Oxford academics drank from cup made from human skull until 2015, book reveals

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Oxford College Used Human Skull Chalice Until 2015, New Book Reveals"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A recent revelation has emerged from a book by Professor Dan Hicks, the curator of world archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum at Oxford University, which details the unsettling history of a chalice crafted from a human skull that was used by academics at Worcester College until 2015. This skull-cup, made from a polished braincase and featuring a silver rim and stand, was a part of formal dining traditions and even served chocolates after it began leaking wine. The practice of using the skull-cup came to an end due to growing discomfort among college fellows and guests, prompting an investigation into the origins of the cup. Hicks emphasizes that the discussions surrounding colonialism often highlight the perpetrators while neglecting the identities of the victims, whose histories were frequently erased due to racist ideologies prevalent during the colonial era.

The skull from which the chalice was made has been carbon-dated to approximately 225 years old, suggesting it may have belonged to an enslaved woman from the Caribbean. In stark contrast, the cup's ownership history is well-documented, tracing back to George Pitt-Rivers, a former student who donated it to the college in 1946. Pitt-Rivers, a known eugenicist, acquired the skull-cup from a Sotheby’s auction shortly after its construction in 1838. The college has since faced criticism for its connection to colonial violence, with statements from figures like Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy highlighting the moral implications of using such an item for leisure. In response to these concerns, Worcester College has decided to archive the skull-cup permanently, ensuring that it is stored respectfully and denying access to it, acknowledging the need for an ethical approach to such artifacts from a painful colonial legacy.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The recent article sheds light on a shocking revelation regarding the use of a human skull chalice by Oxford academics until 2015. This unsettling practice raises questions about historical colonialism, ethics in academia, and societal values. By exploring the context surrounding this skull-cup, the article serves as a catalyst for discussions on the legacy of colonialism and the treatment of human remains.

Historical Context and Ethical Implications

The article highlights the skull-cup's long history of use at Worcester College, emphasizing how such items symbolize the colonial past. The narrative, as presented by Prof. Dan Hicks, addresses the dehumanization of the victims of colonialism, which is often overlooked in mainstream discussions. By focusing on the object’s sordid history, the article seeks to confront the uncomfortable truths about colonial legacies and the ongoing implications of such practices.

Public Reaction and Social Consciousness

The revelation of the skull-cup's usage has the potential to provoke public outrage and reflection on ethical standards in academia. The fact that it was used in formal settings until a relatively recent date underscores a disconnect between historical awareness and modern practices. This could lead to a broader dialogue about accountability and the need for institutions to confront their pasts. The article aims to raise awareness and encourage a societal shift towards acknowledging and addressing historical injustices.

Manipulative Elements in the Narrative

While the article appears to be factual, it may also carry an undertone of manipulation by emphasizing the grotesque aspects of the skull-cup to elicit a strong emotional response from readers. The choice of language, focusing on the "sick variety of tableware," could be seen as a tactic to create shock value, thereby steering the public discourse towards condemnation of colonial practices without fully exploring the nuances of the historical context.

Trustworthiness and Reliability

The reliability of the article hinges on the credibility of Prof. Dan Hicks and the historical context he provides. The use of carbon dating to support the claims adds a layer of authenticity. However, the sensationalism surrounding the story may lead some readers to question its objectivity. The article's focus on the emotional and ethical implications of the skull-cup raises valid points, but it also risks oversimplifying a complex historical issue.

Impact on Society and Future Discourse

This revelation could spark significant discussions about colonialism, reparations, and the ethical treatment of human remains. It may also influence how educational institutions engage with their histories and the artifacts they possess. The broader implications for society could include a push for more inclusive historical narratives and a re-evaluation of how colonial legacies are memorialized or addressed in public spaces.

Community Engagement and Target Audience

The article is likely to resonate with communities focused on social justice, historical accountability, and ethical practices in academia. It targets individuals interested in the intersections of history, ethics, and colonial studies, fostering engagement among those who advocate for a critical examination of the past.

Global Perspective and Economic Implications

While the article’s immediate focus is on a specific academic setting, it reflects broader global conversations about colonialism and its lingering effects. Such discussions can influence political movements, academic policies, and even cultural institutions worldwide. The economic implications may not be direct but could affect funding and support for institutions that fail to confront their colonial legacies.

Use of AI in Crafting the Narrative

It is plausible that AI language models were employed in the article's composition, especially in structuring the narrative and ensuring clarity. AI could influence the tone and style, making the content accessible while emphasizing key themes. The framing of the article, particularly the shocking details, suggests a calculated approach that could be enhanced by AI tools aimed at maximizing reader engagement.

In summary, while the article uncovers an important historical truth and fosters critical discussions, it may also contain elements that manipulate reader emotions. The focus on ethical implications and historical accountability serves to educate, but it risks oversimplifying complex issues. Overall, the article is credible but should be read with an awareness of its emotional framing.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Oxford academics drank from a chalice made from a human skull for decades, a book that explores the violent colonial history of looted human remains has revealed.

The skull-cup, fashioned from a sawn-off and polished braincase adorned with a silver rim and stand, was used regularly at formal dinners atWorcester College, Oxford, until 2015, according to Prof Dan Hicks, the curator of world archaeology at the university’sPitt Rivers Museum.

Hicks, whose forthcoming book,Every Monument Will Fall, traces the “shameful history of the skull”, said the cup was also used to serve chocolates after it began to leak wine.

The archaeologist said mounting disquiet among fellows and guests put an end to the senior common room ritual and, in 2019, the college invited Hicks to investigate the skull’s origins, and how it became what he calls “some sick variety of tableware”.

Hicks said debates about the legacy of colonialism usually focused on how the prominent Britons who profited from it, such asCecil RhodesorEdward Colston, had been memorialised by statues, objects or institutions bearing their names.

But he wanted to show how the identities of the victims of colonial rule had often been erased from history because, due to racist ideas of British cultural and white supremacy, they were not considered noteworthy. “The dehumanisation and destruction of identities was part of the violence,” the archaeologist added.

Hicks found no record of the person whose remains the skull-cup was made from, although carbon dating showed the skull is about 225 years old. Its size and circumstantial evidence suggest it came from the Caribbean and possibly belonged to an enslaved woman, he added.

In contrast, the chalice’s British owners were well-documented. The cup was donated to Worcester College in 1946 by a former student, George Pitt-Rivers, whose name is inscribed on its silver rim. A eugenicist, he was interned by the British government during the second world war due to his support for the fascist leader Oswald Mosley.

The cup was part of the lesser-known privatesecond collectionof his grandfather, the Victorian British soldier and archaeologist Augustus Henry Lane Fox Pitt Rivers, who founded the Pitt Rivers Museum in 1884.

The elder Pitt Rivers bought the skull-cup at a Sotheby’s auction that same year. The listing shows it then had a wooden stand with a Queen Victoria shilling inlaid underneath. Silver hallmarks indicate it was made in 1838, the year of her coronation.

The seller was Bernhard Smith, a lawyer and graduate of Oriel College, Oxford, who mainly collected weaponry and armour. Hicks speculated that he received it as a gift from his father, who served with the Royal Navy in the Caribbean.

The Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy,chair of the all-party parliamentary group on Afrikan reparations, said: “It is sickening to think of Oxford dons, sitting in this bastion of privilege, itself enriched by the proceeds of centuries of colonial violence and extraction, swilling drink out of a human skull that may have belonged to an enslaved person and has been so little valued that it has been turned into an object.”

A Worcester College spokesperson said: “In the 20th century, the vessel was sometimes on display with the college’s silver collection and used as tableware. The college does not hold records of how often this was the case, but it was severely limited after 2011 and the vessel was completely removed 10 years ago.

After taking scientific and legal advice, the college’s governing body decided the skull-cup should be stored in its archive “in a respectful manner, where access to it is permanently denied”, the spokesperson added. “As Dr Hicks acknowledges in his book, the college has dealt with the issue ethically and thoughtfully.”

The book also details other skulls looted from colonial battlefields by prominent Victorians, which were displayed in their homes or donated to museums. These include Field Marshal Lord Grenfell, after whom thetower in Kensingtonis named, who dug up the skull of a Zulu commander two years after he was killed by the British army in the battle of Ulundi in 1879.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian