Pastor Jamal Harrison Bryant on Target boycott ‘victory’ and the Black dollar’s power: ‘They’ve awakened a sleeping giant’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Pastor Jamal Harrison Bryant Leads Boycott Against Target Over DEI Rollbacks"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

On February 5, 2023, Pastor Jamal Harrison Bryant addressed his congregation at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Atlanta, calling for a boycott of Target due to the company's rollback of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Dressed in a sweater featuring Muhammad Ali and standing behind a lectern emblazoned with a Black power fist, Bryant criticized Target for not adhering to its commitment to invest $2 billion in Black-owned businesses by 2025. He urged his church's 10,000 members and the broader Christian community to participate in a 40-day fast from shopping at Target, citing the historical context of economic boycotts as a means to effect change. Bryant emphasized that corporations respond to financial pressure rather than speeches, drawing parallels to the Montgomery bus boycott and expressing concern over the political climate under Donald Trump's administration. After the 40 days, when Target did not reverse its decision, Bryant escalated the call to a full boycott, emphasizing the need for accountability from corporations that fail to uphold commitments to the Black community.

Bryant's boycott, supported by 200,000 petition signers and prominent figures like Rev. Al Sharpton, gained significant traction and impacted Target's sales and customer traffic, leading to reported losses. The pastor articulated specific demands from Target, including a $250 million investment in Black banks, partnerships with historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), and a renewed commitment to DEI initiatives. He acknowledged skepticism regarding the focus on Target instead of other retailers like Walmart and Amazon, explaining that a singular focus was necessary for organized impact. As the boycott continued, Bryant announced a subsequent challenge to Dollar General, citing its prevalence in underserved communities. He encouraged consumers to use electronic protests if boycotting would harm individuals in food deserts. Bryant's activism highlights a broader movement of Black economic consciousness, aimed at holding corporations accountable for their commitments to social responsibility and equity.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article focuses on Pastor Jamal Harrison Bryant's call for a boycott against Target, highlighting his emphasis on the economic power of the Black community. This movement is framed as a response to Target's rollback of its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which were initially part of their corporate reparations following the murder of George Floyd. By invoking historical precedents like the Montgomery bus boycott, Bryant aims to inspire action within his congregation and the broader Black community.

Objectives Behind the Article

The primary intent behind this article seems to be to galvanize support for the boycott of Target by illustrating the potential impact of collective economic action. Bryant's passionate rhetoric seeks to mobilize a sense of urgency and accountability among consumers, particularly within the Black community. By leveraging historical references, the article aims to create a narrative that positions the boycott as a modern-day civil rights struggle.

Societal Perception

The article is likely designed to foster a perception of empowerment within the Black community, emphasizing their economic influence as a "sleeping giant." This narrative suggests that when united, the community can enact significant change, particularly in response to corporate actions perceived as betrayals. It aims to instill a sense of responsibility among consumers to hold corporations accountable for their commitments to social justice.

Potential Concealments

The focus on the boycott may divert attention from other issues facing the community or broader societal challenges. By concentrating on a single corporate entity, the article risks oversimplifying the complexities of systemic racism and corporate accountability, potentially overshadowing other vital discussions around economic justice and equity.

Manipulative Nature of the Article

There is a degree of manipulativeness in how the article frames the narrative. By emphasizing the notion of a "battle" and presenting Target as a direct adversary to Black interests, it creates an "us vs. them" dynamic. This language can evoke strong emotions and may lead to polarized views, which might not fully acknowledge the nuances of corporate decision-making or the potential for dialogue.

Truthfulness of the Article

The information presented appears to be factual, grounded in recent events and public statements made by Bryant and Target. However, the interpretation and framing may lean towards advocacy rather than pure journalism, which can impact the perceived objectivity of the piece.

Community Support and Target Audience

The article is likely to resonate strongly with socially conscious individuals, particularly within Black communities and civil rights organizations. By appealing to a shared history of struggle and resilience, it seeks to unify those who feel marginalized or betrayed by corporate practices.

Economic Implications

This news could have significant implications for Target's market performance, particularly if the boycott gains traction. As Bryant highlights Black Americans as loyal customers of Target, a sustained boycott could impact sales and stock prices. Investors may respond to this situation by reassessing Target's long-term viability, particularly in its commitment to DEI initiatives.

Global Power Dynamics

While the article primarily addresses a national issue, it reflects broader themes of social justice and corporate responsibility that resonate globally. The ongoing discourse around economic reparations and racial equity is relevant in various contexts, making the article part of a larger conversation about systemic change.

Use of AI in the Article

There is no clear indication that artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this article. However, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the phrasing or structure to emphasize certain emotional appeals or historical narratives. The language employed is emotive and persuasive, characteristics often enhanced by AI tools designed for content generation.

In conclusion, while the article presents factual information about a significant social issue, its framing and language reflect a strong advocacy stance. The potential for manipulation lies in how the narrative is constructed to evoke emotional responses and mobilize action. The reliability of the article is bolstered by its grounding in real events; however, the interpretation may skew towards a specific agenda.

Unanalyzed Article Content

On 5 February, a month before lent, Jamal Harrison Bryant stepped up to the pulpit of his Atlanta area megachurch. Wearing a sweater bearing Muhammad Ali’s likeness and standingbehind a lectern branded with a Black power fist clutching a cross, the senior pastor of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church railed against companies thatrolled back their DEI initiativesto appeaseDonald Trump.

Explicitly, Bryant, 54, singled out Target – which, among other things, hadpledgedto invest $2bn in Black-owned businesses by the end of 2025 as corporate reparations after the murder ofGeorge Floyd– for going back on its word. He urged the “conscientious Christian community” to link arms with his 10,000 church members and commit to a 40-day “fast” from the company starting on Ash Wednesday.

A month earlier, a number of activists and civil rights leaders had protested in front of Target’s Minneapolis headquarters, calling for a nationwide boycott. But Bryant’s clarion call cut through, perhaps because it invoked a history that Trump has also placed in the crosshairs.

“What we learned from the Montgomery bus boycott is that racist America doesn’t respond to speeches, it responds to dollars,” Bryant intoned, urging parishioners to liquidate their Target stock while acknowledging the risk he was taking in fomenting this protest as Trump was embracing authoritarianism. “I’m saying this before they got a new FBI chief that calls us a terrorist organization. We doing it in decency and in order. Target, you got 40 days to pull it together.”

When those 40 days passed and Target followed through on its DEI rollback, Bryant upped the ante on Ash Wednesday and called for the #TargetFast to shift to a “full-out boycott”. He challenged Black Americans in particular, who are among the big box chain’s most loyal customers, to hold the line. “We are engaged in this battle because you don’t get to walk away from your public commitments to Black people and think there will not be consequences and repercussions,” Bryant said at a town hall meeting in April. “Somebody is going to accept the price, and we don’t accept layaway in 2025.”

Fueled by the strength of 200,000 petition signers and Black business leaders and activists such as theRev Al Sharpton, New Birth’s Target boycott has rivaled theglobal backlash against Teslain its political urgency. It’s also cost the retailer significantsalesandfoot traffic. (“We’re not satisfied with these results,” CEO Brian Cornell said in a call with reporters last month.) Throughout the boycott, Bryant has not hesitated to call outCardi Band other would-be allies for betraying the cause.

It’s quite an achievement for a pastor’s kid andpreacher-influencerwho has long maintained an interest in serving the greater good. Ten years ago, Bryant thought aboutrunning forthe congressional seat held by civil rights hero Elijah Cummings after Freddie Gray’s killing rocked his Baltimore home town, before taking over as the senior pastor of New Birth in 2019. He’s also reinvented himself as apodcast hostand has become an incidental guest star on the Real Housewives of Potomac. (Gizelle Bryant, a lead cast member, is his ex-wife.)

Days after Bryant announced the next phase of New Birth’s consumer challenge, a nationwide fast from Dollar General, he talked to the Guardian about his boycott demands, the Black entrepreneurs who find themselves caught in the middle, and backing the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture over the Juneteenth holiday.

You have pointed out how much Black Americans spend at Target – $12m a day, by your reckoning. By calling for a boycott, you’re challenging them to make a drastic change in their behavior. Were you challenging yourself, too?

I’m a #GirlDad to four, including three who are in college, so I had to absorb them protesting: “Please, don’t take it away! We go in every week at least for lip gloss.” But when I began to walk it to the disservice that Target is doing to the community, it became a no-brainer. They become some of my greatest disciples on college campuses. That’s been really infectious to a lot of people in the community who didn’t understand that we were not looking for charity or a favor from Target. We’re looking for a partner – even though Black people love Target so much that we’ve already invited them to the cookout and given them a nickname: “Targét”.

What specific demands does the #TargetFast have?

We asked for four things.

The first is because we spend $12m a day, we want them to invest $250m into Black banks so people can have access to capital for home ownership and entrepreneurship.

Second, we asked that they would adopt six HBCUs that have business programs so that young entrepreneurs can learn how to scale and build big box businesses. The reality is we’re 70 years fromthe Montgomery bus boycottand still have no national chain owned by Black people.

Third, we’ve asked in no uncertain terms, that they would honor theircommitment to George Floyd’s family, that they would invest $2bn into entrepreneurs so that their businesses might be able to thrive. So far, that’s the only thing that Target has agreed to.

Lastly, we gave them a blank canvas and said: “Reimagine DEI, even if it has a different name or definition.” I understand the pressure and the weight of thisTrump administration, so if you have to pivot and package it differently, I’m amenable. But I’m also mindful that the top beneficiaries are white women. Even though Black people lag behind, we have demonstrated, through our largesse and altruism historically, a willingness to serve the greater good.

There’s been a fair bit of skepticism within the Black community about singling out Target instead of including Walmart, Amazon and other major retailers. How sensitive were you to that criticismand did it factor into the decision to go after Dollar General next?

So this is the 15th week of the Target boycott. I announced Dollar General in the 13th week. I was of the mind that we had not done organized or unified targeted spending in 70 years, that we really would not be able to see the full brunt of our impact if we went after 14 companies at once. The African proverb says you eat an elephant one bite at a time. Now we have momentum: 50,000 people signed our covenant not to go into Target. We have a directory of more than 150,000 Black businesses we made with help from the US Black Chamber of Commerce that we’ve shared with more than 250,000 email supporters. We just had to start small in order to get real traction. And also you have to be mindful that this boycott wasn’t called by a historic civil rights organization – not the NAACP, the National Urban League, Rainbow Push or the National Action Network. It wasn’t called by a Black church denomination. It was a singular church: New Birth.

In its first quarter earnings report, Target reportedover a half-billion-dollar loss in year-over-year salesand a sharp decline in foot traffic. Do you take any encouragement from that, and does this suggest that they may be ready to listen to New Birth’s demands?

We take it as a victory. I’m grateful that the Kwanzaa principle of cooperative economics is seeing itself in the 21st century. It’s because we’re organized, unified and singular in our focus.

Has Target CEO Brian Cornell reached out to negotiate a detente at least?

Sign up toThe Long Wave

Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world

after newsletter promotion

Cornell and I had one meeting the Thursday before Easter, with the Rev Al Sharpton in New York. Then the Tuesday after Easter he was summoned to meet with the president at the White House. We had not heard anything since, which is why we moved to the “canceling” of Target.

For as much buy-in as you’ve gotten from the Black community for the Target boycott, you also have Tabitha Brown – the actor and healthy living influencer who has a lucrative brand partnership with Target –urging would-be boycottersto consider the effect their actions have on entrepreneurs like her. What do you say to that?

I’m disappointed in her. Tabitha didn’t build her brand from Target. She built it from social media. We love Tabitha, but it’s not true that the only way we can support her is in Target. You can open up a drop-ship, and we’ll buy from you onlineright now. People can still support Black brands outside of big box establishments. I want to see Tabitha thrive. I just want to see us move in a different direction.

Why did Dollar General make sense as the next retailer to go after?

People don’t realize Dollar General has roughlythree times as manystores as Walmart and Target combined. Seventy-five percent of Americans nationwide livewithin five milesof a Dollar General. They hire part-time staff so they don’t have to pay out benefits. They inundate impoverished communities and rural areas with 20,000 or fewer residents, fancying themselves as a stopgap solution in food deserts. But most of the food they sell is processed. Those issues combined with the preponderance of Black and brown people who shop at Dollar General and the fact that minorities comprise just very little of their executive leadership are why they came next in the pecking order.

What do you say to shoppers who live in food deserts who figure to be vastly more affected by a Dollar General boycott than boycotting Target?

For those in rural areas or food deserts, we’ve asked them to do an electronic protest, where we give you a sample script to email or deliver over the phone. They can use the #TargetFast hashtag on social. We by no means want to starve families and seniors. If that’s their only option, we’re asking them to take full advantage. But those who have options, we’re asking to pivot.

Has Dollar General responded?

We understand they released a report suggesting they expect business to beat last quarter’s projections. Good morning, Vietnam.

Who’s next? Walmart? Amazon?

We’re focused on the two we have now, but I don’t want this to just be a boycott movement. Between book bans, funding cuts to schools that teach Black history and threats to pull support from HBCUs, there’s so much more at stake. There’s also the immigration issue that also affects many Caribbean and African transplants as well Hispanic Americans. On Juneteenth Sunday, we’re challenging 2,000 churches to raise an offering to support the National Museum of African American History, which is alsoin the administration’s crosshairs. I’m hoping that what happens with Target and Dollar General will be a wake-up call for AT&T, Disney, Levi’s and other companies that have initiated DEI rollbacks to re-evaluate their positions.

How can allies in the Black diaspora and beyond get involved with this movement?

I was recently in Paris, and people were stopping in the streets to say: “I’m not going to Target.” Great, but y’all don’t even have one! It just shows you the global reach of what it is that we’re endeavoring to do.

Why do you think Target and other companies are so inclined to underestimate the power of the Black dollar?

Again, they’ve not seen us move like this in 70 years, and they don’t know that they’ve awakened a sleeping giant. Black people are now alert, mobilized and conscientious about what’s taking place. And we’re not going to spend our dollars with companies that don’t treat us with dignity.

Interview edited for length and clarity

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian