Ofwat should have to approve water firms’ bonuses and dividends, say MPs

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"MPs Call for Regulatory Approval of Water Company Bonuses and Dividends"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Members of Parliament (MPs) have called for greater regulatory oversight regarding the payment of bonuses and dividends to executives and shareholders of water companies in England. According to a report by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) select committee, the current system allows for irresponsible use of billpayer funds, and it is proposed that the regulator, Ofwat, should need to approve any such payments before they are issued. The committee's report highlights the financial instability of certain water companies, particularly Thames Water, which has been criticized for awarding millions in bonuses to its executives from a controversial £3 billion loan intended to stabilize its finances. The MPs have also suggested that the government explore transitioning to a non-profit model for water companies, akin to the system in Wales, where financial resilience appears to be stronger and the burden of dividends on service quality is absent.

The report comes amid growing concerns about the privatized and profit-driven nature of the water industry in England, which has faced significant scrutiny due to issues such as sewage spills and mismanagement. An independent water commission has been established by the government to investigate the future of this unique industry, which has been criticized for prioritizing profits over environmental responsibilities and customer service. Recommendations from the Efra committee include empowering Ofwat to prevent unsuitable ownership of water companies and to restrict the hiring of certain executives. While new laws have been enacted to limit bonuses for chief executives, the report indicates that loopholes exist, allowing companies to circumvent these restrictions by reclassifying bonus payments. Alistair Carmichael, chair of the Efra committee, emphasized the need for accountability and the importance of prioritizing environmental protection and reliable service delivery in the water sector.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Bonuses and dividends for water company bosses and shareholders should be approved by the regulator before they are paid, as billpayer funds are being used irresponsibly, MPs have said.

They also recommended that the government consider ending the profit-driven water company model and making English companies non-profit, similar to how the system works in Wales, in the report by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) select committee.

The report notes: “Welsh Water’s gearing levels are lower and its financial resilience is better than many of the main water companies. Not-for-profit models lack one of the negatives of private ownership, dividends, which have contributed to the worsening finances of several water companies, most notablyThames Water.”

The committee uncovered in recent weeks that Thames Water executiveshad been paid bonusesworth millions of pounds from a controversial £3bn loan, the purpose of which was to stabilise the company’s finances and save it from collapse.

Ministers recently set up anindependent water commissionto produce a report on the future of England’s struggling water industry, which is globally unique in that it is fully privatised and run for profit. Companies have presided over sewage spills and financial mismanagement leading to environmental destruction, a waste of customer money, large bonuses for executives and the risk of companies collapsing and requiring a taxpayer bailout.

The Efra committee report is aimed at guiding the commission after months of collecting evidence from experts in the sector.

Recommendations from the report include allowing the regulator, Ofwat, to block inappropriate owners from buying water companies and veto the hiring of executives.

The government recently passed new laws that allow it to ban bonuses for chief executives, but the report notes that the weak standards currently underpinning this means water bosses who had recently overseen sewage spills were allowed to be paid bonuses. The new law bans performance-related bonuses only, so water companies can get around this by labelling them as something else, for example as retention payments, the report adds.

The chair of the Efra committee, the Lib Dem MP Alistair Carmichael, said: “Amidst growing public outrage at the poor performance of water companies, some companies have been paying out high dividends to shareholders and excessive bonuses to their senior executives.

“Water companies’ complex and sometimes impenetrable financial structures, with their myriad subsidiaries, holding companies and parent organisations, seem to suggest that their purpose is less to provide a good service to their customers and more to allow them to juggle their finances and their increasingly unsustainable levels of debt.

“This has got to stop now. Trust and accountability in the water sector are very low. It is not acceptable that it has fallen to commendable citizen scientists to expose issues with local water resources. Environmental protection and the delivery of a reliable and safe water must be the first priorities of water companies and regulators.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian