Pentagon stopped Ukraine military aid shipments in February without Trump’s approval

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"US Military Aid Shipments to Ukraine Halted by Pentagon Order Amid Confusion"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In February, shortly after Donald Trump began his second term, the US Transportation Command (TransCom) received a verbal order from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to halt military aid shipments to Ukraine, including 11 flights carrying artillery shells and weaponry. This order led to significant confusion and concern among Ukrainian officials and allies in Poland, who were left questioning the rationale behind the sudden pause. While the White House claimed that Hegseth acted under Trump’s directive to pause aid, key national security officials were unaware of this order, highlighting a disorganized decision-making process within the Trump administration. The flights were grounded after a meeting on January 30, where discussions about Ukraine aid occurred, but Trump did not authorize any halt in support. The order was reversed within a week, but the incident raised alarms about the administration's internal communication and the clarity of its foreign policy direction.

The disruption in military aid shipments, which cost TransCom approximately $2.2 million, underscored a chaotic environment at the Pentagon, where infighting and a lack of coordination were evident. Several staff members, many of whom had limited government experience and were aligned with an anti-interventionist stance, advised Hegseth to consider pausing aid to Ukraine as a strategy to leverage negotiations with Russia. Despite the initial pause, military aid continued to flow, with further shipments approved under the Biden administration. The situation reflects ongoing tensions within the administration regarding US support for Ukraine, with some officials advocating for reduced involvement, complicating the overall policy-making process during a critical time in the conflict. This internal strife has raised concerns among Ukrainian officials and European allies about the reliability of US support amidst the ongoing war against Russia.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on a critical and somewhat controversial moment in the U.S. military aid strategy towards Ukraine. It reveals the complexity of decision-making within the U.S. government, particularly regarding national security and foreign aid. The reported incident raises questions about the chain of command and the clarity of communication among top officials.

Motivation Behind the Report

There appears to be an intention to highlight the disarray or lack of coordination within the U.S. administration during a significant moment for Ukraine. By focusing on the abrupt halt of military aid and the subsequent confusion, the article suggests a potential weakness in leadership. This could be aimed at fostering skepticism about the current administration's foreign policy competence, particularly in relation to Ukraine.

Public Perception

The narrative constructed in the article may lead the public to perceive the U.S. government as indecisive or disorganized in its support for Ukraine. The lack of clarity surrounding the aid suspension and the quick reversal could evoke concerns regarding the reliability of U.S. commitments to its allies. This perception may further influence public opinion about the efficacy of U.S. foreign policy.

Potential Concealments

While the article does not explicitly suggest any deliberate concealment, the confusion and rapid reversal of the aid suspension could hint at deeper issues within the administration. The article does not explore the broader context of U.S.-Ukraine relations or the strategic implications of military aid, which might suggest an intention to focus narrowly on this incident without addressing its wider significance.

Manipulative Nature of the Report

In terms of manipulation, the article appears to emphasize the chaos surrounding the aid situation, which could be perceived as an attempt to paint the administration in a negative light. The language used may evoke feelings of mistrust or frustration among readers, particularly those who are staunch supporters of Ukraine.

Truthfulness of the Report

The report cites specific sources and details, which lends it credibility. However, the reliance on anonymous sources can sometimes raise questions about the accuracy of the claims being made. The complexity of the situation may also result in varying interpretations of the events described.

Underlying Message

The overarching message seems to be one of caution regarding the reliability of U.S. support for Ukraine, especially during a volatile period. This could be particularly resonant for communities concerned about foreign policy and national security.

Impact on Communities

The article may resonate more with communities that are critical of the current administration's foreign policy or those deeply invested in Ukraine's sovereignty. It may also appeal to those who advocate for a strong U.S. commitment to international alliances.

Financial Market Implications

The implications of this report on financial markets could involve defense contractors and companies associated with military logistics. Any uncertainty regarding military aid can influence stock prices of companies in the defense sector, as investors assess the potential for changes in government contracts.

Global Power Dynamics

From a geopolitical standpoint, the article touches on significant themes regarding U.S. support for allies and the implications of any perceived wavering in that support. The situation in Ukraine remains a focal point for U.S. foreign policy, and developments in this area could have broader ramifications for global stability.

AI Involvement in the Article

While there is no explicit indication that AI was used in composing the article, certain phrasing and structuring could suggest a formulaic approach sometimes associated with AI-generated content. However, the nuanced reporting and sourcing imply a human touch in the writing process.

Conclusion

Overall, the article presents a credible account of a critical incident regarding U.S. military aid to Ukraine, framing it within a narrative that questions the administration's effectiveness. The emphasis on confusion and miscommunication serves to raise concerns about U.S. foreign policy, particularly among those invested in international relations and national security.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Roughly a week afterDonald Trumpstarted his second term as president, the US militaryissued an orderto three freight airlines operating out of Dover air force base inDelawareand a US base in Qatar: stop 11 flights loaded with artillery shells and other weaponry that were bound forUkraine.

In a matter of hours, frantic questions reached Washington from Ukrainians in Kyiv and from officials in Poland, where the shipments were coordinated. Who had ordered the US Transportation Command, known as TransCom, to halt the flights? Was it a permanent pause on all aid? Or just some?

Top national security officials – in the White House, the Pentagon and the state department – couldn’t provide answers. Within one week, flights were back in the air.

The verbal order originated from the office ofPete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, according to TransCom records reviewed by Reuters. A TransCom spokesperson said the command received the order via the Pentagon’s joint staff.

The cancelations came after Trump wrapped up a 30 January Oval Office meeting aboutUkrainethat included Hegseth and other top national security officials, according to three sources familiar with the situation. During the meeting, the idea of stopping Ukraine aid came up, said two people with knowledge of the meeting, but the president issued no instruction to halt it.

The president was unaware of Hegseth’s order, as were other top national security officials in the meeting, according to two sources briefed on the private White House discussions and another with direct knowledge of the matter.

Asked to comment on this report, the White House told Reuters that Hegseth had followed a directive from Trump to pause aid to Ukraine, which it said was the administration’s position at the time. It did not explain why, according to those who spoke to Reuters, top national security officials in the normal decision-making process didn’t know about the order or why it was so swiftly reversed.

“Negotiating an end to the Russia-Ukraine War has been a complex and fluid situation. We are not going to detail every conversation among top administration officials throughout the process,” said Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. “The bottom line is the war is much closer to an end today than it was when President Trump took office.”

The cancelations cost TransCom $2.2m, according to the records reviewed by Reuters. In response to a request for comment, TransCom said that the total cost was $1.6m – 11 flights were canceled but one incurred no charge.

An order halting military aid authorized under the Biden administration went into effect officially a month later, on 4 March, with a White House announcement.

The story of how flights were canceled, detailed by Reuters for the first time, points to an at-times haphazard policymaking process within theTrump administrationand a command structure that is unclear even to its own ranking members.

The multiday pause of the flights, confirmed by five people with knowledge of it, also shows confusion in how the administration has created and implemented national security policy. At the Pentagon, the disarray is an open secret, with many current and former officials saying the department is plagued by internal disagreements on foreign policy, deep-seated grudges and inexperienced staff.

Reuters couldn’t establish exactly when Hegseth’s office ordered the freight flights canceled. Two sources said Ukrainian and European officials began asking about the pause on 2 February. The TransCom records indicate that there was a verbal order from “SECDEF” – the secretary of defense – that stopped the flights and that they had resumed by 5 February.

“This is consistent with the administration’s policy to move fast, break things and sort it out later. That is their managing philosophy,” said Mark Cancian, a retired US Marine officer and defense expert with the Center for Strategic and International Studies thinktank. “That is great for Silicon Valley. But when you’re talking about institutions that have been around for hundreds of years, you are going to run into problems.”

The stop in shipments caused consternation in Kyiv.

The Ukrainians quickly asked the administration through multiple channels but had difficulty obtaining any useful information, according to a Ukrainian official with direct knowledge of the situation. In later conversations with the Ukrainians, the administration wrote off the pause as “internal politics”, said the source. Ukrainian officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The shipping of American weapons to Ukraine requires signoff from multiple agencies and can take weeks or even months to complete, depending on the size of the cargo. The majority ofUS militaryassistance goes through a logistics hub in Poland before being picked up by Ukrainian representatives and transported into the country.

That hub can hold shipments for extended periods of time. It’s not clear if the 11 canceled flights were the only ones scheduled that week in February, how much aid was already stockpiled in Poland and if it continued to flow into Ukraine despite the US military’s orders.

The revelations come at atime of upheavalin the Pentagon. Several of Hegseth’s top advisers were escorted from the building on 15 April after being accused of unauthorized disclosure of classified information. The secretary continues to face scrutiny, including from Congress, about his own communications. Previously he’s attributed allegations of upheaval to disgruntled employees.

The canceled flights contained weapons that hadlong been approvedby the Biden administration and authorized by lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

Reuters couldn’t determine if Hegseth or his team knew how the order to TransCom would play out or that the order would be a substantial change in US policy on Ukraine. Three sources familiar with the situation said Hegseth misinterpreted discussions with the president about Ukraine policy and aid shipments without elaborating further.

Four other people briefed on the situation said a small cadre of staffers inside the Pentagon, many of whom have never held a government job and who have for years spoken out against US aid to Ukraine, advised Hegseth to consider pausing aid to the country.

Two people familiar with the matter denied there was a true cutoff in aid. One of them described it as a logistical pause.

“[They] just wanted to get a handle on what was going on and people, as a result, misinterpreted that as: ‘You need to stop everything,’” said one.

According to two sources with knowledge of the meeting, Hegseth arrived at the 30 January Oval Office meeting with Trump with a memo drafted by some of his top policy advisers, advocating that their boss push the White House to consider pausing weapons deliveries to Ukraine to gain leverage in peace negotiations with Russia.

The sources said the secretary attended the meeting with other top officials involved in Ukraine policy, including then national security adviserMike Waltzand Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg. The group broadly discussed US policy on Ukraine and Russia, including potentially tightening sanctions on Moscow.

It’s not clear the extent to which Hegseth proposed stopping aid during the meeting, but the idea came up in discussions, said one of the sources and another person familiar with the meeting.

Since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022, the US had approved billions of dollars worth of military aid to Ukraine. Most was delivered under the Biden administration. But a few shipments remained in the pipeline, scheduled into this summer.

Trump had threatened to freeze aid repeatedly on the campaign trail, but had yet to do so. And during the meeting, he again declined to stop aid to Ukraine or order Hegseth to implement any policy changes when it came to sending equipment to Kyiv, the sources said.

An order effectively freezing any military support for an ally would normally be discussed intensively among top national security officials and approved by the president. It requires the coordination of multiple agencies and often multiple freight companies.

None of that discussion or coordination happened when Hegseth’s office canceled the scheduled flights carrying American artillery shells and ammunition to Poland from Al Udeid military base in the United Arab Emirates and the Dover US military base in Delaware, three of the sources said.

The pause came as Ukraine’s military was struggling to fend off Russian forces in eastern Ukraine and in the consequential battle for the Kursk region of Russia, where Ukrainian forces were losing ground and have since all but been expelled.

Close Trump advisers were tipped off to the pause by Pentagon staffers and discussed with the president whether to restore the aid shipments, according to two sources. By then, TransCom had canceled 11 flights, according to the records reviewed by Reuters. Some media outlets, including Reuters, wrote about the pause but Hegseth’s role was previously unknown.

It’s unclear if Trump subsequently questioned or reprimanded Hegseth. One source with direct knowledge of the matter said then national security adviser Waltz ultimately intervened to reverse the cancelations. Waltz was forced out on Thursday and is expected to be nominated as US ambassador to the United Nations.

When Trump entered office, aid to Ukraine continued flowing and he pledged to work with Ukraine and Russia to end the war – or at the very least broker a ceasefire.

Two of his most prominent envoys, Kellogg, a supporter of Kyiv who worked with Trump in his first administration, and Steve Witkoff, a real-estate magnate and close friend of the president, set out to negotiate with both parties.

Separately, at the Pentagon, some of Hegseth’s policy advisers privately started drafting proposals to pull back American support for Ukraine, according to two sources briefed on the matter.

That group of staffers align themselves closely with the anti-interventionist philosophy.

Some have previously advised Republican lawmakers advocating for an America-first approach to foreign policy and have called publicly, in writings and talks, for the US to pull back from military commitments in the Middle East and Europe – a view similarly held by the vice-president, JD Vance. Several have advocated that the US instead focus on China.

Supporters of the staffers have slammed those pushing back on the anti-interventionist movement in the administration, claiming Vance and others are merely trying to save the lives of people living in war zones such as Ukraine and prevent future American military deaths.

The infighting has complicated the policymaking process, according to a person familiar with the matter and four other sources. At a time when Kellogg and Witkoff are trying to broker a peace deal with Russia and Ukraine, the staffers have advocated behind the scenes for the US to draw back its support for Kyiv – a policy that has angered Ukrainian officials and put pressure on European allies to fill the gap, five people with knowledge of the situation said.

Washington hassigned a dealwith Kyiv for rights to its rare earth minerals – an agreement US officials say is an attempt to recoup money the US has spent to prop up Ukraine’s war effort.

At least one of the staffers who had previously pushed for the administration to pull back its support for Kyiv, Dan Caldwell, was escorted out of the Pentagon for a leak he claims never happened. Caldwell, a veteran, served as one of Hegseth’s chief advisers, including on Ukraine.

Despite the brief pause in February and the longer one that began in early March, the Trump administration has resumed sending the last of the aid approved under Joe Biden. No new policy has been announced.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian