Poultry megafarm in Shropshire halted over river pollution concerns

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Court Overturns Planning Permission for Poultry Megafarm in Shropshire Due to Pollution Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Planning permission for a proposed poultry megafarm in Shropshire has been overturned following a judicial review that raised significant environmental concerns. The ruling was made by Mr. Justice Fordham in the high court in Cardiff, who found that Shropshire council had inadequately assessed the potential impacts of the industrial chicken unit, which was intended to house up to 230,000 birds. Dr. Alison Caffyn, representing the campaign group River Action, argued that the council overlooked crucial environmental factors, particularly the effects of manure spreading on local land. The judgment emphasized that the council failed to consider the cumulative pollution risks posed by multiple poultry units in the area, especially given the already high density of such facilities near the River Severn catchment area. The ruling has been hailed as a significant victory for environmental advocacy, particularly concerning the health of local waterways.

The implications of this ruling extend beyond the immediate case, as it sets a precedent for how local councils must evaluate the environmental impacts of intensive agricultural operations. Emma Dearnaley, the head of legal at River Action, stated that the decision serves as a strong message against the reckless expansion of industrial farming without a thorough consideration of broader ecological consequences. Concerns have been raised about the rising number of industrial poultry units, particularly in the valleys of the Rivers Wye and Severn, where the accumulation of chicken droppings has been linked to severe river pollution, primarily due to high phosphate levels that deplete oxygen in water bodies. The case also highlighted risks associated with biosecurity, as the proposed megafarm was located just 400 meters from another facility, violating government guidelines aimed at preventing disease spread among poultry. Overall, this ruling marks a pivotal moment in the fight for cleaner rivers and responsible agricultural practices in Shropshire and potentially influences other councils to adopt stricter environmental assessments for future agricultural developments.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Planning permission for a poultry megafarm inShropshirehas been overturned in a ruling that campaigners have welcomed as a win for cleaner rivers.

The judgment on Tuesday upheld a judicial review by Dr Alison Caffyn, who argued that Shropshire council had failed to take into account all the environmental impacts of an industrial chicken unit containing 230,000 birds at any one time when it granted planning permission.

In particular, she said officials had failed to take into account the impact of spreading manure on land.

Mr Justice Fordham in the high court in Cardiff quashed the planning permission. He said in his ruling that the council had failed to lawfully assess the impacts of spreading manure or digestate – a byproduct of the anaerobic digestion of poultry manure – as indirect effects of the development.

Fordham also found that the council had failed to properly assess the reality of having multiple polluting poultry units in one area, especially in light of the high density of existing large poultry units in the River Severn catchment.

Caffyn, who brought the judicial review on behalf of campaign group River Action, said the case highlighted systemic failures to account for the environmental toll of having clusters of industrial-scale poultry farms in one area. She said: “There are nearly 65 chickens for every person in Shropshire and yet the council still thought we needed more.”

Emma Dearnaley, River Action’s head of legal, said the case was a “big win for our rivers … The reckless spread of intensive agriculture must end now”.

She said the ruling had consequences for other councils who must now take the health of the wider area into account and look at the broader consequences when it comes to agricultural waste.

“No more megafarms without looking at the bigger picture,” she said.

The case argued that a rise in large intensive poultry units, known as IPUs, in the valleys of the Rivers Wye and Severn was akey cause of river pollutionas chicken droppings contain more phosphates – which starve fish and river plants of oxygen – than any other animal manure. Intensive poultry farming also causes air pollution, submissions to the court say.

Sign up toDown to Earth

The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential

after newsletter promotion

The counties of Shropshire, Herefordshire and Powysare home to more than 50 million chickensat any one time, and Caffyn, who has researched the scale of IPUs in the area, argued this was placing huge pressures on the Rivers Wye and Severn.

Caffyn argued that the increase of industrial-scale poultry farming in Shropshire would inflict a similar ecological disaster on the River Severn as that suffered by the Wye. She said the location of the proposed unit in Shropshire is just 400 metres from an existing one, which appeared to be in breach of government guidelines that say IPUs should not be built within 3km (1.9 miles) of each other because of the biosecurity risks of bird flu spreading between sites.

Shropshire council approved the planning permission after the applicants promised they would transfer the manure to a third-party anaerobic digestion unit. But the ruling said the spreading of digestate, which still contains high levels of phosphates and nitrates, had an indirect impact that the council had failed to assess.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian