Poorer and rural Australians are sicker, yet they get less healthcare. It’s a broken system | Peter Breadon and Elizabeth Baldwin

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Disparities in Healthcare Access for Poorer and Rural Australians Highlight Systemic Failures"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Australia's healthcare system exhibits significant disparities, particularly affecting poorer and rural populations. Research indicates that Australians in the lowest income brackets experience a life expectancy that is approximately 7.5 years shorter than their wealthier counterparts, and they endure a higher prevalence of chronic illnesses. Marginalized communities, notably Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, face even greater health risks. These inequalities stem from a complex interplay of factors, including socioeconomic disadvantage, discrimination, and environmental issues such as poor air quality and unhealthy dietary habits. However, a major contributor to these health inequities is the inadequate access to necessary healthcare services, particularly specialist care. Recent findings from the Grattan Institute reveal that individuals in the poorest regions of Australia receive about 25% fewer healthcare services than those in more affluent areas, resulting in tens of thousands of missed appointments annually. Rural Australians are particularly disadvantaged, receiving only half the care available to urban populations, with many remote areas lacking sufficient specialist services altogether.

The systemic failures in Australia's healthcare access are compounded by high specialist fees and limited public healthcare appointments. Data shows that a significant proportion of low-income individuals face out-of-pocket expenses for specialist visits, with costs rising sharply over the past decade. Public hospitals provide only one-third of all specialist appointments, and while private services have declined, public offerings have not sufficiently compensated for the lack. This leads to extensive waiting lists for essential services, which can be detrimental to patients' health. Experts argue that reforming the healthcare system is critical, including reducing unnecessary referrals, regulating fees, and investing in specialist clinics in underserved areas. A proposed solution involves the federal and state governments committing to a guaranteed minimum level of specialist care, which would require an estimated $500 million investment to address the most acute service gaps. Enhanced funding for public clinics and improved operational practices are also necessary to ensure equitable healthcare access across Australia, ultimately aiming to prevent rising fees and prolonged wait times as the population ages and health needs increase.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When it comes to health, Australia is an unfair country.

Poorer Australians die about 7.5 years earlier than the wealthiest, and spend more years living with chronic disease. People from some communities, such as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, face an even higher risk of illness.

This injustice has deep, gnarled roots, from disadvantage and discrimination to poor air quality and unhealthy diets. But there’s one cause that’s more visible, and should be easier to fix: people missing out on healthcare they need.

A recentcomparison of 10 wealthy countriesfound Australia’s healthcare system rates highly overall, but ranks second-last on access to care, beating only the notoriously inequitable US system.

Poorer and rural Australians are sicker, yet they get less care. It’s a perverse pattern that applies to most types of healthcare, including dentists, medicines, mental health care and allied health.

And aGrattan Institute reportreleased this week compiles new data showing that access to specialist doctors, such as psychiatrists and cardiologists, is also highly unequal.

We mapped access to public and private specialist care and found that people in the poorest areas receive about a quarter fewer services than those in the wealthiest areas. That means poorer communities are missing out on tens of thousands of appointments every year, despite being sicker than average.

Rural Australians get about half as much care as people living in major cities. In many rural areas, specialist care is extremely scarce. Half of remote and very remote areas receive fewer than one specialist service per person each year, something not seen anywhere in Australia’s major cities.

Why does this happen?

First, specialist fees are high, and there’s not much relief for poorer people. Unlike at the GP, disadvantaged people are rarely bulk billed when they see a specialist.

Three-quarters of people earning less than $500 a week paid a bill for at least one specialist visit in 2023. That’s not much less than for people on the median household income, who paid a bill 84% of the time.

And when the bills come, they’re high and rising. The average fee charged has risen by nearly three-quarters since 2010. Again, poorer people aren’t getting much of a discount: the median cost for the poorest people who pay fees is $170. That’s not much lower than the $220 figure for people on an average income.

Second, there aren’t enough public appointments where they’re needed most. Free clinics in public hospitals deliver just one-third of all specialist appointments. And as private services decline, public services don’t fill the gap.

Compared with the average, the communities in the bottom fifth of the nation get 26 fewer private services per 100 people. But they only get an extra three public services per 100 people. As a result, waiting lists for public clinics can be very long – often many months longer than clinically recommended.

Put these two problems together and you get a broken system. In much of Australia, private care costs are high, and there’s no good alternative if you can’t pay. The result is missed or delayed diagnoses, preventable illness and avoidable hospital visits.

To reduce fees and wait times, Australia needs to reform specialist training, reduce unnecessary referrals, and crack down on excessive fees. But an essential part of the solution is much more investment in specialist clinics in underserved areas.

Governments must invest for impact by targeting need. They should combine data on public services, private services, and community needs, then rebalance our skewed service system and put care where it’s needed most.

To make it happen, health ministers should commit to a guaranteed minimum level of specialist care in the national health funding deal currently being negotiated between federal and state governments. It would cost about $500m to fill the worst gaps in the country.

To maximise the impact, public clinics should change the way they operate. There are many opportunities to improve their efficiency, but too often, they aren’t the focus of hospital investment and improvement plans.

State governments should give public clinics more funding and support to adopt best practices. To make sure that expansion and improvement efforts are working, all governments should publicly report waiting times, as some states already do.

The unfair gaps in access to healthcare in Australia are deep and longstanding, but they’re not inevitable. Without real change, we can expect fees and wait times to rise further as Australians get older and sicker. But with targeted public investment, we can make sure that specialist care doesn’t become a special privilege.

Peter Breadon is the health program director at Grattan Institute

Elizabeth Baldwin is a Senior Associate in Grattan Institute’sHealthProgram

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian