of the campaign that it could change hands, butthe decline in the Coalition vote in the pollsmeans we are now considering the possibility that Labor could gain seats, with the opposition leader’s very marginal seat possibly in play.

The teal independent candidate Ellie Smith is running a prominent campaign, but polls suggest Labor’s Ali France is more likely to emerge as Dutton’s main opponent in the final round of counting. Smith is recommending an open ticket, meaning she does not specify how voters should order the other candidates after giving her their first preference. This is common among the teal independents, and does not affect the outcome when they make it to the final round of counting. But where they fall short, their preferences could be crucial.

Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter

In a close race, the flow of preferences from teal voters could decide who wins Dickson. I expect many of Smith’s preferences would flow to Labor, but perhaps fewer than if she had put France above Dutton on her how-to-vote card.

Kate Hulett, running in the Labor-held seat,came close to winning the state seat of the same namein March. One thing that brought her undone was the Liberal party’s decision to preference Labor above her.

But now the Liberals have gone the other way for the federal election, directing preferences towards Hulett, and the Greens are also preferencing her. This may be enough for Hulett to pose a serious threat to Labor’s Josh Wilson.

This seat in the inner south of Melbourne is particularly complex. In 2022, the Labor, Liberal and Greens candidates polled almost exactly the same first-preference vote. The Greens came third in the key round of counting, enabling Labor to win the seat with a 12.2% margin over the Liberals thanks to Greens preferences.

The seat has one of the largest proportions of Jewish voters in Australia, and there has beena strong push to distance Labor from the Greensover its position on the war in Gaza. Labor has traditionally preferenced the Greens over the Liberals, which would probably lead to a Greens victory if Labor was to fall into third place.

This time the incumbent Labor MP, Josh Burns, has instead issued an open ticket on his how-to-vote card, not recommending preferences. This won’t matter if Burns remains in the top two, in which case he will win, with Liberal preferences helping him beat the Greens, or Greens preferences helping him beat the Liberal. But if Burns falls into third, it is unclear how his preferences will flow. Will Labor preferences still flow strongly to the Greens, or will many Labor voters instead prefer the Liberal candidate?

Leichhardt covers Cairns and the Cape York peninsula in the far north of Queensland. The Liberal MP, Warren Entsch, is retiring after holding the seat for decades and Labor believes it has a strong chance of winning.

There has been an increasing vote for rightwing minor parties in recent years, and those parties will sometimes try to make their presence known with their preferences.

This year, One Nation is preferencing the Coalition over Labor across the country, in most seats giving the Coalition its second preference. By contrast, Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots has chosen to put the incumbent major party last, which means it has ranked Labor ahead of the LNP in Leichhardt. Traditionally, Labor has gained strong preference flows from the Greens, while preferences from One Nation and other right-wing minor parties have only slightly favoured the Coalition.

The main challenge for these parties will be to get their how-to-vote cards to potential voters. It’s a big job for the smaller parties to send volunteers to every polling place – including some in very remote areas. A how-to-vote card is no good if voters don’t see it.

This inner-city Adelaide electorate is held by the Liberal James Stevens, but is a top target for Labor and a teal independent, and has even been mentioned as a Greens target.

Greens voters strongly favour Labor over the Coalition when marking their preferences, but there is more uncertainty when it comes to choosing between Labor and independents.

In some seats the Greens have preferenced the local independent higher, but in Sturt they have preferred Labor over the teal independent Verity Cooper, despite Cooper being a former Greens member.

If the progressive vote is split between Labor and the independent, Greens preferences could be crucial in deciding which candidate makes it to the final count against Stevens.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian