‘People buy a lion and can’t handle it’: inside the farms breeding cubs for Tiktok and Instagram likes

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Surge in Thailand's Captive Lion Trade Driven by Exotic Pet Popularity"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In Bangkok, a growing trend of exotic pet ownership among the wealthy elite has led to a surge in the captive lion trade, where lion cubs are showcased in social media posts for likes and attention. A report from the Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailand and the Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group reveals that the number of lions in captivity has more than tripled since 2018, with prices for cubs ranging from $5,000 to $15,000. Many buyers are inexperienced, leading to a troubling cycle where owners often cannot manage their growing pets and request breeders to buy them back. This buy-back system has become integral to the business model of lion farms, allowing for continuous profit through breeding and selling, while also creating challenges in tracking the actual number of lions due to frequent transfers between facilities. Current estimates suggest that there are at least 444 lions in captivity, significantly higher than the 342 officially registered with the government, indicating a thriving yet unregulated industry.

Despite legal attempts to control the trade, loopholes in the Wild Animal Preservation and Protection Act have inadvertently encouraged the lion trade by allowing breeding without stringent oversight. Veterinarians and animal welfare advocates express concern over the conditions in which these lions are kept, often in cramped enclosures with inadequate nutrition. The report highlights that lion ownership poses serious animal welfare issues, with many lions suffering from health problems due to improper care. Moreover, the existence of a captive lion population raises public safety concerns, as incidents of lions escaping private enclosures have been reported. In response to growing awareness of these issues, advocates are calling for an urgent ban on private ownership and stricter regulations on lion breeding, urging the public to consider the ethical implications of exotic pet ownership and the welfare of these animals as they grow larger and more dangerous.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the troubling trend of lion cub breeding for social media fame in Thailand, where wealthy individuals are increasingly purchasing exotic animals for likes and attention. It reveals the darker side of this practice, including the inexperience of breeders and the challenges faced by new owners once the animals grow.

Motivations Behind the Publication

The primary intention seems to be raising awareness about the ethical implications of keeping exotic animals as pets, particularly in the context of social media culture. By highlighting the experiences of breeders and the subsequent difficulties faced by buyers, the article aims to provoke thought and possibly instigate change regarding wildlife trade and animal welfare.

Public Perception and Impact

This report likely aims to create a sense of concern about the treatment of wild animals, particularly in settings that prioritize aesthetics and social media influence over animal welfare. It paints a picture of irresponsibility among buyers who may not fully understand the responsibilities of owning a lion, thereby fostering a more cautious attitude in the public toward exotic pet ownership.

Potential Omissions

The article does not delve into the broader implications of the wildlife trade or provide a comprehensive overview of conservation efforts. This omission could suggest an underlying intention to focus on the sensational aspects of the story, drawing attention away from larger systemic issues related to wildlife protection and trafficking.

Manipulative Elements

There is a level of manipulation present in the framing of the story, particularly in how it portrays the luxurious lifestyles of buyers against the backdrop of animal suffering. The emotional appeal of the imagery of playful cubs juxtaposed with the realities of their future can create a strong emotional response that may overshadow the nuanced discussion of wildlife conservation.

Truthfulness of the Content

While the article appears to be based on factual reporting, the selection of quotes and anecdotes may lead to a skewed representation of the situation. The focus on individual experiences rather than a broader statistical analysis could affect the perceived reliability of the information presented.

Societal Implications

This reporting could potentially influence public opinion and policy regarding wildlife trade. It may encourage stricter regulations on exotic pet ownership and increase support for wildlife conservation initiatives. Additionally, it could spark discussions about social media's role in promoting unethical practices.

Target Audience

The article likely resonates with animal rights activists, environmentalists, and socially conscious individuals who are concerned about the implications of exotic pet ownership. It aims to engage those who may not be aware of the consequences of their social media habits and the impact on wildlife.

Economic and Market Repercussions

While the immediate financial implications for the stock market may be minimal, companies involved in wildlife tourism or conservation could see increased interest or scrutiny. This story may also influence consumer behavior, leading to a decline in demand for exotic pets.

Global Context

This issue ties into broader global discussions about wildlife conservation and ethical consumerism. The rise of social media has significantly impacted how people interact with wildlife, and this story highlights the need for a more informed approach to animal welfare in today's digital age.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

It is conceivable that AI tools were used in drafting this article, particularly in analyzing data or generating certain segments of the text. However, there is no clear indication that AI has biased the narrative, though it could have influenced the presentation of statistics or trends discussed.

In summary, the article presents a compelling yet somewhat sensationalist view of the captive lion trade in Thailand, which serves to highlight the ethical dilemmas surrounding exotic pet ownership and social media influence. The overall reliability of the article is moderate, as it provides important insights but may lack a comprehensive view of the broader context of wildlife conservation.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Champagne glasses clink at an exclusive Bangkok party, where guests in designer clothes laugh and mingle. They take turns posing with a cat, passing it casually from one to the other. But as the camera settles, it becomes clear this is no house cat – it’s a lion cub. One woman, in a red cocktail dress, lifts the animal to her face and blows a kiss at the camera, a glass of wine balanced in her other hand.

Clips such as this are flooding Instagram and TikTok, offering a glimpse into Thailand’s booming captive lion trade. According to a new report by theWildlifeFriends Foundation Thailand and the Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group the number of lions in captivity has more than tripled since 2018 – a trend fuelled in part by the rising popularity of exotic pets among the country’s wealthy elite. A growing network of lion farms cater to this demand – many of them run by amateurs with little experience in wildlife care.

Sitting cross-legged on the floor of her nursery, lion breeder Patamawadee Chanpithak giggles as three cubs – just weeks old – clumsily crawl over her lap, nudging her with closed eyes as if trying to suckle. The room smells of kitten formula.

“We were very inexperienced when we started,” she says, recalling how five of her first six cubs died within days. To date, she has sold more than 80 lions across the country.

Some buyers are Thai and some are foreigners, she says, but all of them are wealthy – lion cub prices inThailandstart from $5,000 (£3,700), with white cubs fetching up to $15,000. Keeping a lion is costly, requiring reinforced enclosures and up to 10kg of fresh meat a day.

Most buyers want their lions as young as possible. While there are customers who buy directly from farms, breeders also work with agents who aggressively promote cubs on social media – not just to sell, but also to rent them out for photoshoots and parties.

The problems begin once the animals grow. “Some people buy a lion and then can’t handle it,” says Patamawadee. “They ask us to buy it back.”

The report suggests this “buy-back” system has become central to the farms’ business model, offering the experience of owning a lion without the long-term commitment. Older lions may be used for breeding or passed on to zoo-like venues, generating profit at every stage of life.

Regular transfers between facilities make it difficult to track individual lions, contributing to the gap between official records and actual figures. The report identifies at least 444 lions in captivity – up from 138 in 2018, and more than the 342 registered with Thailand’s Department of National Parks, Wildlife and PlantConservation. Researchers say the real number is probably significantly higher, as many sales and breeding activities go unregistered.

Despite attempts to control the trade, a number of loopholes have allowed it to flourish. In 2019, the government introduced the Wild Animal Preservation and Protection Act to regulate the ownership of non-native Cites-listed species such as lions, which previously had little protection. According to the report, the law had the unintended effect of boosting the trade in lions by creating a legal pathway with significant gaps in oversight. While lion ownership requires a licence, breeding does not – anyone who legally owns lions can also breed them. Cubs don’t need to be registered until they are 60 days old, and hybrid species such as ligers are excluded from the law altogether. The result is a thriving industry, with the trade in lion cubs alone estimated at more than $1m (£740,000) a year.

Taweesak Anansiriwattana, a Bangkok vet known by his customers as Dr Vee, sits in his office in a clinic on the outskirts of the city. “I don’t agree with people keeping lions as pets,” he says. Over the past five years, he has treated more than 25 privately owned lions. “Our climate is too humid for them. Skin infections are common,” he says, adding that malnutrition is also widespread. “People feed them chicken, but they need organs like liver and intestines to survive.” Though owners are required to build enclosures measuring a minimum of 3 metres by 3 metres, fewer than half of the households Dr Vee has visited meet these standards.

“There are serious animal welfare challenges,” saysTom Taylor, operations chief at Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailandand co-author of the report. “Some of these facilities keep lions in cramped and barren enclosures without sunlight, on concrete substrate, and poor-quality food, resulting in a life of misery.” To meet demand, breeders often separate cubs early to force mothers back into oestrus. Inbreeding is common, especially with white lions and hybrids, which are considered more valuable.

Lions, which are not native to Thailand, are listed as vulnerable by the IUCN. While the country’s captive population offers little benefit to conservation, Taylor warns it is becoming fertile ground for trafficking, fuelling demand that puts wild lions at risk. “We have received credible reports from traders indicating that lions in Thailand are being illegally exported, both as live animals and dead for their body parts,” he says, adding that lion parts may be filling the market gap left by the more tightly restricted tiger trade.

Public safety is also a significant concern, as seen in news reports of lions escaping from private enclosures or being taken into public spaces. In 2024, a viral video of a man driving a pet lion in a convertible car caused widespread concern. In response, the director general of the department of national parks said the government was considering changes to the law, including restrictions on lion ownership.

The report calls for an urgent ban on private ownership and commercial breeding, tougher licensing requirements, and limits on lion cafes and photo opportunities – arguing these practices promote the glamorisation of exotic pets. “Many people are drawn to the idea of owning a lion without fully understanding the ethical, financial and safety implications,” says Taylor, adding that similar trends are emerging with other non-native species, including ring-tailed lemurs and red pandas. “We hope this report encourages the public to think about where these animals come from, the conditions they are kept in, and what happens when they grow too large and dangerous to handle.”

Find moreage of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reportersPhoebe WestonandPatrick Greenfieldin the Guardian app for more nature coverage

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian