‘Not our war’: bipartisan US lawmakers back resolution to block involvement in Iran

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Bipartisan Lawmakers Introduce Resolution to Limit U.S. Military Action Against Iran"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In response to President Trump's threats of military action against Iran, a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers has introduced a war powers resolution aimed at preventing unauthorized military engagement. Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, known for his libertarian views, has teamed up with progressive Democrats, including Tim Kaine, Ilhan Omar, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, to propose legislation that mandates Congressional approval before any military action against Iran can take place. Massie emphasized the importance of adhering to the Constitution, stating, "This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution." This legislative initiative coincides with escalating tensions in the region, particularly following Israeli airstrikes on Iranian military targets, which have raised concerns about a broader conflict involving U.S. forces. The urgency of the resolution is underscored by Trump's call for Iran's unconditional surrender after attending a G7 summit, prompting fears of potential military escalation.

The White House has attempted to quell concerns about U.S. involvement, with spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer asserting that American forces are maintaining a defensive posture. However, military assets have been repositioned in the Middle East, heightening scrutiny over the administration's intentions. Trump's history of vetoing similar resolutions during his first term, particularly concerning Iran and Yemen, raises questions about the resolution's future. Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna, a co-sponsor of the resolution, expressed optimism about its chances in the House, where Democrats could leverage their influence despite the Republican majority being slim. Some Republicans, like Marjorie Taylor Greene, have voiced skepticism about the need for such a resolution at this stage, preferring to trust Trump's commitment to his anti-war campaign promises. Overall, this development represents a significant moment for lawmakers seeking to assert Congressional authority over military actions and redefine the political discourse surrounding U.S. engagement in foreign conflicts.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

AsDonald Trumppublicly threatens to join Israel in attacking Iran, an unlikely coalition of lawmakers has moved to prevent the president from involving US forces in the conflict without Congress’s approval.

On Tuesday, Republican congressman Thomas Massie, whose libertarian-tinged politics have often put him at odds with Trump, joined with several progressive Democrats to introduce in the House of Representatives a war powers resolution that would require a vote by Congress before Trump could attack Iran. Democrat Tim Kaine has introducedcompanion legislation in the Senate.

“This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution,” Massiewrote on Xin announcing the resolution. DemocratsIlhan OmarandAlexandria Ocasio-Cortezreplied “signing on” to the tweet, while Massie’s office later announced that several others, including chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Greg Casar, would also sponsor the resolution.

The resolutions’ introductions came hours afterTrump left a G7 summit in Canadaearly to return to Washington DC and demand Iran’s “unconditional surrender” following days ofIsraeli airstrikesthat have targeted its top military leaders and nuclear facilities.

The White House later denied media reports circulating that the US had decided to become involved in the conflict, with spokesperson Alex Pfeiffer saying: “American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed. We will defend American interests.” However,US militaryaircraft and sea vessels have moved into the Middle East, and Iran’s deepest nuclear facilities are thought to be penetrable only by a bunker-busting bomb possessed by the US alone.

Trump campaigned on keeping the United States out of foreign wars, and this past weekend,JD Vancetoldarmy troopsat a military parade in Washington DC: “We never ask you to go to war unless you absolutely have to.”

Trump vetoed two War Powers resolutions during his first term, which concernedIranand Yemen, and has called for a primary challenge against Massie for opposing his priorities.

Such resolutions are privileged, meaning they must come up for a vote, though House Republican leaders have lately takenunorthodox stepsto undermine efforts targeting issues like tariffs.

In an interview, Democratic congressman Ro Khanna, who co-sponsored the resolution with Massie, warned that if they do that, “they really will be then angering their Republican base,” pointing to Trump and the vice-president’s anti-war pronouncements.

Sign up toThis Week in Trumpland

A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration

after newsletter promotion

“This is an opportunity for the Democrats to become the anti-war party again,” Khanna added. “Our leadership should be vocal on this, and calling Trump out on this, upholding his promise to be anti war.”

He predicted the resolution would “pass if we bring it to the floor” in the House, where the Republican party holds a mere three-seat majority. But it is unclear if enough crossover support will materialize.

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a rightwing Republican who has spoken out against US involvement in Israel’s air campaign against Iran, told the Guardian: “While I’m opposed to America’s involvement in foreign wars and regime change, I do not see a need to sign on to Rep. Massie’s war powers resolution yet as we are not attacking Iran. I trust President Trump will deliver his campaign promises and turn this dangerous conflict between Israel and Iran into peace without war. If the situation changes, then I may sign on. We’ll see what happens.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian