Newsom is warned of ‘criminal tax evasion’ if he withholds federal taxes

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Treasury Secretary Warns Newsom Against Withholding Federal Taxes Amid Funding Threats"

Newsom is warned of ‘criminal tax evasion’ if he withholds federal taxes analysis cover image The Guardian 6.2
Image Source: https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/72895828891a8e8cf63149fef2e5d1e82c8adbfc/214_0_4240_3392/master/4240.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=e87297fdd18685657656616c4d33f3e8
Original Article Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/08/newsom-warned-tax-evasion
View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

California Governor Gavin Newsom has been warned by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that he could face charges of 'criminal tax evasion' if he proceeds with plans to withhold state tax payments to the federal government. This warning comes in response to Newsom's threats to cut off tax payments amid reports that the Trump administration is preparing significant funding cuts for California, particularly targeting its state university system. Bessent publicly criticized Newsom’s statements, labeling them as reckless and suggesting that such actions would defraud the American taxpayer. He urged the governor to consider implementing a tax-cutting plan that aligns with Trump's federal tax policies instead of pursuing what he termed criminal tax evasion. Newsom's comments were made in the context of California's disproportionate tax contributions to the federal government, where the state pays over $80 billion more in taxes than it receives in federal funding.

The tensions between Newsom and the Trump administration have escalated as the governor's threat to withhold federal tax payments is viewed as a retaliatory measure against potential funding cuts that could severely impact California's educational institutions. Following Newsom's remarks, California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas condemned the rumored federal funding cuts as unconstitutional and vindictive, vowing to utilize every legal avenue to defend the state's interests. The ongoing conflict highlights a broader struggle between state and federal authorities, particularly as California positions itself as a significant economic contributor while seeking fair treatment in federal funding allocations. The White House has also weighed in, with spokesperson Kush Desai criticizing California's policies while stating that no final decisions regarding funding cuts have been made, emphasizing that any discussions of such cuts should be considered speculative at this stage.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a significant clash between California Governor Gavin Newsom and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, centering on the issue of federal tax payments. This situation arises amidst threats from former President Donald Trump to cut federal funding for California, particularly affecting its state university systems. The stark warning from Bessent about potential "criminal tax evasion" serves to intensify the existing political tension and public discourse surrounding taxation and governance.

Political Implications

The confrontation between Newsom and Bessent underscores the ongoing partisan divide in U.S. politics. Newsom's assertion that California contributes significantly more in taxes than it receives could resonate with constituents who feel that their state is unfairly treated by the federal government. By framing his response as a potential withdrawal of tax payments, Newsom is appealing to California's identity as a progressive state often at odds with federal policies. This situation may galvanize his political base while simultaneously inviting criticism from conservative factions.

Public Perception and Manipulation

The language used by both officials signals an attempt to shape public perception. Bessent's characterizations of Newsom's actions as "reckless" and potentially criminal serve to demonize the governor and discredit his arguments. The article's framing pushes readers to view Newsom's stance as radical, which may distract from broader discussions about federal and state funding dynamics. This could indicate a manipulation of narrative to maintain the status quo in federal-state relations.

Economic Impact and Stock Market Reactions

The implications of this dispute extend to the economy and potentially the stock market. If federal funding cuts are implemented, sectors reliant on government grants, such as education and infrastructure, could face significant challenges. This uncertainty may lead investors to reassess their positions in companies tied to California's economy or those dependent on federal funding. Stocks related to education and technology, particularly those in California, may experience volatility as stakeholders react to the political climate.

Community Targeting and Support

The article's content appears aimed at both supporters and critics of Newsom. It may resonate more with progressive communities that advocate for state autonomy and believe in the importance of fair taxation. Conversely, it also targets conservative audiences who oppose Newsom's governance style, framing him as a potential lawbreaker. This dual targeting aims to engage a broader audience while reinforcing existing ideological divides.

Global and National Significance

While the article primarily focuses on a domestic issue, it reflects broader themes of governance, federalism, and state rights that resonate internationally. The ongoing tensions between state and federal powers in the U.S. mirror similar debates in other democracies, highlighting the complexities of managing diverse political landscapes. As global attention remains on U.S. domestic policy, this conflict could influence international perceptions of American governance.

Use of AI in News Reporting

It is plausible that AI tools were employed in drafting the article, particularly in structuring the narrative and presenting data. The use of automated text generation models may contribute to the article's clarity and coherence, as seen in the straightforward presentation of facts. However, the specific framing choices and emotive language suggest human editorial oversight to elicit a desired response from the audience.

In conclusion, the article serves multiple purposes, including framing a political narrative, influencing public opinion, and highlighting the tensions between state and federal governance. The portrayal of Newsom's comments creates a charged atmosphere that may detract from substantive discussions about taxation and funding. The reliability of the information presented can be called into question due to the evident bias and strategic framing employed by the author. It reflects the complexities of media narratives in contemporary politics.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Source URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/08/newsom-warned-tax-evasion

The US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, has warned California governor Gavin Newsom that he would be guilty of “criminal tax evasion” if he withholds his state’s tax payments to the federal government amid threats of a funding cut byDonald Trump.

Newsom had threatened to cut tax payments to the federal government two days ago after reports that Trump was preparing huge federal funding cuts targeting Democrat-dominatedCalifornia, including its state university system.

“Gavin Newsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion,”Bessent said in a post on X. “His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes.”

Bessent continued: “I am certain most California businesses know that failing to pay taxes owed to the Treasury constitutes tax evasion and have no intention of following the dangerous path GovernorGavin Newsomis threatening.”

He described Newsom’s comments as “extremely reckless” and advised the governor to come up with a tax-cutting plan for California that mirrored Trump’s federal tax cutting plan, “instead of committing criminal tax evasion”.

The treasury secretary’s comments came after Newsompostedon Friday that “Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it’s time to cut that off, Donald Trump.”

The California governor linked toa CNN reportthat the Trump administration is preparing to cancel some federal funding for California and federal agencies had been directed to identify grants that could be withheld, including the University of California and California state university systems.

In a statement on Friday, the White House spokesperson Kush Desai criticized California’s energy, immigration and other positions as “lunatic anti-energy, soft-on-crime, pro-child mutilation, and pro-sanctuary policies”.

“No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country,” Desai said, but he added that “No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation.”

Newsom and Trump are accustomed to a war of words, including threats to withhold funding. The administration recently cut $126m in flood prevention funding projects, and Trump has threatened “large-scale fines” on the state after transgender athlete AB Hernandez competed in the long jump, high jump and triple jump events at the California Interscholastic Federation track and field championships.

But the reported threat to cut off federal funding to California’s university system appears to have pushed California officials into threats of retaliation. Soon before Newsom made his threat, California assembly speaker Robert Rivasdescribedthe rumored grant cancellations as “unconstitutional and vindictive.”

“We’re the nation’s economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share,” Rivas wrote. “I’ll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA – we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian