New flats in England and Wales may soon all be commonhold. But what does it mean?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UK Government Proposes Commonhold Ownership for New-Build Flats"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent announcement by the UK government to transition all new-build flats to commonhold ownership marks a significant shift away from the traditional leasehold system that has long been criticized for its feudal nature. Commonhold allows flat owners to possess the freehold of their property and manage shared areas through a commonhold association, which is run by the owners themselves. This change aims to empower residents and provide them more control over their living environments, as demonstrated by the experiences of Ele Weeks-Bell and Maggie Coles in Bristol, who have navigated the complexities of commonhold ownership since establishing their development 15 years ago. Their case highlights the challenges faced by early adopters, including a lack of legal support and mortgage options at the time. However, their community-driven approach has allowed for practical and cost-effective solutions to property management issues, fostering a strong sense of cooperation among residents.

Despite the positive aspects of commonhold, experts have raised concerns regarding the general lack of understanding about this ownership model among legal professionals, lenders, and potential buyers. Annabel Dean, a partner at Farrer & Co, emphasizes that the introduction of commonhold in 2002 did not result in widespread adoption, leaving many in the legal field unfamiliar with its intricacies. While commonhold represents an improvement over leasehold arrangements, it also introduces new dynamics where disputes may arise among neighbors rather than with a landlord or management company. Scott Goldstein from Payne Hicks Beach cautions that while commonhold offers more power to owners, it also requires them to engage in significant decision-making, which may not be feasible for everyone. Nonetheless, examples of successful commonhold communities, such as Spire View in North Yorkshire, demonstrate that with the right people involved, these developments can foster a thriving communal atmosphere, suggesting that the transition to commonhold could lead to more positive living conditions in the future.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the potential shift from the traditional leasehold system to a commonhold system for new flats in England and Wales. This change is rooted in addressing the perceived injustices of the current leasehold system, which many view as outdated and unfair. By highlighting the personal experiences of residents who have successfully navigated the challenges of commonhold living, the article aims to create a positive perception of this ownership model.

Government Initiative

The announcement from the government about abolishing the leasehold system suggests a significant policy shift aimed at empowering flat owners. By making all new-build flats commonhold, the government appears to be responding to public sentiment against the feudal-like leasehold arrangements. This change could symbolize an effort to modernize property ownership and enhance communal living.

Public Sentiment and Awareness

The article seems to promote the idea that commonhold can lead to better management of shared spaces and a more engaged community. Personal anecdotes from residents underscore the benefits of collective ownership and decision-making. This narrative could foster a sense of community and encourage prospective buyers to consider commonhold flats as a viable option.

Potential Omissions

While the article presents a positive view of commonhold, it may downplay potential challenges or drawbacks, such as the responsibility and time commitment required from owners to manage shared spaces effectively. A more balanced narrative would include these aspects to provide a comprehensive view of commonhold living.

Trustworthiness of the Information

The article appears to be reliable, primarily as it cites specific examples and experiences of individuals involved in commonhold living. However, the lack of critical perspectives or potential complications raises questions about the completeness of the information presented.

Societal Impact

The proposed change could significantly affect housing dynamics in England and Wales. It may empower residents, reduce the power of landlords, and lead to more collaborative living environments. Economically, this shift could influence housing prices and the availability of flats, potentially making homeownership more accessible.

Target Audience

This news is likely to resonate with individuals interested in property ownership, particularly first-time buyers, and those disillusioned with the leasehold system. It may also appeal to community-oriented groups looking for alternative housing solutions.

Market Implications

The potential shift to commonhold could have implications for property developers and mortgage lenders, as they may need to adapt to the new ownership model. Companies involved in property management and legal services related to housing may also be affected by the change in legislation.

Global Context

While the article focuses on a local issue, the shift from leasehold to commonhold reflects broader trends in housing ownership and community engagement seen in various countries. Such changes might inspire similar movements elsewhere, highlighting the importance of equitable housing practices in addressing societal needs.

In conclusion, this article presents a largely favorable view of the transition to commonhold flats, emphasizing the potential benefits for residents while potentially overlooking some challenges. The overall tone suggests a push for reform in property ownership that aligns with contemporary values of community and shared responsibility.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When neighbours Ele Weeks-Bell and Maggie Coles were setting up their commonhold flats 15 years ago, they struggled to find a lawyer who could help them.

“We were trying to find solicitors that knew anything about commonhold and getting a blank every time,” said Weeks-Bell. “And most mortgage companies were just like, no one has ever done this before, so we’re not prepared to mortgage you, because it’s a huge risk.”

Their block of six flats in Bristol is one of only about 20 commonhold developments inEnglandand Wales created since legislation was introduced in 2002, and the only self-built one, which made getting it off the ground particularly tricky.

Last month, the governmentannounced plans to start abolishingthe “unfair feudal” leasehold system and create a law meaning all new-build flats will automatically become commonhold.

It means buyers will own the freehold of their flat, and a commonhold association, managed by the owners, jointly owns and manages the shared areas.

Weeks-Bell and Coles live in a converted office block that once belonged to a scaffolding company. The whole property, which also includes a number of self-built houses, was going to be taken over by a commercial developer to build a typical housing estate, before a group of local residents banded together to take over the site.

The flat owners have regular meetings, which they take in turns to chair, to discuss the running and maintenance of the building. People take on different roles according to their strengths – some help with the paperwork and accounts, some help with building issues.

A few years ago a hole appeared in the communal wood-pellet boiler system used to heat the building. It would have cost £60,000 to replace it, but they managed to find a metal sculptor who was able to fix the hole at a fraction of the cost.

“That was a biggie, because if we’d have gone down the traditional route it would have been £60,000, and it would have been very difficult for us to find that sort of money,” said Coles. “A management company probably wouldn’t have the time to find the cheaper or most ecological way of doing something, or even care, to be honest.”

Two residents are paid to maintain the shared garden and the block has held numerous communal garden work days over the years, while the owners have shopped around for the best building insurance deals.

“I’m not sure any of us would trust a landlord or private management company to coordinate these works efficiently or to be cost-effective for the flat owners,” said Weeks-Bell.

“We all really do rub along together, it’s great. It’s a quirky old place, so you’re pretty much going to get like-minded people,” said Coles, who moved into the flat from Leicester to be nearer her son after her husband died.

“From the outset we just gelled,” said Weeks-Bell. “It’s very hands-on, everyone has to be involved all the time and all the decision-making.”

Although detailed plans have yet to be published, some lawyers have raised alarm over the lack of knowledge among lawyers, lenders and the general public about how commonhold works, decades after it was first introduced.

“The fundamental issue with it is that no one really, even within the legal profession, understands it,” said Annabel Dean, a partner in the residential property team at Farrer & Co. “It was all introduced in 2002 and it has not taken off since then. In my 20 years of practice, I’ve never had to deal with commonhold. And lenders don’t understand how it works either.”

Dean said work was already going on to “upskill” lenders and fill the knowledge gap before the law change, but it was going to take time for people to become “comfortable with it”.

Sign up toFirst Edition

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Scott Goldstein, a partner in dispute resolution at Payne Hicks Beach, said while commonhold was an improvement on leasehold in many ways, it would bring its own set of problems.

“It’s certainly not going to be a panacea. You’re just changing your enemy. If you’re a leaseholder and your flat is being managed terribly, the person you’re against is the management company or the landlord. If it’s a commonhold, your enemy is going to be your neighbour,” he said. “I’m going to have different types of work to do. There are going to be different types of arguments.”

He added that commonhold gave flat owners a “lot more power”, but with that came “big decisions” that not everyone would be equipped with the knowledge, or the time, to make.

Those warnings of neighbourly disharmony brought on by shared decision-making do not seem to be borne out in some of the more established commonholds.

In the centre of Pickering, North Yorkshire, sits Spire View, one of the few other commonhold developments in the UK. It has 15 units, a mixture of houses and flats, around a two-storey courtyard with flower beds, a common room, guest room and swimming pool.

When Liz Worthy arrived four years ago, having previously had a smallholding, she had a hip problem and could not walk, so she needed somewhere easily accessible. Now recovered, she enjoys the community feel. “I wasn’t a communal person, but I love it here,” she said. “Everyone pitches in.”

Having initially been intended as an over-55s development, there are no longer any age restrictions, though she described it as “ideal” for older people. “It’s brilliant – but it needs the right people,” she said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian