Original Sin: how Team Biden wished away his decline until it was too late

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Analysis of Biden's Re-election Bid Highlights Concerns Over Health and Leadership"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In their book "Original Sin," CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios's Alex Thompson provide a critical examination of President Joe Biden's decision to seek re-election, highlighting the misjudgments made by his inner circle regarding his declining mental acuity. The authors, drawing from interviews with around 200 sources including congressional members and White House staff, reveal a troubling narrative where aides actively sought to shield Biden from the realities of his deteriorating health. As the 2024 election approached, it became increasingly evident to many that Biden was not fit to run, culminating in a disastrous debate against Donald Trump that sealed his fate as the Democratic nominee. Following this event, Biden was swiftly replaced by Vice President Kamala Harris, leading to a precarious political landscape for the Democratic Party as they grappled with the implications of Biden's legacy and the rise of Trump.

The book underscores the tension between Biden loyalists and critics, with sentiments of betrayal echoing throughout the narrative. Prominent Democratic figures, including David Plouffe, voiced their frustrations, suggesting that Biden's candidacy had undermined the party's prospects. The authors argue that the presidency demands a leader capable of functioning under pressure, a standard that Biden failed to meet as his cognitive abilities waned. Moreover, the analysis raises questions about the motivations of those surrounding Biden, who allowed him to run despite concerns about his fitness for office. With Biden's recent cancer diagnosis revealing longstanding health issues, the Democratic Party finds itself at a crossroads, needing to reassess its strategies to reclaim the White House and restore faith within its ranks. As the political climate shifts, the lessons from Biden's presidency and the missteps of his team serve as a cautionary tale for future candidates and party leadership.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a critical perspective on President Joe Biden's decline and the implications of his decision to run for re-election. It suggests that Biden and his team underestimated the challenges posed by his age and cognitive abilities, ultimately leading to a political fallout that affects not only his legacy but also the Democratic Party's future.

Intent Behind the Article

The piece appears to aim at scrutinizing the Biden administration's handling of the president's cognitive health and the implications of his re-election bid. It raises questions about transparency within political circles and suggests that both Biden and his aides were aware of his declining condition but chose to ignore it. This narrative serves to foster a sense of disillusionment among Democrats and could potentially influence public opinion against Biden and his party.

Perceived Public Sentiment

The article is likely designed to resonate with those who feel frustrated or betrayed by the Democratic Party's leadership. By featuring quotes from insiders and political strategists, it amplifies a sense of urgency and concern regarding the party's direction. This could galvanize support for alternative candidates or approaches within the party, particularly among voters who prioritize competence and transparency.

Potential Concealment

There may be underlying issues that the article hints at but does not explicitly address, such as the broader implications of Biden's health on national security or policy-making. The focus on Biden's decline might serve as a distraction from other pressing issues facing the administration, such as economic challenges or international relations.

Manipulative Elements

The article's tone and choice of language suggest a high level of emotional engagement, designed to provoke a reaction from readers. By using phrases like "an abomination" and emphasizing the disappointment felt by key Democratic figures, it seeks to sway public perception towards viewing Biden's presidency as a failure. The overall narrative could be seen as manipulative, particularly if it selectively highlights certain truths while downplaying others.

Credibility Assessment

The article references a substantial amount of sourced information, including insights from around 200 individuals, which enhances its credibility. However, the framing of events and the emotional weight of the language used may introduce bias. While it accurately reflects concerns about Biden's cognitive health, the extent to which it covers alternative viewpoints or the successes of his administration remains unclear.

Comparison with Other News

In the broader context of political reporting, this article fits into a narrative that has been growing about the vulnerabilities of aging political leaders. Similar articles have emerged regarding other politicians as well, suggesting a trend in media focus on age and capability in leadership roles. This reflects a growing concern among voters about the effectiveness of older politicians in rapidly changing political landscapes.

Impact on Society and Economy

The implications of this article extend to the political landscape, potentially influencing the Democratic Party's strategy leading into the next election cycle. If Biden's legacy is viewed negatively, it could result in a shift towards younger or more dynamic candidates, altering voter turnout and engagement. Economically, instability in leadership can affect market confidence, particularly if investors perceive a lack of strategic direction.

Support Base and Target Audience

This article is likely to resonate more with progressive and moderate Democrats who are concerned about Biden's efficacy. It may also attract independents or disillusioned voters who have lost faith in the current administration. By framing the discussion around competence, it appeals to a wider audience that values effective governance.

Market Implications

In terms of market impact, this narrative could influence sectors tied to political stability, such as healthcare, technology, and defense. Investors might react to the potential for leadership changes and shifts in policy direction as the Democratic Party navigates its future.

Global Power Dynamics

While the article focuses primarily on domestic political issues, the implications of Biden's leadership quality can resonate on a global scale. A perceived decline in U.S. political strength and stability could affect international relations and the country's influence in global matters.

It is plausible that AI tools could assist in drafting such articles, particularly in data analysis or synthesizing quotes from various sources. However, the emotive language and narrative style suggest a human touch in crafting the story's tone.

In conclusion, the article presents a critical viewpoint on President Biden's administration and raises questions about leadership in the Democratic Party. The emphasis on cognitive decline and internal party struggles serves to frame a narrative that may influence public opinion and voter behavior moving forward.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Joe Bidenmistook his victory in 2020 for a sweeping, FDR-like mandate. Officially, that was before age and decay caught up. Horrifically, forDemocrats, in June 2024 a debacle of a debate against Donald Trump confirmed what Washington insiders had only dared whisper but what most voters had known: Biden should not have sought re-election.

Less than a month later, he was out, replaced as Democratic nominee by his vice-president,Kamala Harris. Now, Trump runs wild and Biden’s legacy is buried beneath a heap of unkind reporting – and bouquets of sympathy, after news of his cancer.

“It was an abomination,” one prominent Democratic strategist isquoted as sayingby Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson. “He stole an election from the Democratic party; he stole it from the American people.”

Tapper and Thompson concur. Over 350 engrossing pages, they deliver a stinging judgment, trenchantly written and well-sourced.

The two reporters spoke to about 200 people, including members of Congress, White House staffers and campaign insiders. Some reportedly sounded the alarm about Biden’s mental acuity and desperate efforts by aides to hide his deterioration. The alarm was not heeded.

Tapper is CNN’s lead DC anchor and chief Washington correspondent. Thompson is a national political correspondent for Axios and a CNN contributor. His speech at the recent White House Correspondents’ Association dinner was one for the ages.

“President Biden’s decline and its cover-up by the people around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless of party, is capable of deception,” Thompson said. “We, myself included, missed a lot of this story. And some people trust us less because of it. We bear some responsibility for faith in the media being at such lows.”

Original Sin begins with a bang. Its first chapter is titled “He Fucked Us”, from an on-record quote by David Plouffe, senior adviser to the Harris campaign, before that manager of Barack Obama’s 2008 winning effort. “We got so screwed by Biden as a party,” Plouffe says. Harris was a “great soldier”, but the race was “a fucking nightmare. …

“And it’s all Biden … He totally fucked us.” Try putting that toothpaste back in the tube. On the other hand, Plouffe doesn’t reveal what Harris knew about Biden’s fitness and when she knew it.

Biden loyalists return the favor, too, the authors write: “Many … felt that Harris didn’t put in the work and was also just not a very nice person. Some quietly expressed buyer’s remorse: They should have picked [Gretchen] Whitmer,” the Democratic governor of Michigan.

Tapper and Thompson report cold political facts. In 2020, identity politics played an outsize role in Biden’s VP pick. “It boils down to whether he has a Hispanic woman or a Black woman,” Harry Reid, the former Senate Democratic leader,saidthen.

Tapper and Thompson lay bare a sense of betrayal.

“The presidency requires someone who can perform at 2am during an emergency,” they write. “Cabinet secretaries in [Biden’s] own administration told us that by 2024, he could not be relied upon for this.”

Yet, Biden and his minions made sure to clear the field. The representative Dean Phillips of Minnesota, Biden’s only challenger among elected officials, never had a prayer. Governors stayed on the sidelines.

Tapper and Thompson tell us one senior White House aide left because he or she didn’t think Biden should run again. Biden had been walled off from staff to shield his decline.

“I loveJoe Biden,” the unnamed aide continues. “When it comes to decency, there are few in politics like him. Still, it was a disservice to the country and to the party for his family and advisers to allow him to run again.”

That ranks as an understatement. The cover of Original Sin shows Biden with hands covering his eyes. The former president, his family and his closest advisers – known as the “politburo” here – dwelt in a world of alternative facts.

“The Bidens’ greatest strength is living in their own reality,” a source tells Tapper and Thompson. “And Biden himself is gifted at creating it:Beau isn’t going to die. Hunter’s sobriety is stable… Joe always tells the truth. Joe cares more about his family than his own ambition … They stick to the narrative and repeat it.”

To quote Lewis Carroll: “I have said it thrice: What I tell you three times is true.”

Biden’s decline was not sudden, according to Tapper and Thompson. The signs were there years ago: “During an eight-day, grueling bus tour in Iowa in December 2019, Biden gave his aides pause. While doing prep, he struggled to remember the name of longtime aide Mike Donilon. ‘You know, you know,’ he said, groping for it.”

Donilon had worked with Biden for nearly 40 years. It should have been time to start worrying. Cover-up and denial are foundational to the Biden saga.

This week brought Biden’s bad diagnosis.

“He did not develop [metastatic prostate cancer] in the last 100, 200 days,” Zeke Emanuel, a doctor, told MSNBC on Monday. “He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency, in 2021 … I don’t think there’s any disagreement about that.”

Emanuel’s brother, Rahm, was Biden’s ambassador to Japan, and before that chief of staff to Obama.

Democrats must address such self-inflicted wounds. Disapproval of Trump may be all they need to retake the House next year. But reckoning and redirection will be needed to recapture the White House. The party’s brand circles the drain.

For now, Trump is the exception that proves the rule: America is no country for old presidents.

Original Sin ispublishedin the US by Penguin Random House

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian