‘Practices like ours are dying’: why GPs aren’t celebrating Medicare’s record investment

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"General Practitioners Express Concerns Over Medicare Investment Amid Financial Struggles"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a small practice in South Sydney, Dr. Phillip Loxley reflects on the evolution of general practice over nearly four decades. His patients include long-term clients like Wendy Rayment, who has relied on Loxley for her medical needs, including the management of her asthma and treatment for lymphoma. Despite the close-knit relationships developed with patients, Loxley describes his practice as a 'dying breed.' He highlights the significant changes in the healthcare landscape, noting that the financial viability of general practices is under threat, despite the government's recent record investment in Medicare aimed at expanding bulk-billing incentives. Loxley points out that rising operational costs and the complexities of modern patient care have made it increasingly difficult to sustain a practice like his, which has served around 6,500 patients, many of whom are part of multi-generational families.

The challenges faced by general practitioners are echoed by Dr. Louise Stone, a professor of general practice, who explains that the current Medicare rebate structure does not adequately support the time-intensive care that many patients require. With the shift towards managing chronic diseases and mental health issues, GPs find themselves dealing with more complex cases while being reimbursed less per minute compared to brief consultations. Additionally, the burden of unpaid administrative work and the pressure to bulk-bill all patients add to the financial strain. The government's response, while promising to close the earnings gap for GPs, has not alleviated the concerns of many practitioners. Dr. Michael Wright, president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, acknowledges the need for better funding to ensure GPs can provide quality care without compromising their financial stability. As the healthcare system grapples with these issues, the future of general practice remains uncertain, with many GPs feeling overwhelmed by the demands placed on them and the lack of adequate support from the government.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the challenges faced by general practitioners (GPs) in Australia, particularly in the context of Medicare's recent investments. It juxtaposes the long-standing, personalized care provided by some GPs against the backdrop of a changing healthcare landscape that threatens the viability of similar practices.

Concerns About the Future of GP Practices

Dr. Phillip Loxley’s reflections on his practice highlight a significant concern among GPs: the sustainability of traditional practices in a modern healthcare environment. His statement about being a “dinosaur” underscores the fear that smaller, community-focused practices are becoming obsolete. This sentiment may resonate with many healthcare professionals who feel that their model of care is under threat from larger, more impersonal healthcare systems.

Government Investment vs. Reality

Despite the government’s claims of record investments in Medicare, GPs express skepticism regarding its impact on their financial viability. The article reveals that many practitioners operate on extremely thin margins, suggesting that the announced investments may not address the underlying issues that threaten their practices. This discrepancy indicates a gap between government policy and the realities faced by healthcare providers.

Public Sentiment and Awareness

By detailing personal stories of patients and their long-term relationships with their GPs, the article aims to evoke empathy and raise awareness about the potential loss of such personalized care. The narrative emphasizes the importance of continuity in healthcare and how it contributes to better patient outcomes, thereby fostering public support for preserving traditional GP practices.

Underlying Issues and Potential Manipulation

There may be a subtle attempt to manipulate public perception by framing the narrative around the impending crisis in GP practices. The choice of language and the focus on emotional connections with patients could serve to elicit a stronger emotional response from the audience. This approach might be a strategy to rally support for policies that protect smaller practices, drawing attention away from larger systemic issues in the healthcare system.

Comparative Analysis and Broader Implications

When compared to other health-related articles in the media, this piece aligns with a growing trend of examining the implications of healthcare policies on individual practitioners. The portrayal of GPs as vulnerable entities could serve to unite various stakeholders, including patients and healthcare professionals, against a backdrop of systemic challenges. The potential ripple effects of this narrative could influence future healthcare policies and funding allocations.

Community Support and Target Audience

The article is likely to resonate more with older generations and individuals who value personalized and long-term healthcare relationships. It speaks to those who may be concerned about the depersonalization of medical care, thereby drawing support from communities that prioritize localized services over larger health systems.

Market Reaction and Economic Impact

This article might not directly influence stock markets; however, it could have implications for healthcare-related stocks, particularly those tied to larger health service providers. If public sentiment shifts towards supporting smaller practices, there could be increased pressure on policymakers to allocate resources that favor these entities, potentially impacting market dynamics.

Geopolitical Context

While the article is primarily focused on local healthcare issues, it reflects broader trends in healthcare systems worldwide, especially in developed nations. The challenges faced by GPs may mirror those in other countries, indicating a global conversation about the future of primary care.

Use of AI in Analysis

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was employed in crafting this article. However, if AI were to be used, it could have influenced the narrative by highlighting patient stories or drawing attention to specific statistics that support the overall message. The language used throughout may reflect a strategy aimed at eliciting emotional responses, which is a common tactic that AI-generated content can sometimes employ.

In summary, the article serves to illuminate the struggles faced by GPs in Australia, contrasting their personal care approach with the broader challenges posed by government policies. It aims to generate public awareness and possibly influence policy discussions about the future of healthcare practices.

Unanalyzed Article Content

On a Thursday morning in April, the patients in Dr Phillip Loxley’s waiting room have either been coming to his practice in south Sydney since he opened it nearly 40 years ago, or – like 27-year-old Liam there for a check up – since they were born.

Wendy Rayment, 75, is the former. Loxley has not only managed her asthma for years but was the doctor who helped her get a diagnosis for lymphoma in her eye after she experienced a range of “red herring” symptoms, starting in 2016, and then helped manage her care throughout the treatment.

Now in remission, Rayment is back at the practice after slipping on holiday in Vietnam and tearing open her calf, and Loxley is peering at the medication she received there with a magnifying glass, attempting to translate it.

Sue Loxley, Phillip’s wife, is the practice manager and a registered nurse. She has just changed Rayment’s bandages before reminding her to get her flu vaccine when she comes in next week to have the stitches out.

Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter

The Sutherland practice’s books are full with around 6,500 current patients, many of whom are second and third generation, Loxley says. “They almost start to feel like family after a while.”

But the general practitioner (GP) says he’s somewhat of a “dinosaur”.

“Practices like ours are dying out. It would be hard to have a practice like this these days. We can do it because we’ve been doing it for 40 years,” he says.

Despite this election being dubbed a “health election”, with the government spruiking itsrecord investment in Medicareto expand the bulk-billing incentive to all Australians, many GPs say the plan willnot help the financial viability of practicesrunning on the slimmest of margins.

When Loxley began his career he was able to work as a GP with simply “a wooden bed, a desk and some cards you wrote on”.

The rent was far cheaper in those days, and in 1993, seven years after starting his practice, Loxley bought a house nearby for $240,000. Loxley estimates that today it would cost at least $1.8m.

Over the decades, the practice has absorbed new expenses like the introduction of complex software and rising costs of indemnity insurance “bit by bit rather than have to start and pay the whole lot in one go”.

Even with the advantage of starting the practice when he did, Loxley has to charge one in four patients $75 for an appointment (leaving them out of pocket $33.80after they receive the rebate for a standard consultation) to retain the practice’s financial viability. And now, as he looks to retirement, he can’t find a young GP willing to take over his practice.

Dr Louise Stone, a professor of general practice at Australia National University, says by her calculations, a GP today starts working with$400,000 debtfrom undergraduate and postgraduate Hecs, as well as the cost of GP fellowship training, including $10,000 to sit qualifying exams.

Newly fellowed GP Dr Claire Francis says she has the best job in medicine with the worst pay.

Whilespecialist doctors charge up to $950 an appointment, when Francis accepts bulk billing a patient $44 for a 20-minute appointment, she is left with about $20 after paying super, tax and the practice she works for 30% to cover rent, nursing and reception staff, electricity and other expenses.

That does not take into account the time she spends helping patients when they are not in the room, which goes unpaid.

Once her day in the practice is over, Francis’s work can include checking blood and pathology test results, making referrals, filling out social housing forms for disadvantaged patients or spending up to an hour on the phone with the state’s justice department, reporting at-risk children if a patient faces homelessness.

“That has to be done for free at the end of the day, after you’ve knocked off work, on the phone in my backyard or at the dog park,” she says.

“That’s often what general practice comes down to – it’s just doing the needful, because there is no one else to do it.”

As the nation increasingly loses its social safety nets – not only for universal healthcare but housing and liveable incomes – people are struggling more and “GPs really are the catch-all of the entire system,” Francis says.

Sign up toAfternoon Update: Election 2025

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Stone, also a GP, says on average, they do about 10 hours a week unpaid administration. “So a quarter of our time is not paid. We estimated it at around $1.2bn a year on in labor from general practice. A lot of that is trying desperately to get patients into services.”

Working in Redfern and Broadway, Francis’ patients range from people who are chronically homeless to affluent Australians who live in $2m homes and have personal chefs. In order to afford to bulk bill the former, she says she has to charge a gap fee for the latter.

Francis says she believes thegovernment’s $8.5bn election policy, which theCoalition quickly matched, to expand the bulk-billing incentive to all Australian Medicare cardholders from 1 November, is “designed to fail”.

“I couldn’t afford to keep working if I bulk billed everyone. I still have more Hecs debt than I do in superannuation,” says Francis, who went to medical school as a mature age student.

Stone says practices are closing “left, right and centre”, and there arethree reasons behind it. The first is the shift to increasingly more complex patient presentations, such as mental health and chronic disease, Stone says.

“The sweet spot for Medicare is six minutes. If you see a doctor for less than 10 minutes, the Medicare rebate is about $6 a minute. If you see a patient for 30 minutes, it’s about $2 a minute,” she says.

“It shouldn’t matter if you need your cut finger bandaged or you need your five chronic diseases managed, you should get the same support per minute of time or per problem.”

General practices used to make more money on brief consultations, which would subsidise the longer ones, Stone says. However, many simple consultations are going elsewhere, including urgent care clinics, where the government invests$246.50 per patient, nurse-led clinics, where it invests $200 per patient, or emergency departments, which cost it $692 per patient without an admission, Stone says.

GPs are left with longer, more complex consultations where the Medicare rebate is significantly lower per minute, and the government is only investing $42 per patient, by comparison, she explains.

The second reason GPs are not able to sustain practices financially, Stone says, is because the rebate was frozen for so long it has fallen under 50% of what it costs for the service to be delivered. Despite the government spruiking bulk-billing incentives, Stone explains they are only a small bonus on top of the rebate.

The third reason, she says, is the “extraordinary political and community pressure to bulk bill everybody” despite the fact that general practice has never done so.

The health minister, Mark Butler, says: “The Albanese Government’s investment in Medicare will close the earnings gap that Peter Dutton forced upon our doctors, so that a GP no longer has to sacrifice their earnings to bulk bill every patient.”

Dr Michael Wright, the president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, says while some practices that already bulk bill patients and rural ones that receive higher incentives to do so have indicated they will take up the government’s policy, the majority the college has spoken to say they are unlikely to change their billing.

Wright says the workforce incentives both major parties have agreed to will help encourage more doctors to specialise in general practice. While previously a doctor leaving a public hospital to start GP training lost their entitlements and had a large pay cut, “both of those have been fixed”. Trainee GPs will now receive an incentive payment while they’re training and be paid entitlements like parental leave for the first time, he says.

Wright says GPs are up for the health challenges the nation faces with a growing and ageing population, includingone in two Australians having a chronic health condition, but increasingly it takes more time to provide that care.

“We’re here to do it, and if we’re properly funded to do it, we can do it – but if the funding is only for quick consultations, then that’s going to make it harder and harder.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian