Oh to Believe in Another World review – Gripping Kentridge and Shostakovich bring Stalin’s age of betrayal to life

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Kentridge's Film Interpretation of Shostakovich's 10th Symphony Explores Stalin's Era"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a striking artistic collaboration, South African artist William Kentridge presents a film adaptation of Shostakovich's 10th Symphony, intertwining visual art and music to explore the dark era of Stalin's regime. The film, showcased at the Royal Festival Hall during the Southbank Centre’s Multitudes festival, employs puppets and collage to depict historical figures such as Lenin, Stalin, and the poet Vladimir Mayakovsky. Kentridge's grotesque yet humorous interpretation brings to life the tyranny and betrayal of the 20th century, capturing the essence of Shostakovich's symphony, which the composer himself described as a reflection on Stalin's oppressive years. The performance, conducted by Marin Alsop and accompanied by the Philharmonia Orchestra, serves as a poignant reminder of the historical context surrounding the music, emphasizing the pain and suffering endured during this tumultuous period.

The film's visual narrative is marked by rapid editing and poignant proclamations that echo the brutal realities of Stalin's policies, including the Five-Year Plans that led to widespread suffering and death. Kentridge's work juxtaposes the initial hope of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 against the grim outcomes that followed, using artistic references from the era's avant-garde movements. As the film progresses, it reflects on the loss of life and the failed utopia that artists once envisioned. The film culminates in a graveyard scene, symbolizing the tragic legacy of a regime that claimed millions of lives. Kentridge's adaptation, in sync with the symphony's emotional crescendos, offers a profound exploration of memory and mourning, revealing the haunting beauty of Shostakovich's music in the context of historical atrocity. The Multitudes festival at the Southbank Centre continues until May 3, showcasing the intersection of art and history in contemporary discourse.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a thought-provoking review of William Kentridge's film interpretation of Shostakovich's 10th Symphony, presented in the context of a live orchestral performance. It delves into the historical significance of the artwork, particularly how it reflects the oppressive Stalinist regime and the broader themes of betrayal and suffering during a tumultuous period in the 20th century. This piece combines visual art with music to evoke a powerful emotional response, effectively bringing to life the narrative of an era marked by fear and artistic repression.

Purpose of Publication

The review aims to highlight the profound impact of Kentridge’s work on the understanding of Shostakovich’s symphony, while also emphasizing the historical context from which it emerged. By showcasing the integration of visual and musical arts, the article seeks to attract audiences to both the performance and the underlying message about resilience in the face of tyranny. This is likely intended to spark interest in the themes of the festival and stimulate discussions around art as a form of political commentary.

Public Perception

The article aims to create a sense of intrigue and appreciation for Kentridge’s artistic vision while simultaneously engaging with the significant historical themes of the performance. By framing the content within a narrative of betrayal and survival, it encourages audiences to reflect on the parallels between past and present, inviting a critical examination of political power and artistic freedom.

Information Omission

While the article does not explicitly hide information, it focuses primarily on the artistic and historical narratives without delving deeply into potential controversies surrounding Shostakovich’s life or varying interpretations of his work. This selective emphasis may lead readers to a more romanticized view of the era without fully exploring the complexities and nuances present in the historical record.

Manipulative Elements

There is a level of emotional manipulation present, particularly through the use of vivid imagery and evocative language that aims to elicit strong feelings about the tragedies of the Stalin era. The review’s framing of the music as a 'magic key' to understanding the past enhances its emotional weight, potentially guiding readers toward a particular interpretation of both the symphony and Kentridge’s artistic intent.

Reliability of the Article

The reliability of the article appears solid, as it is rooted in a well-respected performance and the insights of an established artist, Kentridge. However, the focus on emotional resonance and historical framing might lead to a less critical view of the complexities surrounding Shostakovich and the political context he worked within.

Societal Impact

The themes presented in the article may resonate with contemporary audiences, particularly in discussions around freedom of expression and the role of art in society. This could lead to increased awareness of the importance of artistic voices in times of political oppression, potentially influencing public sentiment and advocacy for creative freedoms.

Target Audience

The article seems designed to appeal to art enthusiasts, historians, and those interested in the intersection of politics and culture. It likely aims to attract a diverse audience, including those who appreciate symphonic music and visual arts, as well as individuals concerned with historical injustices.

Economic Implications

While this review may not directly impact stock markets or global economies, it could influence attendance and support for cultural institutions and events, highlighting the potential economic benefits that come from promoting the arts. The success of such performances can lead to increased funding and support for similar cultural initiatives.

Geopolitical Relevance

Although the review is focused on a historical context, the themes of oppression and artistic expression resonate with current global issues surrounding freedom and authoritarianism. This connection may inspire discourse on how art can serve as a form of resistance today.

Use of AI in Writing

It is unlikely that AI played a significant role in composing this article. The nuanced understanding of historical context and the emotive language suggest a human touch. However, if AI were involved, it might have assisted in generating ideas or language refinement, rather than dictating the thematic direction.

Overall Trustworthiness

In conclusion, the article presents a compelling narrative that is both informative and evocative, though it does lean toward emotionally charged language that may influence reader perceptions. Its reliability is supported by the credibility of the performance and the historical context discussed.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The 20th century is a cruel farce performed by puppets in a cardboard museum in South African artist William Kentridge’s grotesquely funny, constantly disconcerting film interpretation of Shostakovich’s 10th Symphony. Lenin and Stalin, their faces’ photographs fixed on jerky figures made from scraps, transforming sporadically into living dancers hidden under collaged costumes, monstrously dominate a puppet cast that also includes the bullish-looking but revolutionary poet Vladimir Mayakovsky along with Trotsky and Shostakovich himself.

It would be stirring in an art gallery with recorded music, but on a big screen in the Royal Festival Hall above Marin Alsop conducting a gripping performance by the Philharmonia Orchestra as part of the Southbank’s Centre’smultidisciplinary Multitudes festival, it became a magic key to both the music and the age of betrayal and mass murder it witnesses.

Shostakovich said of his 10th Symphony, “It’s about Stalin and the Stalin years” – as blunt an explanation of a work you’re ever likely to hear from a composer. It was premiered in December 1953 following Stalin’s death in March that year, freeing Shostakovich and other musicians from the dictator’s unbearably attentive grip – except poor Prokofiev, who died the same day as Stalin. So many had died, including Kentridge’s artistic hero Mayakovsky, who shot himself in 1930 as illusions collapsed about Stalin’s meat-factory regime.

Biographers and musicologists argue over Shostakovich’s apparently political symphony – did he write it all after Stalin died? The brilliance of Kentridge’s film, perfectly in sync with each unnerving crescendo and melancholy trough, is that it makes you see through such quibbles and feel the majesty and pathos of this music from the darkest times of the 20th century.

The crux of discomfort came in the painfully fast second movement alongside rapidly edited, montage-manic images and proclamations such as “Comrade life, march faster!” and “We’ll chase humanity into happiness with an iron fist!” These futuristic lines by Mayakovsky became all too bloodily real when Stalin started the Five-Year Plans in 1928, to speed up economic history by enforced collectivisation and slave labour, along with purges that killed millions.

Kentridge’s film opens with lyrical photographs of revolutionary crowds in 1917, but more and more faces are then ringed with pen as if marked by Stalin for death. As the title implies, his film sees the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks in 1917 as the birth of a failed utopia, but a failed utopia is still a glimpse of hope.

Archival discoveries after the fall of the USSR have revealed a bleaker picture of Lenin and his party. But the artists inspired by 1917 certainly did think they were building utopia and it is their aesthetic disruptions, from Mayakovsky’s futurist lines to the art of Vladimir Tatlin, El Lissitzky and Kazimir Malevich and the radical film editing of Sergei Eisenstein and Dziga Vertov that give Kentridge’s film its energy.

But it’s all ironised. A hand reaches into the Museum of Stalinism to reveal this immersive, labyrinthine space is actually just a small model made from cardboard. All the brave pronouncements are the jerky bombast of tiny puppets. And it ends in a graveyard. In the same way, echoes of modernist music in Shostakovich’s 10th Symphony are framed by quotation marks. You are left with an infinitely sad and traumatised lyricism as Shostakovich and Kentridge remember the millions of Russians, Ukrainians and other nationalities slaughtered by the world’s first Communist state between 1917 and 1953. The multitudes.

Southbank Centre’s Multitudes festival continues until 3 May.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian