Nouvelle Vague – Richard Linklater bends the knee to Breathless and Jean-Luc Godard

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Richard Linklater's Nouvelle Vague Explores the Making of Godard's Breathless"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Richard Linklater's latest film, Nouvelle Vague, serves as a tribute to Jean-Luc Godard's iconic 1960 film, Breathless, while also exploring the creative dynamics behind its making. Set against the backdrop of Paris, the film is meticulously crafted in monochrome, a stylistic choice that harkens back to classic cinema, contrasting the vibrant colors of contemporary life. Linklater’s homage is infused with a playful spirit, as it incorporates elements such as vintage cue marks for projectionists, which add a layer of authenticity to the viewing experience. Through this lens, Linklater presents a thoughtful examination of the film industry and the artistic tensions that often accompany the creative process. His portrayal of Godard, played by newcomer Guillaume Marbeck, captures the director's wit and bravado, creating a character that is both charming and elusive. This film not only pays homage to Godard but also subtly nods to his collaborator, François Truffaut, who played a crucial role in the success of Breathless, thus enriching the narrative with layers of historical context and personal rivalry.

As the plot unfolds, audiences are introduced to a cast of characters who embody the spirit of the filmmaking process. From Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg's star-crossed lovers to the behind-the-scenes figures like cinematographer Raoul Coutard and producer George 'Beau Beau' Beauregard, each character is given their moment to shine. The film humorously captures the chaotic atmosphere on set, with Godard's capricious direction leading to amusing interactions among the cast, who freely express their thoughts during filming, knowing they would dub their lines later. Linklater's depiction of Godard's struggles and insecurities, particularly in light of Truffaut's success with The 400 Blows, adds depth to the narrative, portraying the director as a complex figure grappling with his ambition and legacy. Ultimately, Nouvelle Vague is a smooth, engaging exploration of a pivotal moment in cinematic history, offering both homage and critique in a manner that is both entertaining and insightful.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a critical examination of Richard Linklater's film, which serves as an homage to Jean-Luc Godard’s seminal work, "Breathless." It highlights the artistic choices made by Linklater, contrasting them with Godard's original style, while also reflecting on the legacy of the French New Wave.

Purpose of the Article

The intent behind this article appears to be a nuanced critique of contemporary cinema, specifically how modern filmmakers engage with the classics. By juxtaposing Linklater's approach with Godard's groundbreaking techniques, the article encourages readers to reflect on the evolution of film and the significance of homage in artistic expression. It subtly critiques Linklater's choices, suggesting that while he aims to honor Godard, he inadvertently leans towards the more commercial and palatable style of Francois Truffaut.

Public Perception

This piece likely aims to cultivate a sense of appreciation for film history among cinephiles while also provoking thought about the integrity of artistic homage. It highlights the tension between reverence for classic cinema and the interpretations that modern filmmakers bring to the table. The narrative may resonate with audiences who value authenticity in filmmaking and those who are critical of overly commercial adaptations of classic works.

Hidden Agendas

There is no overt indication of information being concealed from the public. However, the article may downplay the complexities of Linklater's intentions, potentially leading to a perception that his work lacks depth. Such a portrayal could obscure the broader context of contemporary cinema's relationship with its predecessors.

Manipulative Elements

The article employs a tone that could be interpreted as elitist, which may alienate casual moviegoers while appealing to film critics and enthusiasts. The use of terms like “impeccably submissive” and “boring old colour” suggests a clear bias against Linklater's approach, which might manipulate the reader's perception of the film without presenting a balanced view.

Truthfulness of the Content

The article appears to be grounded in a genuine analysis of the film and its inspirations. However, the subjective language used may influence how the information is received. While it presents valid critiques, the tone could overshadow the objective facts about the film's production and artistic choices.

Cultural Implications

The discussion of Linklater’s homage to Godard and Truffaut reflects broader cultural conversations about the value of originality versus homage in art. This could resonate with audiences who feel that modern cinema often lacks innovation and relies too heavily on past successes.

Audience Engagement

The article is likely to attract support from cinephiles, film critics, and scholars interested in film theory and history. It speaks to those who appreciate the nuances of film-making and the complex relationships between directors, their influences, and the works they create.

Economic Impact

In terms of market implications, this article might not have a direct effect on stock markets or specific industries, as it focuses more on artistic critique than commercial analysis. However, it may influence audience interest in Linklater's film and potentially impact box office performance.

Geopolitical Relevance

While the article centers on a cinematic analysis, it also reflects cultural dynamics within the film industry. The legacy of filmmakers like Godard continues to have global significance, as it shapes cinematic trends and influences filmmakers worldwide.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

It is plausible that AI tools were used in drafting this article, particularly in structuring the narrative and analyzing film elements. AI models could assist in identifying patterns within film critiques, though the subjective analysis and commentary suggest a human author’s touch is predominant.

In conclusion, while the article provides an insightful critique of Linklater's film, it also carries a subjective tone that affects its overall reliability. The biases present may distort its arguments, making it essential for readers to approach the content with a critical mindset.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Breathless, deathless … and pointless? Here is Richard Linklater’s impeccably submissive, tastefully cinephile period drama about the making of Godard’s debut 1960 classic À Bout de Souffle, that starred Jean Seberg and Jean-Paul Belmondo as the star-crossed lovers in Paris. Linklater’s homage has credits in French and is beautifully shot in monochrome, as opposed to the boring old colour of real life in which the events were actually happening; he even cutely fabricates cue marks in the corner of the screen, those things that once told projectionists when to changeover the reels. But Linklater smoothly avoids any disruptive jump-cuts.

It’s a good natured, intelligent effort for which Godard himself, were he still alive, would undoubtedly have ripped Linklater a new one. (WhenMichel Hazanavicius made Redoubtable in 2017about Godard’s making of his 1967 film La Chinoise, the man himself called that “a stupid, stupid idea”; Hazanavicius wasn’t even making a film about Godard’s first and biggest hit.

Yet Linklater is of course unconsciously creating a stylistic homage – not to Godard, however, but to his much more emollient, accessible and Hollywood-friendly collaborator Francois Truffaut. Truffaut wrote the basic story for Breathless and thereby gave Godard his commercial success; it was based on a sensational true-crime story about a tough guy who shoots a cop and gets an American girlfriend on the run, grabbing at love and romance while he can, existentially aware that a cop-killer’s days are numbered.

The real-life characters of the Breathless story, from the most famous to the most obscure (this latter category being of course treated with rigorous superfan respect) are introduced with static portrait shots, gazing at the camera with their names flashed up on screen; even in the action itself, these people are often addressed by their full name with an awestruck sentence about their importance so we know where we are.

Godard himself, a Cahiers Du Cinéma gunslinger-critic yearning to graduate to film-making, is played by newcomer Guillaume Marbeck, incessantly dropping epigrams and wisecracks and shruggingly dismissive pouts on the subject of cinema – and perhaps Godard was like this, at least some of the time. Linklater mischievously allows the audience to wonder if Godard will ever remove his sunglasses and get a “beautiful librarian” moment, or at least a moment to confess that you shouldn’t watch movies through dark glasses. Aubry Dillon plays Belmondo and Zoey Deutch is Seberg, forever breaking into fluent and Ohio-accented French. Adrien Rouyard is Truffaut, Matthieu Penchinat is the brilliant cinematographer Raoul Coutard whose news background in covering wars made him an inspired choice for Godard’s guerrilla film-making adventures, Benjamin Clery is Godard’s first assistant director Pierre Rissient and Bruno Dreyfürst is Godard’s long-suffering producer George “Beau Beau” Beauregard - whose disagreements with Godard over money lead to an undignified physical scuffle in aPariscafe.

The shoot begins, extended by Godard’s haughtily capricious delays to accommodate authentic inspiration, as the actors amusingly say whatever they like to each other and the tyrannical director while the camera is turning, because everything is to be dubbed later in the studio. Continuity supervisor Suzon Faye (Pauline Belle) crossly tells Godard that his cavalier disregard for matching the eyelines in successive shots mean a problem in the edit; a hint of the imminent revolution in film grammar, perhaps, though Linklater’s Godard has the humility to say he didn’t invent jump-cuts.

By the end, Linklater’s Godard is as opaque and essentially imperturbable as he was in the beginning, seething with competitive anguish at the success of Truffaut’s The 400 Blows in Cannes and struggling to get into parties and film sets; and again, none of this, arguably, is inaccurate. But it’s all very smooth: a slick Steadicam ride through a historic, tumultuous moment.

Nouvelle Vague screened at theCannes film festival.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian