Need for speed: how sport’s risk takers recognise deadly danger and do it anyway | Emma John

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Exploring Attitudes Toward Risk in Sports: From the Cresta Run to the Isle of Man TT"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article introduces the concept of risk in sports through the author's personal experience at the Cresta Run in St Moritz, a notorious skeleton course known for its deadly history. While the author refrains from participating due to a lack of athleticism and fear of injury, their friends embrace the thrill, illustrating the varied tolerances for risk among individuals. The narrative shifts to the Isle of Man Senior TT race, a motorbike racing event recognized as one of the most perilous in the world, which was recently canceled due to adverse weather conditions. This decision marked only the second cancellation in the race's 118-year history, emphasizing the seriousness with which organizers regard safety despite the event's long-standing tradition of danger, having witnessed 156 fatalities since its inception in 1907. The author reflects on how, for some, the thrill of competition and the camaraderie among riders overshadow the inherent risks, showcasing a complex relationship with danger in sports.

The article further examines evolving attitudes towards risk in various sports, highlighting the changes in safety protocols and equipment over the years. It draws parallels between historical and modern sports, noting how past practices accepted high levels of risk, often linked to cultural norms surrounding masculinity and combat readiness. The author mentions the shift in rugby union towards player safety and the introduction of mandatory helmets in cricket, illustrating a broader trend of increasing awareness and precaution in sports. The narrative culminates in questioning whether the cancellation of the Senior TT signifies a broader shift in attitudes towards acceptable risk, especially in light of recent efforts to enhance safety measures. Ultimately, while the author admires those who willingly embrace danger, they acknowledge their own limits and the complex nature of risk acceptance in sports culture.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the complex relationship between risk, adrenaline, and the human experience in the context of extreme sports. By recounting a personal experience at the Cresta Run, the author highlights the thrill-seeking behavior of individuals who willingly engage in dangerous activities. This sets the stage for a broader discussion about the nature of risk in sports, particularly in light of recent events, such as the cancellation of the Isle of Man Senior TT race due to unsafe weather conditions.

Risk Perception and Individual Differences

The author presents a vivid contrast between her own reluctance to engage in risky activities and the eagerness of her friends, who are experienced athletes. This reflects the subjective nature of risk tolerance, where individuals assess danger based on personal experiences and capabilities. The narrative suggests that while some individuals thrive on adrenaline and seek out danger, others prefer to avoid it, fostering a nuanced understanding of human behavior in the face of risk.

Safety Interventions in Extreme Sports

The decision to cancel the Senior TT race serves as a critical point in the article, emphasizing the inherent dangers of such events. The fact that this race was called off only for the second time in 118 years illustrates the severity of the conditions and the prioritization of safety over the spectacle of the event. This moment acts as a reminder of the fine line between thrill-seeking and recklessness, challenging the glamorization of extreme sports.

Public Perception of Extreme Sports

By discussing the dangers associated with the Cresta Run and the TT races, the article likely aims to provoke a reflection on society's fascination with risk-taking. It raises questions about the allure of extreme sports and the potential consequences of such activities, possibly encouraging readers to reconsider their own views on safety and adventure. This reflection may lead to a broader societal discussion about the responsibilities of organizers and participants in extreme sports.

Potential Manipulative Aspects

While the article does not overtly manipulate, its framing of risk and danger could influence public perception, possibly fostering fear or concern about extreme sports. The language used, which describes the risks in vivid detail, may elicit an emotional response from readers, prompting them to think critically about the motivations behind participating in dangerous sports. However, it does not seem to demonize these activities outright, instead aiming to foster understanding.

Reliability and Trustworthiness

The article appears credible as it draws on personal experience, factual information about the TT races, and a balanced view of risk perception. The author does not present extreme sports as inherently negative but instead encourages a conversation about safety and personal choice. This nuanced approach enhances the article's reliability as it acknowledges multiple perspectives.

Audience Engagement and Societal Impact

The content is likely to resonate with adventure sports enthusiasts, athletes, and those curious about risk-taking behaviors. It may prompt discussions in communities that participate in or follow extreme sports, potentially influencing their views on safety and risk management. Economically, heightened awareness could impact the insurance and safety equipment industries related to extreme sports.

The article does not display a direct connection to current geopolitical issues but taps into broader themes of risk and human behavior, which are universally relevant.

While artificial intelligence may have been employed in the editorial process, the unique voice and personal anecdotes suggest a human touch in storytelling. If AI were used, it may have helped in organizing themes or enhancing language but did not overshadow the author's personal narrative.

In conclusion, the article provides a thoughtful exploration of risk in sports, prompting readers to reflect on their own attitudes towards danger and safety.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Last year I visited St Moritz’s infamous Cresta Run. You know the one – the vertiginous skeleton course that has killed a number of its participants and maimed many more. I was with a group of friends who were attempting it for the first time, and who quickly became addicted to the adrenaline fix. I stubbornly refused to even contemplate it.

It’s not just that my mates are braver than me – they are – but they’re all decent athletes, cricketers, hockey players, marathon runners and Channel swimmers. They have rapid reflexes and hand-eye coordination: I barely have a sense of where my arms and legs end. There are endless ways to hurt yourself on a crushingly heavy toboggan with razor-sharp runners that’s hurtling at 50mph between sheer walls of solid ice, and if anyone was going to slice off a finger or break their head landing upside down, it was me.

We all have different tolerances for risk. Plenty of my friends refuse to contemplate cycling, even though they know it would get them about town quicker and save them money. I don’t think twice about the dangers. But I’ve seen and experienced enough near-misses to know they have a point.

Last Saturday, the Isle of Man Senior TT race – the showcase event of the island’s annual motorbike-racing festival – was called off only six minutes before it was due to start. Gusty wind and rain made conditions tough all week; now they were causing experienced riders serious concern. The organisers heeded the warnings and scratched the blue-riband race for only the second time in its 118-year history.

That’s a pretty serious intervention for a motor sport meeting that is already considered the most dangerous on the planet. The TT races are held on the island’s regular roads and you only need to watch a few moments from one of the bikes’ onboard cameras to appreciate how terrifying it is. The trees, telephone boxes and brick walls lining the roadside may whip past like pixellated scenery but they’re all too solid, and all too close. There have been 156 competition fatalities since 1907.

It is tempting to balk at a sporting contest that has resulted in death almost every year it has been held. For those outside the motorcycling community, the acceptance of such a high toll seems not just alien but foolhardy and irresponsible. But visit the Isle of Man in TT week and you’ll soon see: no one there is glorifying danger, either in the paddock or on the sidelines. My own experience, when I spent timein the former some years ago, was of riders who could not have been more cognisant of, or serious about, the risks they were facing.

Our attitudes towards risk – in sport, as in life – aren’t fixed. Just look at how far rugby union has moved on player safety since professionalisation – changes in the scrum sequences, new laws on tackling, concussion protocols, smart mouthguards. In 1977, the England cricketer Dennis Amiss was laughed at when he took to the crease in a batting helmet. Within 25 years they were mandatory for every junior player.

If sports have sometimes celebrated the physical danger they pose that’s no surprise, given how many have their roots in combat preparation and masculine coming-of-age traditions. Ancient civilisations from Greece to China promoted martial arts. The stickball game that’s the precursor to lacrosse iscalledkapucha toliby the Choctaw, AKA “the little brother of war”.

Safety isn’t of paramount concern when you’re moulding soldiers or executing undesirables. Chariot racers hurtling around Roman circuses were often trampled by horses or dragged under their own wheels (and this was considered family entertainment, at which women were welcome). Sunday archery practice, mandatory in England from 1363, was frequently lethal, in spite of the standard warning call: “’Ware the prick!”

I learned the latter from Steven Gunn and Tomasz Gromelski’s new book,An Accidental History of Tudor England. Throwing sports were popular in the summer back then and there are records of bystanders being hurt or killed by all sorts: sledgehammers, stones, pikestaffs and plough parts. When drowning rates spiked among Cambridge undergraduates in the 16th century, the university banned swimming (a first offence earned you a public beating, a second, expulsion).

“It’s not that they’re reckless about risk,” Prof Gunn says, “but sometimes, other things seem more important.” Many of the footballing deaths he came across were accidental stabbings, because the players – working men – had nowhere safe to leave the knives they usually carried in their belts. “And if you haven’t got a knife when you get to the end of a game, how are you going to have anything to eat?”

Our own era can offer similar stories. The rapid rise of extreme sports in the 90s reflected a wider shift towards individualism, with personal freedom and self‑expression reaching an ecstatic apotheosis in their dopamine hits and adrenaline-fuelled highs. In a stable and affluent society, it is possible to declare that “life is for living” through pursuits that shorten your odds of dying.

Motor sport has always been dangerous (motorbike racing especially so – the tragic deaths oftwo British Superbike riders at Oulton Parkin May were another reminder of that). But attitudes towards acceptable risk have changed even there, as the post-Senna history of F1 demonstrates. And in recent years many measures have been taken to make the TT event safer – especially after 2022, when it endured its joint-deadliest year.

The past two years have witnessed no fatalities, despite several bad crashes last week and one rider remaining in hospital in a serious condition. Does the scratching of the Senior TT indicate that attitudes to acceptable risk are changing even on the Isle of Man?

By sheer coincidence, I found myself at a reunion for our Cresta Run trip last week, surrounded by dozens of people who had thrown themselves down the icy terror and lived to tell the tale. There was a bond there that I would never share, forged by the dangers that people had knowingly undertaken together. I couldn’t make their choices, but I can still admire them.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian