Poker Face season two review – Natasha Lyonne’s fun detective show is painfully close to being a classic

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Poker Face Season Two: A Promising Yet Flawed Return for Natasha Lyonne's Detective Series"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the second season of "Poker Face," Natasha Lyonne reprises her role as Charlie Cale, a woman with an uncanny ability to detect lies. The show pays homage to classic case-of-the-week crime dramas, featuring a new mystery in each episode, often with an array of notable guest stars. Cale's character is portrayed as a charming and charismatic detective, embodying a stylish yet chaotic aesthetic that resonates with viewers. Her catchphrase, 'bullshit,' encapsulates her straightforward demeanor and sets the tone for her adventures. As she navigates her way through various misdeeds, the series captures the essence of a classic detective narrative, albeit with a modern twist. Despite its engaging premise and Lyonne's compelling performance, the mysteries themselves often fall short of expectations. They tend to be predictable and lack the cleverness or complexity that would elevate them to true brilliance. Each episode begins with a crime, typically a murder, followed by Cale's journey to uncover the truth, but the resolution often hinges on her ability to spot dishonesty rather than any intricate detective work. This approach can lead to a sense of repetitive formula, as she frequently finds herself in similar situations, such as working as a waitress at the crime scene or encountering shady characters from her past.

While "Poker Face" boasts a variety of settings and a diverse cast of guest stars, including well-known actors like Katie Holmes and Steve Buscemi, the show's mysteries do not always deliver the excitement or unpredictability that viewers might desire. Some standout episodes break the mold, offering unexpected twists and more intricate plots, showcasing the potential of the series to be a truly engaging detective thriller. These moments highlight the frustration surrounding the overall execution of the show, as they reveal how much more dynamic and captivating "Poker Face" could be with smarter storytelling and more surprising outcomes. As it stands, the series remains an entertaining watch but is hindered by its inability to fully realize its potential as a classic detective show. It continues to air on various streaming platforms, including Sky Max in the UK and Peacock in the US.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Poker Face" season two provides an engaging glimpse into the show's qualities while also highlighting its shortcomings. The analysis reflects on the series' blend of crime drama with quirky characters, particularly focusing on Natasha Lyonne's portrayal of Charlie Cale.

Perceived Intentions Behind the Article

The writer aims to celebrate the show's unique charm and Lyonne's performance, while also critiquing the narrative structure and mystery elements. The article is likely intended to attract viewers by emphasizing the fun aspects of the show, even if it falls short of being a classic.

Public Sentiment and Reactions

By framing the review in a positive light despite acknowledging flaws, it seeks to generate a favorable public perception. The writer’s admiration for Lyonne's character might resonate with fans of crime dramas and mystery genres, creating a sense of community among viewers.

Potential Concealments

While the review is largely positive, it might downplay the narrative weaknesses that could deter some viewers. The focus on Lyonne's performance may distract from discussing the overall effectiveness of the plot and its execution.

Manipulative Elements

The article’s manipulative aspect is subtle, as it emphasizes the entertainment value of the show while glossing over its flaws. The language is designed to evoke excitement, which may lead readers to overlook the lack of depth in the mysteries presented.

Trustworthiness of the Content

The review appears credible, as it draws on specific observations about the show and its characters. However, the overall enthusiasm might result in a slightly biased perspective, making it necessary for readers to consider additional reviews for a more rounded understanding of the show's quality.

Societal and Economic Implications

The reception of "Poker Face" could influence viewership ratings and streaming service subscriptions, particularly among fans of Lyonne or the crime drama genre. If the show garners enough attention, it may impact the market for similar series and the allocation of resources within the television industry.

Target Audience

The review likely resonates more with younger audiences and fans of independent cinema, given Lyonne’s indie aesthetic and the show's quirky elements. It aims to appeal to those who appreciate character-driven narratives and unconventional storytelling.

Market Impact

While the review itself might not directly impact stock prices, the success of "Poker Face" could influence the parent company's market performance, particularly if it leads to increased subscriptions or viewership. Companies involved in production or distribution of similar content might also see shifts based on the show's popularity.

Geopolitical Context

The article does not have a direct geopolitical significance but reflects broader trends in media consumption and the increasing demand for unique storytelling in television.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

There's no clear indication of AI involvement in the writing of this article, but AI-generated content might influence the style or tone of future reviews. If AI were used, it might shape the narrative to focus more on the engaging qualities of the show, potentially skewing perceptions of its depth.

The article ultimately serves to promote "Poker Face" season two by highlighting its strengths while downplaying its weaknesses, creating an engaging narrative that encourages viewership.

Unanalyzed Article Content

This tribute to case-of-the week crime dramas is so nearly a brilliant TV show. Starring Natasha Lyonne (Orange Is the New Black,Russian Doll) as Charlie Cale, a woman with a foolproof ability to tell truth from falsehood, the series follows in the footsteps of classic story-of-the-week crime dramas; each episode features a tranche of excellent guest stars and a freshly covered-up misdeed for our thoroughly charming citizen-detective to uncover. With her gravelly-chipmunk New York tones – or “voice like a rusty clarinet”, as one character has it – Lyonne ensures Cale is an idiosyncratically charismatic protagonist you can really get behind. She’s cool: her catchphrase is “bullshit” and her aesthetic is 1970s-hued indie sleaze; shades, spray-on jeans, biker boots, shrunken T-shirts, wild, matted hair. She’s chaotically good, too: mischievous enough to bend the rules but essentially golden-hearted, in possession of an old-timey garrulousness and an inability to let things lie. What’s not to love?

The mysteries themselves, mainly. Most episodes of Poker Face – which was created byKnives Outdirector Rian Johnson, although he is not a credited writer on this second season – involve a 10ish-minute Cale-free opening, during which the viewer bears witness to a crime, usually a murder. Afterwards, we discover how our hero came to be acquainted with both the perpetrators and victims. Since the end of the very first episode, Cale has been on the run: first from a shady casino boss who wanted her dead (she was involved in the destruction of his business and the suicide of his son); then, as of the start of this new season, another shady casino boss who wants to exploit her lie-detection skills. To evade capture, she zigzags across the States at random – and into the path of a host of inadvertent murderers.

As a setup, it’s knowingly ludicrous. Yet while Poker Face’s crimes are all archly odd – variously involving pilfered breast milk, clearly robotic alligators and five sisters all played byCynthia Erivo– they are not quite wacky enough to qualify as pastiches of the vintage murder mysteries (Columbo, Magnum, PI, Murder, She Wrote) they pay homage to. The action is amusing rather than laugh out loud (why cast the outrageously hilarious Patti Harrison then not give her a single funny line?), yet too camply stylised to be dramatically absorbing either.

This would be less of a problem if said mysteries were clever or complex or surprising enough to work on their own terms. Unfortunately, they range only from tediously predictable to moderately diverting. Like Columbo, Poker Face is not a whodunnit or a whydunnit, but a “howcatchem” – we watch to see how the protagonist unravels the riddle. This means no shocks or twists for the audience, something viewers have grown to expect from other anthology-type series likeBlack MirrorandInside No 9. Again, this lack of jeopardy would be fine if the solving was done artfully or ingeniously. But Cale’s approach only draws partially on her mind-reading talents – which, as she points out, are limited to spotting dishonesty rather than unearthing truth – and mainly hinges on an ability to pick up on vague clues: her final exposé is often a result of a sudden realisation that has nothing to do with her special powers.

Despite the variety of settings – a gym, a baseball stadium, a cabaret theatre, a police awards ceremony – and a multitude of high-profile guests (among them Katie Holmes, Awkwafina, John Mulaney, Melanie Lynskey,Steve Buscemiand Alia Shawkat, enjoying herself immensely), the mechanics can feel repetitive. Cale is often some kind of waitress in the venue where the crime took place; she needs cash-in-hand jobs to survive her itinerant lifestyle. There are multiple instances of somebody spiking a rival, and numerous plots involve people demanding hush money to keep schtum. The dampening effect of this formulaic approach is brought into sharp focus by the straightforwardly great episodes that don’t follow it: one gratifyingly unpredictable instalment involving Cale’s apprehension by crime boss Beatrix Hasp (a fantastic Rhea Perlman), who demands she help expunge a rat (or is it a mole? Or perhaps a snake?) from her gang of heavies before they attempt to flee the country, and another about a group of old-school con artists that blessedly doesn’t spell out its final denouement in advance.

These are the episodes that are the most frustrating, because they prove how well Poker Face could work. More intricately plotted murders, more inspired crime-solving and a few more surprises for the audience, and we would have that rare thing: a gripping and genuinely fun detective thriller with an enchanting, one-of-a-kind guide.

Poker Face aired on Sky Max and is on Now in the UK. In the US, it airs on Peacock. In Australia, it airs on Stan.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian