Niki de Saint Phalle and Jean Tinguely review – joyous show from art’s golden kinetic couple

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Exhibition Celebrates Niki de Saint Phalle and Jean Tinguely's Artistic Collaboration"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The exhibition at Hauser & Wirth in Somerset showcases the vibrant and dynamic works of Niki de Saint Phalle and Jean Tinguely, marking a centenary celebration of Tinguely's birth. On a sunny day, visitors are greeted by Saint Phalle's iconic Nanas, three exuberant sculptures that embody joy and movement, crafted from polyester and adorned with colorful mosaics and mirrors. These figures are representative of Saint Phalle's artistic journey, which began in the mid-1960s after she met Tinguely in Paris. Their relationship was complex and intertwined, both romantically and artistically, as they collaborated on numerous projects while navigating their personal lives. The exhibition highlights the evolution of their work together, featuring Tinguely's kinetic sculptures that animate the gallery space with clanking and whirring sounds, inviting reflections on themes of automation and creativity.

In addition to Tinguely's mechanical creations, the exhibition also emphasizes Saint Phalle's bold and curvaceous sculptures, which contrast beautifully with his angular designs. The couple's artistic synergy is evident in pieces that blend their styles, such as the motorized contraption with a Saint Phalle head that interacts with the viewer. The show also delves into the darker themes present in their work, including Saint Phalle's provocative shooting paintings and Tinguely's haunting installations, which grapple with concepts of life, death, and societal critique. The exhibition culminates with intimate drawings and letters that reveal the personal connection between the two artists, with Saint Phalle emerging as the standout figure of the show. The display runs until February 1, showcasing the rich legacy of both artists and inviting contemplation of their lasting impact on contemporary art.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights an exhibition featuring the works of Niki de Saint Phalle and Jean Tinguely, inviting readers to appreciate the artistic and personal dynamics between the two artists. This review serves to celebrate their legacy while also situating their work within a broader cultural context.

Purpose of the Article

The intention behind this article appears to be to promote the exhibition at Hauser & Wirth and generate interest in the works of Saint Phalle and Tinguely. By framing the artists' relationship and their creative collaboration, the piece aims to enhance the audience's understanding and appreciation of the exhibit.

Public Perception

The article is likely designed to evoke a sense of joy and admiration for the artists' work. By emphasizing the vibrant and playful nature of Saint Phalle's sculptures and Tinguely's kinetic pieces, it encourages a positive reception among readers and potential visitors to the exhibition.

Omissions and Hidden Aspects

While the review focuses on the artists' accomplishments and the joyfulness of their work, it may downplay the complexities of their personal relationship, including rivalry and other challenges they faced. This selective focus could lead readers to form an overly simplistic view of their artistic partnership.

Manipulation Ratio

There is a moderate level of manipulation in the article, primarily through its selective presentation of the artists' relationship and the emphasis on joy and vibrancy. While the review is grounded in genuine artistic appreciation, it may gloss over more nuanced aspects of their lives.

Truthfulness of the Article

The review appears to be accurate in its descriptions of the artworks and the artists’ backgrounds. However, the emotional tone may skew perceptions, which is common in art criticism where subjective experience plays a large role.

Cultural Message

The underlying message seems to celebrate creativity, collaboration, and the enduring impact of these artists. It seeks to inspire readers by showcasing the joy embedded in art, potentially resonating with those who value artistic expression and community.

Connections with Other News

Comparing this article to other cultural reviews or exhibitions, there may be a trend of focusing on emotional connections to art, which aligns with broader movements in contemporary art criticism that emphasize personal narratives and experiences.

Industry Image

The publication venue likely aims to position itself as a champion of the arts, promoting exhibitions and events that highlight significant contributions to the cultural landscape. This helps to reinforce a positive image of the art industry as vibrant and relevant.

Societal Impact

The article may influence public interest in the arts, potentially increasing attendance at the exhibition and strengthening community engagement with cultural events. It could also stimulate discussions about the importance of collaboration and creativity in various aspects of life.

Target Audience

The review seems to cater to art enthusiasts, students, and the general public interested in cultural events. It likely appeals more to those who appreciate vibrant and expressive art forms.

Market Influence

While the article itself may not have direct implications on stock markets or specific shares, increased interest in art exhibitions can lead to greater financial support for cultural institutions, thereby indirectly influencing related sectors.

Geopolitical Relevance

On a broader scale, the emphasis on artistic collaboration and creativity can resonate with global discussions about cultural exchange and the role of art in society, reflecting current themes of cooperation and innovation.

AI Involvement

It’s possible that AI tools were used in drafting or editing this article, especially in shaping the tone and style. Models focused on natural language processing may have contributed to the overall readability and engagement of the content, though the core artistic insights remain human-driven.

In conclusion, the article's reliability hinges on its accurate representation of the artists and their works, despite a slight bias in emotional framing. The call for appreciation of art and its creators stands as a testament to its cultural significance.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It is a bright and sunny day in Somerset, and out on the neatly mown lawn at Hauser & Wirth, Niki de Saint Phalle’s voluptuous Nanas (“girls”) are positivelysparkling. There are three of them (a nod to Botticelli’s three graces): one silver, one black, one white, all made from polyester jazzed up with colourful mosaic and shimmering mirrors. She has captured them mid-twirl, arms tossed in the air like they just don’t care, legs kicked out at jaunty angles. They are joyful and radiant, monumental and robust, dancers and warriors.

Saint Phalle, a French American artist, began creating her abstract sculptures of women in the mid-60s, a decade after she first met the Swiss sculptor Jean Tinguely in Paris. He was married and so was she but five years later, both divorced, they got together; by the time they were married in 1971 both were seeing other people. It was a complicated, sometimes competitive relationship – romantically and artistically – that saw them collaborate and support each other creatively until Tinguely’s death in 1991. Saint Phalle looked after his legacy until her own death in 2002. Now, on the centenary of his birth, a new exhibition is presenting their work side by side – at least once we get off the grass and into the gallery.

As if to make up for the solo Saint Phalle welcome outside, the first room is almost entirely dedicated to Tinguely’s strange kinetic sculptures – presided over by another powerful Saint Phalle belle. Having grown up in Basel, where he later worked as a window decorator and studied drawing, Tinguely moved to Paris in 1952 and began to animate his Calder-esque wire works with electric motors. Here, half-a-dozen contraptions made with scrap metal and found materials from branches to rubber belts stutter to life every few minutes, clanking and clattering in time with their moving parts. Originally visitors would have pressed buttons to make them move. Sadly, now they’re old and rickety, they are programmed to turn on one by one (though apparently the rockers can be a bit erratic).

Built from the 1950s until his death, Tinguely’s whirring designs might verge on comic but they’re as relevant today as they were when first exhibited. A physical (and audible) manifestation of the anxieties of automation, his semi-robotic assemblages – among them his Métamatics, or drawing machines – were initially met with resistance. At Hauser & Wirth, one device doodles in pen on to an unfurling roll of paper while another scribbles on a single sheet. Standing in front of them, questions inevitably arise about authenticity and the creative capabilities of man vs machine.

Viewed alongside his angular scrap metal, Saint Phalle’s sculptures are deliciously colourful and curvy. When viewed together, they hum with life. The couple began collaborating in the late 1950s; for her first sculpture, she commissioned him to create an iron armature which she covered with plaster. A black-and-white polyester head with a rosy pout sits on the shoulders of a motorised contraption made from wood and iron; when the motor starts, the head shifts back and forth, its lightbulb crown flashing. Elsewhere, a miniature nana performs an arabesque on an iron stand that spins her round like a ballerina in a jewellery box. On display for the first time are the gold pieces of furniture Saint Phalle made for A Dream Longer Than the Night (1976), the bizarre and frequently frightening film she wrote, directed and acted in with Tinguely.

There’s often a shadowy undercurrent, as well as strength in the face of adversity (in Saint Phalle’s case, sexual abuse and a strict Catholic upbringing). It’s there in the 11 roebuck skulls Tinguely fixed to a bicycle wheel in 1990, titled The Infernal Circle of Death. It’s there in Saint Phalle’s provocative plaster and bronze altarpieces, piled high with small plastic dolls which bring to mind the good and the damned imagined by Hieronymus Bosch. In 1961 she started her famous shooting paintings, firing a rifle at low reliefs and exploding bags of bleeding paint across the surface. Produced against a backdrop of political unrest in France, the three on display burst with rage and defiance.

Sign up toArt Weekly

Your weekly art world round-up, sketching out all the biggest stories, scandals and exhibitions

after newsletter promotion

Despite their different backgrounds – she came from an aristocratic French family; he was working class – both were socially and politically engaged and tirelessly devoted to their art. The final room features intimate drawings and letters by Saint Phalle, with creatures real and imagined and a load of love hearts. Tinguely is here, too, his name squiggled in ink, a rusty chariot-like contraption supporting a Saint Phalle-style goddess Athena, sensuous and strong. And there, glimpsed through the window, are the three Nanas on the lawn, still twirling, still sparkling.

It may be Tinguely’s centenary but Saint Phalle is the star of this show – and the show is all the better for it.

Niki de Saint Phalle and Jean Tinguely: Myths & Machinesis at Hauser & Wirth Somerset until 1 February

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian