‘People raised hell’: why shouldn’t Scarlett Johansson and James Franco play queer characters?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Director Justin Kelly Discusses the Role of Straight Actors in LGBTQ+ Cinema"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The discussion surrounding the casting of straight actors in LGBTQ+ roles has gained significant attention, particularly with the experiences of director Justin Kelly, who has worked with actors like James Franco and Scarlett Johansson on queer-themed projects. Kelly argues that Franco's performances as gay characters were not merely acts of 'pretending' but rather an expression of his interest in diverse storytelling. He emphasizes that the presence of high-profile actors in queer films can help secure financing and bring important stories to the forefront, highlighting that the backlash against actors like Johansson, who stepped down from a role as a transgender character following public outcry, ultimately deprives the audience of potentially inspiring narratives. Kelly feels that the focus on who plays these roles often overshadows the importance of visibility and representation in the film industry, which is crucial for the LGBTQ+ community.

Kelly also reflects on his experiences with Kristen Stewart, noting how her coming out and choices in roles have brought a new dimension to queer representation in cinema. He discusses Stewart's deep connection to her character in the film JT LeRoy, where she portrays a non-binary artist navigating identity issues, drawing parallels between her off-screen struggles and her character's journey. The director highlights Stewart's ability to infuse her performances with authenticity, particularly in roles that resonate with her own experiences of hiding aspects of her identity. Through these narratives, both Kelly and Stewart challenge the notion that only LGBTQ+ actors can authentically portray queer characters, advocating for a more inclusive understanding of representation in the film industry. The conversation ultimately underscores the complexity of identity in storytelling and the need for diverse voices in cinema, regardless of the actors' sexual orientations.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the ongoing debate surrounding the casting of straight actors in LGBTQ+ roles, particularly focusing on Scarlett Johansson and James Franco. It highlights Justin Kelly's perspective, who has worked closely with Franco on LGBTQ+ themed projects, asserting that the actor’s intentions were genuine and aimed at promoting queer narratives. This discussion is not only relevant to the film industry but also touches on broader societal attitudes towards representation and inclusivity.

Representation in Media

The article argues against the backlash faced by straight actors playing queer characters, emphasizing that such performances can help bring diverse stories to mainstream audiences. Kelly’s remarks reflect a sentiment that recognizes the importance of visibility and representation in media, suggesting that the inclusion of prominent actors in queer roles can challenge stereotypes and foster acceptance. This perspective aims to shift the narrative towards a more inclusive understanding of identity in the arts.

Public Sentiment and Activism

By invoking historical struggles for LGBTQ+ rights and the acceptance of diverse identities, the article seeks to resonate with readers who may feel similarly frustrated by the concept of "queerbaiting." It positions the casting of straight actors in queer roles as a necessary step in the evolution of societal attitudes. This approach is aimed at garnering support from both the LGBTQ+ community and their allies, advocating for a more nuanced view of representation.

Potential Concealment of Issues

While the article champions inclusivity, it might overshadow other pressing issues within the LGBTQ+ community, such as the need for authentic representation by actors who identify as queer. The focus on high-profile actors could divert attention from lesser-known queer artists who are striving for recognition and opportunities in the industry. This could be seen as a subtle way of masking the ongoing challenges faced by marginalized groups within the entertainment sector.

Manipulative Elements

The article’s tone could be perceived as somewhat manipulative, as it utilizes emotional appeals and historical references to frame the casting debate. By portraying critics of straight actors in queer roles as regressive, it may inadvertently alienate those who advocate for a more authentic representation. The language used creates a dichotomy between progressive and conservative viewpoints, which could polarize discussions further.

Trustworthiness of the Information

The article presents a strong argument supported by personal anecdotes from Justin Kelly, which lends credibility to the discussion. However, it lacks a diverse range of perspectives, particularly from LGBTQ+ individuals who may have differing opinions. This could affect the overall reliability of the narrative, as it presents a singular viewpoint that may not fully encompass the complexities of the issue.

Societal Implications

The conversation sparked by this article could impact societal views on representation in media. It may encourage a broader acceptance of diverse casting choices, but it could also provoke backlash from those who feel that authenticity in representation is being compromised. The economic repercussions may manifest in the film industry, influencing the types of projects that are greenlit based on perceived audience preferences and the ongoing discourse surrounding inclusivity.

Target Audience

This article seems to appeal primarily to progressive audiences, particularly those invested in LGBTQ+ rights and representation in media. It seeks to engage individuals who are sympathetic to the complexities of identity and the importance of visibility in storytelling. By promoting a narrative that supports straight actors in queer roles, it aligns itself with communities advocating for broader acceptance and understanding.

Global Context

In the context of global power dynamics, this discussion reflects a shift towards more inclusive narratives in Western media, which may influence cultural production in other regions. As conversations about representation gain traction, they may affect how stories are told around the world, potentially leading to more diverse casting practices across different cultures.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

There’s a possibility that AI tools were employed in crafting the article, particularly in terms of structuring arguments and analyzing public sentiment. However, the emotive language and personal anecdotes suggest a human touch that may not be easily replicated by AI. If AI were involved, it may have helped in shaping the narrative to appeal to current social movements and discussions about identity.

In conclusion, while the article offers valuable insights into the casting debate, it does so from a perspective that may overlook the nuanced complexities of representation. The reliability of the information could be questioned due to its singular viewpoint, but the broader implications of the discourse it generates are undeniable.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Justin Kelly and I first met in 2008 when I was sent to Los Angeles to interview Gus Van Sant. I breezed into the screening room where Van Sant was viewing a rough cut of his film Milk, and promptly tripped over the film-maker’s Australian shepherd Milo, who was snoozing in the dark. Kelly was minding the dog that morning, so in some small but unshakable way I will always blame him for my spectacular stumble.

Kelly was the editorial assistant on Milk, which starred Sean Penn asthe assassinated San Francisco politician Harvey Milk, and James Franco as his lover. Kelly then went on to direct Franco on two occasions as gay characters based on real people: activist Michael Glatze, who renounces his former life after finding religion inI Am Michael; and the escort, porn producer and convicted murderer Joe Kerekes inKing Cobra. Consequently, Kelly has had a ringside seat for the whole “queerbait” argument over whether straight or apparently straight actors should play LGBTQ+ roles.

“I never saw James’s performances as him ‘pretending’ to be gay,” he tells me from among the jaunty cushions in his mother’s guest bedroom in Prescott, Arizona, where he has stopped off during a road trip. “I just saw him as being interested in playing all kinds of characters. He knew he could help these cool queer movies get made and give someone like me a chance to direct. When we were doing press, journalists would throw him some shade, and I’d be like, ‘He’s bringing these incredible queer stories to the screen, so what’s the problem?’”

The term “queerbaiting” wasn’t in circulation when I Am Michaelopened in 2015. “Once it started floating around, I became very irritated by it,” Kelly says. “I think it’s fucking bullshit. Since before Stonewall, gay people have been asking the straight world to accept us and not treat us differently. And now we finally have these huge names – actors, musicians – telling the world that not only should you not be homophobic but that maybe it’s fucking cool to be gay … and people aremad? I’m like, ‘What is wrong with you?’” He is laughing and spluttering. “That’s what we’ve been asking for all this time!”

Such complaints may be guided partly by the misapprehension that work is being snatched away from LGBTQ+ talent. “Dare I veer into a controversial example?” asks Kelly. “Scarlett Johansson was going to play a trans character, then people raised hell, so she dropped out.” He is referring to the still unmade Rub & Tug, for which Johansson was cast as the real-life trans male gangster Dante “Tex” Gill, beforeshe stepped down from the filmin 2018. “It would have been a great story to get out there. Who knows how many people it would have inspired? But it fell apart. And now that movie is gone. I think queer people should feel bummed about that. I mean, imagine ScarJo at the Oscars for playing a trans man: that would’ve been major. The important thing to remember is – guess what? – famous actors get indie queer films financed. And we need visibility.”

After twice working with Franco, who spent more than a decadeteasing the world that he might be gay, Kelly directed Kristen Stewart in JT LeRoy, about a notorious real-life literary hoax. Until Stewart came along – and came out – no other modern performer of comparable calibre and status had expressed queer sexuality so emphatically through their choices of roles. In JT LeRoy, she stars asSavannah Knoop, a non-binary artist who agreed to pose as the (male) author of a brace of queer novels that were in fact the work of Knoop’s older sister-in-law.

Stewart has also been revelatory as a diffident night-school teacher pined over by a timid student in Kelly Reichardt’sCertain Women, and as a queer, steroid-pushing gym boss in Rose Glass’s lurid B-movie-style rompLove Lies Bleeding. Much of the frisson in her two films with Olivier Assayas – Clouds of Sils Maria and Personal Shopper – derives from the effect of her being not quite tangible, or just out of reach. In both, Stewart is a peripheral or ephemeral figure: a curious position for one of the world’s most photographed faces. Personal Shopper, JT LeRoy and Spencer, in which she plays Princess Diana,all provide Stewart with fastidious scenes of dressing and undressing that hint at the divestiture or cultivation of layers, defences and secrets. The sense is that the actor is exposing some unseen inner dimension, expressing her own queerness through a series of masks.

Attaching Stewart to JT LeRoy was nothing short of a coup. She came out publicly on Saturday Night Live in 2017, being greeted with cheers after describing herself as “like, so gay”. Kelly had met her a few years earlier to discuss the script, which he and Knoop adapted from Knoop’s book Girl Boy Girl: How I Became JT LeRoy. “Kristen made it clear that she’d brought her girlfriend with her,” he says, “and I remember thinking, ‘Ooh, I know she’s gay and no one else does!’”

It took several years to secure financing. So why did Stewart hang on? “She was very connected to the material. I brought it up one time when we were shooting in Winnipeg. We would go to this small-town gay bar where everyone would stare and send over drinks. I told Kristen, ‘Part of me was wondering if you were gonna get 5,000 other great offers and bail.’ And she said, ‘I would have done this movie at any point. I was afraid it might never happen because it’s such a cool story that it could have been too cool for people to put money into, or to understand.’”

The timing couldn’t have been better. “Since she wasn’t officially out when she signed up, she jumped at the opportunity to play Sav, who was not just a lesbian but a queer woman who now identifies as non-binary – but at that time did not. There are already non-binary aspects to the character in the movie, though, in all the going back-and-forth between being a boy and a girl.”

Stewart worked closely with Knoop. “Kristen and Sav really hit it off. Sav’s a true artist: their whole style, their clothing. They wear the weirdest shit, it’s fucking incredible. Kristen was so into them as a person. One of the things she brought, I think, came from not being out at that point. Sav, the character, was pretending to be JT while also in the closet about being potentially trans and potentially non-binary, and not knowing how to put that out into the world. And Kristen was going through a similar thing: at that level of fame, you’re potentially gonna get attacked or ostracised for coming out. That idea of hiding part of one’s identity was something she wove into the character so beautifully in these very quiet ways. You can see in a lot of her roles that she’s dealing with identity. As Princess Diana, she’s trying to figure out who she is as someone who doesn’t want to be that famous.”

Her performance in Love Lies Bleeding, though, is the one that Kelly maintains is the closest to theKristen Stewarthe knows. “In JT LeRoy, she was playing someone so different from herself, even though there was that connection of both having a secret. Whereas I saw more of Kristen in Love Lies Bleeding, more of the real person in terms of being a badass bitch. I think it was a chance for her to do so many things she’s always wanted to do. To play a version of herself and to be super-fucking-gay. To have those sex scenes, the stuff about fingering, the ‘I wanna spread you’ line, licking the protein shake that spills on her girlfriend’s body, taking men down. All things that I believe she was dying to put out there.”

Looked at from this distance, I Am Michael and JT LeRoy play like cracked mirror images of each other. Both are inspired by real-life identity crises and capitalise on the actors’ off-screen baggage. Just as Stewart’s experience of being in the spotlight while hiding parts of herself informed JT LeRoy, so Franco’s teasing about his own sexuality enhanced I Am Michael, a film that hinges on the sincerity or otherwise of his character’s conversion. A formerly gay man trying to convince the world he is now straight was being played by a straight actor who had long hinted that he might be gay.

“I don’t think I was conscious of it at the time,” says Kelly. “But now you bring it up, it probably did help. We’re watching this guy question his sexuality. It might also have helped him play the character as well. I don’t know whether James is gay or not.” He smiles. “I mean, everyone’s a little bit gay, so …”

This is an edited extract from It Used to Be Witches: Under the Spell of Queer Cinema by Ryan Gilbey, published on 5 June by Faber. To support the Guardian, order your copy atguardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply. Ryan Gilbey will be in conversation with Dorian Lynskey at Foyles, Charing Cross Road, London, on 4 June, and with Guardian theatre critic Arifa Akbar at the Cinema Museum, London, 15 June.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian