Oklahoma high schools to teach 2020 election conspiracy theories as fact

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Oklahoma High Schools Revise Curriculum to Address 2020 Election Discrepancies"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Oklahoma's new social studies curriculum for high schools has sparked controversy by requiring students to identify alleged "discrepancies" in the results of the 2020 presidential election. This shift from the previous standard, which simply asked students to examine issues related to the election, reflects a broader Republican effort in red states to promote narratives sympathetic to Donald Trump. The revised curriculum emphasizes topics such as the sudden halting of ballot counting in key battleground states, security risks associated with mail-in voting, and unusual voting trends, which critics argue misrepresent historical facts. Ryan Walters, the state school superintendent and a vocal Trump supporter, has driven this change, claiming that it aims to counteract what he describes as left-wing indoctrination in education. The new curriculum has also been criticized for its lack of thorough review and the way it was hastily approved by the state school board, raising concerns among some Republican leaders about its appropriateness and accuracy.

In addition to the changes regarding the 2020 election, Walters has proposed removing discussions about Black Lives Matter and the murder of George Floyd from the curriculum, further highlighting the ideological shift in educational standards. The proposed revisions are expected to cost Oklahoma taxpayers $33 million for new textbooks and materials, and they have prompted a lawsuit from parents and educators claiming that the standards represent a biased perspective on social studies. Many teachers express concern that the changes could lead to a more ideologically driven educational environment, particularly in rural areas where conservative viewpoints may dominate. Despite pushback from some legislators and educators, conservative groups are rallying support for the new standards, threatening political consequences for those who oppose them. This situation underscores the ongoing national debate over the role of education in shaping political narratives and the influence of partisan politics on public school curricula.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a significant shift in Oklahoma's educational curriculum, particularly in the teaching of the 2020 election. This change appears to align with a broader Republican agenda that supports narratives favorable to former President Donald Trump. By incorporating conspiracy theories about the election as part of the curriculum, the state is attempting to influence the perception of students regarding electoral integrity and political discourse.

Intent Behind the Article

The article aims to inform the public about the changes in Oklahoma’s educational standards and the implications of these changes on critical thinking and historical understanding. By emphasizing the teaching of “discrepancies” in the election results, the article suggests that the state is endorsing a particular political ideology rather than an objective analysis of historical events. This could be seen as an effort to legitimize the false narratives surrounding the 2020 election.

Public Perception and Manipulation

There is a clear attempt to shape public perception regarding the education system and its alignment with political ideologies. The narrative constructed around the “wokeness” of educators might be used to rally support among conservative communities who feel that traditional values are under threat in schools. This could be an effort to distract from other pressing issues within the educational system by focusing on ideological battles.

Information Concealment

By prioritizing certain narratives, the state may be attempting to obscure discussions about systemic issues such as racial equality and social justice, as indicated by the proposed removal of education on topics like Black Lives Matter. This selective teaching could limit students' understanding of complex societal issues, steering them towards a narrower worldview.

Manipulative Nature of the Article

The article exhibits a manipulative quality by framing the changes as a necessary corrective to what is portrayed as left-wing indoctrination. The language used by Ryan Walters, the state school superintendent, reflects a strategy to polarize opinions and provoke a strong emotional response among audiences who may feel similarly disenfranchised.

Factual Basis of the News

While the article presents factual information regarding the curriculum changes, the framing and interpretation of these changes lean towards a critical viewpoint. This suggests that while the events described are real, the implications drawn from them may be influenced by the article's angle and the author’s perspective.

Broader Implications

The potential societal impact of these educational changes could be substantial. They may foster a generation of students who are less critical of information and more susceptible to partisan narratives. This could further entrench divisions within society and affect political engagement in the future.

Target Audience

The article seems to resonate more with communities that are concerned about educational content and believe in traditional values. It likely appeals to conservatives who feel that current educational practices do not reflect their values or beliefs.

Market Impact

In terms of market reactions, this news may not have immediate direct effects on stock prices or the broader economy. However, it could influence sectors related to education, publishing, and media that focus on educational content and materials, potentially affecting shares of companies involved in educational publishing or curriculum development.

Global Context

While the article primarily focuses on a regional issue, it reflects larger trends within the U.S. regarding educational content and political ideologies. The approach taken by Oklahoma may echo similar movements in other states, contributing to a national dialogue about the role of education in shaping societal values.

In conclusion, the article presents a specific viewpoint on Oklahoma's educational changes, highlighting the manipulation of historical narratives for political purposes. The reliability of the news can be assessed as moderately high in terms of factual reporting, but the interpretation and implications drawn from these facts are influenced by a particular ideological stance.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As part of the latestRepublican pushin red states topromote ideologiessympathetic to Donald Trump, Oklahoma’s new social studies curriculum will ask high school students to identify “discrepancies” in the 2020 election results.

The previous standard for studying the 2020 election merely said: “Examine issues related to the election of 2020 and its outcome.” The new version is more expansive: “Identify discrepancies in 2020 elections results by looking at graphs and other information, including the sudden halting of ballot-counting in select cities in key battleground states, the security risks of mail-in balloting, sudden batch dumps, an unforeseen record number of voters, and the unprecedented contradiction of ‘bellwether county’ trends.”

The revised curriculum standard comes at the behest of Ryan Walters, the state school superintendent, who has publicly voiced his support for Trump. In October, Walters lauded Trump in aninterview, saying that “Trump’s won the argument on education”.

Walters, who has also advocated for ending “wokeness” in public schools, went on to say: “We have education bureaucrats that are left-wing, elitist, that think they know best for families, and they have become so radicalized that our families are going: ‘What is going on here?’”

Oklahoma’s new social studies standards for K-12 public school students, already infused with references to the Bible and national pride, were revised at Walters’ direction. The Republican official has spent much of his first term in office not only lauding Trump but also feuding with teachers’ unions and local school superintendents.

“The left has been pushing left-wing indoctrination in the classroom,” Walters said. “We’re moving it back to actually understanding history … and I’m unapologetic about that.”

As part of his revisions, Walters also proposed removing education about Black Lives Matter and George Floyd’s murder, Tulsa’s NBC affiliate KJRHreports.

The outlet further reported that the revisions were expected to cost the state’s taxpayers $33m in new textbooks and related material.

Other effortsby Walters includepromotingTrump-endorsed Bibles across classrooms, as well as supporting an attempt to establish the US’sfirst public religious charter school– a case the conservative-majority supreme courtseems opento siding with.

The new standard raised red flags even among Walters’ fellow Republicans, including the governor and legislative leaders. They were concerned that several last-minute changes, including the language about the 2020 election and a provision stating the source of the Covid-19 virus was a Chinese lab, were added just hours before the state school board voted on them.

A group of parents and educators have filed a lawsuit asking a judge to reject the standards, arguing they were not reviewed properly and that they “represent a distorted view of social studies that intentionally favors an outdated and blatantly biased perspective”.

While many Oklahoma teachers have expressed outrage at the change in the standards, others say they leave plenty of room for an effective teacher to instruct students about the results of the 2020 election without misinforming them.

Aaron Baker, who has taught US government in high schools in Oklahoma City for more than a decade, said he’s most concerned about teachers in rural, conservative parts of the state who might feel encouraged to impose their own beliefs on students.

“If someone is welcoming the influence of these far-right organizations in our standards and is interested in inserting more of Christianity into our practices as teachers, then they’ve become emboldened,” Baker said. “For me, that is the major concern.”

Leaders in the Republican-led Oklahoma legislature introduced a resolution to reject the standards, but there wasn’t enough GOP support to pass it.

Part of that hesitation likely stemmed from a flurry of last-minute opposition organized by pro-Trump conservative groups such as Moms for Liberty, which has a large presence in Oklahoma and threatened lawmakers who reject the standards with a primary opponent.

“In the last few election cycles, grassroots conservative organizations have flipped seats across Oklahoma by holding weak Republicans accountable,” the group wrote in a letter signed by several other conservative groups and GOP activists. “If you choose to side with the liberal media and make backroom deals with Democrats to block conservative reform, you will be next.”

After a group of parents, educators and other Oklahoma school officials worked to develop the new social studies standards, Walters assembled an executive committee consisting mostly of out-of-state pundits from conservative thinktanks to revise them. He said he wanted to focus more on American exceptionalism and incorporate the Bible as an instructional resource.

Among those Walters appointed to the review committee wereKevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation and a key figure in its Project 2025 blueprint for a conservative presidential administration, and Dennis Prager, a radio talkshow host who founded Prager U, a conservative non-profit that offers “pro-American” educational materials for children that some critics say are not accurate or objective.

In a statement to the Associated Press, Walters defended teaching students about “unprecedented and historically significant” elements of the 2020 presidential election.

Recounts, reviews and audits in the battleground states where Trump contested his loss all confirmed Democrat Joe Biden’s victory, and Trump lost dozens of court cases challenging the results.

In addition to the curriculum revisions, a proposed rule approved by the state board of education in January mandates that parents enrolling their children in the state’s public schoolsshow proof of immigration status.

Describing the rule, which has been met with widespread outrage among parents, students and immigration advocates, Walters said: “Our rule around illegal immigration accounting is simply that … It is to account for how many students of illegal immigrants are in our schools.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian